Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Republicans blocked Democrats from adding $25B or highways, transit to stimulus package

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:11 PM
Original message
Senate Republicans blocked Democrats from adding $25B or highways, transit to stimulus package
Source: Cox Cable Omaha

WASHINGTON (Associated Press) -- Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked Democrats from adding $25 billion for highways, mass transit, and water projects to President Barack Obama's economic recovery program.

Already unhappy over the size of the measure, Republicans insisted additional infrastructure projects be paid for with cuts elsewhere in the bill.

But the Democratic amendment garnered 58 votes, just shy of the supermajority needed under Senate budget rules, and many more efforts to increase the measure's size are sure to follow.

"We can't add to the size of this bill," said Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. "The amount is just inconceivable to most people."

At issue was a plan by Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to increase the highway funding in the bill to $40 billion, which reflected complaints from lawmakers in both parties that Obama's plan doesn't do enough to relieve a backlog of unfinished projects. The duo also wanted to increase mass transit programs by $5 billion boost and water projects by $7 billion.

"Our highways are jammed. People go to work in gridlock," Feinstein said Tuesday.

Just two Republicans supported the move, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Christopher Bond of Missouri. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Judd Gregg, R-N.H., named Tuesday morning to become Commerce secretary, did not vote.

Senate debate unfolded as Obama issued another call for swift action on the measure, urging lawmakers to act "with the same sense of urgency Americans feel every day."

Republicans, for their part, readied a plan to lower mortgage costs to try to jolt the housing market out of its slump.

The $885 billion Senate economic plan faces assaults from both Democrats and Republicans during debate this week, as lawmakers in both parties aim to kill ideas that won't jolt the economy right away.

"The goal is to shape a package that is more targeted, that would be smaller in size and that would be truly focused on saving or creating jobs and turning the economy around," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. She said ideas like $870 million to combat bird flu should be dumped.

Others, such as Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., have complained about items such as health research being in the bill. But Specter _ a moderate whose vote is sought by Obama _ is instead proposing to add $6.5 billion for the National Institutes of Health.

-MORE-



Read more: http://omaha.cox.net/cci/newsnational/national?_mode=view&_state=maximized&view=article&id=D9649L700&_action=validatearticle



Ben Nelson is a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. How?!!
Who won the last election? Who fucked up the economy over the last 8 years?

Republicans should be glad they are not wearing tar and feathers and sitting on some abandoned section of railroad track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ben Nelson is a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. These people are just so out of touch...
The people need help after 8 years of having their government turn it's back on their needs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It's amazing since
they must know what Washington gridlock is like. I'm surprised that, for once, they don't even want to take care of their own needs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Well, no one ever inferrred that the GOP was full of mensa candidates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I somewhat agree...
They've already got 850B in the bill. Why isn't more or that devoted to transit infrastructure in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. last week the house rushpublicans whined infrastructure money was too much
then after voting against the bill, they complained there wasn't enough money for infrastructure - now the senate rushipublicans are complaining it's too much?

will they get their way? you betcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beavker Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. If they want Dems to fail, just let the Dems do what they want.
If they think that the Dems ideas are crap and useless, let them do as they please. They want them to fail anyway. So why would they think that their plan is bad? Why isn't Rush calling on the Repukes to let the Dems do as they please because it will just fail and his little plan will have come to fruition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Because the only way Dems fail is if they don't get their bills through.
The Dickhead Party knows that the Dem proposals will work if enacted, so they need to block them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thucythucy Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. 58 votes means that
if Kennedy had been well enough to vote, and Franken was seated (as he should be) the amendment would have passed.

Very frustrating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wow! Your Profile is probably still warm. Welcome. Did you join for this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thucythucy Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Pretty much,
yeah. I've been a DU reader for ages and finally decided to take the plunge. This is a great site, one of my daily "must sees."

Thanks for the welcome.

Best wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Hear's to a healthy and happy long stay on DU! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beavker Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I'm pretty new to the DU
And also a Nebraskan, surrounded by Repukes (though Omaha is actually Blue, it's just hard to tell from where I sit at work because of the make up of my fellow office mates).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Yeah, it can be a challenge at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. why the hell aren't they loading this up with what we need and taking out
everything the repukes want as far as anything that does not benefit the whole of society. The repukes have had two decades of getting what they want - and these bailouts started and were pushed by their guy and yet the dems as usual are taking the heat - they have the majority wtf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Get rid of nuclear power subsidies. That is 50B right there. Of course the GOP won't like that. (nt)
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 03:45 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Republicans will stop anything that might mean more union workers, the republicans
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 04:03 PM by GreenTea
despise workers having a voice against the rich, elite & powerful corporations, that are the republican party, however, the republicans certainly don't mind stealing the workers tax dollars, (bailouts subsidies & corporate tax cuts).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Or trim $25B of tax breaks
If all they can do is complain without being constructive, just take out the useless junk the Republicans support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Enough of them!
There are enough votes in the Senate to pass a real stimulus bill. Appeasing the GOP will give Obama the same results that Neville Chamberlain got when he appeased Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just wait until another collapsed bridge.....
very fucking annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NM Independent Donating Member (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Of course. Because our infrastructure doesn't need it anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpominville Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Pay for it with a Tax CUT?!? Proof Cons are Insane.
Thats like trying to pay for your next car by taking a pay cut.

Republicans are morons and its time we called them out for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beavker Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. Throw them a curve ball.
Ask for massive corporate tax cuts, no capital gains tax...then we can laugh when they vote No on the stimulous, then remove the measures anyway. Proving that they will vote No even on their own agenda issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. why did we never see headlines - Democrats block xxxxxx - I am sick of this n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. "The amount is just inconceivable to most people." Unless you use the money to kill people
and blow things up, of course.

The trillion spent on the Iraq disaster, and the trillion or more pending on the Iraq disaster, well, that truly was inconceivable to most people. As well as useless, destructive, stupid and irresponsible.

Of course, only the GOP would think a senseless, utter failure is a good idea.

Dems are in a position to CRUSH republican opposition, which they need to do if we are going to get out of this mess.

Strongly worded letters still don't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wasn't critical infrastructure supposed to be a main part of stimulus?
Since when does 4.7% count as a main part?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. So we paint them as obstructionists who care only about big corps & the rich.
not the every day American struggling to find work and get by. Remind Americans by using ads, etc that this disaster happened because of the way the Republicans ran and neglected things.

Then Dems add back in some of the "compromises" that were manipulated out of the House bill and time the "redo" so it will go through when we can definitely have enough votes to make sure it goes through to be presented to President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. "Expose", rather than paint".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. True, that's a better choice since they already are obstructionists. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. I still like my idea:
Turn out the lights on the Senate Floor and once the lights come back on see how many of these Republican fucks are still standing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. What is our military defense (offense) budget?
The pukes sure have no problem pouring money into that. But that is where their corporate donors are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Or better, what is the "off-budget" military spending? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. Republican obstructionist
They know that if they can defeat this bill and the economy sinks into depression which it may already have. They will be able to tag it on Obama for not saving the country from this economy.

They are taking their que from Limbaugh. Baaaah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. Dear Sen. Feinstein: building more highways won't solve gridlock
the cuts to mass transit are far more troubling. it's the main thing we DO need (aside from clean energy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC