|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
BlueJessamine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 09:50 AM Original message |
Obama: Time to look forward, but Bush aides aren't above the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannie4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. i love obama!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Why? That was the most watered down, weak assed answer I've ever heard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I wish I didn't feel he same way, but I do. "Looking forward" seems to indicate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
88. That's exactly right. We're a nation of laws, and Dems must show that we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
25. It is not up to Obama to tell the DoJ who to prosecute or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. You are soooo right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #46 |
78. Or You Could Be Completely Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #78 |
90. 50 50 chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
71. You think this would come as a surprise to Bushco? I bet the pardons have been in a safe in an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
56. What he says isn't inspiring, and if what he says is what he does then he's obstructing justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
81. They don't need him to direct them, and it is best he doesn't get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. lame.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. In answer to the question, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. Bwahahahahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azygous (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Charlie Brown, football, Lucy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
82. Not looking good, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
6. how do we move forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. This story does not bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Revenge? BushCo has a 22% approval rating. At this point I think America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 06:47 AM Response to Reply #16 |
69. Well, bush still has a 100% approval rating at Time-Warner-CNN &the Washington Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Teasing Liberals with an empty statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
8. I guess I'm reduced to the hope that he's talking softly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_thayer (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Me too, but I don't think it's pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
11. Oh STFU all of you and quit your damn bellyaching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I agree completely.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Yeah it IS stupid....unless you take that discussion to Obama himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Again, I agree completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 07:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
61. I'm not cheerleading, I intend to hold Obama's feet to the fire for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riverdale (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-09 01:49 AM Response to Reply #61 |
92. If the President does it, then it is not illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. How can we go forward if we don't know our past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Better yet, how do we own our future if we don't own our past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dystopian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:53 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Aptly put. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
47. Josh Marshall had an interesting take on your deeply stupid sentiment today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Now stop with that logic stuff! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:50 AM Response to Reply #47 |
75. Thank you. Doing something--speaking, writing, whatever--is our duty and our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EconomicLiberal (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
14. Translation: The Bush crime cabal will get away scot free. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
17. As an Obama supporter, I am disappointed in his response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushmeister0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. It's worse than double talk. It's Bush Speak 101. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
18. If we move forward without prosecutions of those who did break the law. Then they are above the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booksenkatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
21. Clinton "looked forward" too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. So, President Obama is going to leave those kinds of decisions up to the AG. Velly interestink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Depends. In this case, though, he appointed the AG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. The DoJ is supposed to be loyal to the law. It is not the president who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. I agree that it's best to keep any info on future prosecutions secret. However, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. The DoJ is not the president's personal lawyer. Sure, the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You're right, alfredo, the DOJ is not the president's personal lawyer. And I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. If I was in Obama's place I would be vague on the question of prosecution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 07:25 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. I agree. But I'm afraid they're not so "slow" that they haven't already thought of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. True, but they want to make sure some don't bolt before anything can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Bingo! To answer the question directly feeds into a neo-con trap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. "Snuffy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Isn't he though? You'd never know he once worked for a Dem Prez. Smug little twerp.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:36 AM Response to Reply #62 |
72. They have had plenty of time to destroy evidence and they have done so. Hard drives AWOL, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #29 |
79. Supposed to be loyal to the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
83. Sssshhhhhh! We're not allowed to ask those kinds of questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
24. It is quite obvious that Obama has no intention of calling those bushista |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nodramamama (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. He seems to imply that prosecuting Bush aids is a step backward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Obama is right by being vague at this point. His AG still faces confirmation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marasinghe (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
86. yeah; way to play smart - instead of doing the right thing (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-13-09 12:11 AM Response to Reply #86 |
91. He hasn't even taken his oath yet. How can he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
27. Nothing will happen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
31. Whatever the answer, I am happy that the question got asked on national TV. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Especially the question most voted up on his site and by a very large margin. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejbr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
32. Wait and see, I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meeker Morgan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
36. Hear that George? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
37. Any one who cannot read O's answers as just so many dodges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
39. What a BS Dodge. Anyone can interprit this anyway they choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
41. Obama plays poker, so I am told. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. Naive as I am, I will say that Obama would never come out and say he will go after the bastards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
43. So blatant criminals with blood-soaked hands will walk away smiling, with a wink from Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressIn2008 (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
44. Ah. So prosecuting war crimes is now "a step backwards." Isn't upbeat enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
45. There's one thing we can all agree on about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
49. Umm... So was that a 'yes' or a 'no'? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
51. obama doesnt have a choice really..the sins of our nation can only be healed by holding the creators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
52. I am interested in his answers once he IS the POTUS and not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
54. I hate to say it, but I think that's code for "forgive Bush" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyldRogue (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. And if that happens... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
57. Obama is as good man as Colin Powel, and as powerless nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #57 |
74. Powell? Powell, who did his best to sell the Iraqi invasion to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marasinghe (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #74 |
89. irony - perhaps witting - on the part of poster # 57.. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
58. I hope he is trying to keep it low key for 9 more days, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJessamine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
60. Dawn Johnsen, Obama’s choice to lead the Office of Legal Counsel, rejects Obama’s “look forward” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 06:54 AM Response to Reply #60 |
70. Nice find! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJessamine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #70 |
80. you're welcome! n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marasinghe (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
87. question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
64. Obama's statements are very disappointing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #64 |
76. Beautiful. Please email at change.gov or write a LTTE or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-11-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
67. He is with Pelosi on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
77. Thing is, Clinton's approval ratings went up after he got impeached. So, they are scared. If you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
84. The world is watching, Obama. As am I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-12-09 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
85. I LOVE YOU OBAMA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC