Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates Says More Troops For Afghanistan By Summer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:06 PM
Original message
Gates Says More Troops For Afghanistan By Summer
Source: Associated Press

(01-27) 08:56 PST WASHINGTON, (AP) --

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday there is too little "time, patience or money" for the United States to set unrealistic goals for war-torn Afghanistan.

He also confirmed plans that the Pentagon could send two more brigades there by late spring and a third by mid-summer in an effort to try to salvage a country besieged by corruption and increasing violence.

More troops could be sent after that, Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee, but that would hinge on the Defense Department's ability to build a larger infrastructure.

But Gates said there can be no mistaking the realities of the situation on the ground in Afghanistan. He said the United States must ratchet down any heightened expectations in the war — and that the aim should be to eliminate terrorist bases. Gates said less lofty objectives may be unavoidable, simply because the country is so poor.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/01/27/national/w055300S98.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great, getting ourselves stuck even further in another quagmire
When will the US learn the mistake of bringing the military to a battle of ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. a country besieged by corruption and increasing violence.
Our Puppet can't be trusted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, No, No!
Guess we're going to be marching on Washington this spring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. shakes head
So, we're going to "surge" ("more troops") in Afghanistan but no "benchmarks" (goals) are to be set, though "nation building" ("lofty objectives") will have to take place, and that the aim now is the same as the it's always been - catching the terrorists, eliminating their bases....so don't get your hopes up.("ratchet down any heightened expectations in the war")








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gates: Cash Cows of War Running Dry
Gates: Cash Cows of War Running Dry
By Nathan Hodge

In his first appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee as a member of President Barack Obama's cabinet, Defense Secretary Robert Gates today issued more words of warning to the defense industry and Pentagon bureaucracy.

"One thing we have known for many months is that the spigot of defense funding opened by 9/11 is closing," he said. "With two major campaigns ongoing, the economic crisis and resulting budget pressures will force hard choices on this department."

This reinforces a message Gates has been telegraphing to the weaponeers for some time now. But what he really seems to be suggesting here is that the practice of lavish wartime supplemental spending needs to end. From his testimony:

"Efforts to put the bureaucracy on a war footing have, in my view, revealed underlying flaws in the institutional priorities, cultural preferences, and reward structures of America’s defense establishment – a set of institutions largely arranged to plan for future wars, to prepare for a short war, but not to wage a protracted war. The challenge we face is how well we can institutionalize the irregular capabilities gained and means to support troops in theater that have been, for the most part, developed ad hoc and funded outside the base budget."

Wartime spending needs, Gates added, "must have a home and enthusiastic constituencies in the regular budgeting and procurement process."

This gets to an important point. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been funded largely through emergency spending measures, and that firehose of money has warped the Pentagon budget process and seriously diminished oversight. While supplemental war budgeting is supposed to cover the unpredictable costs for ongoing operations, in practice it's become a way for the services to plump up spending for new equipment and avoid the pain of making sensible long-term budget decisions.

<more>

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2009/01/gates.html
*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. big mistake. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Selecting Gates means NO CHANGE to US military policy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. ABC: President Obama Heads to the Pentagon Tomorrow
President Obama Heads to the Pentagon Tomorrow
Victor Ratner and Sunlen Miller

January 27, 2009 11:04 AM

ABC News' Victor Ratner and Sunlen Miller reports:

President Obama will visit the Pentagon tomorrow to meet with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Service Chiefs.

White House aides say this is the next in a series of meetings designed to get a comprehensive view of the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan – and the impact on American forces in the region.

While appearing before Senate Armed Service Committee this morning, Secretary Gates confirmed tomorrow’s visit.

This will mark Obama’s first visit to the Pentagon as President.

On his first day in office last week President Obama met with Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Secretary of Defense Gates, and head of US Central Command Gen. David Petraeus. Tomorrow's meeting will include the service chiefs who run the four military services...http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/01/preside...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why don't we train the Afghans
To fight for themselves. It would be cheaper to recruit them and train them than having us over there. You pay them, cloth them, feed them and train them. I'm sure if they see it as it will get the US out of their country I think they would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Semi_subversive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. My semi-adopted son is headed there in October
He came back from Iraq in July and is having PTSD problems. I'm hoping that he will get out of it since he will be getting full custody of his two year old son. My oldest son will be moving up to the Ft. Lewis area next month to be his roommate and possibly take care of his home when/if he's deployed. We may wind up taking care of his son here in Sacramento for the 12 months he's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. went thru that myself
they are reusing and reusing the troops like so much fodder for these goddamned unnecessary wars....its total bullshit..these kids are being deployed over and over again..
looks like we need to march on DC again to stop another war.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here we go again...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. If the fire is already out of control you don't throw gasoline on it
Ya douse the fucker with water (money, humanitarian aid, weapons for the people who actually want the Taliban gone) and go home and have a brew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. To be considered for the POTUS position means to work for the military industrial elite.
To hell with what we want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlexDeLarge Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. With the economy going the way it's going
there won't be any need to debate about a draft. We'll all be in the military soon enough, since it's the only job that seems to be available to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I think that's all part of their plan. We will be forced into helping them gain their NWO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Were we not specific enough - NO WAR - not just iraq = stop killing people n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC