Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arizona moves to allow concealed guns in bars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:29 PM
Original message
Arizona moves to allow concealed guns in bars
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090628/ap_on_re_us/us_guns_in_bars

PHOENIX – There was a time in the Wild West that cowboys had to check their guns before they could pull up a bar stool for a drink — rules that protected against the saloon gunfights that came to define the frontier era in places like Arizona.

But a bill moving through the Arizona Legislature has some bar owners fearful that the state is turning back the clock to the Old West. Lawmakers are considering a bill that would allow anyone with a concealed-weapons permit to bring a handgun into bars and restaurants serving alcohol.

The bill gives bars discretion to keep gun-toting patrons out, and anyone with a weapon would not be allowed to drink. But the bill has angered bar owners who believe booze and guns are a recipe for disaster.

"This might be one of the stupidest things that I have heard of," said Mike Nelson, who owns Pomeroy's bar in Phoenix and plans to post a sign on his front door outlawing guns in his bar as soon as possible. "Can you think of a single reason guns and alcohol should be intertwined?"

The bill is part of a nationwide push by the National Rifle Association. Georgia passed a similar law in 2008, as did Tennessee earlier this year in becoming the 40th state to allow bar or restaurant patrons to carry guns.

"These laws are common sense," said NRA spokeswoman Rachel Parsons. "Restaurants are not immune to criminal activity. Law-abiding people — regardless of whether they're in restaurants, cars or homes — they should be able to protect themselves against criminal attack."

One of the bill's sponsors, Republican Rep. John Kavanagh, said it's about time Arizona passes such a law, and that the most important thing is that people carrying guns into bars aren't allowed to drink.

"You don't want intoxicated people with weapons, and this bill continues the prohibition against drinking and carrying," said Kavanagh, a retired police officer in New York and New Jersey. "What is the problem with having a gun in a delicatessen where someone is having a beer with their pastrami two tables away?"

The law would only apply to people with concealed-weapons permits because lawmakers say that type of gun owner has to pass a background check and take an eight-hour course to get their permits, and are therefore safer. More than 127,000 Arizonans have concealed-weapons permits, according to the Arizona Department of Public Safety.

Arizonans are also allowed to openly carry guns — on a belt or holster, for example. But those people would still not be allowed in bars or restaurants serving alcohol if they're armed.

The bill has been approved by the Senate and is now before the House; Republican Gov. Jan Brewer would still have to OK it.

Marc Peagler, owner of the Silver Spur Saloon Restaurant in Cave Creek outside Phoenix, said he's in favor of the legislation and sees some marketing potential in it.

"I look at it this way — let's just say for a moment you're a crook or a thief," Peagler said. "Are you going to break into a place where you know that there might be 10 to 15 people who are armed? I wouldn't do that."

Peagler, a gun owner himself, said people with concealed-weapons permits aren't people to be concerned about.

"People who carry concealed weapons for the most part are your general law-abiding citizens, and the people who are going to break the law are going to do it no matter what laws we have out there," he said. "If somebody has been drinking and they have a weapon in the car, they're just going to go out and get it."

Frank Murray, owner of Seamus McCaffrey's Irish Pub & Restaurant in downtown Phoenix, said he opposes the law and will prohibit his customers from coming in armed.

"It's kind of like the Wild West days," he said. "We've got enough nuts out on the street walking around with guns. We don't need them in places with alcohol and families."


Read more: Associated Press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. how moronic.
So if a person is carrying a concealed gun, how is the bar going to know he doesn't have a gun, and refuse therefore to serve him drinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great idea! What could possibly go wrong?
Kinda Sleazy Rice can start a career as PR rep for shot-up bars with her trademark phrase, "Nobody could have foreseen that this could have happened."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. they're trying to destabilize American society, they want duels back
again. It's what they're aiming for, have the
"little guys" too busy killing each other & the judges be their family members......Add opt out into this bill, sneak it in, secret hold it whatever it takes-why have the so-called Dems not already DONE this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #53
85. I want them back, too.
There were half as many aggressive assholes back in those days, thanks to dueling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. thinning the herd- always a good thing.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. God's solution to overpopulation.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am in favor of it because
it will likely reduce the number of fist fights in bars. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Not to mention the amount of repeat bar business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
80. And people fighting with broken beer bottles...
which, lets face it, can cause some nasty scars later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. We should be able to witness the Law of Unintended (but not unforeseen) Consequences in action. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Guns and booze! What could possibly go wrong?
:beer: :shrug: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
73. Sheriff: Drunk woman tried to kill boyfriend in N. Arizona
HACKBERRY, AZ – A Northern Arizona woman has been charged with attempted murder after she allegedly shot her boyfriend multiple times nine days ago.

According to a Mohave County Sheriff's Office press release, Mia Marie Robb, 41, got into an argument with her boyfriend on June 21st, and shot him several times at their home about 25 miles northeast of Kingman.

Robb drove her boyfriend, 47-year-old Kurt Allen Sanders, to Kingman Regional Medical Center to be treated for his gunshot wounds. Sanders, who at the time was listed in serious condition, was airlifted from the hospital to Sunrise Medical Center in Las Vegas, according to the press release ...

According to the release, "An analysis of Robb's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was determined to be 1.70 percent" ...

http://www.abc15.com/content/news/northernarizona/havasu/story/Sheriff-Drunk-woman-tried-to-kill-boyfriend-in-N/zYHpM1Ih4Ui8Elr7-ds-Ag.cspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Did I miss it?
Was this woman a CHL holder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #75
77. Well, if you're supposing that..
.. this rule (which applies to CHL holders) is bad, then I'd think that seeing whether CHL holders are likely to be involved in these kinds of incidents is relevant.

If they are likely to follow the rules (which stats show they are) what makes you think they won't follow the rules about not drinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #77
82. The fact that one must be licensed to drive a car, and that the law prohibits DUI, does not prevent
licensed drivers from driving intoxicated. Having the license, obviously, is no guarantee

People routinely underestimate their ability to perform with alcohol in their systems, and in consequence they routinely ignore safety rules associated with the use of alcohol. There is no reason to expect gun permit holders to differ from the general population in this regard. There are no good statistics on this subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #82
83. There are good stats on..
.. how often CHL holders are charged with possession while intoxicated (or drinking at all in some states), how often they're charged with DUIs, how often they're charged with assault, etc..

As a group, they're less likely to be involved in violent and non-violent crime than even law enforcement officers. Does it happen? Sure.. but less often than the general public at the least.

It boils down to the fact (backed up by stats in some states) that CHL holders tend to obey the law now. If the law about where they can go is changed, but the prohibition on consuming alcohol is left in place, chances are, these folks will abide by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I stopped patronizing one local AZ restaurant/bar
because some of the other patrons got likkered up and belligerent. At least one of them bragged about keeping a gun in his truck in the parking lot. After he threatened me with bodily harm, I vowed never to set foot in the place again. And I haven't.

The passage of this law pretty much guarantees that I will never set foot in any Arizona restaurant that serves liquor again.


TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. This should be a boon for the restaurant/bar business in Arizona.
I'd feel much safer with a bar full of strangers, drinking, packing heat. Just hope no loud popping noises happen near closing time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. It is a very sorry state that so many Americans are so terrified of life in America.
"Home of the Brave" What a joke..Americans are scared shitless of going to the store......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. CCW Permit Holder Stops Mass Murder In Progress (In a bar)
Three Men Killed in Winnemucca Shooting on Sunday

Deputies with the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office are investigating a shooting in Winnemucca early Sunday morning that left three people dead and others injured.

The shooting happened at the Player's Bar & Grill on South Grass Valley Road.

Investigators say a feud between two local families is behind the early-morning shooting inside the bar. Three men from Winnemucca died from gunshot wounds, and two others are in critical condition at the hospital.

Deputies say about 2:25 a.m., 30-year-old Ernesto Villa Gomez walked into the bar and starting shooting. 20-year-old Jose Torres and his 19-year-old brother Margarito Torres were killed. When Villa Gomez was reloading his semi-automatic gun, a man from Reno took out a gun and shot Villa Gomez. That man has a concealed weapons permit.

http://www.ktvn.com/Global/story.asp?S=8378732


Just to counter the sky is falling posts.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheModernTerrorist Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. so...
the answer is more guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. 41 states have similar laws. No widespread problems. Permit holders don't seem to be the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. You don't get it
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 01:49 AM by ProudDad
Not only that but this bug-shit legislature is getting ready to (if they haven't already) pass a law that allows deadly force if "one feels threatened" as self-defense they are preparing to repeal the requirement for gun permits -- in other words, soon you don't have to have a CWP in Arizona.

Not only that, ex-felons can buy guns in bug-shit crazy fucking Arizona.

This place is Fucking NUTS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. The law banning possession of firearms by felons is federal.
Although felons can petition the court to have the right to possess firearms restored.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
86. Wrong...
Check it out...

In Arizona, after one conviction, ALL Civil Rights are restored -- including the right to buy and carry arms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #86
91. When a felon has served his/her debt to society
They should have their rights restored. Instead, we condemn them to a life where they can't get a decent job and carry the stigma of their past forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sl8 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-02-09 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #86
98. "This section does not apply to a person’s right to possess weapons..."
from http://www.cosc.co.pima.az.us/Forms/ClerkForms/RestorationofCivilRights.pdf :

§ 13-912. Restoration of civil rights for first offenders; exception
A. Any person who has not previously been convicted of any other felony shall automatically be restored
any civil rights that were lost or suspended by the conviction if the person both:
1. Completes a term of probation or receives an absolute discharge from imprisonment.
2. Pays any fine or restitution imposed.
B. This section does not apply to a person’s right to possess weapons as defined in § 13-3101 unless the
person applies to a court pursuant to the procedures of § 13-906.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
76. I know felon is a scary word
But having a quarter pound of Marijuana makes you a felon in Arizona, I've violated that law myself(smoked every gram :smoke:) but never caught so legally I'm not an ex-felon. Possession of less then 40 grams or even possessing a pipe is a class 1 felony if you have priors for the same offense, first offense is a class 6 misdemeanor but as soon as you violate a condition of your probation such as not paying your $$ to the Arizona DEA they bump it up to a felony. I don't see how that segment of the population should be barred from owning guns. I have committed these felonies myself but since I never been convicted I can probaly own a gun but I don't want the responsibility because I've served in Kuwait/Iraq and know what it is like have a weapon on you at all times and you can't be careless for a second.

However my question is assuming you don't have a problem with the general public from obtaining a license and a gun would you have a problem with a felon who was busted with a joint twice or failed to pay their $$ to the Arizona DEA after the first time?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. Don't get me wrong
I believe that "ex-felons" SHOULD have all normal Civil Rights restored.

I also believe that the way "felons" are treated post-conviction is most of the problem.

The criminal-injustice system in this country is counter-productive -- creates more "criminals" than it could possibly "cure"...It's an expensive obscenity.

But the point is guns.

I think that ALL guns should be outlawed except long guns for hunting (if you eat what you shoot). We'd be a hell of a lot better off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. From the article...
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 08:45 AM by No Elephants
"The bill is part of a nationwide push by the National Rifle Association. Georgia passed a similar law in 2008, as did Tennessee earlier this year in becoming the 40th state to allow bar or restaurant patrons to carry guns.

Besides, are the bars going to check for permits before admittting gun toters? (Wouldn't want that job.) If not, claiming that permit holders are not a problem is meaningless.

Edited bc I misread the article big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. re: checking permits..
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 09:03 AM by X_Digger
.. You're right that bar owners wouldn't likely know, but many states (like TX) maintain stats on CHL holders, and on balance, they're less likely to be involved in violent (and non-violent) crime than even police officers.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/crime_records/chl/convrates.htm

TX Licensees were 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public - 127 per 100,000 population versus 730 per 100,000.
TX Licensees were 14 times less likely to be arrested for nonviolent offenses than the general public - 386 per 100,000 population versus 5,212 per 100,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. That's because of selective enforcement
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 11:46 AM by ProudDad
rather than any intrinsic "benefit" of carrying.

Cops target black and brown people. The "authorities" don't issue permits to black and brown people.

Most law abiding black and brown people want guns melted down for scrap, not permits to carry the stupid things.

Ergo...

You're quoting a Meaningless statistic from racist Texas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Actually, Texas is a 'shall issue' state..
There is no discretion on the part of "authorities" here. If you have a clean record (well defined, no wiggle room), pay $140, attend 10-14 hours of class, pass a test on the law and use of force, pass a practical live fire test, get fingerprinted and photographed.. they can't stop you from getting a license.

There are either 8 or 9 'may issue' states like New York, where only the well connected or famous can get permits. Abuses of the 'may issue' states' systems are well documented and do fall in line with your statement.

Here in TX, I know more 'black and brown' people with CHLs than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Unfair! You're bringing facts to a 'faith-based' argument
Don't you know his "knowledge" of what Texas is like trumps what TX law says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
68. Pro-gun wack jobs ...
like some who haunt the halls of DU...

are famous for their "faith based" pro-gun arguments.

The FACTS are that states where guns are easier to purchase and carry have more homicides and accidental deaths with guns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. Bullshit. This Is Just a Pissing Contest
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 08:51 PM by NashVegas
Other states (except for Tennessee, which started this trend a couple of weeks ago) that allow concealed carry in bars and restaurants don't have specific laws that say you can - they just don't say you can't.

What Tennessee rural politicians did was pass a specific law that said you can. All they're doing is drawing lines in the sand so the NRA knows who to endorse and who to work against in 2010.

Also, in Tennessee, this is the result of muscle-flexing on the part of rural state reps banding together to run over larger cities in their state.

http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/general-assembly-shows-rural-urban-shift-hill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Many states have statutes similar to TX

TX:
Sec. 46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed, on or about the license holder's person:
(1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;

GA:
(b) For the purpose of this Code section, "public gathering" shall include, but shall not be limited to,
athletic or sporting events, churches or church functions, political rallies or functions, publicly owned or
operated buildings, establishments at which alcoholic beverages are sold for consumption on the
premises which derive less than 50 percent of their total annual gross food and beverage sales from the
sale of prepared meals or food and you cannot drink alcohol while there.

WY:
(t)(vii) Any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic liquor and malt beverages for
consumption on the premises, which portion of the establishment is primarily devoted to that
purpose.

(Carry in a restaurant, but not at the bar.)

OK:
Provided however, a person
possessing a valid concealed handgun license pursuant to the provisions of the Oklahoma
Self-Defense Act, Section 1290.1 et seq. of this title may carry the concealed handgun into
any restaurant or other establishment licensed to dispense low-point beer or alcoholic
beverages where the sale of low-point beer or alcoholic beverages does not constitute the
primary purpose of the business.

(Restaurants yes, bars no)

WA:
(d) That portion of an establishment classified by the state liquor control board as off-limits to persons under
twenty-one years of age.

(so restaurants yes, bars no)

MI:
4. A tavern where the primary source of income is the sale of alcoholic liquor by the glass consumed on the
premises

(again, restaurants, not bars.)

SD:
23-7-8.1. Form and contents of permit. The form of the permit to carry a concealed pistol shall be prescribed by the secretary of state pursuant to § 23-7-8. The permit shall list the applicant's name, address, and the expiration date of the permit. The holder of a permit may carry a concealed pistol anywhere in South Dakota except in any licensed on-sale malt beverage or alcoholic beverage establishment that derives over one-half of its total income from the sale of malt or alcoholic beverages.

FL:
any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic beverages for consumption on the
premises, which portion of the establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose;

KY:
Any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense beer or alcoholic beverages for consumption on
the premises, which portion of the establishment is primarily devoted to that purpose;

On balance, seems to be about 50/50 between states that don't mention bars / restaurants specifically, and those that say no bars, but restaurants that serve alcohol are fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. There was a specific prohibition against it in Tennessee if I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. You obviously don't live in bat-shit crazy Arizona
There are so many wack jobs in this state...I sure as FUCK ain't gonna be going into any bars...

So you have one piece of anecdotal "evidence" to counter the 44,000 handgun deaths per year...

Way to go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Calling bullshit on your numbers, you can't back those up with any reputable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. But your one lonely little anecdote does prove something?
Turnabout's fair play, Dave. You can't dismiss opponents' stats when all you're offering is an anecdote. I know the gun community believes that the best defense is a strong offense, which is why you all do what you just did and attempt to deflect a legitimate criticism of your "evidence" by ignoring the criticism and opening fire on the critic, but not everyone is so easily taken in. The original criticism still stands unanswered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBuckeye Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. His numbers are wrong
According to the CDC in 2006, Last up to date numbers, 30,896 total, of which, 642 accidental, 16,883 were Suicide, 12,791 were Homicide, 220 were Undetermined and 360 by Legal intervention. Remember that in the same year, 43,664 were killed in Motor vehicle accidents, 37,286 died from poisoning, 20,823 died from unintention falls. In 2005 CDC reported 652,091 people died from heart disease, 559,312 from cancer and 143,579 from stroke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Thanks you saved me from posting it on DU for the 25th time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #50
63. Never said my anecdote proved anything. However there aren't 44,000 gun deaths a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. Welllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Exxxxxcccccccuuuuuuussssseeeee Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

I'm sure those 30,000 dead people are very happy that you clarified that statistic... :sarcasm:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. As if you just barely missed it. The information is easily found, do your homework next time
before you post and then you won't have to act so outraged when someone points out that you were wrong.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #70
88. Thanks for your straw man
Didn't work though. I'm sure most on DU saw through your logic error to the basic point.

Guns DO kill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
94. Who said that guns don't kill? I said they don't kill 44,000 a year in the US and I am correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. Big whoop...(n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
89. Interesting ...
How un-nuanced and single-minded the pro-gun nut jobs are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Who might they be?
"How un-nuanced and single-minded the pro-gun nut jobs are..."


Whom exactly are you referring to here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. So it's wrong to ask you to get your facts correct? Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. You're a broken record
of no significance...

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. To answer his criticism, no I don't live in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. See how the legislators feel about concealed weapons in the Arizona State House. After all,
crime could happen there too, right? And everyone present would need to defend themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
55. What we really need to do is put guns in the hands of Senators and Reps . . .USHR/Senate -- !!!
Then we'd finally see some real action!!!

Meanwhile, start asking your Senator how he does at target practice cause

you don't want a rep who's a poor shot!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. it's the vast right-wing conspiracy at work

And no, I'm not being facetious.

The mushy-headed "liberal" response to such nonsense never ceases to amaze me, though.

To save repeating myself ...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5949076&mesg_id=5949407
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. You obviously don't live in bat-shit crazy Arizona
Or you would be scared shitless too...

I wouldn't trust these motherfuckers with a penknife, let alone a fucking pistol...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I live in Arizona and you are absolutely right
This state is full of nutjobs and macho-morons.

I can't wait until they let everyone carry a concealed weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. And you let them drive cars?
That's a whole lot crazier than allowing people who aren't drinking to carry guns in bars or restaurants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
61. Strawman. Don't be silly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. Thanks for proving my point...
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. It just means soon there will be fewer rednecks
Am I wrong, but I seem to recall that in every western movie that concerns "cleaning up a town" the first thing the sheriff did was ban the carrying of firearms in town in order to cut down on the wanton violence.

And Arizona's response to wanton violence is to encourage everyone to carry a loaded firearm everywhere, even if they're drinking.

I don't live in Arizona, so I say, good idea. Pretty soon there will be fewer of these nutcases to worry about.

I worked on a large art exhibit in Phoenix ten years ago. On a trip to the building supply store to get materials for the exhibit, while walking through the parking lot, I encountered two shifty looking little weasels leaving the building with their automatic pistols stuck in the waistband of their jeans. At the building supply store. Just in case. Or maybe to compensate for the diminutive size of their cocks and their brains. Who cares? Let them shoot each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. Believe me, when I moved here from Barbara Lee's territory
a couple of years ago, I had an inkling of how crazy the Legislature was here...but Janet N. was governor and would veto the bat-shit crazy stuff.

But after Janet Napolitano abandoned us to these bat-shit crazy mother fuckers (may Dog Damn her hide for that desertion in the face of fire) for her cushy bullshit job to "defend the Fatherland", we're finding out how bat-shit crazy those mother-fuckers REALLY ARE.

Arizona is rapidly becoming the outlier. Not only are they passing every bug-shit right-wing piece of shit law they can, they're preparing a budget that will finally drive Arizona down to the bottom of the barrel when it comes to Education. We're going to finally make it from number 49 to NUMBER 50!!!

We're number 50, we're number 50...

Bat-shit crazy right-wing mother fuckers...DAMN...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. One of many reasons why I wish Napolitano had not been tapped for HS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
79. Blood in the streets, Dodge City, OK corral, wild west, did I miss any.?
Arizona is different. In all the other states that allow people to carry guns in bars it is really really uneventful.
Not so in Arizona. That is because the people in Arizona are not like people in any of the rest of the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. Recommending, because the replies are so wonderful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Guns in bars and churches. What next? Banks? Courtrooms? How about prison cells?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. Guns are already allowed in banks
If you have a concealed carry permit, in every state I know of you can carry in a bank, too.

Courthouses and jails both have pretty strict physical access controls that make them actual gun-free zones (for the most part) rather than gun-free zones in name only, like Virginia Tech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm generally OK with concealed-carry but this oozes TEH STUPID!
Guns and alcohol don't mix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. hear, hear. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Exactly...they should strengthen this law by saying that...
people who are concealed-carrying can go into bars, but they SHOULD NOT be allowed to drink.

Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Fool killer moves in mysterious ways
his wonders to perform. Has a whole state ever gotten a Darwin award?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. Hard liquor and Uzis is the RWnuts idea of smart.
See why we need to regulate these people?!? Damn this pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sponsored by the NRA & metal detector lobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. Bars are the most secure places now
is there any law that prevent the use of a gun while drunk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. Theres still a law that prevents the use of alcohol while armed. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Why do you say bars are secure?
The ones I went to when I lived in DC sure weren't. Hell, there was a summer where the joke was "another night another knifing in a U street club."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. Bars? Secure? Would You Care To Back That Up? (n/t)

You're not saying that carrying pistols in bars makes them secure, are you? That whole "An armed society is a polite society" notion went out the door some time ago; even hard-core gun militants found it ludicrous....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
71. I think he forgot the :sarcasm:
But actually one will want to pick a fight now knowing thay can get shot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. I noticed some of the naysayers live in states that DO allow this
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 01:56 PM by friendly_iconoclast
Must be a lot of bar shootings in Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Oregon, then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. Well, that's one way to cut down on DUI, I guess.
Can't drive drunk if you've been shot dead.

Actually, in the 'Wild West,' many jurisdictions had the horse sense to confiscate guns while folks were in town, or at least in bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
42. Wow.
That is an unbelievably bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
45. "I'm eighty-sixed? Oh yeah? Haw! Well yer .44ed! Bang, bang bang"
Stupidest. Bill. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
47. And this is a good idea
how exactly?

One less reason for me to go to a bar, I guess. Getting hit in the crossfire has little appeal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obi Wan Jesus Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
52. this has EPIC FAIL written all over it.
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. GOP's NRA . . . working together for a violent America -- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. More violence = a more frightened populace= more gun owners=
more violence=....it all makes good business sense to the GOP. If people weren't afraid they'd never get anyone from their party elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. True . . . that's also how the Drug War was used to create fear ....
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 09:46 PM by defendandprotect
fear of druggies, fear of hippies, fear of your own kids!!!

If you see anything of TV these days, TORTURE is a constant part of the plot, it seems ....

The New Deal assisted in a more confident, humane society -- that's the stuff that makes the

right wing's trigger finger itch!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. GOP? Hell, one cursory look at our site here....
...would show the gun lovers are everywhere. Sadly, it's not a GOP phenomenon anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
67. Arizona Senator pulls concealed weapons bill
Edited on Tue Jun-30-09 04:37 PM by ProudDad
"PHOENIX — The sponsor of a bill that would have allowed people to carry concealed weapons without a permit says she is holding the bill until next year.

The bill also would have allowed people who do have permits to carry a concealed weapon to a school while dropping off or picking up a child."

Did I mention that the Arizona Legislature is filled with BAT SHIT CRAZY MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!

:eyes: :nuke:


http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/299127.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. I think that goes without saying.
I mean the batshit crazy mofo part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
78. I'm for gun rights, but if you need a gun to go into a bar, stay home instead nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mule_train Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #78
81. 'if drunks cant have guns, then only sober people will have guns'
Edited on Wed Jul-01-09 09:54 AM by mule_train
is that whatcha want ossifer...(hic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
84. So has FL or TN had any problem with CHP holders???
The ones you have to worry about are those with concealed weapons and no permit. Not those of us that have willingly submitted ourselves to background checks, fingerprinting and paid money to carry legally.

Hopefully we'll finally pass this here in Va in the next year or so, that way I won't have to do the "virginia tuck" right now when the family and I go out to eat we travel the extra 3 miles to West Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
90. Yow-ser! They're living in the Wild Wild West!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-01-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
93. outta-sight! booze and guns - a shoot out by this weekend...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC