Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Curveball Alters Talks on Wall St. Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:01 PM
Original message
Curveball Alters Talks on Wall St. Reform
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 05:06 PM by ShockediSay
Source: NYTimes

President Obama’s proposals to tax and curb the activities of Wall Street have thrown an unpredictable element into the debate over financial regulatory reform. They also have touched off an intensive new round of lobbying and raised questions in Congress over whether his plan will add urgency or merely bog things down....

“There is no question that this was presented to stoke and jump in front of a lot of populist furor,” said Senator Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican who is working with Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, on the problem of securities firms being so big and interconnected that their collapse could bring down the financial system.

“I think everybody watching understands that this was a political undertaking and not necessarily a substance undertaking,” he said. “This is a soak-the-rich populist grab.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/business/02regulate.html



?soak-the-rich

I think the rich have been hosing us for way too many years and for way to much !!!

AND the lobbyist system is the reason so many disapprove of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Soak the rich," huh?
Eat the rich!

(be sure to cook them thoroughly first)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No thank you.
Even cooked thoroughly, they taste bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. That's why you soak them first.
A nice 6-hour brine will draw out those nasty flavors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Now I disagree on Eat the Rich
I don't think they would be tasty at all. I much prefer to keep Gitmo open and use it as a new "summer camp" for the Band of Crooks that we call CEO's and alike allowing them to enjoy many of the fun activities & water sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Okay. Your plan sounds good, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The rich tilted the board way back at the beginning.....
and they are, basically, stealing the wealth of the commons. Time to take it back.

If the poor are always with us, it's because the super-rich are always with us; you can't have one without the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "Wealth of the Commons"
great tool for the propaganda war funded on the right wing by the corporatist
fascist leaning types
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yava Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. The rich tilted the board way back at the beginning...
and you can't eliminate one without eliminating the other?
sounds nice though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Stealing? It was handed to them by govenment. Abolishing laws and regulations established
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 08:14 PM by No Elephants
as a response to the stock market collapse of 1929, which worked for decades. Refusing to enforce whatever laws and regulations remained. Incompetence or worse, as will several examinations of Madoff, followed by a green light every time. Almost unconditional bailout. Over a year after the TARP, still no new regulations.

They did not have to bother themselves to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. "they"?
Come on. It is obviously the case with the banks, the insurance companies, drug companies, etc.

But the average millionaire is a self-made small businessman.. many of them are farmers.


Let's try to separate the discussion between earned wealth and unearned wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unsoak the rich maybe. We soaked them with TARP money already.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Douse them with the cold water of paying their fair share of taxes -personal and corporate- and
bring back regulations of the Glass- Steagall sort...
(A kid can dream can't he?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. First WMDs, now this. We gotta stop this Curveball guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. My first thought as well! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. why not soak the rich?
the rest of us have been getting soaked for 30 years.

The rich should have their chance too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck the rich and their bull shit trickle down mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. How about We Wring your Necks
take your money and then through you all to the people you directly harmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not exactly, Senator Bob. What's happening here is that Obama wants big business
to pay its fair share for being able to fleece the little people of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC