Afghanistan: Military’s influence on aid too great, according to NGO’s report

[Turborama]

Source: Human Rights Tribune

6 April 09 - Much of the international aid to Afghanistan over the past seven years has been spent to achieve military and political objectives, and the current approach to aid lacks “clarity, coherence and resolve”, a group of international NGOs has said.

IRIN, Kabul - In a report to the heads of NATO-member states, 11 international NGOs operating in Afghanistan have warned about over-reliance on short-term military gains at the expense of longer-term peace and development .

“There is a need for a truly comprehensive strategy for the long-term reconstruction and stabilisation of Afghanistan,” said the report entitled Caught in the Conflict (subtitled Civilians and the International Security Strategy in Afghanistan), released on 3 April.

To prevent a blurring of the lines between military and humanitarian actors, aid agencies and NATO-led forces agreed on a modus operandi in 2008 but this is being largely ignored less than a year after it was signed, the report said. “We have seen no difference on the ground,” said Matt Waldman, Oxfam’s policy and advocacy manager in Kabul.

The NGOs - including Oxfam, CARE Afghanistan, ActionAid and Save the Children (UK) - are concerned about the growing impact of armed conflict on civilians and the increasing use of aid for military and political gain. “We feel a pull on our sleeves pulling us to the military tent,” said Dave Hampson, a representative of Save the Children UK, adding that funds for aid agencies were being tied to military and political conditionality more than ever before.

Read more: http://www.humanrights-geneva.info/Afghanistan-Military-s-influence,4312

---

The NGOs working on the ground are the ones we should be paying more attention to:

Caught in the Conflict

Civilians and the international security strategy in Afghanistan

"This paper makes recommendations on how the security strategy of the international community should
be changed in order to minimise the harm caused to Afghan civilians and reduce the disruption to
development and humanitarian activities in the current environment in Afghanistan."

The 27 page report in PDF format: http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/civilians-caught-in-the-conflict-afghanistan.pdf

UNAMA report

Over 2,100 civilian Afghans were killed in the conflict in 2008; about 55 percent by various insurgent groups and the rest by pro-government forces, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said in a report entitled Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict in 2008.

The UN and rights watchdogs have repeatedly accused the insurgents of deliberate, systematic and widespread attacks on noncombatants and civilian locations.

The NGOs also voiced concern about a significant increase in civilian deaths resulting from aerial strikes by international military forces which were reported to be 552 in 2008; 72 percent higher than 2007, according to the UNAMA report.

The 48 page report in PDF format: http://www.unama-afg.org/docs/_UN-Docs/_human%20rights/2009/UNAMA_09february-Annual%20Report_PoC%202008_FINAL_11Feb09.pdf

[Sparky 1]

1. Out of Afghanistan NOW

We can't afford any more war.

What are we there for? What are our goals? What is our exit strategy?

Do we have any strategy other than continuing to enrich some in the military/industrial complex?