Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Broadcom co-founder testifies he didn't know backdating stock options was improper

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 02:25 AM
Original message
Broadcom co-founder testifies he didn't know backdating stock options was improper
Source: LA Times

Henry Samueli, who co-founded Broadcom Corp. in a friend's garage and helped grow it into a leading microchip designer, took the witness stand Tuesday with an equally challenging task at hand: defending the company's backdating of stock options to a federal jury in Orange County.

. . .

Samueli said Broadcom's success was based largely on its highly skilled employees. In order to retain its employees, the company issued them stock options, which swelled in value during the tech boom of the late 1990s.

When the company went public in 1998, more than 70% of its employees became instant millionaires. Options are rights to buy shares of a company's stock at a specific price, usually set at the price on the date they are issued. Backdating stock options to an earlier date, when the stock price was lower, increases their value.

After securities regulators began investigating the practice earlier this decade, many companies were forced to revise their financial reports to reflect the increased option-related expenses.

In 2006, Broadcom had to restate its earnings to reflect $2.2 billion in options-related compensation costs, reducing the company's previously reported financial results.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-samueli9-2009dec09,0,3181295.story




That's his official defense? He didn't know that forging the dates on official documents was wrong. That's what he is going with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Henry, some free advice
Because you probably don't know this either... If you drop something, bend at the knees to pick it up. That might be usefull where you are headed.

Honestly, he ought to get a harsher sentence for wasting the court's time with crap like that. "I swear, judge, I had no idea that the speed limit was 30 miles per hour in that neighborhood. I thought it was 110."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aragorn Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. "ignorance
of the law is no excuse." end of trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. yep.
next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tazkcmo Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. No problem for the CEO.
It's ok when a mover or a shaker "cannot recall" or "was not aware" or "misspoke". They're not one of the masses to be fed to the prison system at first opportunity. No no no. The Beautiful People will NOT be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. George Costanza: "Was that wrong?"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did the shareholders know?
That is the question.

It was part of normal compensation if they knew.

It was ripping off the shareholders if they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. No, the shareholders didn't know

The financial statements had to be restated to include the amount of money actually paid to execs. Over two billion dollars had to be removed from previously recorded profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow. He thought putting a false date on an official document was totally proper. Makes me...
wonder what else he did that is obviously wrong to everyone else but to him seemed perfectly okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-09-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Using bullshit as your defense is never a winner strategy.
Edited on Wed Dec-09-09 10:34 AM by Javaman
"It's my first day!" - Homer Simpson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC