Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Votes to Increase Indecency Fines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:43 PM
Original message
House Votes to Increase Indecency Fines
WASHINGTON -- The House overwhelmingly passed legislation Thursday substantially increasing the maximum fine for radio and TV indecency.

The vote was 391-22. Similar legislation is pending in the Senate.

"I am tired of hearing parents tell me how they have to cover their children's ears," Rep. Joseph Pitts, R-Pa., said during debate on the measure. "Today, we're saying enough is enough."

The bill would raise the maximum fine for a broadcast license-holder from $27,500 to $500,000. The fine for a performer would jump from $11,000 to $500,000.

Edward O. Fritts, president of the National Association of Broadcasters, noted that the industry has already scheduled an indecency summit for March 31.

"Voluntary industry initiatives are far preferable to government regulation when dealing with programming issues," Fritts said. "NAB does not support the bill as written, but we hear the call of legislators and are committed to taking voluntary action to address this issue."

more.........

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-indecent-programming,0,3805074.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, and if you want to know what "indecency" is,
just ask Michael Powell. He knows it when he sees it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demon67 Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Indecent is right
This vote was indecent. 391-22. Where were the Democrats?!?!?!? Are there only 22 people in Congress willing to defend the First Amendment? What could be more chilling to free speech than allowing an all-rethug government to unilaterally decide, after the fact, what it deems "indecent" and empowering it to then impose half-million dollar fines. This sounds like something out of a totalitarian regime -- which, I guess it is, but where are our folks on this one?

We spend untold billions to remove the Taliban from Afghanistan only to elect them to the US Congress. I expect this from the religious right, but where are our representatives? Someone, please, tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Good thing this does not apply to C-SPAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demon67 Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hello out there . . .
apparently no one in Congress or at DU is much interested in free speech on the airwaves. (Ironic, since we are on the cusp of launching a progressive radio station.) Help me understand why no one else seems concerned about the chilling effects of this bill? Maybe if I titled my post "JANET JACKSON's BREAST" it would draw more of a response. I am completely blown away by this vote and by DU's apparent indifference to same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Momof1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have been thinking about this
Isn't this just the final nail in the coffin of ABC, CBS, & NBC, and radio as we know it?

As long as we have the remote control, we can turn the channel and watch South Park and they are not affected by this bill.

Radio listeners can go to Siruis and listen to whatever they want. I don't think this bill will really do anything except take viewers and listeners away from the traditional stations.

But that is just MHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demon67 Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the reply
I appreciate your thoughts. In part, my problem is that radio is a crucial mass medium -- largely because it is free and ubiquitous -- and only a small percentage of Americans have (or can even afford) sattelite radio at this point. This bill will allow Michael Powell or some other repuke stooge to decide what all of us can listen to. Yesterday, it was Opie and Anthony. Today it is Howard Stern. Tomorrow, who knows?

This is more than another incremental step toward Big Brother. In my mind, this is a milestone that will reverberate through our culture for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess they have nothing better to do. Two illegal, immoral wars,
magnificent human rights violations by the US, one illegal overthrow of a nation and another going for its third attempt, the economy tanking with no hope of recovery because the jobs are being outsourced for next to nothing wages, which means no one will be able to buy the crap which means the businesses will fail, the treasury has been looted by the administration and their corporate masters....but we are SAFE from the scourge of Janet's breast...except that the corporate whores who payed to put Janet's breasts on the air are only kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC