Judge OKs Challenge to Human-Gene Patents

[Xipe Totec]

Source: Wired

A federal judge ruled Monday that a lawsuit can move forward against the Patent and Trademark Office and the research company that was awarded exclusive rights to human genes known to detect early signs of breast and ovarian cancer.

The first-of-its-kind lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Public Patent Foundation at the Benjamin Cardozo School of Law claims that the patents violate free speech by restricting research.

U.S. District Judge Robert W. Sweet of New York, in ruling that the case may proceed to trial, noted that the litigation might open the door to challenges of a host of other patented genes. About one-fifth of the human genome is covered under patent applications and claims.

Sweet wrote:

The challenges to the patents-in-suit raise questions of difficult legal dimensions concerning constitutional protections over the information that serves as our genetic identities and the need to adopt policies that promote scientific innovation and biomedical research. The widespread use of gene sequence information as the foundation for biomedical research means that resolution of these issues will have far-reaching implications, not only for gene-based health care and the health of millions of women facing the specter of breast cancer, but also for the future course of biomedical research.


Read more: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/11/genes

[ixion]

1. naturally-occurring things should not be patentable

IMO.

[Juan_de_la_Dem]

3. I agree

[Javaman]

4. Considering that it clearly states in the US Constitution that no living thing

will not be patented, I think we should, you know, respect that. but apparently the reagan administration was perfectly okay with issuing patents on biological organisms.

Which gave rise to GMO's. But I digress.

[Xipe Totec]

7. I'm thinking of patenting the table of elements

maybe not the entire table, just hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen.

You guys better stop making compounds with my patented elements.

[earcandle]

2. Would a federal consumer protection agency normally weigh in on these decision? We have no one

funded in that post at the moment. How convenient. 

[Peace Patriot]

5. I mean really. Have we gone over the edge with corporatism, or what? nt

[Blue State Blues]

6. agreed, they didn't create the gene, they read it

it would be like me getting a patent on DU, because I read it.