Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Won't Block Chrysler Sale

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:34 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Won't Block Chrysler Sale
Source: Associated Press

(06-09) 16:27 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for Chrysler's sale to Fiat, turning down a last-ditch bid by opponents of the deal.

The court said late Tuesday it had rejected a plea to block the sale of most of Chrysler's assets to the Italian automaker. Chrysler, Fiat and the Obama administration had warned that the high court's intervention could have scuttled the sale.

A federal appeals court in New York had earlier approved the sale, but gave opponents until Monday afternoon to try to get the Supreme Court to intervene.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ordered a temporary delay just before a 4 p.m. deadline on Monday.

Now the court has freed the automakers to complete their deal.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/06/07/national/w024200D59.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the best possible (least bad) deal
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like I get to go back to work!
Rumor is we'll go back on the 29th...let's cross our fingers!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Good luck. Hope more consumers can get loans to purchase
a car, which is really what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. So I'm guessing "secured bonds"
Are no longer secure.

Good luck trying to sell future debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The bonds in question were junk bonds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, they were not
They were secured bonds of the type purchased by pension plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They were purchased for .43c on the dollar
Thats not a secured bond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. What in the heck are you talking about?
The price doesn't determine if the debt is secured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, but the price may well indicate that the bonds are not secured, at least not
Edited on Wed Jun-10-09 07:24 AM by No Elephants
with assets that are worth anything, or that the position of the bondholders is not a good one for any one of a thousand or so other possible reasons.


It isn't as though no "secured" bondholder has been hurt in a bankruptcy before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I can't believe people here are jumping through
Hoops to justify screwing pension funds that bought secured bonds from Chrysler.

This would be akin to you selling your home and financing it yourself. When the buyer defaults, you would naturally go to the court to get YOUR property back because that's your legal right. Now what if the courts said... go screw yourself. We like this guy more than you so we're going to give him YOUR house and you can have 10K as compensation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Kindly point out where I justified anything--and I fully understand the concept of
Edited on Fri Jun-12-09 05:56 AM by No Elephants
secured lending. However, I also know that understanding the basic concept of secured lending is from knowing enough to make a judgment about this specific case.

I also understand that things are not always straightforward. Sometimes documents are faulty. Sometimes the borrower has other valid defenses against the lender. Sometimes, the so called secured lender is not fully secured because the liguitdation value of the assets is less--sometimes far less--than the value of the debt. For instance, having a security interest in car parts and cars that are only 1/4 finished is not as "secure" as it may have seemed when the lender was looking to lend.

I don't know all the relevant facts in this case because I have not read the loan documents or the court papers, so I cannot comment specifically on this particular case with a high degree of intelligence, so I didn't attempt that.

My prior post was simply to say that assuming there is no connection between the the price at which a bond is selling and the above issues is often a faulty assumption. And your post indicated that you were not taking that into account at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good News
When Obama first talked about the bankruptcy, he detailed how all other alternatives failed, including, and especially negotiating with the creditors.

At least, some employees will keep their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. It may be good for employees today
but it's a disaster to investment from today forward and without investment there are no new jobs.

If "secured debt" is no longer secured interest rates will rise. I wouldn't invest in any corporate bond today. I don't care if they're AAA or junk. If the company goes belly up there is no guarantee that the collateral that was assigned to this debt will actually be mine. That makes it unsecured debt. When the government is running a trillion plus deficit I would think that this is a bad plan while you are trying to convince foreign investors to invest in the US.

Has anybody else noticed what's happening to the yield curve?

Venezuela here we come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good
Hopefully Chrysler can now get on with becoming a stronger company. For the sake of the workers and my state, I hope everything goes well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Inevitable outcome I think
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC