Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Malpractice Cases Spike ... for Pets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 04:46 PM
Original message
Malpractice Cases Spike ... for Pets
LOS ANGELES, July 29 — When attorney Robert Newman lectures at veterinarians' conventions, he brings along his chihuahua, Ruben.

Newman begins his talk by telling the audience that he paid $23 for Ruben at an animal shelter. Then the little dog trots on stage. Ruben sits, speaks, plays dead, rolls over, gives Newman a high-five.

"Then I pick him up and I ask, 'How many of you believe that if I bring Ruben to you and you do something wrong that results in his death and you give me $23, that you've made me whole? Raise your hands,' " says Newman.

But there's always silence and no one raises their hands, says the attorney. "They know that a fair-market value approach to a companion animal is a joke, an insult."

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/Business/CSM_fido_030729.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. A friend of mine had a dog
that had gotten sick, and she took it to the vet.

vet said it had a lower-intestine blockage, did the surgery, and charged her $700.

2 weeks later the dog was sick. So the vet says "oh well the whole blockage isn't out" and charged her another $700.

Meanwhile, while inside the dog, the dr said they'd found a tumor, removed it, and charged her $1000 for the surgery. When my friend found out that not only did they NOT notify her of the tumor, they didn't ask her if she wanted it removed from the dog. There was no indication it was cancerous or the source of her problems.

She asked for the tumour so that she could get it biopsied by another vet, and the vet said "oh we threw it out".

So my friend took her dog to another vet who said he could see absolutely no evidence that there was ever a tumour inside the dog that was removed (i.e. no scar tissue, etc), and that there never was any intestial surgery done because there were no stiches on the intestine.

The Doctor charged her $2400 to cut the dog open and sew it back up. The second vet said that the state the stiches were in looked as if the dog wasn't even opened up the second time because of the amount of healing that had taken place.

Friend tried to sue the Dr, but was unsuccessful because of the terribly lacking 'malpractice' laws for vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francis Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That sounds like fraud n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC