Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Wasserman Schultz: Republicans Are Giving Women A ‘Back Of The Hand Treatment’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:33 PM
Original message
Rep. Wasserman Schultz: Republicans Are Giving Women A ‘Back Of The Hand Treatment’
Source: Think Progress

Rep. Wasserman Schultz: Republicans Are Giving Women A ‘Back Of The Hand Treatment’

This morning, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) participated on a conference call with the Center for American Progress Action Fund’s Judy Feder to discuss Republican efforts to shut out women’s issues in the health reform debate. Feder noted that in 2006, nine Senate Republicans voted to explicitly kill a proposal that would have ensured that insurance companies cannot use domestic violence as a pretext for denying coverage to women. The two went on to discuss how, as the House vote drew near, Republican lawmakers’ disregard for the interests of women became more apparent.

In the House Rules Committee the Friday before the vote, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), who is also the chief recruiter for Republican House campaigns in 2010, justified the practice of insurance companies discriminating against women by comparing gender differences to smokers and non-smokers. The next day — on Saturday morning — Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) and several of his GOP colleagues shouted down congresswomen making 1-minute speeches on the importance of health reform for women. Wasserman Schultz denounced the interruption tactics and Sessions’ comparison of women to smokers as the “Republicans’ back of the hand treatment to women”:

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: I’m pleased to have an opportunity to express and underscore my concerns of essentially what amounts to the Republicans’ back of the hand treatment to women, issues that are important to women, particularly women’s health. We already have had a clear sense that Republicans were opposed to our efforts to advance women’s health interests. Now we know we know they’re opposed to letting women voice opinions on health care as well. <...> My colleague Pete Sessions actually compared women to smokers and suggested women, like smokers, have to pay more for insurance just by the accident of our ability to get pregnant.

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/09/pregnant-women-smokers-comparison/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw you Pete Sessions....
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 05:00 PM by BrklynLiberal
and how friggin' stupid does a woman have to be, to be a repuke???!!!! They are like abused wives....think they deserve bad treatment, keep coming back for more, and do not have the emotional strength to break away. Talk about sockpuppets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. and about 25% of the Democratic members of the House.
She should concentrate on her own caucus first IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pardon us for noticing, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, but you then turned around and voted for this bill.
Somehow, it seems that when certain Democrats have the historic opportunity to stand up for the rights of women, sadly, they cave when it counts the most.


It seems, once again, that Debbie Wasserman Schultz talks a good game, but is too frightened to follow through.


Who is standing up for the rights of women in this country? Not Debbie Wasserman Schultz. But, then, she pooh-poohed impeachment hearings for Bush-Cheney as well.


We're sick of talk.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. +10
Clean your own house first Debbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. The bill or the Stupak amendment? Please advise...thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. She voted Nay to Stupak, but YEA to the main bill that contains Stupak. Not good enough, Debbie.
She voted against the Stupak Amendment, then voted AYE on the main bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, which contains the Stupak Amendment.



They just cannot have this both ways. There is no way in HELL that women's rights should be bargained away *just to pass this bill*. This is unforgivable. But, then, Ms. Wasserman Schultz has never had the mettle to stand up when it really counted. So, she is voting true to form.


Links to both House votes are in this thread.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, Debbie, it's not just repukes.
About 40 Dems threw women under the bus, too.

Although none approached the exquisite idiocy of Sessions with that "smokers" remark. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R.....
The fact that this asshole then turned around and voted for this bill should tell us all something about the bill.
Republicans are all about controling women and women's sexuality. Always have been..always will be.
Now days a lot of dems are doing the same dang thing.
How smart is it to piss off over half of the population? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. add the House Health bill to that statement and I will agree!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. GOP = Grand Old Patriarchy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. So are the Dems.
I could deal with "no PO money for abortions, with exceptions of rape, incest, life/health of mother, and severe fetal distress." I wouldn't like it, but I'd be willing to suck it up for the "greater good" of having a PO. But the Stupak Amendment goes TOO FAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good on you Rep. Wasserman Schultz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bajamary Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Vichy Dems didn't approve contraception
Dear President Obama,

Why are you against an American woman having birth control paid for in your so-called "health reform" bill?

Why did you ask the Democrats way back in January to have contraception taken out of any health reform bill?

What does your wife think of that or is it okay with Michele as well?

What a friggin' disaster.

This is NOT health REFORM.

This is non reform health care bill is actually several steps BACKWARD for We The People. And it's a huge financial windfall for your buddies in the health industry.

I deeply regret every hour I worked to get you elected by going door-to-door in MI, IN and WI for nearly four months.

I will never again support, vote for, or work for, either you or your Vichy Democrats (aka Corporate Democrats).

Shame of all of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. I know it's a very serious and troubling subject, but you Americans have a hilarious way with
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 04:37 PM by Joe Chi Minh
words and metaphors. I'd thought it was only the males! It could hardly be more apt for the context, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yet it takes two to tango
"Pete Sessions actually compared women to smokers and suggested women, like smokers, have to pay more for insurance just by the accident of our ability to get pregnant."

And Viagra is touted and under some insurance programs, paid for.

But it's the womans fault, don't ya know, even though men want to fuck like bunnies til the cows come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC