Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schwarzenegger vetoes bill restricting insurers' ability to cancel policies of sick patients

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 01:59 PM
Original message
Schwarzenegger vetoes bill restricting insurers' ability to cancel policies of sick patients
Source: Los Angeles Timese

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a measure that would have restricted the ability of insurance companies to cancel the policies of sick patients and signed into law a bill honoring Harvey Milk as he rushed to act on 704 bills before their midnight signing deadline Sunday.

The governor vetoed 229 of the bills, but did not carry through on his threat to reject hundreds more as punishment for legislative leaders' failure to reach a bipartisan deal on upgrading the state's water system. Schwarzenegger said sufficient progress had been made in the water talks to move the bills off his desk.

The health insurance bill, AB 2 by Assemblyman Hector De La Torre (D-South Gate), addressed a practice known as rescission, a practice The Times has reported extensively about. It can involve insurance companies removing patients with serious, costly illnesses from their rolls retroactively.


Congressional investigators uncovered cases in which insurance officials were rewarded by their companies for finding excuses -- such as a form being filled out incompletely during enrollment -- to take policies away from some of the sickest patients.

Schwarzenegger said he supports protecting such patients but state regulators have implemented reforms that are doing so, significantly decreasing the number of rescissions since 2005.

"The market has changed -- and it is because of my Administration’s strong action in this area," he wrote in his veto message. He also criticized provisions of the bill that he said benefited "trial lawyers rather than consumers."

Other bills he rejected included bids to force any extension of the 710 Freeway to be done underground, ban pay hikes for top administrators at public universities in bad budget years and tighten oversight on fertility clinics.



Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/10/schwarzenegger-bill.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never get that argument
I won't sign that bill because some new regulations will partway do what the bill would.

And the problem with making sure it's all done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. it's not an argument, it's an excuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. His argument is a shallow excuse.
He knows damned well that there are no real protections out there. The supposed protections he is talking about still have huge loopholes in them. A lot of people are still vulnerable. He is a republican, and he is beholden to the Insurance Industry, so he is protecting them, not California citizens, but he can't come out and say that so he has to come up with some kind of excuse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. That will end up being one of the biggest blavkmarks on his "legacy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. CA needs to quit electing movie stars and start electing the best people for the job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. That Would be Great
Only one problem, it seems that not enough Califonians have two brain cells to rub together, much less recognize a qualified candidate for the office of Governor.

We're talking about the state that gave the job to Reagan, Wilson , and the Terminator!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The state is so huge that it should be split up, either north-south (which won't
happen because the south wants our water), or coast (blue) and valley (red). The huge factor means you can't elect someone who can't afford to buy lots of TV ad time. So we don't get Howard Dean who can go talk to everyone in every little town in Vermont, we get Ahnold who can get lots of money from scumbag utility companies and other corporate bribes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Celebrity Addiction
This addiction to celebrity is killing this country. We judge people not on their ability, but on their looks, speechmaking skills, and sadly sex appeal and celebrity endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Schwarzenegger makes me sick...
And I see he is intent on keeping a lot of people sick.

That's what happens when a cartoon character is put in charge... I'm sick of this stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. He knows CA won't elect him again.
So he figures he's got nothing to lose except lobbyists' money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. they lobbyists' money?
how about OUR money? now is the time to be afraid, very afraid of what he can do. he has nothing to lose at this point and another year to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL RECALL
Schwarzenegger is an ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck Schwarzenegger is a slimy fucking corporate republican, what would one expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bet they're really happy they went to all the trouble of replacing Davis with this joker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yehonala Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. I must be strange but...
Isn't the point of insurance to pay for the sick? Isn't that why we buy it in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. What a lame excuse.
I seem to recall more than a few articles about rescissions in California recently so whatever reforms he is tallking about are not doing the job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lame duck POS. Who knew something could be worse than his ham acting?
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 07:47 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bought and Paid For
A made man. A soulless man. A flabby, disgusting man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. A health care "girly man"!!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC