Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Counsel Craig to end embattled tenure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:31 PM
Original message
White House Counsel Craig to end embattled tenure
Source: Washington Post

White House Counsel Gregory B. Craig is expected to announce his departure as early as Friday, people familiar with the situation said, ending an embattled tenure in which he struggled to lead the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

Craig will be replaced by Bob Bauer, a prominent Democratic lawyer who is Obama's personal attorney.

The shakeup has been long-awaited, coming after months of dissatisfaction over Craig's management of Guantanamo policy. It represents the most high-level White House departure to date -- as well as the most concrete expression of how badly the administration's detainee policy has gone off-course.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/12/AR2009111211348.html



Top White House Lawyer Pushed Out
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/12/top-white-house-lawyer-pushed-out/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_politicalticker+%28Blog%3A+Political+Ticker%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll leave it to Mr. Obama's newly appointed attorney to interpret how Mr. Obama's
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 11:44 PM by BunkerHill24
feelings about torture. Maybe now there will be of no misunderstanding of how Mr. Obama himself feels about torture, or Gitmo-bay torture, as a whole, without further due blame from anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. maybe as a coincidence, all the leaks to the press will stop now
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 11:57 PM by tomm2thumbs
just a coincidence of course. nothing being implied there.


updated: wanted to note that 'leaks to the press' refers to leaks against the WH, not leaks from Craig. Wanted that to be clear.

I think he was a marked man. He drafted executive orders banning torture and ordering the Guantánamo prison closed within a year. Over the objections of the Central Intelligence Agency, he recommended the release of Justice Department memorandums describing harsh interrogation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He did his job...
Let's thank him for his service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's what concerns me.
He seems to be working (or worked) on behalf of the right thing to do - stopping torture and closing the prison. What's going to happen now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katkat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. this certainly looks bad for Obama
and apparently Rahm's fingers were in this pie.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/us/politics/13craig.html?_r=1&hp

You don't usually have the spouse leaving as well when things are amicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Craig's wife is not the one stepping down. Bauer's wife is. Bauer is replacing Craig.
Still, that is an odd combination of events. Maybe they did not want two spouses on the White House payroll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama needs a new personal attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He's got several including
Valerie Jarrette and his wife. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maglatinavi Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Valerie's wife???
Hmm! ... Any way, just one more matter to make me incredulous about Obama... Sigh!!!
:cry: :cry: :cry: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. I think BumRushDaShow meant Obama's wife, who is a lawyer.
Michelle will not be available for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Fine, but she needs to get out of the Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs stuff.
Valerie Bowman Jarrett (born November 14, 1956) is a senior advisor and assistant to the president for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs for the Obama administration. (Wikipedia)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. There's another side to this
Mr Craig was apparently asshole buddies with Karl Rove and may have been up to his elbows in the Don Siegelman mess - on the bad side.

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/03/05/dana-jill-simpson-and-greg-craig/

Far as I'm concerned he was allowed to pollute the White House way too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Officials: Top White House lawyer to be pushed out
Source: CNN.com

Tokyo, Japan (CNN) -- In the first major shakeup among President Obama's senior staff, White House Counsel Greg Craig is being pushed out in favor of veteran Democratic lawyer Bob Bauer because of a dispute over plans to close the U.S. military prison in Cuba, CNN has learned.

Democratic officials said Craig was ousted because of frustration among senior White House aides over his handling of the plans to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. As the White House's top lawyer, Craig was pivotal in advising Obama to sign an executive order during his first week in office promising to shut the prison by the end of January 2010.

In a politically embarrassing move that has frustrated some of the president's liberal supporters, White House aides have since backed off that deadline, citing complex legal issues surrounding what to do with the approximately 200 terror suspects still detained at Guantanamo.

Craig was one of the lawyers defending then-President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. He became an early and active supporter of Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries, angering backers of then-Sen. Hillary Clinton. That is one of the reasons why allies of Craig are frustrated he is being replaced so early in the administration.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/13/obama.staff.shakeup/index.html



Is this implying that Obama's aids will decide to keep Guantanamo open?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's Not a Good Sign
Those who live with Guantanamo, will die with Guantanamo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It may not be all that bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Craig was thick with Rove
Is that true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. so it appears
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Do you know more?
My understanding was that he wasn't doing a good job shutting down Guantanamo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. unfortunately, that seems to be the most likely interpretation
but considering that this is from backroom crosstalk, I am not sure if it is the correct interpretation.,

I certainly hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. No, apparently he wasn't working fast enough to shut it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amerstates Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Sacrificial lamb for a stupid statement about closing gitmo in a year.
There are real criminals in Gitmo; find 'em and let the others go. But GOD DAMN not another one you let go better get caught again on the battlefield killing Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Well now, that's an interesting requirement to put on it, amerstates. So, those "real"
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 10:36 AM by bertman
criminals (however you define them) will be incarcerated somewhere else, but we will release the others who have been kept locked up like animals in cages, tortured physically and mentally, and imprisoned for YEARS--many after being abducted. Those individuals will be SO GRATEFUL that they have been released that they will NEVER have anything to do with fighting the kind Americans who let them out of Gitmo.

Amazing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. My understanding was that he wasn't doing enough to get it
closed down. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. What Rahm wants...
...Rahm gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Read the article linked to by Mac56 above. I refreshed my memory about this article
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 11:18 AM by peacetalksforall
which had faded from memory. This dismissal could be as much about other issues as it is about what is implied here - Guantanamo.

I kinda hope it's about Siegelman as much as people think it's about Gitmo. After reading the article again, I say good riddance. Shouldn't have been hired in the first place. Not knowing more, he seems someone that you would not want on the inside.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Why would Craig be fired for something that was known when Obama hired him?
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 11:39 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm not sure. The article was written March 2009. Did Obama know all that?
The Siegelman case may not be getting the support it deserves because Craig is/was an insider? At the same time, it's not going away - helped by his perseverance and the transcript that was released and other things that are coming out.

If he knew that there was a Craig-Rove communications link - he was a fool to hire him.

But, what does that say about some others - like the ones handling (supposedly) the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Gitmo or Rove/Seigelman/Dana Jill Simpson ethics charges
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 12:02 PM by chill_wind
or some mixture of both?

Gitmo?

Rahm’s Greg Craig Campaign
By: emptywheel Wednesday October 21, 2009 9:33 pm

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/10/21/rahms-greg-craig-campaign/


Rove/Seigelman?

http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/3263/white-house-should-craig/


or who knows why, and we may never.


http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/08/03/greg-craig-in-trouble-but-for-what/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC