Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin to pay tax on past per diem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:06 AM
Original message
Palin to pay tax on past per diem
Source: Anchorage Daily News

Gov. Sarah Palin must pay income taxes on thousands of dollars in expense money she received while living at her Wasilla home, under a new determination by state officials.

The governor's office wouldn't say this week how much she owes in back taxes for meal money, or whether she intends to continue to receive the per diem allowance. As of December, she was still charging the state for meals and incidentals.

"The amount of taxes owed is a private matter," Sharon Leighow, Palin's spokeswoman, said in an e-mail. "If the governor collects future per diem, those documents would be a matter of public record."

The revelation about Palin comes as U.S. senators, including Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, are under scrutiny over back taxes. A survey by the political newspaper and Web site Politico (www.politico.com) found that Begich was one of seven senators who acknowledged owing back taxes.



Read more: http://www.adn.com/palin/story/693695.html



Hah hah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is the amount a private matter? Her tax evasion as a government official isn't a private.
matter.

Anyone who wants to know should have access to the information, right?

:wtf: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. During the campaign Alaskans found out she took $17,000
for living at home. Some budget hawk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Such a scammer - and a bad one at that. Can't even cover her ass properly.
How much taxes do you owe Sarah, hmmm?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. I still want to hear more about who built her house (ie Sport Complex Contractors):
Did Sports Complex Contractors Build Palin's House for Free?
by stef

Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 08:52:55 AM PST

The prosecution just rested in the Ted Stevens trial, in which he is accused of accepting $250,000 worth of free renovations to his house from VECO, an oil pipeline company. VECO workers labored for months remodeling Stevens' home at the company's expense.

The Palin's two-story, four bedroom, four bath home on Lake Lucille is worth $552,000. "Todd Palin built the house with friends who were contractors, he said in a recent television interview."

At the same time the mighty Todd was building the house, the Wasilla Sports Complex was under construction right down the road. Just who were these "friends who were contractors" who did such a huge favor for the Palins by building their house for them? Was it payback for the sports complex contracts? Wayne Barrett of the Village Voice asks the question, below the fold.


Wayne Barrett reports that after the $12.5 million Wasilla Sports Complex was approved, the design contract went to architect Blase Burkhart, "son of Roy Burkhart, who is frequently described as a "mentor" of Palin and was head of the local Republican Party." Roy Burkhart was also a Palin campaign contributor. Palin then appointed Blase Burkhart to the builder-selection committee, which awarded the construction contract to "Howdie Inc., a mostly residential contractor owned at the time by Howard Nugent." Nugent was a Palin campaign contributor, also.

-snip

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/11/111018/34/47/627460
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. So many questions that will go unanswered with Pandora.
I almost forgot about the magic house. Everything about it dropped out of sight so quickly and it never got much attention except for those nasty, do-nothing bloggers.

I'd like to hear more about it too. This has scandal written all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Palin herself asked for the review:

ITs a long story.


.............. The Washington Post published a story in mid-September that said she had charged the state almost $17,000 for meals and incidentals while staying in her own home.

The state considers Juneau, where she lives in the Governor's Mansion, to be Palin's official duty station.

Palin billed the state for 312 nights spent in her Wasilla home during her first 19 months in office, according to the Washington Post. She received $60 a day tax free, money intended to cover meals and incidentals, while traveling on state business, her travel forms show.

"Last fall we raised questions about longstanding practices within the Department of Administration regarding tax treatment of per diem payments," Kreitzer wrote in an exchange of e-mails over the past few days with the Daily News.

"At the Governor's request, we reviewed the situation to determine whether we were in full compliance with the pertinent Internal Revenue Service regulations," Kreitzer wrote. "As a result of this review, we determined that per diem needs to be treated as income, requiring a revision of W-2 forms for any affected employees."..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, this is funny. "At the Governor's request,..." Only because she got
caught!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It seems like she was about to be outed anyway so
she opted to be on the offensive rather than risk being on the defensive. It looks so much better that way.

Still, Sarah speaks out of both sides of her mouth and the quicker this tax evasion gets buried and forgotten, the better it is for her.

Apologies in advance for being so bitchy about this.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. after she got busted while running the campaign with daddy
warbucks.

this pisses me off. I get paid per diem for work, and have since I was 22. I have always known the money is only tax free if I spend it on food and travel, and have receipts.

It's very simple, and the laws haven't changed.

Why wouldn't she know that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. How many repukes going to scream about this?
None. Honesty is something only for Democrats not a single MSM will give this more then a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Poor baby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. So she should have to resign immediately, right?
isn't that the standard? Or just the standard for Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. SOP for Dems only, you betcha. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Time to have a garage sale! I hear she has some great dresses left over
from a recent campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. well thank God she wasn't appointed by Obama ...
imagine the hell she'd have to face for paying her taxes late ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. you mean like some other Obama appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Watch out for that limelight Sarah!
It could shine on places you preferred to remain dark! :toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. it's that there gotcha media at play!

now, per diem laws having not progressed forward she having known this did so violate but found herself innocent

there, also

and then car extraordinary beneift laws, as daschle, those laws there having changed but he is no longer the american people have a right to question, there, also, why he doesn't pay his taxes and just who is tom daschle? is he a real american?

wink wink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. Slow Ahead: Grifter at Work. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Pay TAXES on it? They should withhold any future payment of salary
until every last dime is paid back. In effect, the state is increasing her salary. Wanna bet the legislature in Alaska didn't vote to do that?

What a load of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillyindependent Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is this really news? Come on now! The article says under..
new determination she now owes taxes on money she received. So ok. She pays them. I personally would not classify this as tax evasion. Also, why are we still talking about Palin? Why is she even relevant to me now? She lost. I will be much happier if i just never hear her name again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Most of the article is about a Dem in the about the same situation. I agree--it was
was a new determination. I think Dems look petty when they jump on stuff like this (IMHO).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. First, I don't see Dems jumping on this. Second, do you think Repubs looked petty?

When they jumped all over a new determination that Daschle should pay taxes on the company car? Or when they jumped all over Geithner learning that he had to pay his employer's share of payroll taxes in addition to the employee's share he had already paid?

This is especially similar to the Daschle situation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. it's only "new" because during the campaign, when it came to light,
her people announced that they didn't interpret the law to mean she had to pay taxes on per diem, which is utter bs -- and I say that as someone who pays taxes on per diem or collects the necessary receipts!!!

It's not tax evasion when the whole rest of the world knows you have to pay taxes on per diem if you don't produce receipts for the cost of food and taxis because you are in a city for work, instead of AT HOME, which brings to mind the question of why was she getting per diem in the first place?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't think it's fair to immediately jump to "Tax Evastion" with ANYONE, D or R.
Edited on Wed Feb-18-09 01:36 PM by RBInMaine
Look folks, these tax situations do get complicated. So I'm going to be non-partisan on this one and say hold your fire until all the facts are in. D's, I's, and R's often have to amend tax returns, end up owing back taxes for all sorts of different reasons, ... They are not all tax frauds. So on this we have to always wait and see. While we still have to be responsible, all kinds of tax errors and oversights occur. (And no, I myself do not owe back taxes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. This is not a matter of tax evasion - it really is about money she should never have had.
They have effectively given her a back door raise by first paying her travel expenses to live at home, and then turning around and saying - oh, that should not be travel expenses, it is income and having her pay taxes. She should not have gotten any of it to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. HAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. 2012.
That is what this tying up loose ends is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. Did I miss the part where Obama named her to his cabinet?
I thought that this kind of scrutiny only applied to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. ANOTHER thing Sarah Palin' and not-Joe The not-Plumber have in common!
Besides both being the dumbest of dumbest MFers on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC