Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Confirms Controversial Judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:45 PM
Original message
Senate Confirms Controversial Judge
Source: Associated Press

By LARRY MARGASAK (AP) – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday confirmed U.S. District Judge David Hamilton for the Chicago-based federal appeals court, approving a nominee targeted by conservatives as a liberal activist.

Hamilton was approved on a 59-39 vote and became the eighth of President Barack Obama's judicial nominees to win confirmation. He is the third confirmed for a U.S. appeals court, which is usually the last stop for federal court cases.

Republican senators — backed by their conservative allies outside Congress — had blocked a vote for five months until Democrats overcame a filibuster last Tuesday with a 70-29 vote.

The failure to stop the confirmation showed that Republicans lack the clout to block Obama's judicial nominees as the president remakes the federal judiciary following eight years of George W. Bush's mostly conservative choices for the bench.


Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5grQHSwLPcLkQZhThfU7x8m6vToTwD9C2R9KG0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. well a bit of good news is always welcomed!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who Lit the Fire Under Harry "Asbestos" Reid?
I'd like to shake his/her hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Whoever did soaked the asbestos in Ronsonol before lighting the fire
Enough said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. "A liberal activist"...repuke speak for he uses a brain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. "George W. Bush's mostly conservative choices" what utter crap
* lined the benches with neocon extremist zealots, not conservatives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pack the courts with as many liberal "extremists" as you can, President Obama!!!
You won't hear a word of complaint from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Sounds fair and balanced considering the imbalance of before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lmarcotty Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Controversial?
EVERY judge Obama nominates for the federal bench is "controversial" if you take the f'ing Repugnicans at their treacly, nauseating, hypocritical word. Thank you, AP, just buying their bullshit at face value once again. Obama's picks for judge have been as mainstream, middle of the road as you could find anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. right, not controversial at all -- he had richard lugar's support, for crying out loud.
this was just another obstructionist tactic for the sake of slowing down democratic accomplishments, plain and simple. this judge was just a pawn in a much larger (and much more petty) game of party politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. elections having consequences? seems we have far too many signs of it not being the case right now

this is good to see -- more signs like this would be welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. K &R.. and some good news.....
Now this is a step in the right...er I mean left..direction :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. So they filibustered untill 11 of them decided not to?
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 10:01 PM by quakerboy
What happened and why, would be my questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC