Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Jackson Slams Black Votes Against Health Care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:28 PM
Original message
Jesse Jackson Slams Black Votes Against Health Care
Source: CBS News

"You can't vote against health care and call yourself a black man," Jackson said Wednesday night, the Hill newspaper reports. Jackson made the remarks at an event hosted by the CBC Foundation to celebrate the 25th anniversary of Jackson's presidential bid."


Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/19/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5712116.shtml



?????

I didn't realize that the underpinning issue underneath all of healthcare reform was race; who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. typical jesse jackson
it doesn't quite have the ring of hymietown, but it expresses the same tendencies. here's a hint, jesse. you are not "the emperor of black people" to quote south park. you don't get to decide who is and who isn't authentically black, which is of course an absurd idea in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Poor guy just trying to be relevant....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
103. And to which large group are you more relevant than Jackson is to African Americans?
Not counting family members, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mddem9850 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
119. I agree. True attention seeker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhcave Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Heavy Hands
Robbing someone of part of their identity for not agreeing with you is quite a weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
99. Oh, ffs. Saying something is not robbing anyone of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't realize that either.
Who said that race was the issue of healthcare reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The OP has a habit of interjecting race and being divisive
The OP also sports an avatar of MLK, but doesn't seem too fond of civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twitomy Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think Jesse Jackson is interjecting race and being
divisive, not the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How is Jackson being divisive?
He's talking to black people about black people & their needs.


This thread sure is a magnet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. How's this?
Who does the representative in question represent?

His race or his constituents?

Does he stop and think, "Gee, my district is fairly conservative and against this, but most people who have my skin color are in favor of it. So instead of voting as my district wants, I'll vote for the community that really counts, those of my race."

That's Jackson.

He could have voiced the opinion that in spite of the congressman's district he should have supported the health care bill because it's simply the best thing for Americans--i.e., all the people living legally in the United States and territories--and that as a representative he should use access to additional information and foresight to see the consequences of doing nothing. But Jackson didn't. Instead he said there is something more important than being a representative *or* simply doing the right thing for all Americans, and that is racial solidarity, doing things that helps those of the same race.

Being all rah-rah for a group enforces group solidarity. It triggers outside criticism while saying that any outside criticism can only be wrong and racist. It's a two-fer for Jackson, for whom race and ideology are often inseparable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. +1
And if Davis has to behave like a republican for his "conservative" area, then just be a fucking republican. I'm sick of fake ass democrats. Jesse Jackson can say what he wants to black people about black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffinEd Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Shades of Gary Franks
But at least he was a registered republican, unlike Davis who is playing one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. he's talking to black people
and telling them who isn't black and who is, based on their political beliefs. how is that NOT divisive? if i said, "if you are a white man and you don't believe in string theory, you aren't a white man" would that be divisive? well probably not, because most people don't know from string theory. here's a better example "if you don't believe in the right to choose, then you are not a white woman" would that be divisive? jesse jackson is not (i quote again from south park) the emperor of black people. the idea that this grandstanding oft-discredited fool thinks that he is the arbiter of who authentic blacks are, is both a sign of his massive ego, and his massive disconnect from reality. he really has become a parody of himself. william shatner has played off that syndrome very well, and in fact cleverly exploits it and props to him. jackson just looks like an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
100. The analogy is not "If you don't believe in the right to choose, then you are not a white woman."
That makes no sense. White women are not a group for which the right to choose is more significant than it is for women of color. The better statement for comparison would be, "Any woman who votes against a woman's right to choose, then you are not a real woman."

I'm not saying the latter is (or is not) a wonderful statement, either. IMO, men should also be for the right to choose. I'm saying only that it's mnore comparable to Jackson's statement.

Underlying what Jackson is saying is that there is a historical and a statistical correlation in this country between and among poverty and African Americans and poor health care (not only because of poverty, either), all of which is very familiar to most African Americans. So, if you vote against health care, you are not a real black person. You don't get it.

Now, the first statement could be considered sexist. However, women do have a more personal knowledge and a more direct experience with wombs and pregancy than do men. And African Americans do have a more personal and more direct knowledge and experience of what health care for African Americans really has meant and still means in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
86. Talking to Black People has been done
for hundreds of years .

He is Black, the audinece as I understand it was Black and quality Health Care is known to be a big problem among my people.

MLK I am sure would have said the same thing to a Black audience.
That would be "politically correct."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
101. It would be interesting to keep track. Jackson, Sharpton, affirmative action. Which of those
thread topics is the biggest magnet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
97. You would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
111. You are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
96. I, too, have observed divergence between the posting behavior and the avatar.
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 04:12 PM by No Elephants
Only once before, though. Then again, I tend to stay in LBN unless a moved thread link takes me to another forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Perhaps not THE issue, but AN issue according to many minority groups.
From the article:
A handful of major minority and civil rights groups injected race into the health care debate last month when they launched a series of ads linking the decades-long push for health care reform to civil rights.

The NAACP National Voter Fund, National Council of La Raza, Campaign for Community Change, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, PowerPAC.org and the United States Student Association said they were running the ads because "people of color have a special stake in health care reform." The coalition pointed out that minorities have higher rates of common problems like heart disease and cancer and also face higher insurance rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
102. The opening poster is incorrectly implying that Jackson said that.
But, I know you don't believe everything you read here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think he meant FAT people shouldn't be against HC reform.
Because there's nothing funnier than a fat redneck holding a sign against HC reform, which is what most of the tea parties consist of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ed76638 Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fuck Artur Davis
That bitch doesn't deserve the office of governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Jesse Who?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Jesse Jackson: You can't vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 02:08 PM by The Northerner
Source: The Hill

The Rev. Jesse Jackson on Wednesday night criticized Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.) for voting against the Democrats’ signature healthcare bill.

“We even have blacks voting against the healthcare bill,” Jackson said at a reception Wednesday night. “You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man.”


Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/68451-jackson-you-cant-vote-against-healthcare-and-call-yourself-a-black-man=



Ugh! Can someone tell Jesse Jackson that it's about policy not race.

The bill is lackluster, unconstitutional, and should be redone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Watch out for castration. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Will that procedure be covered, or will it be like abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
110. Would sure cut down on the Viagra costs! (No pun intended.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
105. Disagreement = castration? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. So a discussion about race is inappropriate to a reception of the CBC?
What should the Congressional Black Caucus talk about at their receptions, in your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. not to mention
as with every problem in america, the healthcare crisis disproportinately affects african-americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Which was certainly his point. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. if only people knew what the hell is going on in this country
they wouldn't be so quick to misconstrue the realities of race in this country. the problem is not what jackson said, the problem is what he was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Americans never want to talk about race unless someone with some color to them
does something "first".

That seems to be the level of discourse that is comfortable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. rubbish
EVERY problem? cmon. get real. apparently, racist and evidenceless racial accusations are ok if you depict african-americans as a victim. fascinating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. how was the Rev. Jackson being racist?
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:50 PM by reggie the dog
He just thinks that health care reform is so important to the black community that no self resepecting black should be against the plan. I disagree with him, and like Kucinich did I can understand holding out for real reform. But this does not make Rev. Jackson racist, certainly not a CBC meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. i was referring to the previous post
claiming that every problem in the US negatively affects blacks disproportionately. that's false. i think jackson is a disgusting racist, but that wasn't the point of my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Nearly every problem in the US dDOES effect
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:23 PM by reggie the dog
non whites disproportionately than whites. Much of this is linked to anther division along which problems effect one group disproportionatley, class division. Non whites are more highly represented in the lower economic classes to (yes there are white folks like me making 20 grand a year too who are in the lower middle class or poor class) but blacks are more highly represented in the poor classes than they are in the population as a whole. Non white poors are shit on that much more than poor whites because of racism.


Also why do you thing that Jackson is a racist? I thought the whole Rainbow Push Coalition was about fighting for the litte people, uniting poor people of all races into a political movement. Did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. that's a different argument
and not what he said. i'll give one example. suicide. whites are 11.9 per 100,000 and blacks are 5.3 . that;'s JUST one example of where blacks are NOT overrepresented in a negative category compared to whites. simply put, it's false. fwiw, it also depends on WHICH "non-whites". for example, japanese americans exceed whites in nearly every positive category and are underrepresented in nearly every negative category. last i checked, they are "non whites". even if we accept arguendo that "non white poors are shit on much more than poor whites", they manange to outclass whites, blacks, etc. in plenty of categories. jackson has repeatedly proven to be a racist. from his "hymietown" days, to claiming that one is not an authentic black man if you disagree with him on policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
52. I rember the scandal with the hymietown days
and thought that he renounced those statements. The suicide totals are very interesting. Asians, especially from Japan, are accepted as whites for the most part. It is mostly the Latinos and blacks who are shit on. Poverty, housing, job security, wages, health insurance, violence in their neighborhoods, longer jail for the same crimes as whites who get less jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. he did renounce those statements
of course. what else would he do? and if it was isolated, i'd cut him some slack and give him the benefit of the doubt. but when he keeps doing stuff like that, it's pretty obvious. regardless of whether asians are accepted as whites, the point is that they are nonwhites that outclass whites (a counterexample). i disagreed with the claim that blacks were overrepresented in every bad category, and i already gave one example that proves that poster wrong (suicide). that's all i was sayin'. declaring blacks are the universal victim is ridiculous, or that they are disproportionately represented negatively in everything in US society is also ridiculous. dat's all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. instead of everything he needs to say
nearly everything, and also keep in mind that in some aspecets, other groups are behind blacks. Puerto Ricans are poorer than blacks in Chicago if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. nearly everything would at least have been arguable
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:47 PM by paulsby
and not easily refuted. i woulda let it slide on by... it also breaks down by gender. some would say women are "always" overrep'd in victim class stuff, but that's clearly not true either. look at suicides again, for an example... rates per 100k white male 19.5 white female 4.6 nonwhite male 9.3 nonwhite female 2.1 black male 9.2 black female 1.7 !!!! hispanic 5.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. as a techer I try to avoid words like always and never. just too hard to
back up with evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. i would NEVER use such words
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Self delete
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:52 PM by FBaggins
sorrry... replied to wrong post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #60
112. Suicide, unlike something like racial discrimination, is something the alleged "victim"
controls. Not really comparable.

You just keep lumping together things that are not at all alike as though they were equivalent or highly comparable.

BTW, no one but you said anything about females, so why don't you save your rebuttal attempts for when someone else actually raises the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
107. Actually, Jackson doesn't "keeps doing stuff like that." If you had been as public
an activist as he has for as long as he has, and scrutinized as closely as he has been, I'm guessing you would have more than a few mistakes in your column.

Then again, you think his calling out Davis's vote during a recent meeting of the CBC is racist and I think it makes perfect (non-racist) sense, though I am not crazy about the bill myself because it is far too industry oriented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
109. Oh, gawd, not the Asian bs again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
57. He judged someone by the color of his skin
What else would you call that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. he didn't so much judge them by their color
as say how can any self respecting person with this skin color vote against something which could so help those who share the same skin color. I disagree with the idea but I honestly do not see racism. Sort of like if I say no self respecting american should have suppored the war in Iraq. As an American I have a certain right to say that which a French person really would not have because they would be perceieved as racist against Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. That's pure spin.
That isn't what he said.

And "ow can any self respecting person with this skin color vote against something which could so help those who share the same skin color." is ALSO offensive.

I know plenty of african americans who are otherwise progressive but don't believe that it is government's role to provide health care for its citizens. i may not agree, but I won't judge them for standing by their beliefs.

I know plenty of african americans who are otherwise progressive who are deeply religious and firmly "pro-life". I may not agree but I won't insult them by saying they aren't black if they don't change their mind.

I know plenty of african americans who are otherwise progressive who believe that homosexual sex is wrong and can't bring themselves to support gay marriage. If I don't agree... I can try to persuade... I CAN'T point at the color of their skin and say "you can't believe that".

Racism at it's core is the belief that people are inherently "different" because of the color of their skin. Not being a racist, I can't accept that this is different because of the color of Jackson's skin.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. I see what you mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
113. No, he did not. He judged Davis by his vote, and for good reason.
See, for example Reply ##x 8, 86 and 100. And do some research on health care in this country in relation to African Americans. past and present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #36
73. yes...every fucking problem
this shitty racist system has created a myriad of problems for african-americans, indians, latinos, etc.
one example:
medical care (plenty of studies out there about the variance between care provided for black women with breast cancer and white women with breast cancer.

another example: arrest, conviction and incarcerations rates.

another example: life expectancy.

have you lived one day as a black person? if not, you are the one who needs to get real. you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. ah, already resorting to personal attacks and
swearing. how incredibly mature. and i already gave a counterexample. a problem that is UNDERrepresented in the african american community. suicide. and i already posted the #'s. that disproves your absurd statement. there are of course other counterexamples, but if you make the claim "EVERY", then all i need is one to disprove your paternalistic theory about african americans in this country. hth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #75
81. What other counterexamples do you have?
Using a single statistic about suicide doesn't refute the overall truth of what she has said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. it most definitely does
she said every. i offered a counterexample. that's how you refute a claim of every. you want another? fine. african americans are less likely to use crystal meth than whites. crystal meth abuse is one of the worst scourges we've seen in recent years in terms of productivity lost, lives ruined, etc. not only is this true statistically, but it's true anecdotally ime.

here's the stats. among high school students for example:
1.9 % of blacks, 4.5% of whites, and 5.7% of hispanics reported having used meth

whites and blacks were roughly even in mj use. roughly equal in heroin use. they were more likely to have used mj before age 13, though

http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/minorities/minorities_ff.html

dea arrest figures support the above (granted arrests include adults). black were disproportionately overrepresented in some drugs, and under represented in others, most notably methamphetamine 141/5367. they were significantly overrepresented amongst crack arrests 3161/695. crack arrests get a higher sentence than powder cocaine arrests, and thus this is argued to be racially disparate (which si undeniable) and racist (which is arguable, since more violent crime is associated with crack than powder cocaine) . i personally don't think ANYBODY should be sent to jail for drug POSSESSION, crack or otherwise. however, i think powder and crack cocaine, IF punished, should not get disparate sentences. thus. this is one area where blacks are disproportionately negative represented. and it's of course no doubt true there are plenty others. but as mentioned there are some where they are disproportionately positively represented, and thus the OP was false. that's all i said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
54. Which is why they disproportionally support it
but not universally.

I won't disparage those who disagree on legitimate grounds.

Telling people that they must behave a certain way because of the color of their skin is remarkably little progress for decades of struggle. I helps not a whit that the speaker is a particular race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #54
74. sorry...i don't want any more clarence thomases
but you can be as high-minded as you like. a black fascist is stil as fascist. we don't need any more black people supporting regressive shit...white people are doing just great with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Well then let's just shoot 'em eh?
A black fascist is still a fascist... Yep

he's ALSO still black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllTooEasy Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. They can talk about anything...just don't be stupid about it, Brutha'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. Stupid? I'd say taking Jackson's remark out of context
and dinging him for it is stupid. I don't agree with him about this particular bill but in general, yeah, he's right as rain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
116. "Just don't be stupid about it, Brutha?" Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
49. A "discussion about race" isn't inappropriate... but THIS is.
Any statement that says that people should think alike, act alike, or believe the same things based on the color of their skin is inherently offensive. It doesn't matter the color of the speaker's skin or that of his audience.

My Jackson should look up the word "freedom" and try it some time.

Persuade... don't compel or bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. Baloney. A community gets to talk about itself in its own voice.
Maybe YOU should look up the word "autonomy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. It's "allowed" to talk to itself in it's own voice.
And I'm allowed to tell him he's acting in a racially biased way. And any black man who is told that he must vote a certain way because of the color of his skin is entitled to call that prejudice exactly what it is.

He should be offended... and Jackson should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. No, it's not "allowed". That's not the word. Maybe you really should
look up "autonomy" because you are unclear on the concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. You're embarrassing yourself.
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:47 PM by FBaggins
The meaning of the word directly rebuts what you're saying (even more ridiculous to offer the word in rebuttal to "freedom").

If you MUST vote a particular way because of the color of your skin... you DON'T have autonomy. Nor freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. Well, no. No one "allows" the black community to speak in its own voice
because that isn't a power anyone else has, capiche? Except some members of the 101st Chairborn who seem to believe Jesse Jackson needs their input on how to be black.

lol

What Jackson meant has gone so far over your head, it can't even see you from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #62
67. Jesse Jackson is NOT "the black community" - he's one man
Nor is he "their voice".

seem to believe Jesse Jackson needs their input on how to be black.

What a ridiculous comment... especially after defending the guy who just told them how to be black.

You don't get it, do you? It's offensive to be told how to authetically be yourself... even by someone else "like" you in that way.

What Jackson meant

Is as clear as the nose on your face. What he later tried to SPIN it as meaning was dishonest and not believable.

Most african americans support the bill and for good reason. SOME won't support the bill and I have faith that they ALSO have good and valid reasons.

Why? Because I don't assume that blacks are stupid. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. That's right. He's not "the black community", he is only one man.
Very well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. "One man" who made an incredibly stupid
and insensitive remark. Rather than try to spin it he should apologize for that stupid remark - which would give him the cover (and coverage) he needs to say what he should have said.

Frankly... You can't call yourself a black man and ever tell a black man that he can't call himself a black man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #71
79. You still have no idea what he was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. I'm sorry if English isn't one of your first two languages
To everyone else... he was quite clear.

He (and obviously you) wishes that there was more wiggle room... but he was quite clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #67
115. What does being stupid have to do with it, whether black, white or any other hue?
Landrieu, Nelson, and the rest of the Purple Snakes are not voting against this because they are stupid. Neither are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #61
120. Jackson said nothing about "must." If I say, "If you never eat pasta, you are not a true
Sicilian," I am not telling people in Sicility that they MUST eat pasta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
89. So a female speaker shouldn't be able to talk to women about the importance of childcare?
~and label it as an issue that is important to women? Not all parents responsible for obtaining child care are women. Not all women have or want children. Yet the issue effects most women and more often than men, and it is very much a women's issue. So would it be gender biased or "playing the gender card" if a female speaker spoke to a women's group and told them that a child care bill would be good for women and shame on any female legislature who would vote against it?

Members of a minority group not only have the right, but have the obligation to persuade leaders who are members of the same minority group to act in a manner that meets the needs of that group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
87. The Congressional BLACK Caucus is doing what they are suppose to do

Is the perfect forum to express such a view.

Jesse was 100% appropriate in that setting.
I have attending the CBLACKC many times.
Those attending are leaders in their community and know how to go back and express the views of the CBC in a meaningful way.

It's interesting how White people can try to tell Black people how to talk to members of their own race and/or those that are totally supportive of what issues are important in the Black Community and the USA.

There must be some on this thread that want Black People to not be encouraged to support the Health Care Bill.


Huum ~ let's hope they are Freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
106. A CBC reception while a health care bill is pending and only one member voted against it.
With this legislation being the most important domestic legislation since the Civil Rights Act.

Yeah. Can't imagine why Davis's vote leapt to Jackson's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. One of the few times I disagree with Jesse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. It's called poisoning the well or the No True Scotsman fallacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Juan_de_la_Dem Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Actually Jesse, I was thinking " and call yourself an American"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. When 95% of the progressive caucus votes for the bill & 99% of repubs vote against it,
it's not surprising to see Jackson come out in support of the bill.

I realize that some progressives believe that the Progressive Caucus sold them out by voting for the bill. Of course, perversely, I wonder if the insurance industry views the 99% of republicans who voted against it as "sell-outs" for not supporting an "industry bill". (Or do some think that the repubs are playing 3-D chess and voting against something they are really for because they are way out ahead of the poor Democrats in their strategy?)

It could just be that the PC, while many of its members - perhaps all - would prefer a much stronger reform bill, think it is the best we can get and better than killing it and starting from scratch in a possibly more hostile political environment. And it could be that Jackson agrees with them - both in terms of wanting something better, but realizing this is better than the alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Thanks - You certainly wrote my exact thoughts much better than I
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 03:38 PM by GreenTea
I did my abbreviated version.....that all caring people should vote for the bill because something needs to pass NOW...To get the ball (bill) rolling, get our foot in the door, to create a better bill now as well as better each year to come, until it becomes 100% single payer.....someday!

The Republicans tactic was/is to stall, stall, stall and which they know (along with the insurance corporations funneling money for distorting ads and political pay-offs) will eventually kill the bill, as they have for the past 50 or 60 years, republicans would of loved for the progressives to of killed the bill, and is the precise reason why they got a "republican", a "C" House cracker with a "D" after his name to insert the abortion bullshit purposely into the bill at the very last second....However, it passed anyway thanks to Speaker Pelosi....And Reid's Senate bill yesterday appears to be much better, surprisingly, than the House bill...the only ones who won't and didn't for it were the 39 Dems (some for diabolical reasons) and all the slimy republicans (minus 1).

Thanks for your eloquence. Again, exactly as I perceive it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #31
50. come on dude
why not a c house asshole? You do know that there are uncle tom black republicans. How would you like it if people here reffered to them as niXXXXX?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. that's not the point
the point isn't that he supports the bill. the point is that it is not an element of being a black person in the united states, for them to have the same policy position as jackson. it's disgusting, equating racial identity, with a policy position. if some racist white said "if you are for affirmative action, you aren't a white man", it would be equally disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
118. More to the topic: All but one member of the Congressional Black Caucus voted for the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. A despicable comment by Jackson.
When a political vote defines "race" we know the score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. How is jesse profiting from this
It's time we Democrats reject leaders who clearly lead only for their own benefit. Jesse could be the poster child for self-dealing in the name of a movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. Nice slur, Rush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. disgusting but typical
sorry, but political leanings, let alone stance on a policy issue does not define one's race or heritage or make one inauthentic. that is SUCH crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. Joe Lieberman will be so disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCML Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
41. I support health care reform
do i get to be an honorary black man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
121. No, but apparently you do get to make a nonsensical post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
43. Dennis Kucinich = Definitely not black
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllTooEasy Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. are you sure?
:sarcasm:

If Dennis and Michael Steele walked into Harlem, which one do you think would get his ass kicked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. no shit???? you just figured out that Dennis was white?
Perhaps you are blind, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
122. Dennis Kucinich voted against the bill because it is not progressive enough for him. I very much
doubt that had anything to do with Davis's reasons for voting against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffinEd Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
77. So where's the outrage from the CBC?
Oh, here it is:

Other members of the CBC found no fault in Jackson's words. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) was in the audience. He called Jackson's criticism of Davis "accurate," but said he did not hear Jackson say "You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man."

"If it is an issue that disproportionately impacts black folks, race has to be considered," Cleaver said. Jackson, he added, "is expected by his constituency to call balls and strikes."

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called the remarks "vintage Jesse Jackson," but said Davis's vote against healthcare was consistent with a voting record more conservative than many CBC members.

"Artur Davis has a more conservative constituency," Waters said. "Since he's running for governor of Alabama, he reflects an even more conservative constituency."

Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) said each man was doing what he considered the right thing.

"People have a right to vote their constituency, and people have a right to."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From what I read, it appears that Davis is in favor of the Senate HCR bill. And if he truly has his sights on becoming governor of Alabama, then he's going to trend even more conservative in the future. Hell, he might even morph into Mike Steele (now that's a scary thought).

Frankly, I think this whole tempest in a teapot (Jackson's comment) is exactly that - a tempest in a teapot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #77
93. Jackson was talking to his Family that he has known
for more than 25 years.

He had every right to say what he did ~ every right.

I am in no way directing this at you ~ your words are allowing others to hopefully see the dynamics in the Black Community - thanks for posting what Maxine and what Sheila Jackson Lee said... "Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) said each man was doing what he considered the right thing.?


What would people think if he had said, " Black People should NOT vote for the Health Care Bill - it doesn't give enough to Black people, only to White people? --- now that would not be appropriate in any setting.

The man is FOR the bill, isn't that what DU wants to happen -- well most of DU I thought, sometimes I wonder.

I am speaking as an African American woman who has been in the struggle for Justice for over 40 years.

I totally agree with him, knowing the Health Issues that affect our community - perhaps at a higher rate than others -- Diabetes comes to mind ~ "There should not be one Black American that does not support the Health Care Bill."

Until they have walked in the shoes of a Black American, I wish people would leave this issue for BLACK people to decide if Jesse was right or wrong.

Thanks again for your Post





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffinEd Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #93
108. No problem
I'm an African American male, and none of the black people I associate with are the least bit upset over Jackson's comment. Then again, I don't hang out with the likes of Clarence Thomas, Ron Christy, Ward Connerly, or the Steele boys (Shelby and Mike).

Honestly, being in Massachusetts, we're more interested in getting to the bottom of why Bill Belichick decided to go for the first down against the Colts. Now that's something to get your undies in a bunch about.

Just saying. B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #108
114. We are on the same page nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #77
123. Why would there be outrage from the CBC? Unlike many posters here they
understand why Jackson said what he said and therefore understood his comment was not racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
78. We Davis supporters and Alabama voters don't care what Jesse thinks.
:toast: to Artur Davis, the next governor of Alabama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
83. I agree that it's better to keep race out of it, but
I do question where Davis's opposition is coming from. It makes me think he's more concerned about winning higher office in conservative Alabama than representing or looking out for the interests of the constituency of his own district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Rep. Artur Davis is running for governor in Alabama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
104. I think this bill is too conservative and perhaps even unconstitutional. However,
I very much doubt that Davis voted against it for those reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
85. Racists love shit like this
so they can jump on a black man and not any black man, but Jesse Jackson, their favorite guy to hate, it's a two-fer.

The bigot here isn't Jesse Jackson.

So, now that race is no longer the issue, let's talk about content... I disagree with the man, because this Bill is garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #85
91. How is he not a racist?
He believes all people of a certain race are required to act a certain way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #91
95. in spite of what black people have been through historically in this country
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 03:18 PM by fascisthunter
yes, his point is not racist. What wouldn't have been acceptable would be a white person telling a black person what he should or should not say to people of his own race.

I suppose you think Bill Cosby is a racist too since he addresses black Americans about black issues in black communities. You reveal more about yourself in your attempt to paint Jesse Jackson and you don't even realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #95
117. Do you know what racist means?
I will define it for you:
It is a belief that race determines who you are as a person, that all people of a certain race fit a certain mold when it comes to base values, morality, intelligence, and so on.


I don't know if he hates whites or not, but he certainly believes that race should determine how you think. That is racism.

"What wouldn't have been acceptable would be a white person telling a black person what he should or should not say to people of his own race. "

And if a white leader told all white people how they should think if they want to be counted as white? Like for instance, no true white man would ever vote for obama, is that a racist statement?

"I suppose you think Bill Cosby is a racist too since he addresses black Americans about black issues in black communities. You reveal more about yourself in your attempt to paint Jesse Jackson and you don't even realize it."

Bill cosby attacks attitudes found among certain members of the black community, not all blacks and he doesn't believe black people should htink a certain way distinct from everyone else. As far as I can tell he promotes education, hard work and basic decency not because it is a "black thing" but because it is the right thing to do.

Your irrational lashing out and over the top defensiveness (and strawman arguments) reveal a lot more about your personality than I think you really wanted for us to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
88. So he gets to decide who is allowed to be black or not?
I wonder how a white politician saying "you can't be white if you don't agree with me on X" would have been received.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
90. Jesse ceased being relevent about a decade ago -
- now he's just wind and noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
92. uh-oh, it's Angry White People time on DU
Every time Jackson says something, they come out in force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Uh-oh, it's Blame Whitey time on DU
Every time something critical is said about a black man, it must be that Angry White People want to have their time. What a bigoted statement, one of the few that are consistently allowed on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
98. Good thing Jackson never said anything like that. Twist much?
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 04:24 PM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
124. Why does the headline say "votes," when only Davis's vote was involved?
(Sorry, but after reading all the crap on this thread, that is the best I can do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC