Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nigerian man indicted in foiled airline attack on Christmas Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:07 PM
Original message
Nigerian man indicted in foiled airline attack on Christmas Day
Source: Detroit Free Press

A federal grand jury in Detroit indicted Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab today in the Christmas Day terrorist attack on a Detroit-bound airliner

Abdulmutallab was charged with six counts: attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, attempted murder within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, willful attempt to destroy and wreck an aircraft within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States, willfully placing a destructive device on an aircraft and two counts possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a crime of violence.

The attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction charge is punishable by up to life in prison.

Abdulmutallab, 23, a Nigerian national, is in custody at a federal prison in Milan, charged in a federal criminal complaint with trying to detonate a bomb hidden in his underwear on Flight 253, which was bound from Amsterdam to Detroit.



Read more: http://freep.com/article/20100106/NEWS05/100106050/1318/Nigerian-man-indicted-in-foiled-terror-attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. OK, but "weapon of mass destruction?"
DU attorneys, is this an intent kind of thing? Like if I get on a blimp with a hatpin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. High explosives don't cause mass destruction?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Im not following that one, sorry.
Hopefully this idiot lives a long and horrible life in the Pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. simply getting on a blimp with a hatpin doesn't do it, but trying to kill everyone aboard would
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think if 250 people are on a plane and someone blows it up, its MASS DESTRUCTION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It is a statutory term

When you want to know what a term in a statute means, you read the definition section of the statute, in this instance 18 USC 2332a:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002332---a000-.html

(2) the term “weapon of mass destruction” means—

(A) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title;

(B) any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;

(C) any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector (as those terms are defined in section 178 of this title); or

(D) any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life; and


And the "destructive device" from Section 921 is:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000921----000-.html

(4) The term “destructive device” means—

(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas—
(i) bomb,
(ii) grenade,
(iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces,
(iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce,
(v) mine, or
(vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses;

(B) any type of weapon (other than a shotgun or a shotgun shell which the Attorney General finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes) by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and

(C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled.

The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon; any device, although originally designed for use as a weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic, line throwing, safety, or similar device; surplus ordnance sold, loaned, or given by the Secretary of the Army pursuant to the provisions of section 4684 (2), 4685, or 4686 of title 10; or any other device which the Attorney General finds is not likely to be used as a weapon, is an antique, or is a rifle which the owner intends to use solely for sporting, recreational or cultural purposes.

-----------------------


So, all Umar has to do is to say the junk in his drawers was actually an antique which he intended to use solely for cultural purposes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. LOL, thanks
...And the last bit is worth a DUzy. I didn't see it coming. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Whenever you read a statute, look for the defense.... /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent12345 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. The black sheep
The man, or can i say a boy is a black sheep in the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. ya know, I was wondering what happened to that guy who said he was
coming to deliver my check ...

it just now dawned on me ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. ROFL

This post may come as a surprise to you, but I have a 100% risky free transaction to propose...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC