Source:
The IndependentFormer attorney general Lord Goldsmith today described how he gave the "green light" for military action against Iraq just a month after expressing concerns about the legality of the war.
Giving evidence to the Iraq Inquiry, Lord Goldsmith said he personally presented a draft opinion to Tony Blair in January 2003 in which he raised questions about the legal basis for the use of force.
But the following month - after meeting US government lawyers in Washington - he returned to No 10 to tell Mr Blair's senior advisers they did not need specific authorisation from the United Nations.
...
In his initial five-page draft opinion, which he gave to Mr Blair on January 14, he warned that he still believed a further resolution was necessary, specifically authorising the use of force.
Read more:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/goldsmith-changed-mind-on-war-legality-1880448.html
What struck me was that he went to America to get the US view on how private talks before the UNSC 1441 resolution between the US and France had gone (on whether it required a 2nd resolution after that for any country to use force), but when asked why he hadn't asked the French too, he replied "You cannot have the British Attorney General being seen to go to the French and ask them 'What do you think?' The message that would have given to Saddam Hussein about the degree of your commitment would have been huge".
So asking the Americans about what had been said is OK, but asking the French is unthinkable? Wow, that shows how anti-French he is, I think.
Other links:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/27/lord-goldsmith-iraq-inquiryhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8481759.stm