Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush 'raised Iraq issue (three days) after 9/11'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 10:43 AM
Original message
Bush 'raised Iraq issue (three days) after 9/11'
Source: UKPA

George Bush raised the issue of Iraq with Tony Blair just three days after the 9/11 attacks, Mr Blair's former foreign policy adviser has said.

Sir David Manning told the official inquiry into the war that Mr Bush told Mr Blair that there could be a link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaida in a telephone conversation on September 14 2001.

He said Mr Blair insisted that the evidence would have to be "very compelling" to justify any action against Iraq.

Sir David said that, throughout the period, Mr Blair argued strongly in favour of trying to resolve the issue of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction through the United Nations.

"The British Government's view throughout this was disarmament. It was not regime change," he said.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hCv5RDoqQrl85J0I8eQGff65GOiw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. The decision to invade Iraq was made well before 9/11
PNACers sent a letter to Clintonin 1998 warning him of Iraq:

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC


Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.


--more--
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Then the quote, George Bush raised the issue of Iraq with Tony Blair just three days after the 9/11 attacks, Mr Blair's former foreign policy adviser has said, would put Bush back in DC after his three-day flee from Florida. So what the hell was he doing during those three days beside "getting out of harm's way?" Deciding to invade Iraq? And what the hell was he thinking about? Getting the Brits to go in on the invasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Smirk." - xCommander aWol (R)
Edited on Mon Nov-30-09 11:03 AM by SpiralHawk
"Well, you know how we Cons are with our Republicon Family Values, smirk, when it comes to matters of truth and honor. Smirk."

- xCommander aWol (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm glad you posted this.
It's one of the single most damning pieces of the Iraq invasion. The dye was cast, the movement started and it was a done deal once the 911 attacks happened. And the signatures to the letter spell bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Why do you think Bush was literally ramrodded into office
via the election results of a state his brother just happened to be governor of? If you think that was a coincidence, I have a bridge in Brooklyn you may want to buy!

:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. "sweep it all up". One woulda thought Americans on the whole were too intelligent to fall for that.
And yet, 70% of Americans thought Iraq did 911.

The ONLY nation in the entire world who thought Iraq did 911.


Gee, America, maybe it isn't everyone else that's dumb...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush is on record in 1998 or 1999 talking about the war on Iraq ...
.... he would have when he was President. (Houston Chronicle ???) and in Dec 1999 bush, Cheney, Rummy, and others
went to the Pentagon war room to have a summit on an attack on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. All I know is that not long after 9/11, news stories appeared
about the anthrax from the attacks on Tom Daschel and the media being traced to Baghdad, and about how nameless Bush regime officials wished that torture was legal.

:mad:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC