Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jerry Brown gets a Democratic challenger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:02 PM
Original message
Jerry Brown gets a Democratic challenger
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 09:05 PM by andym
Source: Los Angeles Times

It may appear that Democrat Jerry Brown has an unfettered path to the November election.

But technically, that's not true.

San Francisco resident Peter Schurman, a former executive director of MoveOn.org, announced his candidacy for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination via press release Tuesday.

Schurman staked out the ground to Brown's left, calling for tax increases and lowering the vote threshold in the Legislature to make tax hikes easier.

Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/04/jerry-brown-gets-a-democratic-challenger.html



A move to influence policy positions by pressuring Jerry Brown from the left, or a serious attempt to become governor?

Proposition 13 (property tax protection) really needs to go, but can it be done? Considered the 3rd rail of CA politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never heard of him...
I'm sure Schurman thinks he's serious, but I have no idea if anyone else does...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll vote for him if he is younger than 72!
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 09:14 PM by xxqqqzme
"...Schurman, who is 40 and lives in San Francisco, announced his candidacy Tuesday. He says the Democratic nominee must take bold stands, such as forcing corporations and the rich to pay their fair share.

He supports raising taxes and ending the two-thirds vote requirement to pass budgets..."

from AP & http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2010/04/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I've heard it's risky to trust anyone older than 30... nt
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Smells a bit fishy to me.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. What's fishy? Tax rises on the middle classes
And tax cuts for the wealthiest - combined with
falling wages are RUINING California.

We have at least one candidate to say so.
Jerry isn't going to fix those problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Schurman staked out the ground to Brown's left, calling for tax increases
Just cut the fucking tax cuts the richies and you won't have to increase taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. As much as I like Brown, any move to the left is good
We've been nudged so far over to the right that even our left is too far right, so ANY counterbalance is a good thing, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Remember how Obama staked out the ground to the left of Hillary?
I'm more cautious now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great strategy.
This allows Brown to look moderate to the voters and takes away some of his "moonbeam" baggage.

This is a plus for Jerry.

Jerry will trounce either one of the repukes just based on his experience and savvy if he is not labeled ultraliberal first. This allows Jerry to move to left-center where the California electorate is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I hope you're right.
Back in 2003, Ariana Huffington ruined it for everyone left of Schwarzenegger by reinforcing the worst stereotypes about "liberals". She was shrill, loony, self-entitled and certainly didn't seem fit to run California. Schwarzenegger seemed like a true statesman in comparison.

I have no doubt that Huffington's ambitions were fueled almost entirely by vanity, but I still wonder whether there was more to it than that. Her campaign was so ridiculous, it was almost as if it was intended to help Arnie win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Bingo !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Does anyone under 60 have much idea of that "moonbeam" deal?
I mean, for all intents and purposes he'd been invisible to the people since 1982. Only reason I know about that stuff is because I'm a political historian. And let's remember that when he was at his lowest, he only narrowly failed to capture a GOP-held US senate seat in 1982 before temporarily slipping into oblivion.

Brown was never a left-winger. He has however been an opportunist. He opposed Proposition before he supported it, for instance. If he has a primary challenger to his left, I'll support him or her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Jerry was in exile only for a short span.
He later became mayor of Oakland and did wonders to the downtown area before becoming attorney general.

His prior experience as governor, mayor and attorney general will make Meg Whitman appear juvenile.

He is also extremely savvy with media and would destroy Meg in debates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yes. Im in my 40s, know the "Moonbeam" theme well
and would guess we're all about to get reminded. I welcome the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Brown got labeled with "moonbeam" because he had an idea tthat the state later adopted.


"As Governor, Brown proposed the establishment of a state space academy and the purchasing of a satellite that would be launched into orbit to provide emergency communications for the state—a proposal similar to one that would indeed eventually be adopted by the state. In 1978 an out-of-state columnist, Mike Royko, then at the Chicago Sun-Times, nicknamed Brown "Governor Moonbeam" because of the latter idea. In 1992, almost 15 years later, Royko would disavow the nickname, proclaiming Brown to be "just as serious" as any other politician.<35>"

I bet NYC first responders would have appreciated an emergency communications systems on 911. Giuliani's repeated refusal to provide first responders with effective communications equipment contributed (at a minimum) to a lot of deaths on 911.


Brown was never a left winger? Disagree strongly.

Brown has been an opportunist? Which politician hasn't?

You left out the number of the proposition you were talking about, so I am not sure which you mean. If you mean his position on Prop 8, after the people passed it, he first said that, as attorney general of California, he would fulfill the duties of his office and enforce it. That is VERY different from opposing gay marriage, which Brown never did.

However, Brown did not leave it at that. He looked further into the law and decided that he might be able to make a case (literally) that Prop 8 should be overturned. And, once he realized he might have a legal basis for a challenge, he did an outstanding job. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1868504,00.html

Too often, policians say the liberal thing in a primary, then fade away (or claim impotence--same thing) when they are in a position to actually DO the liberal thing--for example, Obama on DADT. When a politician does the opposite, it's cause for me to celebrate him or her.

As far as Brown's challenger being to his left, maybe, maybe not. Brown is a known quantity. I'm not so sure about the challenger. Please see Reply ##s 24 and 28.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. This was my second thought
my first being "Oh crap, here we go herding cats again, removing one of Brown's best assets - lack of a primary challenger to break his bank roll."

Then, after a little rationality set in, I came to the same conclusion that you did. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that this was all Brown's idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
25.  I agree that claiming Brown is too far right could help Brown.
I don't think the California electorate is in any one place.

To clarify, I think most California voters are either decidedly right or decidely left.

And a much smaller group than either of those two is in the center.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. If Prop. 13 goes...it will force thousands? millions? from their homes.
I want Prop. 13 to stay. Period.

And all this blather about how bad it is...is from the greedy money
wasters in the state.

I simply cannot imagine the horrific tax bills that would come due on
people if Prop. 13 were removed. The only crime that many homeowners
have committed is, simply staying put in their dang home for many years!

NO, NO, NO...read our lips...Try to get rid of Prop. 13 and we'll get rid of those
in elected positions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Then continue to live in a state that is constantly on the brink of banruptcy
Actually you'll get to bankruptcy pretty quickly

Then you'll have worse things to worry about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. then remove it for commercial properties
simple fix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. News flash # 1. Most things cost money. News flash # 2.
The notion that government can afford things that cost money if only waste is eliminated is true only in very small part--and they never try really hard tto eliminate the waste anyway. So, it eventually comes down to things like closing schools and fire stations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. I voted for Proposition 13 in 1978, and I'd vote for it again.
The problem is spending, not low taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Do you think there's some middle ground between ALL and NOTHING?
Your statement "The problem is spending, not low taxes," is a tad simplistic, wouldn't you say?

Well, no matter. I do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I'd be OK with removing some of the restrictions on increasing tax on commercial property
But the state spends too much money, money that it doesn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. "Money it doesn't have ..." Well, obviously.
"...the state spends too much money..."

One's opinion on the matter is entirely dependent on one's station in life ... and how well their blinders fit.

Your "too much money" is someone else's "how the hell are we going to provide health care to all these kids on half a budget???"

Good day to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. Prop 13 doesn't just limit property taxes, it limits all taxes.
The Prop 13 protections on residential property taxes could easily be kept in place while lessening restrictions on other forms of taxation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Schurman is not advocating revoking prop 13.
Edited on Wed Apr-07-10 06:35 PM by Luminous Animal
He advocates closing the loopholes that allow corporations to skirt the restrictions of Prop 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Jerry needs something to pull him left and out of his drift toward DLC pablum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Do you really think Brown is drifting toward DLC?
really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
28.  Brown's challenger is a former Executive Director or moveon.org.
Edited on Wed Apr-07-10 11:16 AM by No Elephants
moveon.org was formed as a response to the impeachment of President Bill Clinton. Before he ran for President, Bill Clinton was a founding member of the DLC. Brown and Clinton are long-time adversaries, from the time Brown ran against (and way to the left of) Bill Clinton and, among other things, challenged Clinton on Whitewater. Clinton supports Gavin Newsom against Brown.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. I hope you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. Wipe the floor with him, Jerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. Why is this on the front page
This guy is going nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadeyrn Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
30.  Jerry Brown
 I would like to invite all the good people of the world to
join the Jerry Brown for Governor fan Facebook page
at................http://www.facebook.com/jerrybrown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. It's a shame -- considered voting for Brown, but then he called pot dangerous.
So he's either dumb or lying, which makes him unfit for my vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. he's not dumb
by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC