Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Semenya to keep gold; gender tests to remain private

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:00 PM
Original message
Semenya to keep gold; gender tests to remain private
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 02:03 PM by Dulcinea
Source: ESPN

JOHANNESBURG -- South African runner Caster Semenya will keep her 800-meter gold medal from the world championships, and the results of her gender tests will be kept confidential, the South African sports ministry said Thursday.

Caster Semenya of South Africa will get to keep her world championships gold medal and prize money, and her gender tests will remain sealed.
The ministry also said in a statement that the International Association of Athletics Federations has agreed to allow the 18-year-old Semenya to keep her prize money.

"Whatever scientific tests were conducted legally within the IAAF regulations will be treated as a confidential matter between patient and doctor," the sports ministry said. "As such there will be no public announcement of what the panel of scientists has found. We urge all South Africans and other people to respect this professional ethical and moral way of doing things."

On Wednesday, the IAAF said the gender tests performed on Semenya had not yet been completed. The body had been expected to announce its findings Friday.


Read more: http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/trackandfield/news/story?id=4669920



This poor girl (and I will call her a girl until I hear otherwise.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I feel very sorry for her as well..
But this seems to have muddied all policy for the future--will they allow her to compete in future contests? What, now is the policy for other athletes? The whole way in which this has been handled has been abysmal. I wish this woman well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't the world already know "she" is a man with internal testes?
The test results were public shortly after they were done - months ago.

It is unfair to the other competitors in the sport to have to compete against a man, descended testes or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Brilliant deduction....
If you had vestigal ovaries in you then you are not a man. Despite the obvious DICK...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If you're producing testosterone at an abnormally high rate for a woman
due to said testes then there is a competitive issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Delete, wrong spot
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 02:32 PM by WriteDown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Define abnormally. The hormone levels are on a continuum, you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Outside the accepted range for a woman? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. You need a number. "accepted range" does not work. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. 15 to 70 ng./dl. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
60. Good. Now you just need to tell all women outside this range that they can't compete. Or,
use handicaps as in horse racing. That'll work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. I'm fairly certain if they're outside the range than steroid tests
are usually the next logical step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Caster Semenya's testes are not vestigial - they are undescended
They produce testosterone like any other male's testes, giving Semenya an unfair advantage in competition against women.

Asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yes, those are the facts, folks.
Unfortunate as that may be for Caster, her high leveles of testosterone mean that her body also has a different bone density, fat distribution and muscle mass that makes it virtually impossible for women to compete against her. The only way to even begin to level the playing field in this instance would be to allow the other women competitors to use male hormone supplements and steroids. Whether or not she identifies as a female doesn't negate her biology. I remember when I first saw her photograph my immediate thought was that she was not, biologically speaking, female. So the results of her tests did not come as a surprise to me.

This really is a tragic situation but you can't be unfair to all women athletes to accomodate Caster's plight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Just suck it up. She keeps the gold. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
57. Undescended testes, that are not corrected surgically can become cancerous
or so we were told when our son had to have surgery for one being undescended.. The doctor was head of pediatric urology at Mayo Clinic, so we trusted his diagnosis..

I wonder why the sports world just does not test for testosterone, and have people compete based on that level..male or female
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. So basically they're admitting he's a man.
This brings up a lot of issues. He should be able to keep his previous medals if he did not know this, but probably should be prohibited from future events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. she.
She grew up as a female, her family and community relate to her as a female and she's never identified her gender as male. Why are you calling her a he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Biologically he is a male....
Unless he also has functioning ovaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. From what I understand
She looks female on the outside.
Meaning she has both female and male genitalia.
So is it the testes that make her a man?
do testes trump vagina? I'm confused.
She identifies as a female, that's what makes her female.
It's just basic respect for others, it's not difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Her functioning sexual organs are male...
If her female organs are also functioning than that is another issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Threedifferentones Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
59. Functioning?
They produce semen? You're sure she has a functioning prostate too? Testosterone obviously gives her an overwhelming advantage against other women, her sex organs are obviously not fully "functioning," and since SHE is biologically neither male nor female you should HER as SHE wishes.

I really don't feel too bad for the women who have finished second to her, I'd rather have normal sex organs than win a gold, personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. says who?
She looks female on the outside.

Wasn't that she DIDN'T look female on the outside the issue that started all of this uproar in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It's hard to remember; the goalposts were moving all over the place on this one. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. By outside I meant
no penis.

otherwise, they wouldn't have had to do testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. so, post-menopausal women and women who cannot conceive are not female?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Explain?
Even if ovaries are removed a woman will still be XX. Gene therapy may one day change that, but currently genetic testing can be used to identify gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. first, that's not the arguement you made.
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 04:23 PM by galledgoblin
second, not everyone is XX or XY.

third, I can't believe I'm having this discussion on DU of all places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. My initial post was based on if someone had functioning
sexual organs. Either or. If there is neither then we have to go to the genetics. Certain chromosomal combinations are either considered mailed r female. -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. God almighty, it must be nice to live in a world with no shades of gray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Genetics doesn't offer much in that area.
Mosoacism maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Science says you're wrong.
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 07:19 PM by sudopod
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=gender+intersex&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

To simple-mindedly insist that the presence of a requisite number of sex chromosomes is the only determining factor in gender assignment is, at best, ridiculously outdated, and went out about the time they took homosexuality out of the DSM.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. The links you cite make my point....
Their is biological gender and then "cultural" gender which is subject to shifts. Biological gender trumps cultural in sports though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. No, they don't.
Gender is a spectrum, to which we assign people as "male" or "female" on the basis of cultural norms. There is no hard and fast system though, whether it's counting chromosomes or vaginas. Hell, the only paper in that list (which was kind of a subtle test to see if you were paying attention) that had much readable text mentions in its abstract that there can be a difference in hormonal and chromosomal gender. Which is it big guy? Are both of those trumped by the presence (or lack thereof) of external genitalia? Things aren't that goddamned easy, else there wouldn't have been a controversy, but you don't recognize that because it doesn't fit into your little patchwork of prejudices.

People who think like you are a big chunk of what's wrong with this country. You think every problem has a simple solution, but that just isn't true. That lie is what got people like Reagan and Bush elected, and almost put the levers of power in the hands of Sarah Palin.

Simple solutions for simple minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. No, gender is a pair of chromosomes...
Sometimes a triplet or quadruplet in rare circumstances.

Question, a woman is murdered and DNA is found under her finger nails. It is male DNA. Do we start gathering female suspects?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. No, it isn't
No matter how many times you repeat yourself it won't make it true. That's the consensus of the medical and scientific communities, though what do they know, they're a bunch of "elitsts" after all, what with their fancy college edukashuns.

Read a fucking book, Mr. Savage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You're repeating yourself enough
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 07:50 PM by sudopod
thank you very much.

Does anyone really think WriteDown is here for any reason other than to disrupt?

Alert on me if you like, I'm fucking sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Why would anyone alert?
You are correct in your assessment. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. yeah, I'm with you
I'm through reading this shit from them. The trolling on other topics, often coupled with misspellings and child-like grammatical mistakes, by that poster can be funny, but the shit I've seen in this thread is just fucking mean, and purposefully obtuse. It may well be "ignore" time - if only we could have a mass "ignore" campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
67. If you say so...
I'm not much of one for grammatical mistakes or spelling errors, but if you'd like to point out some posts. Mind you, one hand doesn't work very well so typing is not the easiest activity for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. "boo-hoo"
I'm done. Troll someone (and ideally, somewhere) else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I'm not crying...
My wrist reconstruction was years ago, but it does not lend itself to flexibility. Still better than it was before the repair though. Cheers. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. I agree with you.
Edited on Fri Nov-20-09 01:52 PM by BreweryYardRat
"Does anyone really think WriteDown is here for any reason other than to disrupt?"

But this is why we have the "ignore" function. I also got sick of his (its?) attitude and slammed the ignore button a while ago. If the mods think he's (it's?) enough of a nuisance, they'll tombstone him. Put him (it?) on ignore and deservedly forget all about the nasty little troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. Still can't reconcile your own info you've provided..
Once again there is scientific gender and there is gender identity. Two very different concepts. Let me ask you a question. Should he/she be able to continue competing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. wrong
but currently genetic testing can be used to identify gender.

what about Androgen insensitivity syndrome?
would you call women with AIS, men because although they look, feel and act female their chromosomes are XY?

Your ignorance on this subject is really mind blowing.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Yes...
They are technically still male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. If you found out that your sister had AIS
or anyone else that you knew, would you then refer to her as a he?
to her face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I would probably call him by his name.
We're talking about scientific gender here. If you want to be called something else, that is fine, but we're discussing scientific distinguishments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. okay, you're kidding right?
"him by his name"

You'd introduce her as "This is my brother, Jennifer and his husband Kevin."

wow, you really are hopeless.

And no, we are not talking "scientifically", we are talking about a person.
Scientifically, in a clinical sense we'd talk about her as a person as a her and her condition as being one of intersexuality.

In other words, if a person with AIS talked to their geneticist they wouldn't be referred to as the gender that they didn't identify with, they'd be referred to as a woman who has AIS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I couldn't just say...
This is Jen? You do know there is such a thing as scientific gender right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Because there isn't. :/ nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. There isn't?
So you're fine with Lebron James playing in the WNBA? Should be a dominant year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. please
suddenly turning this debate from you calling this girl a he into a discussion about scientific gender is transparent.
The issue is gender identity.
Don't transfer your ignorance onto me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. If that were the issue....
than his/her eligibility to compete would not be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. She has no womb nor ovaries
But since she has testes (though undescended) her testosterone levels were measured at three times those found to be within the normal range for women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
55. Look, if you want to talk about gender identity and competitive sports...
Edited on Thu Nov-19-09 07:49 PM by theHandpuppet
... fine and dandy. This is a really tough issue but I agree that Casper should not be competing in what are traditionally women's events.

HOWEVER, if you're insisting on calling Casper "he" when she is female identified, then you're doing so just to be a jerk. You're coming off as maddeningly obtuse or deliberately offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
69. Honestly, it was neither...
I was just referring to her/his scientific gender. Obviously, in public a person can choose whichever pronoun they like. Although it can sometimes lead to confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. THIS. SO #$@&ING MUCH, THIS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Is there no end to your fail? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Ouch...
Hard to argue with your solid logic and expansive points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. Before accusing others of not using logic
try using it your self. It's not logical to genetically test every single person to determine their gender, gender is determined by first, society and then later the individual. That's true for everyone.
So why should Caster's gender identity be determined by the test over how she identifies herself?

you can also try being human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. You have it the opposite way around....
Genetics like mathematics is the ultimate truth. Let's say Phil Mickelson decided he wanted to be identified as a woman, should he then be able to compete in the LPGA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Is anyone arguing that she should be allowed to compete?
And if Phil Mickelson decided that he's a woman than hell yes, I'd call her a she.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
64. That is an excellent question...
From the article

""However, the question of whether she remains eligible to compete as a woman remained uncertain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Keep the tests private....after everyone knows the results?
The IAAF lives in a dreamworld......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
34. there are so many sexual fuckups naturally.
XXY, XXYY. then you have the XXX. IF she has a XX and a Y. she is still female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
61. will she be able to compete in the olympics in 2012...?
Edited on Fri Nov-20-09 01:30 PM by dysfunctional press
"However, the question of whether she remains eligible to compete as a woman remained uncertain."

if she's allowed to continue competing as a woman- she's going to get a lot of wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
62. Sad that the world's obsession with entertainment (and yes, sports are entertainment)
has made this into such a big deal. The amount of time, money, and energy that is going into this dispute boggles the mind. We are facing collapse of entire ecosystems and economies, and personal tragedies on an apocalyptic scale, and people fuss over the genital abnormalities of one person in a Third World country.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. That is actually an excellent point....
There are a lot of big topics on the world stage these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC