Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boxer, Webb target Wall Street bonuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:15 PM
Original message
Boxer, Webb target Wall Street bonuses
Source: The Hill


Boxer, Webb target Wall Street bonuses
By J. Taylor Rushing - 02/04/10 12:18 PM ET

Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.) unveiled a bill Thursday to tax extravagant bonuses paid out by financial firms that have benefited from taxpayer assistance.

The Taxpayer Fairness Act would apply only to Wall Street firms and banks that received at least $5 billion from the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Specifically, it would impose a 50 percent excise tax on any 2009 bonuses paid to employees at those firms that received a salary greater than $400,000. The tax would apply to the portion of the bonus that exceeds that figure — which Boxer and Webb picked because it matches President Barack Obama’s salary. Employees’ base pay would be unaffected.

“There is an outcry out there,” said Boxer. “People are hurting from the residual effects of Wall Street … This bill is symbolic, but it’s real.”

Boxer estimated that up to $10 billion could be generated from the bill, which would be dedicated to reducing the federal deficit. She emphasized that TARP assistance was only a portion of the assistance that the major financial firms received, along with asset guarantees and low-interest loans.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/79751-boxer-webb-take-aim-at-wall-street-bonuses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Boxer & Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fair enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. All in all, I see Grayson as having the strongest stand against the Banksters
Edited on Thu Feb-04-10 04:00 PM by truedelphi
It would be nice to stop the bonuses and it would be nice that if the bonuses are not stopped, then the Federal Government tax them.

But the real problem is not the bonuses, it is that as much as 14 Trillion has been handed over to the top Banksters, and We the People are not allowed to even know who got what and when and what they did with it.

On edit: While I applaud Webb and Boxer, I applaud Grayson even louder. He speaks out about the heart of the problem, not the marginal situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I love Boxer
And this is why I like Webb. On economic/labor issues, he sides with us. I applaud them for working together on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's good, Webb. However, I didn't see your name in the list of those
who voted against Bernanke. I don't remember seeing Warner, either.

I don't feel my phone call to both of your offices was a waste, but things like that makes it difficult for me to turn out for you on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. It Needs to do MORE
The ability of Corporate Board Rooms to wipe out a company's profits by paying ridiculously exorbitant bonuses needs to be curtailed forever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. good, although I'd tax them higher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC