Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Caroline Kennedy faced tax 'problem' and nanny issue, says source close to Gov. David Paterson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:46 PM
Original message
Caroline Kennedy faced tax 'problem' and nanny issue, says source close to Gov. David Paterson
Source: NY Daily News

ALBANY - Caroline Kennedy, who stunningly quit her push for Hillary Clinton's Senate seat, is dealing with a "tax problem and a potential nanny issue," a source close to Gov. Paterson said Thursday.

"She was facing some potentially embarrassing personal issues" that came up during the vetting process, the source said, adding that the governor had decided she was not up to the job anyway.

Kennedy cited "personal reasons" when she released a terse one-sentence statement announcing she was quitting her Senate bid.

A source close to Kennedy insists she quit because her husband, Edward Schlossberg, decided he didn't want her to move to Washington.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/01/22/2009-01-22_caroline_kennedy_faced_tax_problem_and_n.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whew
Thank GOD it wasn't S E X. LOL.

I liked her too. But these personal problems are cliches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:56 PM
Original message
yeah, how many times have we heard this story
Nanny.

Taxes.

Gets 'em every time.



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think sex was involved too
Gossip columns have reported for more than a year that Kennedy's marriage to Ed Schlossberg is essentially over, and the gossip site Gawker.com has reported rumors that she's been linked to New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0109/The_real_reasons.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Geez...apparently, she shares her mother's taste in men
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Me too. I guess I was living in a fool's paradise, like others of my generation.
This is just not right. First it was her spotty record of voting now a violation of our tax laws. She is not fit for the job of U.S. Senator. We have re-instituted proper standards of conduct now with the Obama Administration. She doesn't measure up to those standards, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
54. Why is it that the richest people who love to lecture the rest of
us about what we do, end up doing the same shit. And they can AFFORD to pay the taxes. I'm disgusted. Go away, Caroline..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
67. They've got time to worry about such things
The rest of us are too busy trying to earn a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
71. Some of us tried to point out the folly of Kennedy worship
But nooooo, we got creamed for even suggesting such a thing.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
76. You mean like nominating Geithner to oversee the IRS . . .
It appears the standard of conduct has not really improved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. OH good grief - she's old enough to tell her nanny to piss off already!
Sounds like a taxing problem indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
66. No tax problem- Patterson is a liar and trying to cover his ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems remarkable, in this day and age, that an emancipated woman lets her husband make decisions for
her. I just find that hard to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I have worked with many male potential candidates for public office who decided to not run because
of their wives' objections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No kidding. You have to have the partner on board, even sometimes
a separated or divorced one when there are children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Colin Powell's wife supposedly decided he would not run for Pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Nah, It's All Damage Control
It's Paterson who needs to save face more at this point than CK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clareman Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yeah, the Paterson people are scrambling
It's the Paterson (and Cuomo) people pushing the nanny and tax story. If it's true, it's kind of odd that it didn't surface a month ago.

And it's especially odd that Obama trusted Caroline Kennedy to vet the VP candidates. If she had a nanny or tax problem of her own, what does that say about Obama's judgment? Did Obama really have a "tax cheat" (as some of you are calling her) making sure that Biden and all the others had no tax or nanny problems?

Whatever the problem was, somebody better get the real story before it sticks to Obama... who, by some accounts now, had a "tax cheat" vetting his VP choices.

What a fiasco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clareman Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Insults won't change the situation
If the person who was in charge of vetting Obama's VP turns out to have the most obvious problem, the classic nannygate a la Zoe Baird or Kimba Wood, it does look horrible. So yeah, it's a serious embarrassment.

Calling me a Freeper (which is pretty funny considering I spent the fall canvassing and phonebanking for Obama) doesn't change that fact.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Obama's judgment is just fine..
You need to stop cackling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
58. That person only called you a freeper because you act like one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. It must be something to do with her kids
The other issues she would have known would become known at the outset. And her husband wasn't going to stop her, that's just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Not Silly. If They're About to Separate, Ease of Shared Custody
becomes a major issue. Poster above says rumor mills have been grinding out gossip about them going their separate ways, and remaining married in name only. And an estranged spouse is a whole lot less tolerant of inconvenience than a loving one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACTION BASTARD Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. C'mon now she's a Kennedy...y'know "something" is wrong with her somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, a super-rich socialite who is also, you know, a tax cheat.
I think it's fair to say that she would have had some trouble holding the seat in 2010. Good move to withdraw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. now who was the obama pick who hadn't paid his taxes?
like caroline is exceptional in this regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Geithner was an excellent choice in every other respect.
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 04:24 PM by MathGuy
Caroline Kennedy was more like the Democratic version of Sarah Palin.

And, we don't need to worry about Geithner facing reelection in 2 years. Every Senate seat is critically important, given that we have an excellent chance to go above 60 in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. so being a tax cheat doesn't disqualify one from office, like i said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I agree that this was stunt casting, but c'mon....
...that's an extreme comparison.

Kennedy's got a little more on the ball than Palin.

She is a lawyer, after all. Palin's a failed state beauty pageant contestant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. "Caroline Kennedy was more like the Democratic version of Sarah Palin."
:wtf:

So a graduate of Radcliffe and Colombia Law School is suddenly the leftest version of the moose brain with diarrhea of the mouth who flunked out of 5 schools before finally stumbling through the 6th to get a degree in communications, afterwhich her trailer background reasserted itself and she promptly started out-of-control reproducing of herself not unlike what was shown in the movie "Idiocracy"?

'Mkay... :eyes:

I'm not a NY state resident but geebus... that comparison was way out in right field.

NY is about as corrupt as some of the more newsworthy corrupt states and certainly the downstate/update battle is raging there, regardless of whether a Kennedy or a Cuomo was under consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
68. Also, CK graduated in the top 10% of her class at Colombia Law School
and passed the notoriously difficult NY bar exam.

Let's see Palin do that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. She doesn't have to. She got elected to high office without that baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. True, she doesn't have to
but then again she couldn't, so the point is moot.

Extensive knowledge of the law and the Constitution is not "baggage" for an elected official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
69. uh have you seen Gore's transcripts? ,,,and Abe Lincoln wasn't Ivy League
Bill Gates was smart enough to drop out of Harvard.

Democratic Elitists, sigh...........

I prefer the self made types--who don't need Ivy League stamped on their fannies in an attempt to prove their worth.

Trailer trash? Your respect for poor people is overwhelming----please don't run for office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Gates had a 1590 on his SATs, Palin 841
It is not elitist to want intelligent people running the country.
Bush was such poor student that the University of Texas Law School rejected him.
Haven't we had enough of people like Bush and Palin in charge of things?

btw- Gates is hardly self-made. Gates’ great-grandfather was a state legislator and mayor. Gates’ grandfather was the vice-president for a national bank. His father was a prominent attorney.
His father lent him a quarter milion to start Microsoft.
Gates is no rags to riches story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. Wow, that's harsh.
"Caroline Kennedy was more like the Democratic version of Sarah Palin."

There is an IQ separation of at least 50 points between Palin and Kennedy- and if you made up a Political IQ test it would be even greater. I think Caroline would do fine in politics, but she needs to take it one step at a time. You don't go from shunning publicity to being a US Senator in one step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. You mean our new Secretary of the Treasury?
Edited on Thu Jan-22-09 05:03 PM by Baby Snooks
I love Obama. I can do without his table. Something tells me as time goes on Obama will find he can do without his table as well.

She had this odd look on Tuesday at the inaugural ceremony. Before Ted Kennedy collapsed. An out of place look. A look of sadness. Maybe worry? Maybe a lot of things. Maybe something that caused Ted Kennedy to worry. And collapse. Whatever it was or is, I doubt it had anything to do with Edwin Schlossberg deciding moving to Washington would destroy the marriage. But it sounds good.

Obviously it is a serious tax problem. Otherwise no one would have cared. They don't seem to care about the tax problem with our Secretary of the Treasury.

The final act of Camelot. The curtain has fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
63. IRS says no tax problem- Patterson is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. "adding that the governor had decided she was not up to the job anyway"
That's your story in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lin_e65 Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
78. The way the governor handled this ...
showed he wasn't up to the job, either. Did anyone even think a bit---I'm sorry, I'm not the smartest person......that Caroline dropped out Wednesday---the day after Teddy had his seizure. Maybe, just maybe, she dropped out to be with the only person who consistently was a father figure in her life...in order to spend the remaining time with him. Also, after Teddy's gone, it will be Caroline who will be the matriarch of the family. Why are people who blog always looking at the negeative side of people???. Ya'll sound like Rushies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I Almost Feel Sorry For Paterson
The more these leaks come out, the worse he looks for dragging it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sdfernando Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. I can't believe some of you
Labeling her as a "tax cheat" when you don't even know the full story.

What about Timothy Geithner....is he a tax cheat as well???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. well, yeah
he's a tax cheat, but at least he's a qualified tax cheat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. and does not face reelection 2 years from now (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sdfernando Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. so I guess you're happy
that a criminal will be running the Treasury Dept....just like before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. OK let's lock him up and throw away the key instead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. At Least It's Not a Girl
They all have cooties, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
59. Oh yes, the double standard here
Why? Because she's a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RCinBrooklyn Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sounds like a bit of sour grapes from that source to reveal this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Jesus Christ, the Dems are starting to dig themselves a hole..................
.............First it was Il and Roland Burris, now it's NY and a Kennedy. Come Saturday, Patterson should tap Coumo and that will be the end of the NY fiasco. I swear, Democrats are so fucking good at cutting their own throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. You got that right!
The epic fail would be if Congress fails to enact President Obama's agenda. This is minor, compared to Blago. This will blow over, though, but it looks like you're right--some folks are looking for a way to fail.

That's part of what being a Democrat or has been--I hope we've left that behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
52. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Patterson really is a piece of work.
Why is this dirty laundry going out at this point? Awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. because Bruno is still pulling Paterson's strings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Someone is.
It takes a lot of nerve to deny the President his personal pic. Who is Bruno though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #44
57. Bruno Says Obama's Like Spitzer: ....
Bruno - Spitzer - Troopergate ...after Spitzer resigned paterson got busted for the same ofensives with hookers but Bruno let him stay as long as Bruno got to play puppetmaster and Paterson gratefully kisses his ass.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/06/nyregion/06spitzer.html

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/02/a-new-nadir-in-bruno-spitzer-relationship/

The dysfunctional relationship between Gov. Eliot Spitzer and the Senate majority leader, Joseph L. Bruno, has hit a new low.

Mr. Bruno, the state’s top Republican, railed about the governor for nearly an hour this afternoon, in the wake of Mr. Spitzer’s call for a state review of Mr. Bruno’s use of taxpayer-financed helicopter flights.

He called the governor “an overgrown rich spoiled brat who has tantrums all over the place.”

He said the governor, a Democrat, was “too temperamental to be the chief executive of 19 million people.”

He said the governor “does not understand that he is not a dictator, he is not a tyrant, he is not a king.”

He said the governor had done “practically nothing” to create jobs.

He said the governor would “make a great salesman” because he has no capacity to hear people say no.

He called Mr. Spitzer’s recent speeches lambasting Senate Republicans “a lot of well-thought-out fiction.”

He said the Senate would take a hard look at the governor’s nominee to head the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, H. Dale Hemmerdinger, because he had played host to a fund-raiser for the governor.

Mr. Bruno recounted a heated phone conversation with the governor in recent budget negotiations, during which the governor demanded that he come immediately to his office. “I am going to hit you so hard you’re going to go down and you’ll never get up,” Mr. Spitzer said, according to Mr. Bruno. The governor’s staff has disputed the account.

“Make a mud ball, throw it up against that wall, some of the mud sticks, right?” Mr. Bruno said. “He’s hoping enough mud sticks, slows me down, makes me less effective.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. I Suspect He Is, More Than Many Will Admit
Only a nicer version. We'll find out soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Oh GMAFB, half of Manhattan faces that issue I'm sure..
it's okay for Geithner not to pay taxes, but we're going to hang Caroline Kennedy for it? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Who said it was okay for Geithner?
A lot of people don't think it's okay. A lot of Democrats. A lot of people had a problem with Hillary Clinton. A lot of people don't think the obvious conflict-of-interest is okay. A lot of Democrats.

A lot of people had a problem with Caroline Kennedy stating she would make financial disclosure AFTER she was appointed. A lot of Democrats.

Obviously she realized part of that disclosure would disclose the tax problem despite someone obviously telling her initially it wouldn't. And given the obvious "look the other way" attitude of Congress, it must be a serious tax problem. Not something that can be dismissed as an accounting error.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. nanny issue? how old are her kids?
I thought her kids were all grown up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. 20 & 18
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. the rich really are different
Oh boy, I'd love to know why an 18- and 20-yr old need a nanny. I'll bet the person in question is actually some kind of personal maid to CK but she dare not call her that in public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. The nanny issue doesn't need to be a current nanny
Just because whatever problem there was occurred in the past doesn't make it not a problem for this current appointment (and in any event, the tax/illegal worker issue - whichever variation of nanny problem it is supposed to be - would be the same whether it was a nanny or a personal assistant).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. a "housekeeper issue"
Another news source is claiming the person in question was a housekeeper. Guess we'll never know and it doesn't much matter anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. hell, more useful for that age set than younger!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
65. Patterson is lying- there is no tax issue- no nanny issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherish44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. just some rambling thoughts on CK
She's the last surviving member of a mega wealthy family. She and John-John inherited hundreds of millions of dollars. Remember the Kennedys owned Merchandise Mart, her mother married a billionaire and after she died, they auctioned off her stuff and people went APE SHIT with the bidding and were willing to pay $1000 for Jackie O's dryer lint.... And since her brother died without any heirs, she mostly likely inherited a good chunk of his estate. I'm sure she can affored to hire some very savvy accountants who know a few tax tricks. But don't tell me that US Senate members (who I'm willing to bet are mostly are millionaires themselves) don't have a few "creative accountants" doing their taxes. As far as the nanny goes...mostly an undocumented immigrant which would be enough to cause all the GOP members to have major strokes and wet themselves. Think of the carpet cleaning bill. I think she's just too reserved for the nasty game of politics. She'd be dealing with some cutthroat, bitter motherfuckers with this current Congress. You have to be tough and being a woman, she'd have to be a raging bitch to get any headway with them and she just doesn't seem to the proverbial "balls". Caroline probably got her feelings hurt from all the criticism. Anyway there's all kinds of things she can do and I hope she finds her niche. It's obvious she's inspired and wants to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Probably not an undocumented immigrant?
Why would someone hire an undocumented immigrant other than to save a few bucks? Is she is so wealthy, why would she do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. A point I made upstream. They do seem to do it though.
Obviously whatever it was it was an embarrassment, and besides, she's not qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. I don't agree that she was unqualified, but I beleive that there are better choices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. I think it was painfully obvious from the beginning she wasn't
qualified, and somebody got some dirt on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. A source close to Paterson,
published in the NYT. Would that be the Mayor of Paris any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why do rich people think they are above the law regarding these issues?
It derailed quite a few Clinton nominees as I recall and it has come up with Geithner too. PAY YOUR FUCKING TAXES ALREADY, you rich assholes! That is why they have accountants, since they are apparently too stupid to figure it out themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. It's a rumor from the office of the guy who sold Caroline down the river
and doesn't want to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Well she thre Hillary under the bus, didn't she?
Paybacks can be hell. Wonder where this "info" came from. Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
64. Patterson was LYING- there is no tax issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
79. Mebbe it was a NYS tax issue, who knows? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
75. Shameful.
I don't know who I'm less impressed with -- the Media or the people buying what the Media is selling. Everyone is dissing Kennedy based on .... what, exactly?? An unnamed source in the Paterson camp. Good grief. Can we please at least wait until we know all of the facts? I *HATE* the way our Media breaks a story and then adds in their own opinions (or those of unnamed sources) when they need to fill up space. This is disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
77. she may have hired an illegal alien for a nanny
but claimed her as an employee on her taxes anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC