Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A New Cigarette Hazard: ‘Third-Hand Smoke’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:14 AM
Original message
A New Cigarette Hazard: ‘Third-Hand Smoke’
Source: New York Times

Parents who smoke often open a window or turn on a fan to clear the air of second-hand smoke, but experts now have identified another smoking-related threat to children’s health that isn’t as easy to get rid of: third-hand smoke.

That’s the term being used to describe the invisible yet toxic brew of gases and particles clinging to smokers’ hair and clothing, not to mention cushions and carpeting, that lingers long after smoke has cleared from a room. The residue includes heavy metals, carcinogens and even radioactive materials that young children can get on their hands and ingest, especially if they’re crawling or playing on the floor.

Doctors from MassGeneral Hospital for Children in Boston coined the term “third-hand smoke” to describe these chemicals in a new study that focused on the risks they pose to infants and children. The study was published in this month’s issue of the journal Pediatrics....

Third-hand smoke is what one smells when a smoker gets in an elevator after going outside for a cigarette, he said, or in a hotel room where people were smoking. “Your nose isn’t lying,” he said. “The stuff is so toxic that your brain is telling you: ’Get away.’”...

***

Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician who heads the Children’s Environmental Health Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, said the phrase third-hand smoke is a brand-new term that has implications for behavior. “The central message here is that simply closing the kitchen door to take a smoke is not protecting the kids from the effects of that smoke,” he said. “There are carcinogens in this third-hand smoke, and they are a cancer risk for anybody of any age who comes into contact with them.”...

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm smoking right now.
Mmmmm yummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So am I, and I suspect if EVERYTHING that caused death was
researched and put into a graph, there would be many other causes other than smoking that are very hazerdous. I've been smoking for a LONG TIME, but I can tell you, it;s bothers me a lot more when I'm waiting at a city bus stop where 50+ busses stop every hour, coupled with all the heavy city traffic idling at the traffic lights. Smoking has been around for a VERY LONG TIME, but only in the last few decades many children are contracting asthma, diabetes, high cholesterol #'s, etc. Surely you're not going to blame that on smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
67. Many children in the past probably weren't diagnosed with asthma.
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 04:43 AM by pnwmom
I wasn't diagnosed till well into adulthood. Doctors had missed the symptoms when I was a child, and I didn't know enough to realize something was wrong.

I knew I had a problem with cigarette smoke, though. So I thought it was one more "allergy" that I had. The pro-smoking people will say that there is no such thing as an "allergy" to cigarette smoke, that it is "only" an irritant. What they don't tell you is that "irritant" doesn't mean "irritating" or "annoying." "Irritant" is another word for an asthma trigger.

Fortunately, my mother gave up smoking when I was still in elementary school, but there was still a of exposure in the outside world back then. Even in places like doctor's offices and hospitals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. You've got that right.

I remember being raised in a family full of smokers and having my nasal passages constantly constricted. I had some attacks where I had difficulty breathing, and the family thought it was nervousness.

Smoking has been cleaned up, and I don't have those symptoms anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. When I was growing up they thought asthma was a psychosomatic disease.
And by the time I was a teen, I knew that -- so why would I tell anyone I thought I had an imaginary illness?

Nervousness. Your breathing passages were inflamed and constricted -- darn right you were nervous! I was nervous those three times I had pneumonia as a child, too. Nothing like not breathing to make you feel nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #73
142. I have a terrible allergic reaction when I'm near a smoker.
Watery, itchy eyes, difficulty breathing, etc. I grew up in a household of smokers, and by the age of 8 - I could barely breath in the house, and had all sorts of problems leading to my tonsils and adenoids being removed. I also suffored continuous nose bleeds, so bad I would end up in the emergency over it. The drs suggested they stop smoking, and things did get better - but the overall damage was already done.

People's selfishness never seems to amaze me. They'll cry outrage over a coal/ash spill, but blow smoke in the face of their loved ones. They'll fight to save the environment, while polluting their own. Morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #67
213. My younger sister has serious lung damage due to my parent's smoking.
She was prone to asthma as a baby and child, and both our parents smoked. Now she has serious lung damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
248. Third hand smoke is a canard
Seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. ...
You are going to a hell

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:


:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #58
66. Oh, I already knew that my dear.
Albeit for reasons completely distinct from smoking. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #58
206. Which hell?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
100. After this study, I think I'll take it up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
118. 4th hand smoke kills too
I am about to jump off of a tall building after reading these idiotic studies of smoking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #118
150. I got 4th hand smoke from looking at an unopened
carton of cigarettes. I am really starting to buzz. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
178. I have to question your honesty.
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 01:59 PM by ronnie624
But I can't fault you for the lie. It's the nicotine addiction that's talking. Crack and heroine addicts 'enjoy' their fix also.

I know that every time you attempt to exert yourself physically, you wish you could quit. Every time you suffer from an upper respiratory infection, and your breathing becomes ever more difficult, but you can't resist the urge to fire up another one anyway, you pray for the strength to destroy your demon. Doubtless there have been times when you are alone with your cigarette, and you are forced by your solitude into a bit of introspection, you've realized that you don't really 'enjoy' your addiction at all. It irritates your throat, makes you feel generally lousy, destroys your health, and offends other people.

I smoked for exactly thirty years, and I desperately wanted to quit for most them. I finally did it a little more than five years ago and I consider it my most taxing and difficult accomplishment. Now I work out 8-10 hours a week, I have more endurance than I did at twenty, I always feel good, and when I get the flu, it isn't anywhere near as severe as it used to be. I also enjoy the added benefit of spending cigarette money on other things, and my house, cloths and vehicle no longer carry the foul stench of stale cigarette smoke.

Few people are able to quit on the first or second attempt. In fact, most of those who do succeed must try multiple times, and only about 20% make it beyond six months. It is very difficult, but if you keep trying, you just might make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #178
194. I actually enjoy smoking.
Thanks for your concern, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
180. go cough right ahead cough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. oh for fuck's sake!
Look, smoking is bad mmkay. Smoking around your children is worse, but Kee-rist we have to draw a line somewhere. I can only imagine a nasty neighbor whose hedge trimmers you didn't return calling child protective services on you because he saw you smoking within 5 miles of a child.

If there was one MILLIONTH of the effort and rabid outrage against smoking applied to auto emissions and industrial pollution, our contribution to global warming would be nil.

I wager some of these doctors smell easy grant money and publicity, with a new cute SCARY term to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Thank you. You beat me to it. All of it. n/t
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
76. Couldn't have said it better, so I won't try. Thanks. ~nt~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
190. probably because of all the coughing and hacking...
JUST KIDDING!!!

My partner smokes - I "don't like it" but it's really up to him...I love him dearly, but won't nag him over this...and he seems to be healthier than I am...and he smokes OUTSIDE - even in the freezing cold...

I don't like all these nanny laws - read somewhere that you can't smoke OUTSIDE for chrissake! OUTSIDE!

Before I could move into my house, I had to sprinkle baking soda all over the place and let it sit and vacuum and steam the carpets...

My aunt was such a heavy smoker that my mom and aunts and uncles had to almost throw everything out and strip all the walls, etc. after she passed away before they could sell the house...my sister wouldn't even go for a visit it bothered her so bad - ii WAS that bad...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
78. thank you, well said
this anti-smoking crap is just way out of hand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #78
124. Seriously
This is totally overboard. Smokers have rights too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #78
146. Totally agree; let's get rid of all environmental regulations while we're at it
and stand up to those big- government, tree-hugger, liberal environmentalists who are trying to deny us our rights to pollute everything we can .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #146
149. uh, what... you don't think liberals smoke?
you need to get out more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #149
153. Played in smoky bars, sometimes 6 nights a week, for over 30 years; so have gotten out plenty
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 12:04 PM by abq e streeter
and yes, believe it or not, I've noticed that liberals smoke;, though to a much lesser degree than non-liberals in recent years anyway, from my own observation. Most progressives I know are much more health-oriented than others, and considerate of the rights of others to not be poisoned .I was among the musicians who testified to a state Senate committee about an indoor smoking ban that included bars, and it was only the republicans we had to convince, the Democrats were much more ready to support the concept of environmental regulation in the interest of public health ( ended up passing unanimously after our testimony ) . But yes, a few otherwise progressive enlightened people seem to willfully cling on to this one blind spot in their desire for a clean, non-polluted environment when it interferes with their nicotine addiction. Thank you for assisting me in pointing out the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #153
174. not hypocrisy, my friend, human, very, very human.
we are beautiful, tragically flawed creatures, not automatons. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #174
179. Fair enough; as one who is at least as, if not more flawed than most...
just trying to point out the hypocrisy of progressives who by definition as progressives, stand for clean air, water, food supplies etc, yet rabidly defend poisoning others with cigarette smoke...It IS hypocrisy in my opinion, but that is part of being an imperfect human too I suppose......By virtue of us being on DU, despite some differences on individual issues, we are on the same side of an important struggle for the soul of America; and here's wishing you a great new year, abq e streeter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #179
209. Do you also think progressives should refrain from using the known protoplasmic poison ethanol?
There are twelve million alcoholics in the U.S. Virtually all of them poison the social fabric, costing lives directly through accidents, killing their own bodies, wrecking families, racking up tens of billions in health care costs, hundreds of billions in economic losses.

How do you feel about progressives' daily use of the known carcinogen gasoline? Are you, by any chance, a driver? Do you cause the emission of automobile smoke into the atmosphere? Do you care that the people in the car behind you must breathe some of what comes out your tailpipe?

What's your opinion on progressives who permit their children to be exposed to the known diabetes facilitator sugar or the known liver poison acetaminophen or the known carcinogen sunlight?

As an aside, what's your take on the carbon dioxide that many progressives exhale?

Ok, I'm done being sarcastic. Your reply lacks all sense of proportion. Each time you breathe out you emit uncounted thousands of micro-organisms from your lungs and sinuses. In the right circumstances, these germs can infect or even kill, especially among the elderly and infants. In a technical sense, you are a continuous biohazard. But in a practical sense, you are just another person.

Your misuse of the poisoning argument shows the same disregard for actual risk as my gedanken paragraph above. Poisons are utterly dependent on dose...you learn this in the first semester of toxicology. An argument that takes no account whatsoever of dose or risk probabilities cannot be treated seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #209
214. wow
A very wise Duer told me that we're better than conservatives because 99% of them are idiots, whereas only 70% of us are. MY argument lacks all sense of proportion? Guess I just met one of the infamous 70%...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #214
215. fine as an opinion, but dead on arrival as an argument n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #209
216. Alcohol And Health
Moderate drinkers tend to have better health and live longer than those who are either abstainers or heavy drinkers. In addition to having fewer heart attacks and strokes, moderate consumers of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine or distilled spirits or liquor) are generally less likely to suffer hypertension or high blood pressure, peripheral artery disease, Alzheimer's disease and the common cold. Sensible drinking also appears to be beneficial in reducing or preventing diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, bone fractures and osteoporosis, kidney stones, digestive ailments, stress and depression, poor cognition and memory, Parkinson's disease, hepatitis A, pancreatic cancer, macular degeneration (a major cause of blindness), angina pectoris, duodenal ulcer, erectile dysfunction, hearing loss, gallstones, liver disease and poor physical condition in elderly.

<http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/alcoholandhealth.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #216
217. Do you believe that alcoholics are moderate drinkers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #217
219. Your question is purely rhetorical and merits no answer.
An alcoholic can drink in my presence without forcing me to imbibe along with him. The whole point of arguing over second hand or "third hand" smoke is its potential risks to non-smokers. In addition to that, I am certain there is no research that claims there are benefits of any sort associated with smoking tobacco.

The lack of sound logic in many of your arguments seems to suggest that you simply relish contention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #219
226. Do you think that alcoholics do not cause harm or damage to others?
In that case, I must conclude there are no alcoholics among your family or friends.

I don't relish contention, and I don't relish the demonization of others who hold different opinions. No one has a monopoly on right thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #226
236. Alcoholism does indeed harm others.
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 01:17 AM by ronnie624
However, in order for your analogy to be relevant to the topic of second hand or "third hand" smoke, the act of consuming alcohol by one person, would have to force someone else to imbibe as well. The act of drinking in the presence of non-drinkers does not force their bodies to absorb alcohol. The act of smoking in the presence of others however, does indeed force them to ingest tobacco smoke - a substance laden with toxic chemicals - which is at the center of the issue of second hand smoke. Whether or not tobacco smoke is harmful to the smoker or harmful to others in general terms, is irrelevant to this particular issue.

We now live in an era where it is no longer the norm to regard as weirdos, those who object to being subjected to tobacco smoke. You should be used to it by now.

As for your talk of "demonization", I suppose you are referring to my observation of your penchant for being argumentative, even at the expense of simple logic. If you consider that "demonization", perhaps you should alert on my post. The moderators might agree with your assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #236
241. It's not the act of consuming, but the act of harming, that's relevant.
The topic of the O.P. is that smoking by one person causes harm to other persons. It's not that smoking by one person causes others to smoke.

You just said: ..."in order for your analogy to be relevant to the topic of second hand or "third hand" smoke, the act of consuming alcohol by one person, would have to force someone else to imbibe as well."

Again, you seem to think that drinking excessively creates risk or harm only for the drinker. Actually, it creates a minefield of risk around the drinker. In the short term, excessive alcohol can lead to traffic and other physical accidents, verbal abuse, violence, and more. In the longer term, it can destroy a family, permanently damage the mental health of affected children ill-equipped to deal with the mayhem, and by diverting medical resources, cheats others of needed medical care. It harms all of us indirectly through loss of work and productivity, increase in medical costs, and social costs associated with cleaning up the damage done by the drinker to family, relatives, and others.

My point is a simple one. You'll have to go back a few cycles in this thread to see it. I'm not here to argue specifically about the risks shoved by drinkers onto others, but rather, to use it as one example among many. The "third-hand smoke" alarmists are happy to moralize with nothing more than a whiff of aspersion but not at all happy to introspect which of their own behaviors might be included in this silly diatribe.

As far as "demonization" is concerned, do you really want me to post links to some of the things you've said about me/to me in other threads when you found out I have some opinions different from yours? Ugly is the kindest description I can offer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #241
243. Convoluted nonsense,
created specifically to perpetuate disagreement. Clearly, you love to argue.

Good day to you, Psephos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #219
253. It's true that being near an alcoholic doesn't force me to imbibe..
but alcohol is a major cause of accidents and violence to bystanders as well as drinkers.

I drink moderately, don't smoke, and my nose and throat don't like being near smokers - but one can't say that only tobacco is a danger to others. Certainly I'd rather meet a smoker than a drunk on a dark evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #209
232. as a non-smoker
do I think alcoholism is bad? Absolutely. I think it's an addiction and disease. Disclaimer. I have a beer every now and then and occasionally a Long Island iced tea.

Not everyone who drinks is an alcoholic. However everyone who smokes is a smoker (from the social smoker who will light up maybe once a week to the chain smoker).

Drinking alcohol does not pollute the air. Smoking does. I left a job at a chain dept store because management allowed the overnight crew to smoke in the (public) bathrooms. It was worse than the bathrooms in high school. I think as an employee, I have the right to take a piss in an environment where I can breathe. I don't think that's much to ask for. Besides what they were doing by allowing indoor smoking was illegal in NY in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #232
242. And I think I have a right to take a drive in an environment where no drivers have been drinking
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 05:21 AM by Psephos
But if a driver had a beer and was driving, I fear her less than the one that had nine beers.

In other words, the risk is relative to the dose. Same with smoke. In terms of my own health, the numbers show the drinkers are an overwhelmingly greater risk to me than the smokers.

I repeat: the drinkers pose far more statistical risk. But you're giving them a pass (possibly because you drink alcohol yourself).

But let's forget about alcohol, for the purposes of discussion. The people in the next car over are worried about a driver who's been using meth or hash or whatever.

Or texting while driving.

Or fighting with his wife or boss.

Or was up too late and didn't get enough R.E.M.

etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #153
222. And you're proud?
As if the club owners and smokers forced you to set up and play in smoke-filled rooms?

There is some logic to this study. After all, something that does not exist does not smell or stink, and smoking particulates do stink. Even as a smoker I sometimes can't stand it.

Still, unless you were playing good Christian music, the particulates of your http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081223162113AAjTpaF">evil rock 'n' roll undoubtedly polluted the minds and spirits of hundreds if not thousands over the last 30 years.

Someone could do a study finding a certain percentage of your audience ended up in prison.

There is no end to the legislating perfection slippery slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #222
223.  I hereby apologize...
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 01:49 PM by abq e streeter
how selfish and petty of me to put my silly concerns over being exposed to an array of carcinogenic chemicals in order to be able to earn a living as being as important as the rights of smokers to pour those chemicals into my throat and lungs. I'm so ashamed; please forgive me. And fellow progressives, please immediately contact your representatives and demand an end to any and all efforts at environmental regulation, lest we inconvenience those whose god given right to disseminate those chemicals might be affected. Thank you for helping me and hopefully other misguided progressives to see the light. By the way, part of that testimony I've come to be ashamed of concerned a long time, and beloved, local entertainer who is dying of emphysema. I now understand that that's basically tough shit for him; your right to your cigarettes far outweighs his fatal disease in terms of what's truly important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
88. don't let any facts get in the way there.
ALBANY, N.Y. - A study released Thursday credits New York's 2003 Clean Indoor Air Act with an 8 percent drop in heart attacks statewide because of reduced exposure to secondhand smoke.

The report, issued by the state Health Department, found that hospitals admitted 3,813 fewer patients for heart attacks in 2004 than would be expected in New York without the indoor smoking ban. Studies elsewhere have reached similar conclusions. In one case, the rate of admissions for heart attacks returned to normal after the ban was lifted.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21027964/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #88
143. So they can tell which heart attacks were related to second (or third hand) smoke?
I read the article, thought admittedly not the study. I haven't been able to find it yet. Is it possible that fewer people had heart attacks because fewer were FIRST HAND SMOKING?

Here's a little gem from the article that would set off red flags for most people if he was a working on a study that people didn't want to believe.

"Clearly I'm a researcher, but I'm also probably a tobacco control advocate," Juster said. "But I'm a researcher first. If the (clean air) law was not effective I would be reporting that, but the law is effective."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #143
152. denial is ugly
the evidence is out there and it is compelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #152
181. Can you please send me a link to the study...
I'm interested in reading how they determine that the heart attacks they were no longer seeing were a result of second hand smoke, as opposed to first hand smoke or other factors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #88
147. gee Mr. Facts, your article is about secondhand smoke and this thread is about so-called "thirdhand"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #147
151. The general tone here is "its all bullshit":.
It isn't. The clear evidence of indirect harm from smoking is now becoming undeniable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #151
193. It can't by definition be "undeniable" if so many voices are raised to deny it
Third-hand smoke? Because someone with an agenda and a grant says so?

Skepticism is the only corrective we have against speculative science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #193
196. The people with an "agenda" are the GOP enabling tobacco pushers
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 06:44 PM by Lorien
and big pharma, who WANTS you to smoke, get sick, make them rich, then die before you cost them too much money. They'd love it if your filthy habit sickens a few of your family members. Ca-ching! They made a tidy profit from my grandfather and grandmother who both died of smoking related illnesses (only he smoked). You never saw the film "the Insider"? Maybe you should. It might be enlightening.

People deny it because they are, by definition, "in denial" about their addiction and the nature of the substance they're addicted to. They're all Phillip Morris' bitches-and, by extension, the GOPs. Not a single one of the deniers has EVER responded to these facts from the American Lung Association point by point:

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #196
204. good copy and paste, but bad relevance - I explicitly referred to "third-hand" smoke
Your reply is all about second-hand smoke. Poisons are a function of dose. Drink 20 liters of water and the dose will kill you. Stand at the seashore and breathe dissolved uranium in the sea spray - it will never hurt you because the dose is negligible.

This third-hand smoke business is exactly that - a business. There are exactly zero double-blind, controlled experiments producing any statistically significant data. It's all a puff of smoke.

btw, I don't smoke, I hate smoking, and I understand better than you probably think what kind of physiological damage the free radicals in cigarette smoke can cause when a smoker inhales them.

Also, I did see The Insider and thought it was excellent.

What I don't think is excellent is when emotion and self-righteousness interfere with the only safeguard we have to improve science: criticism. As soon as someone trots out the "denier" trope and uses authoritarian or conspiratorial conjectures I know that the discussion is no longer scientific.

You could do worse than read some Karl Popper on how science winnows out what's true from what's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #88
198. They never do:
Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
89. exactly...... or the perfume, nail and hair products that are over used by the same people who are
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 08:53 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
making all the noise....never mind the household cleaning and laundry products

and scented candles are the worst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #89
183. Bingo!
They don't do studies on common products like febreeze that people are encouraged to pollute their environments with. They don't look into the off gassing of toxins such as formaldehyde coming from man-made fabrics, carpets, furniture, walls in the house. Or consider the EMF being emitted by wireless cell and cordless phones. And on top of it all, people are eating dead, processed, chemicalized food from boxes and not allowing their bodies the opportunity to create natural defenses, or to heal. Its no wonder there is so much chronic illness nowadays. I'll bet if they looked at the whole picture, smoking would be only one small piece of a very big puzzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
106. Thank you.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
137. I don't smoke and I don't like the after smell of smoking.. BUT....
I agree with you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
230. Get no argument from me.
No on sems to ever look at all the other pollutants and toxins that are released by auto exhaust or smoke stacks or all the pesticides people use without thought and this is because these things are said and sold to be of benefit to mankind.

No one ever wonders where all the dust goes from all the worn down tires , is has to go somewhere, it's heavier than air so it must be on the lawns and floors and water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh JFC
WTF will they think of next? What a load of crap. I wish anti-smokers would spend more time contributing to work on overcoming the addiction. I'm sick of these "terra!! terra!!" warnings about second hand smoke, much less 3rd. I'm also tired of being branded a threat to society ... a 2nd, now 3rd-hand killer.

Off to feed my addiction now. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
72. Whether all you smokers like it or not, it's a filthy, disgusting habit
Nothing stinks the air up more than cigarette smoke. So you can either take this information as yet another reason to stop or you can go through your mental gyrations of how you're being picked on again to avoid the fact you're not only poisoning yourself but everyone within breathing distance of you. Sure there are a lucky few who can smoke till their 80 or 90 but it sure ain't the lot of you. Mom dead at 60, my good friend at work in the hospital at 64 near death right now, riddled with cancer. Both pack-a-day plus smokers and the doctors said point blank it's the cigarettes. Working in a nursing home I knew a lady who slowly suffocated to death as her lung capacity slowly shrank to nothing because of emphysema caused by smoking. I grew up thinking bronchitis was an annual event, inevitable, sometimes twice a year. But it wasn't me lighting up at six, seven, eight years old.

And for the others in this thread who use auto exhaust and pollution to compare damages and effects, all I can say is *wow*. That's nuts. I hope you realize how ridiculous that sounds.

You want to know how to overcome the addiction? Get sick of it, real sick of it, ashamed of it, disgusted with it. See it for what it is, what it does to you, and to the people around you. You have no idea what you're missing out on because of your choice to smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. Oh gee I didn't know that
:sarcasm: on the subject line

Thanks to Chantix I did stop smoking for several months just last year. Unfortunately the addiction drew me back. Two decades ago I quit for two years. I do know the advantages of not smoking and don't need education nor need to be berated. I need help, and I've been through every stop smoking program and have tried every method of quitting available to date (except the patch because of the dangers). Treating smokers who have an addiction surpassed by heroin addiction as if they are weak-willed threats to society does no good. Perhaps if the high sin taxes we paid were put to better use, as in cigarette rehab programs, it would go further than having non-smokers look down their noses at us and hearing the lectures.

I worked for one of the first corporations that banned smoking on the property. If an employee was caught drinking or smoking a joint, they were put on sick leave and sent for rehab. Smokers were told they would be fired if they smoked a legal substance in their own vehicles. Where's the sense in that? We could use rehab centers, too.

People die from a lot of poisons. My mother smoked all her life, lived till 87 and died of other causes. Many people who have never smoked die of lung cancer whether or not they were exposed to that "scary" second-hand smoke. A lot of people die from exposure to other carcinogens.

I'm not saying smoking is good. It sucks. I don't like smelling like an ashtray and don't smoke in my own house. I'm just sick to death of people lecturing and telling me what to do - that's a trait I also despise in RW conservatives. It doesn't work with any smoker, though it apparently makes non-smokers feel very pious. There are a very few programs around the country that are in-patient programs to fight the addiction. When those are available where I live, I'll check myself in.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #74
184. I do empathize with you
I smoked for over 20 years and have been smoke-free for the past 10. It took many many tries to quit, once I even stopped for a full year then started again. But I did finally manage to quit, and without any support group or drugs. This is how...

I picked a date about 3 months ahead that I planned to quit. In the meantime I stopped smoking in the house and car, and stopped drinking coffee which made it uncomfortable and not so pleasant to smoke. I worked on my head. Every time I went outside to smoke, I told myself how much I hated it, how it stunk, how gross and disgusting it was. After I went in I washed well to get the stink off. By the time my quitting date came I had cut down so much and I hated it so much that it was no effort to quit. I barely had any withdrawal symptoms and I never had any urge to take it up again.

Good luck!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #72
79. so is being a judgmental, holier-than-though windbag
so I guess we should outlaw that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #72
80. Oh for crying out loud!
? Get sick of it, real sick of it, ashamed of it, disgusted with it. See it for what it is, what it does to you, and to the people around you. You have no idea what you're missing out on because of your choice to smoke. WHAT?????????? sick!
I AM TOTALLY DISGUSTED, but not by my smoking habit,it's the CORRUPTION STUPID!)
I'm missing out on a LOT! Not from smoking, but from the lack of money, the inefficient way society runs these days.......( spent 3/4 of an hour running down to the library to log in to my hotmail account to check it out because I got a spam from some JERK! ( a nonsmoker with nothing better to do?)
In my profession time = money.........almost 50% of my time is drained off by foolishness these days! AND if I don't correct it I PAY A PENALTY! So I squander my time! At almost 70, this is a BIG LOSS!

"others in this thread who use auto exhaust and pollution to compare damages and effects, all I can say is *wow*. That's nuts. I hope you realize how ridiculous that sounds." Youbetcha! I lived in NJ 25 miles east of Philly..........had bronchitis every year............... moved to the coast of Maine 17 1/2 years ago..haven't had bronchitis since!
Since I am busier in my 69 th year than I have been in all my life.....do me a favor will you! Take up a crusade against the BIG FOOD producers!
I haven't been able to afford to eat the way I used to, thanks to the reagan/bush stock market crash & recession of 20 years ago. So I am now in danger of being a diabetic from the HIGH FUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, in CAMPBELLS TOMATO SOUP etc etc etc.............I have to bake my own bread now to avoid hfcs, you CAN"T BUY a commercial loaf without it! WHat with having to grow my own veggies too, to avoid e-coli or irradiated spinach, I hardly have any time left to paint!
Picasso smoked until he died at age 91. but I am sure his food was healthier!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #72
91. "Nothing stinks up the air more than cigarette smoke". BULLSHIT
as a resident of one of the cities with dozens of ozone alert days every year, allow me to inform you of some of those things:

Cement kilns
Cars
Trucks
Lawnmowers
Gasoline powered leaf blowers
Motorcycles
Coal burning power plants

Every single one of those things is worse than smoking. In Los Angeles, a child gets the maximum allowable exposure to chemicals they breathe in the first 10 days of life due to the poor air quality. Yet we continue this anti-smoker jihad on "health" grounds because smokers are individuals and it's easier than taking on the REAL polluters that are making it difficult to breathe in our cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #72
103. Being a judgmental prig is also a filthy habit
Any person promoting shame as a positive is simply so negative that logic is impossible. Go shame yourself for being so arrogant and presumptive. Hubris is a killer too.
I'd like to discuss your eating habits, in detail. You are in fact what you eat. What do you eat? Do you take prescription drugs? Do you know how much of that crap is in our water table, just because some folks 'need' mood enhancers and uppie yuppie pills? Do you understand that nearly every 'personal' choice you make, that all of us make, impacts others greatly? It is not just smoking, as much as you'd like that to be the case. Procreation, hell, it is destroying our planet, too many people. Got kids? How many?
When you paint your home, what kind of paint do you use? Are you one who wears leather or uses it for upholstery? Criminal level pollution, just for style.
What do you weigh? How tall are you? How often do you have major medical testing? Do you drive for pleasure? Eat meat from factory farms? Are you a drinker?
Don't look too closely. You could not stand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #72
140. Wow?
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 11:24 AM by Baby Snooks
"And for the others in this thread who use auto exhaust and pollution to compare damages and effects, all I can say is *wow*. That's nuts. I hope you realize how ridiculous that sounds."

There are medical studies showing increased number of cases of asthma in children as a result of air pollution.

There are medical studies showing that many of the common types of cancer associated with smokers also are found in non-smokers.

I get tired of all of this. I am addicted. Have tried it all. Some are not able to break the addiction. I try to be respectful of non-smokers. They, however, are not respectful of me. So you know what? *puff, puff* in their face every chance I get.

This is the same rationale of "if we get rid of the Republicans life will be perfect." All eyes turn to Nancy Pelosi.

I have the right to smoke in my home. Some states would like to tell me I don't have that right. I think the non-smoking movement has gone too far. Clean up the air outside. Then clean up the air inside.

And you know what? My doctor, who was head of internal medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told me 20 years ago that my concern should be emphysema. I have a history of lung cancer in my family. So I will probably die of lung cancer even if I had never smoked.

I have a friend who has never smoked and never been around smokers apart from restaurants and clubs. She has emphysema. No doubt from all the second-hand and third-hand smoke she's been exposed to.

It couldn't possibly be from living in the most or second most polluted city in the country.

Would I stop if I could? Yes. And don't tell me I could if I wanted to. Not having to put up with people telling me I'm disgusting because I smoke in itself is sufficient motivation to stop. The point is I am one of those who is hopelessly and physically addicted and perhaps in a way I am physically disabled so perhaps I should start suing people for discriminating against me under the provisions of ADA.

In the meantime, if you get abusive in your attitude towards me simply because you feel I should stop smoking to please you, expect to have smoke blown in your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #140
154. Seems like there are also plenty of studies showing...
the dangers of drunk driving, and the damaging effects of alcohol on the liver. I think we should institute a ban immediately. I mean, how are we ever going to know if a ban works if we don't try....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #154
158. last time I looked there is a ban on drunk driving.
there is no particular need to ban self abuse with alcohol or tobacco, however where that self abuse cascades into harm to others, regulation is in order.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #158
162. But the ban on drunk driving is ineffective....
Just read the obit column in your paper. We obviously need to ban the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #162
163. No the ban is effective, just not totally effective.
Drunk driving fatalities are way down. It seems that the trade off between individual rights and public safety is reasonable with both drunk driving and second hand smoke. In neither case is there any need to initiate a general prohibition against self abuse with alcohol or tobacco. If there is valid evidence that third hand smoke constitutes a real danger to public safety, as the evidence for second hand smoke now convincingly does, then it could in fact be justifiable to further restrict your individual right to kill yourself with tobacco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #158
225. I think the point is that it's a half-assed "ban".
The government can pretty much eliminate drunk driving...but the money is against it. One result of a real ban would be the extinction of an entire industry (bars) in any area without good public transportation (most of the U.S.).

In other words, the "ban" is a farce because business would go apeshit if it was real. Shit, DUI arrests would go through the roof if cops simply hung out after about 2:00 a.m. by bars...why don't they? Hmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #140
199. Baby Snooks
Good luck, when you make the choice to try again.

I smoked for 30 years and only quit when I was good and ready to. All the concerned non-smokers in the world couldn't have done a thing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. oh, you've got to be fucking kidding me
Actual doctors are wasting their time on this? They ought to be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. they ought to be ashamed, but they'll get rich off of this instead.
WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN! is quite profitable, and smokers are easy scapegoats for sad, scared people who are too afraid to deal with the actual dangers of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
82. Please........
Won't someone think of the ELDERS? You sre making our lives HELL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Yes; according the article the only research was a telephone survey
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 12:41 AM by MindPilot
"Do you agree that (insert name of big scary thing here) is a big scary thing?"

Conclusion:
"Our study clearly shows that people are afraid of the (insert name of big scary thing here)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. I had
cabbage and black-eyed peas New Years day, I got your 3rd hand smoke right here bub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. looks like you had your own 'dropping' at the stroke of midnight
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. I
made my dog cry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Radioactive residue on the floor from tobacco smoke?
Riiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Tobacco plants have an affinity for radioactive minerals in the soil
I remember when that information was first published, about four years before the Surgeon General's report of 1964. Chemists and biologists who knew what ionizing radiation did to living tissue couldn't quit fast enough.

Some recent bad news is at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VB2-4183HWG-9&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=d6ae43bb14b5e65d39b3618132229dbe

Whether or not there's enough in the brown smelly goo clinging to the furniture to be harmful seems like a reach to me. Sucking it into your lungs just isn't that good an idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Way outside my realm of expertise, but surely tobacco isn't the only plant
that uptakes radioactive material & heavy metals from the soil? I have a tough time believing that the levels in a smoker's home would be high enough to even exceed the background radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. I think the levels might slightly exceed it
but probably not by as much as the radon from granite countertops.

I'm just guessing here.

It stinks, but I can't believe it's dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #31
55. those other plants aren't treated with chemicals to make them go straight to the brain
that is the purpose of the chemicals added to tobacco in cigarettes. to deliver it to the brain as fast as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
105. It's NOT the only plant that uptakes radioactive material from the soil
It is, however, a plant we use by setting it on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
70. I Was Cleaning a Smoker's House, and You Wouldn't Believe How Filthy the Walls Were
Brown, and sticky, and thickest at the top of the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #70
136. and smells like hell
plus the stench clings to stuff in a way that most other scents don't. We get books back from patrons at the library and I gag when I'm checking them in because the smell has permeated the paper. If a book that's been in a smoker's house for 3 weeks smells that bad what do you suppose the house smells like? People can smoke all they want but don't pretend that it doesn't smell or act like there's something wrong with other people for not liking the smell of it. I won't voluntarily sit next to someone who overdoses on cologne and I won't sit next to a smoker either. And having said all that, I will also admit that I'm an occasional social smoker. It doesn't bother me when I'm smoking (probably because my nose is fucked up from the smoke) but when I smell it on my clothes later it makes me gag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azygous Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
112. A natural incecticide
Farmers use tobacco leaves mixed in with the nesting material of their chickens to kill mites and other parasites. Won't hurt the chickens but it's potent enough to knock off the bugs. Draw your own conclusions, but then there's something in the personalities of smokers that make them especially prone to denial.

I grew up with smoking parents, and if parents could only experience the rib bruising pain a child suffers during an bout of bronchial pneumonia, they'd quit on the spot. But then maybe not. I can recall my mother laughing hysterically when my alergy doctor informed her I was allergic to tobacco. "But she doesn't even smoke!" I could understand the connection at age five. My mother was in denial, obviously. Smoking eventually killed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #112
186. I had one just like her
and had to watch her fight for every breath she took for the last 20 years of her life.

I don't know what it is about addiction that puts people so deeply into denial or threatens them so deeply when something about their drug is changed.

I just know that it'll kill most of them and I know it's a hideous price to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
68. A lot of things have radioactive isotopes in them.

Depends on how fast they decay, and the type of decay. Tobacco does leech a lot of elements from the soil. But if a radioactive isotope is in the tobacco, you could assured that it's also in the soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm totally sick of this crap....
When the sheriff and his posse made a huge burglary/drug bust around the corner from me, the last thing I was concerned about was 1st, 2nd and 3rd hand smoke.

I'm much more concerned about the fucking crack that's infested every corner of every town in every city and state.

This fucking crack has turned people into god damned zombies willing to do whatever it takes to get their next hit. They steal, cheat, prostitute and kill for this crap.

Our government and citizenry have a major drug crisis on their hands and all they can worry about is some LEGAL drug.

STFU about the damn ciggies, get rid of the damn CRACK and provide rehab for those addicted to it!!!!!!

I get the uneasy feeling that there are far more people addicted to crack then addicted to tobacco - at least that's how its starting to feel out there. Wish I knew where to find some "real" stats on how far and deep the crack (and meth) epidemic has spread and why no one seems to be as concerned about that as they do tobacco.

Sorry for ranting.

Interesting report.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Lets not forget the deadly forth hand smoke... that of a DU smoking flamewar
side effects include gaps and memory and a sudden craving for granite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. snarf!
good one. :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
155. Shit! You mean I can get cancer from DU as well?!
Thats it, I'm going to go live in a cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #155
233. Your monitor is emitting radiation right now
And there's a whole bunch of toxic chemicals and heavy metals in your computer -- probably far more than in "third hand smoke."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. I quit smoking after 35 years 2 1/2 years ago
I will assume that I am radioactive for the remainder of my time on this planet and everyone needs to get a grip on their sanity

this is bullshit

and anyone who wants to make something of it needs to quit drinking water and breathing - in general and without any ugly aspersions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
69. The radiation in tobacco smoke is old news.

I was a Navy Nuke, I could tell you that when they gave the figures for how much radiation was emitted by isotopes in tobacco smoke I was surprised.

But still they are overstating things for effect. The level of radiation is far less risky than the chemical compounds in tobacco smoke. It probably causes .1 percent of the total cancers caused by smoking, or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. One of the smoking nurses I worked with at my last job
used to spritz her uniform with Febreze after a smoke break.

The odd thing was that it worked.

While that sticky brown goo clinging to everything in a smoker's house might smell offensive, I can't imagine it would be that great a danger to anybody who wasn't chewing the furniture.

I don't think I'd want smokers near toddlers' clothing or toys, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
108. Quick Warpy. Call child protective services on me and my wife.
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 09:52 AM by YOY
We sometimes disappear our the back door for a puff! All while the other one of us is watching our toddler! Not around her or even in her line of sight, but FER CRISSAKES! IT'S ON OUR CLOTHES!!!! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!

Quick take her away!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #108
169. I was thinking of the black cloud about three and a half feet
off the floor in the house I grew up in that settled on everything making it obvious I came from a home in which two people chainsmoked.

I spent my childhood in a room with a closed door and an old towel stuffed under it.

I'm glad you smoke outside. It's a nice thing to do for your kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
128. and has anybody studied the longterm effect of Febreze on lungs? probably not.
I know two people who never smoked but died of lung cancer.

I agree with the dangers of all the other stuff people here have already mentioned. Air fresheners, exhaust, food additives, the stuff in our air, our water, the stuff we brush our teeth with, put on our skin, add to our laundry, all absorbed through the skin.. smoking has been around for a very long time, compared to most of this other stuff.

And of course, judgemental arrogance has also been around for a long time, and has started most of the wars. (this point isn't directed at you btw but it's popping throughout the thread).

I also think hate and stress and anger are as toxic as 3rd hand smoke, maybe even more toxic than first-hand smoke. And it's contagious, too.

I'm not defending smoking but common sense & compassion goes a long way. The anti-smoking fanaticism is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. I have co-workers who smoke at home and/or in their vehicles who stink so badly
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM by bertman
that it's disgusting to be around them. They have no clue how bad they smell until I tell them, and, of course, they don't like hearing it because they can't quit.

I smoked for 19 years and was lucky enough to be able to quit cold turkey one day and never looked back.

The medical hazard I'm most concerned about, though, is second-hand fart residue. Is anybody studying that toxic aroma?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. then why don't you do them a favor and QUIT.
Good for you, you were able to quit. So of course now it's perfectly okay to harrass others that haven't got your willpower?

They can clean their cars, and they don't notice the smoke smell. But I'll bet they dislike being around you for reasons that cannot be rinsed out in the wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
59. I could care less if they dislike hearing it or being around me. If I wore clothing that
had been worn every day and hadn't been washed in a week and never bathed or wore deodorant and stunk to high heaven, would I want someone to tell me that I smelled bad? Damn straight I would. I would appreciate being told something like that so I could do better.

Some people just don't have it in them to tell someone else when that person is doing something that makes them very uncomfortable. I'm not made that way. When I work in close quarters with other people I try to keep myself in a physical state that doesn't make them feel awful or wish I weren't there--as in I don't wear cologne or perfume because I have a co-worker who gets headaches from the smell of cologne. So, I expect the same from others. I think that's part of making a workplace somewhere you want to be, rather than someplace where you are miserable. Often people will not know until you tell them. And usually they will make an effort to "air out" or wash their clothes more frequently or use a deodorizer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. these twits need to start studying the effects of cheap cologne and perfumes
Because they've gone into the *I wouldn't believe your shit if it fell out of the sky* levels on this subject.

WHO paid for this research -- does it even say? Dr. Landrigan -- what do you DRIVE? Because I'm sure your CAR has caused far MORE cancer causing agents than anyone's clothing has!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. ridiculous
So what do they say about standing at the bus stop as traffic drives past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chucktaylor Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. Life is deadly. Nobody gets out alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
92. "Health nuts are gonna feel stupid one day...layin' in hospitals dyin' of NOTHING!" Redd Foxx
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Without trying to turn this into a gun flame war...
I can't help but wonder if some DU smokers can relate to DU gun owners with regard to always being under fire (smoke) for their personal private activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. and beyond that, BBQ smoke contains a lot of carcinogens.
I guess we shall have to grab the pitchforks and crack down on backyard grilling too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Yeah. That's the same.
What is with the smokers on this board? Are you all so defensive that you just can't accept the fact smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in this country?

God. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. and what number in your list of preventable causes of death is "3rd hand" smoking?
It's a real threat, you know. I don't know why I wasn't taking it seriously before. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Oh brother, someone fetch the salts.
this one is about to have a spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. It may be, but it still is a personal choice no?
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 01:08 AM by Endangered Specie
I mean, most people on this board would think people should be allowed to smoke marijuana without being harrassed.

Personal choice and personal responsibility.


Keeping in mind, I personally would never EVER smoke any tobacco product. But to draw another analogy, most women on this board would NEVER have an abortion, but Id say nearly all support not being able to decide for other women whats 'best'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. oh, any and all cooking of food should obviously be outlawed
unless it's cooked by the sun's rays in a clay oven, naturally. Even if you aren't BBQing, you have to power that cooker some how, likely from a coal-fired or nuclear power plant. Wind power isn't clean either - it's just 3rd hand pollution; I've seen those turbines being hauled of the back of vile diesel burning 18 wheelers before being installed. Why do people who use electricity refuse to acknowledge that they're horrible, offensive, hate children, and ought to just go off themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I think that a lot of us certainly can
yes, indeedy-do. While I'm very pro 2nd amendment, I would be more scared if someone came into my house, stole a gun and killed someone with it than if they came into my house, stole a pack of lucky strikes and forced a kid to smoke them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. well, responsible owners would not allow that to happen
much like a responsible smoker/tobacco chewer would not smoke while pregnant/blow smoke on their child etc...

Also, cigarettes kill more people than guns in this country, but its your right to choose what chemicals to put into your body as much as it is my right to be able to defend myself with something a little more sophisticated than a sharp stick (and punch (hopefully tiny) groups of holes in paper targets).

There will always be people who 'know better' or 'for the children...' want to make decisions for us on what we can do. Better to unite than divide ourselves up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. oh, I agree
Both are things for reasonable adults, and I'm all for reasonable laws restricting access. I didn't smoke until I was an adult, and I think that's the way it should be for anyone who wants to smoke. With a few minor exceptions (deer hunting with low powered rifles with adult supervision, for instance), I also don't think children should be allowed to use fire arms.

The US has really broken my heart over the last 8 years, but there are still things about it that I love very much, even though I'm afraid they're going away.... mutual respect for the differences of others is one of the things that I love about the US that's being eroded away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Lets hope over the next four years we can heal all those broken hearts...
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 01:16 AM by Endangered Specie
and find similarity and respect in our differences :)

one technicality I can't resist though:
Its already federal law you must be 18/21 to own a longgun/handgun, and, for a minor to be allowed to use it the adult must be present and supervising. In NC it is a misdameanor to (simplified wording) leave a gun such that a minor can easily obtain access to it.

also, some would consider low power rifles to be inhumane to use on deer.

I am curious what you think about the perhaps less controversial issue of second-hand smoking and how it should be managed in a public atmosphere? I bet smoking laws are just as complicated as gun laws so I really don't know what rules their are w/ regard to where you can/can't smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. there are no easy answers, unfortunately
I'm no sage, and I'm not a medical doctor, a sociologist, etc., so I can't say what good laws could/should be - I'd just like to have the people drafting the laws representing what's best for the people at large with respect to their personal liberty, instead of working from the tyranny of a powerful elite or puritanical majority.

I don't see why business owners shouldn't be able to choose to allow smoking in their businesses, for instance, especially if it's an adults-only place, such as a bar. I don't have kids, but I have friends who do. If I'm indoors or at a restaurant with children present, I won't smoke, but if I'm outside or at a park and I'm talking to a friend and they have a child with them, I'll have a cigarette - it's outside, for christ's sake. Life is dangerous and has some hazards - I don't think being 5 feet away from someone smoking outdoors with a breeze is going to cause any irreparable harm to anyone.

As for "low powered", I guess I don't have a definition. I don't know enough about guns. My dad was a sharp-shooter in the army, and for his own personal reasons would never let us kids so much as touch a gun. I did have cousins that hunted with their dads, and I know they were just simple rifles that they used, and it always went ok. I'm not surprised about the adult supervision laws that you mentioned, but it seems like more should be done for some things - to pick a recent news event, I just can't imagine any reason why an 8 year old would be allowed to fire an Uzi, no matter who is supervising him. It seems like giving a kid control over a tractor trailer at 80mph on a crowded highway - activities for properly trained licensed adults are not necessarily ok for kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
83. Honey.........
mutual respect for the differences of others is one of the things that I love about the US that's being eroded away.
It's done GONE!
Until people learn to be more sensitive to others we are screwed! What is wrong with you people? Impeaching bush would have saved a LOT MORE PEOPLE why are you concerned only with the smokers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #83
145. I'm not concerned with smokers
I am a smoker. I am concerned about civil liberties, such as being an adult and being able to choose what to do with my own body, such as smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mt13 Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #26
148. hmmm.
lucky strikes! we used to play a game when i was a kid: see an empty pack of lucky strikes on the ground, stomp on it while punching your friend in the arm, yelling "lucky strike!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
156. What gets me is the hypocrisy
Like guns, smoking is an inherently dangerous activity - and I acknowledge that as one who does smoke. Personally, I kind of wish the government would ban cigarettes, because I plainly lack the will power to quit on my own and sincerely wish that I had never been allowed to start. But the government doesn't do that, because they get to fund their pet pork projects by constantly raising taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, knowing that smokers and drinkers are too unpopular to resist imposition of any new taxes. If you want to ban smoking as a public safety hazard, I can respect that position. If you want to assess higher taxes on smokers to compensate for the increased costs to public health posed by smoking, that too I can respect. But when you rail about the evils of smoking, but then rely upon smokers to pay for everything from roads to schools to utilities to parks to whatever, that's pretty fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. It's true, and all the denial from nicotine addicts will NOT disprove it.
Flame away - you know it's right. And I don't give a damn what you think - just keep your filthy smoke away from my lungs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. ok, immediately stop driving, flying, grilling meat, etc.
Nobody here is advocating blowing smoke in kids' faces just because we can smell junk science and manufactured fear and outrage. I would, however, strongly suggest you see someone about your self-righteousness and indignation. Both conditions are highly toxic, addictive, and contagious. For the record, I don't smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. How about you keep your lungs away from me?
Thanks, now we are both happy. OK, at least I am; you may never be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. Fine. Just stay the fuck out of my bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. And please keep your pristine lungs away from my smoke.
I paid for my cigarettes, dammit, and I don't want to share any of my smoke with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
61. And are you equally disdainful of fireplaces, barbeques and bonfires?
SAME EXACT chemicals wafting in the air, sans nicotine, which you might be interested to know is *not* the carginogenic agent in tobacco smoke.

Well, one thing is sure: the "I'm going to die because I got a whiff of cigarette smoke" grandiose-coughing drama queens never fail to entertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
170. You know, I've posted these facts here many times, but no GOP enabling
tobacco addict (and that's what a tobacco addicted friend of mine calls herself, along with "Philip Morris' bitch") has ever addressed these facts point by point. Here they are, from the American Lung Association:

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp. Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
36. I'm vociferously anti smoking, however...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
38. At my job, when smokers come back from the parking garage after a smoking break,
they do smell pretty disgusting. I hate it when one of them comes up and talks to me by the water cooler or coffee machine right after they take a smoke break, and I have to act friendly and pretend not to notice the foul smell of the toxic fumes drifting around them. I wish they could chew some nicotine gum instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
41. Nobody should smoke
Zero benefit; the health hazard is obvious by now. The odds of disease of many kinds increase for whoever smokes.

Guilting people into thinking they are harming others is all that will work when they insist on harming themselves? And maybe it really does harm others and smokers just don't want to think about that. Who can blame them when they care so little for themselves?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. oh, there are benefits.
Smoking relaxes me, it increases short term memory and helps concentration, it provides relief for nervousness/anxiety. I'm an adult and I'm responsible enough to choose what to do with my own body. Should sex be eliminated in favour of artificial insemination? I'm pulled muscles during sex, which I'm sure wasn't "good for me", but, trust me, it was damn well worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #43
139. The dangers of smoking outweigh the "benefits"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #139
144. maybe for you, but, guess what?!
I'm a fucking adult, and I can choose what to do with my own fucking body!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #144
175. Whoa. All those exclamation points. I see what you mean about nervousness and anxiety
and needing to relax. But it would be much better to do something like breathing exercises or yoga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #175
191. would I?
I think you would do better to go back to age 3 or 4 and relearn what it is to live in a society with other people who are different from yourself.

Breathing exercise and yoga = sucks.

Smoking a pack of lucky strike brand cigarettes = awesome.

What don't you get about this? Are also some crazy pro-life fundy? Do you realize that this way of thinking of yours is exactly the same kind of mentality that gets abortion clinics bombed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #191
235. OK. Dr Koop = Eric Rudolph.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #139
157. Same could be said of drinking...
Check your local paper for drunk driving deaths last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shardik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. What's in the future? Fourth or fifth hand smoke?
I knew a guy who knew a guy who shook hands with a smoker so know I have radiation poisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. I couldn't work today, I had to call off.
Last night I was at a convenience store and a man came in and stood behind me at the checkout. It was obvious he had recently smoked a cigarette. Almost immediately I could feel my throat closing. I got so light-headed I couldn't make my purchase. I left the items on the counter and got out of the store as quickly as I could. Things started going black just as I got to the door and the next thing I knew I was sitting on the sidewalk propped up against the wall. A kind Samaritan was fanning my face while his friend was calling 911. I persuaded him to cancel the call. I live just a few doors down and just needed to get home and lie down. I was gasping for breathe all night, my hands and feet were almost blue from constricted circulation and all the carbon monoxide. I couldn't sleep at all. Even if I my lungs hadn't been seared by my exposure I wouldn't have been able to sleep. I was worried sick about what was going to happen to me now. I'm not ready to die. Now it's all I can think about.

I see a lung specialist on Monday(if I make it till then). I hope he can help me. I want my life back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #47
62. A psychosomatic reaction I suspect. If not, you belong in a bubble. Seriously.
Or maybe you just need a sarcasm smiley. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #62
173. Really, if I was that much of a twit
don't you think someone would have killed me by now? Or should have? I was just mocking some of the ridiculous over-reaction some have toward tobacco and tobacco users. Not smoking is a good choice to make, and annoyance over second-hand smoke is a legitimate complaint, but third-hand exposure threatening the purity of non-smokers is something I just can't view that as anything other than maddeningly silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #47
218. hilarious :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
48. I avoid second and third hand smoke easily
I make sure I get it first hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
49. When I see stories like this....
...I an tempted to introduce the researchers to 4th hand smoke. That's when I walk across my carpet and then stick my boot up their ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
50. I think nobody should drink
Because booze is more harmful than tobacco. I don't drink but I smoke cigs and pot. What about the effects of second hand booze. You know the family that just got killed cause a drunk ran a red light. And all the drunk can say is "What Happened". Or the child who didn't have dinner because booze was more important. Or the wife that gets beaten every night. All under the disguise of "I didn't know what I was doing". See all better. Leave us smokers alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
52. I get tired of smokers' shit-stinky smoke being forced on me
You try to hire a repairman, they come in reeking of cigarettes, stinking up the whole house. Not to mention, our whole family has allergies (tobacco being one of the worst). Even if they don't smoke in your house, the smoke is in their clothes and on their breath.

What the hell is with people wanting to smoke, anyway? Everybody knows it causes heart and lung disease. Nothing says "trash" quite like a cigarette in someone's mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. It's a drug. They're addicts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #52
63. Nothing says "trash" quite like a mind so willing to write off a person based on appearances. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #52
64. thanks for the compliment
The sort of people on this board that use the word "trash" to diminish others are the ones that I know I wouldn't be friends with in normal life. Right now, my cigarette is in the ashtray next to my computer, because I'm typing. Soon, I will put it back in my mouth and go back to being trash. I'll be very highly educated trash with an interesting life, people who love me, and not full of bile - just full of soothing cigarette smoke.

Seriously, why would you insult someone like that? I'm how many thousands of miles away from you, and you call me trash? Way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #52
75. So you wouldn't want to meet Obama
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 06:29 AM by vanboggie
Good grief, the man used to be a SMOKER! Actually, I'm sure he's still fighting the monster. I disagree with your assumption that all smokers are trash. Personally, I think Obama is a classy, brilliant man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #75
84. Yes and I HOPE
You moralistic police won't harrass him when he has a cigarette on the south lawn..The man is going to have his hands FULL with world affairs......
I'd rather have him smoking in the oval office than distracted by focusing on not smoking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. It's going to be tough
With the pressure Obama will be under, a relapse would be likely. I agree - he needs to concentrate on fixing problems. He can quit smoking in 8 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #85
107. We've turned a corner with smoking
I think the anti-smoking crowd have gone way overboard. I don't know that smoking will be cool again like it was in the 50s and 60s, but we're going to see a lessening of the hysteria against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #85
208. As a former smoker I agree with you.
I don't want someone in the middle of nicotine withdrawal with his finger any where near "the button"!

I quit smoking 16 months ago and my health has steadily gone down hill and I've talked to some other former smokers who had the same thing happen. Nothing major, but having always been healthy and having assumed I'd feel even better when I quit it's somewhat depressing. Most the problems I've had can be blamed on the 25 pounds I've gained - if I lose them some of the problems I've developed might go away.

Oh, and to the sanctimonious crowd - I did not start snacking when I quit. I was very careful about what I ate, the problem is your metabolism slows down when you quit because your heart isn't working as hard to pump oxygen (yes, that is a good thing). But, when you're a 50 something female, your metabolism is already slower than it used to be so stopping the cigarettes pretty much threw it into reverse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #52
109. and that is when I take a step closer and exhale in your face.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #52
111. Request a non-smoking repairman when you call, or sniff him at the door. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #52
122. Best not hire Barack Obama!
Don't let that reeking addict into your home! Just post his picture all over the place as something to look up to! Obama is a smoker, and has been one since his teen age years it seems. What the hell is with him?
Just saying. Barack and I smoke. Take it up with the reeking President Elect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
159. Ironic
That you have a picture of Barrack in your sig after that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #52
165. I feel the same way about SUV drivers
Yet we won't ban them either. Land of the free and all, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comrade snarky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
182. It is funny that you have
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 02:26 PM by comrade snarky
An Obama photo with your post.
"Nothing says "trash" quite like a cigarette in someone's mouth."

Feel that way about our incoming president? He struggles with smoking you know. Is he "trash"?

on edit: didnt see all the replies. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
53. they don't have to tell me this. I can get a migraine from just smelling a smoker
And once I got a migraine from someone who had washed her hair but the smell coming off her clothes and lungs did me in. With me it is the formaldehyde and the toluene. Add to cigarette smoke the perfumes and deodorants and hair spray and I can barely go out in public. Why do you think I am on the computer???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #53
93. I get migraines from smoke too.
I was standing in line outside and a bunch of people lit up. I backed up about 10 feet away, and people looked at me like I was the rude one. People don't ask "mind if I smoke" very often. And if they do they expect you to say go ahead.

I was being trained for a job that involved driving- so I spent the day in the car of a smoker. He walked away from the car to actually smoke, but just being in that car for an hour gave me a migraine. I don't know how anyone can get used to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #53
95. Formaldehyde is in many other products that're widely used everywhere....
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 09:13 AM by jus_the_facts
...like your furniture...carpet...etc..etc....just lookin' at your computer screen will give you a migraine too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
54. the impotent lashing out against easy targets.
same as it ever was, same as it ever was.

wake me when people want real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #54
138. Yes, the smokers on this forum really are lashing out on easy targets. FUCK science.
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 11:00 AM by cryingshame
As an ex-smoker, I can only hope those who are addicted find the strength to tackle a really unhealthy habit that impacts those around them.

Impotence is not being able to get up in the morning and go on with your life without crutches that make you and others around you stink and ultimately sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
56. If people are really that fragile we have no hope
of surviving the modern technological world we have created for ourselves.

Might as well light up and slam a fifth of Jameson's right now ... :evilgrin:

Trav
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
60. Addicts will always defend their addiction.
The rest of us are aggressively unimpressed by that defense. Stinky legal junkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #60
167. Truly spoken - just look at all of the people addicted to their gas guzzler cars
The world is in danger of a global climate shift, but people won't give up their sports cars or their luxury sedans or their SUVs because "a Prius just isn't as much fun to drive." Will people recycle their garbage? Turn down the thermostat and put on a sweater? Turn down the A/C and turn on a fan? Hell no! This is Amurika after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
concerned canadian Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
65. something about building immunities

My mother began smoking cigarettes in the 1940's as a young woman, held and nurtured 9 children and 15 grand-children.

Nobody died so far (except for her first and second husbands, both of complications due to alcoholism)and Mom was forced to

quit smoking after an extended stay in hospital 5 months ago. "It was probably the cigarettes that were making me dizzy (thus causing

the fall that landed her in hospital the first time)" she reasons.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
71. Oh, come on!! I'm not a smoker and I think this is silly.

The indoor air is so much cleaner than it was in the '70s. I remember sitting in the same room as smokers, in my family and at work, and wishing my eyes didn't sting. If I could have gone asleep in the '70s and be awakened now, I would immediately find that such an immediate relief.

Now that we have smoking down to "third hand" I think it's time to move to more pressing environmental issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
81. Yet another hazard of cigarettes: Lighting up while driving can cause fatal car accidents
Ban cigarettes in cars! And while walking on stairs! And when you're sleepy!

There is not enough sarcasm for this one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
86. Smokers....
....are a government and big business cash cow. It's first, and foremost about the money. They are laughing at the anti-smoking nannies willingness to help in the swelling of their coffers, and the ease with which they can play off the egos of the holier-than-thou. I'll continue to rely on logic and common sense to tell me when smoking is appropriate, and inappropriate. Confronting me in one of the "appropriate" situations, and it will be an embarrassing experience for you, and you will never have any reason to confront me in one of the inappropriate situations because, again, logic and common sense are with me. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajPayne2 Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #86
187. I agree
Getting in others business will kill you quicker than smoking. Just saying, be careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
87. Ignore the industrial pollutants in your environment
Ignore the toxic waste, the spewing plumes of gas.

It's your mother's fault. Her and her Virginia Slims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
90. a cancer risk, seriously?
what cancer would that be, finger cancer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
94. Smoking is filthy habit that should be banned
I have suffered enough from insensitive smokers that think it is there god given right to pollute the world, then get upset at reports like this.

If you want to kill yourself and smoke, just put a plastic bag over your head when you smoke, and spare everyone else the misery you are inflicting on the world.


Parents smoking is child abuse, plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #94
96. so is nagging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. My nagging doesn't cause health problems to others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #97
102. Oh I'm positive nagging causes not only your BP to go up and the person/s on the receiving end too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zagging Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #97
110. You just gave me a stress migraine with all your nagging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #97
113. Your nagging just caused my colon to erupt!
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 10:08 AM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. Then you should first ban everything else that's destroyin' the environment too...like TOILET PAPER.
....and all combustion engines...and industrial chemicals...and on and on....cigarettes aren't even in the same ballpark as far as polluting the world. If people would get their heads outta their asses and think instead of react then the *world* could be a better place...but alas...that's never gonna happen either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
domlaw Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #94
99. Jumped the Shark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #94
123. Parents smoking is child abuse, plain and simple.
So...did you vote for Obama thinking of him as a child abuser? And you found a way to rationalize that vote? Or maybe your rhetoric here is just rheotric, not attached to your real world feelings and actions?
I could not vote for someone I thought of as abusing his children. McCain does not smoke, I guess you voted for Johnny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #94
160. So when do you want to start Prohibition II...
Seems like you'd be working feverishly to ban alcohol as well. Turn on your news and check out the drunk driving deaths in your own town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #94
171. The facts support your statements
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #171
195. *crickets*
as usual from the deniers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #94
188. lol so my mom was achild abuser???? go away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #188
205. Indeed she was, with her selfish habit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #94
231. that is a really bad idea
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 07:26 PM by MATTMAN
it will just turn into a blackmarket that will not solve anything at all. Not to mention a massive increase in organized crime.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/10/higher-cigarette-taxes-lu_n_96094.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
101. So, why doesn't health insurance cover
smoking cessation? Why no rehab clinics for smokers? I'm not talking about weekly 1 hour meetings, I'm talking about a week or so of lock-up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #101
130. Exactly
Therein lies a good part of the solution to the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
104. It's like the Unholy Ghost of the Carcinogen Trinity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
114. OMFG!
What a steaming pile of manure.

Smokem if ya gottem!:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
115. Oh lookie---another thread of smoker rationalizations....
Idiots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #115
116. That doesn't look like it works very well.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #116
117. Nah---you know those car fumes.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #117
121. Volcanic "ass" consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #115
125. Idiots?
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 10:32 AM by vanboggie
Another post with an Obama banner in the sig line who is calling all smokers idiots. Does that include Obama? I rest my case, and before pre-emptively responding Obama quit, know that I am quite sure I've spent more time quitting than he has and I'm still a smoker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #125
129. Nah--- just the ones who proudy claim they smoke....
and then pile on the dumb ass rationalizations for doing it.

Yeah---they're idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #129
134. Perhaps
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 11:02 AM by vanboggie
You miss the point, however. No smoker enjoys the addiction. Addiction requires treatment and to date health insurers refuse to pay for the meager help that is available.

I've always been a very considerate smoker, but after reading through this thread I'm sickened by those of you who feel so superior. If all non-smokers were so intolerant I would stop being considerate. I hope it makes you proud to be without vices so you can belittle others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #115
161. Know what this is?
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 12:21 PM by WriteDown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesJ Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
119. Now Who's Hiding Their Heads in the Sand
Jeez, people! The response to this study is depressing me. I thought only the Repubs and neo-cons denied science when it didn't please them.

As a life long non-smoker I can say that the smoke does cling to hair, clothes, curtains, rugs, etc. And what is that smoke made up of...

And as a parrot owner I also know that parrots can absorb nicotine through their feet when perched on the hand or finger of a smoker. Even if the smoker has washed his hands!

I am not a fanatic anti-smoker and I cringe when I see how our society has marginalized smokers (much as us non-smokers were marginalized 20 years ago). But all this study does is confirm what any non-smoker already knew.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #119
164. Thanks for your post, JamesJ -- welcome to DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #119
200. Well said JamesJ. Sadly, DUers often sound identical to global
warming and evolution deniers when it comes to smoking. This place suddenly turns into "Libertarian Underground" with the rights of addicts trumping every non-addict's rights. It's sad that otherwise intelligent people take such absurd positions, but I guess that's what an all consuming addiction can do to people.

Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contradistinction Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
120. Anti-smokers need to move to a non free country
I am sick & tired of all the anti smoking crap. They banned smoking here in the casino's & the anti smokers got their wish. Business has dropped by 1/2.

I'll keep on puffin thank you very much! You don't like it? Well, it's time for me to stop being nice & blow it in your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #120
126. Heck yeah!
And the President is one of us now. Stuff it, anti-smoking Nazis... go find yourself a dictatorship to run and tell people what to do, leave my country out of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #120
131. Can I see a link that shows business was cut by 1/2 because people can't smoke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #131
201. No, you can't
because there isn't one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #120
172. The facts. Deal with them:
Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.


I live in a free country where I'm allowed LIFE and liberty. If you take away my life with your petty habit I no longer have my right to it, now do I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #172
224. see my post#223 re: our petty concerns vs the rights of smokers
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 01:11 PM by abq e streeter
as I said there,I've suddenly seen the light; how can we possibly justify being so selfish as to attempt to stand in the way of anyone trying to poison our environment with any mixture of chemicals they want to if that attempt inconveniences them in any way. Shame on us. DOWN WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
127. Do you drink? Ever?
Do you enable those who do? Have you read the numbers of deaths directly from drinking, and also the number of deaths of non drinkers at the hands of drinkers?
Do you drink, ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #127
132. Now there's a good rationalziation...
Keep em coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #132
141. That is not a rationalization, I don't need one
That is a question as to the OP's own behavior. It is easy to jump on folks for what they do, while pretending our own actions are beyond reproach.
Drinkers kill innocents. Those who condone drinking assist them. Those who are concerned with thrid hand freaking smoke, but don't think about pouring vino down the gullets of their party guests are simply not thinking at all. Sorry if that bothers you.
The OP is being asked about her rationalizations of her own actions. If she drinks, she's a hypocrite. Plain and simple. The kind of hypocrite that points at others while doing the same sort of thing. Or in this case far worse.
Maybe she does not drink at all. If she answers, we will know. That is how questions work.
I do as I wish. I don't need anyone's approval. Nor do I take the preaching of others without asking them who they are and upon what standing they preach. If that bugs you, I don't care. Some folk are just bugged by nature, galled that they do not run the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #141
168. Some states do have dram shop laws...
... which govern the liability of people who provide alcoholic beverages to drunks and the subsequent actions done by drunks under the influence. In some states, dram shop rules extend to hosts at private parties. But dram shop laws vary greatly from state to state and I've never heard of them being enforced anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
133. how soon 'til my hugging someone after smoking will be considered a murderous act?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #133
135. Dunno our side can be just as bad
Edited on Sat Jan-03-09 10:45 AM by vanboggie
I thought we got rid of the Xtian Right Wingers trying to run us out of the country. Guess not. :smoke: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
166. When I was little I got ear inflections constantly as a result of my parents' smoking.
Also, smoking while pregnant greatly increases the risk of the child having ADD and being born premature? Well guss what, my mom smoke while she was pregnant with me and I was born 2 months early and was diagnosed with ADD when I was 5.

You smokers and take all your rationalizations for your disgusting habit and shove it up your rear end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #166
177. It's child abuse.
I absolutely *hate* to see parents puffing away in the designated smoking areas in the Disney parks with their children right next to them. I guess they are more concerned about getting their nicotine fix than with the comfort and health of their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #177
189. child abuse? lol at you...sorry..that's a stretch. disney is also child abuse lmfao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #189
202. Really, so all that time I spent missing school and being violently ill
from my parents chain smoking is equal to....? I've worked on Disney films, and no parent ever wrote to our company to tell us that our movies caused their children to have nausea, vomiting, congestion, and blinding headaches. On the contrary; the movies mostly seem to bring their kids a lot of joy. We sell billions in products and have millions of visitors in our parks every year to prove that. What would a Phillip Morris theme park look like, I wonder? A graveyard?

Get the facts:

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #177
229. So, it follows, you think Obama was a child abuser. QED.
Did you vote for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #229
234. I'm sure that Obama is smart enough and considerate enough not to smoke around his kids
and I am a little surprised that you would suggest otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #234
240. You didn't get that I was making a ridiculous statement on purpose?
Calling a smoking parent a de facto child abuser is beyond ridiculous - it's a vile lie. The idea that Obama's smoking made him a child abuser was an exercise in reductio ad absurdum.

The only abusers in this case are those who abuse the meaning of the word "abuser" by using it hyperbolically. More evidence that dogmatic judgers just can't help themselves when they see an opportunity to tell others what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
176. Yes.
Returning from my parents' home always means a thorough washing of people, clothing and any other washable items. That noxious stuff sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #176
197. I can't even sit near a smoker on a plane
my chain smoking parents made me so sensitive to smoke that my eyes turn bright red, swell, and my nose runs like a faucet if I'm near a smoker when he or she is NOT smoking. The stuff *is* toxic as hell, and I'll keep posting the fact to prove it (see below). Yes, my father and his girlfriend WERE child abusers for chain smoking in a car with young children with the windows rolled up. I'd get so sick from my visits with them that I'd spend the next two to three days throwing up, having severe headaches, a sore throat, and a stuffed up nose, missing school-and for what? So they could enjoy their cancer sticks which cost them a ridiculous sum of money every week? NO GOOD COMES FROM SMOKING. EVER. It's killed people whom I loved, and I can't believe that DUers are still idiotic enough to take up the habit.

The facts:

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #197
203. Thanks for that
though you definitely don't need to convince me!

I'd rather the nasty things were relegated to history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #203
211. Me too. They've killed enough already.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #197
207. But you're fine with deodorant, body spray, perfume...
traffic fumes, high pollen days, floor cleaner, bathroom tile cleaner, furniture polish, febreze, air freshener, scented candles.....the list goes on and on. I hope you turned your parents into CPS which was the only right thing to do. You may want to call them concerning Barrack Obama as well :eyes:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #207
210. Yes I am. Thanks for the ridiculous reply
Now respond to these facts point by point. Come on, WriteDown, show us what you've got; refute EVERY FACT below:

People deny it because they are, by definition, "in denial" about their addiction and the nature of the substance they're addicted to. They're all Phillip Morris' bitches-and, by extension, the GOPs. Not a single one of the deniers has EVER responded to these facts from the American Lung Association point by point:

Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet

Secondhand smoke, also know as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. It is involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers, lingers in the air hours after cigarettes have been extinguished and can cause or exacerbate a wide range of adverse health effects, including cancer, respiratory infections, and asthma.1

*
Secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a known cause of cancer in humans (Group A carcinogen).2

*
Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke. Secondhand smoke contains hundreds of chemicals known to be toxic or carcinogenic, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic ammonia and hydrogen cyanide.3

*
Secondhand smoke causes approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 22,700-69,600 heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers in the United States each year.4

*
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at work are at increased risk for adverse health effects. Levels of secondhand smoke in restaurants and bars were found to be 2 to 5 times higher than in residences with smokers and 2 to 6 times higher than in office workplaces.5

*
Since 1999, 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke-free policy, ranging from 83.9 percent in Utah to 48.7 percent in Nevada.6 Workplace productivity was increased and absenteeism was decreased among former smokers compared with current smokers.7

*
Nineteen states - Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont - as well as the District of Columbia prohibit smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars. Montana and Utah prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants; bars will go smokefree in 2009. New Hampshire prohibits smoking in some public places, including all restaurants and bars. Four states - Florida, Idaho, Louisiana and Nevada - prohibit smoking in most public places and workplaces, including restaurants, but exempt stand-alone bars. Fifteen states partially or totally prevent (preempt) local communities from passing smokefree air ordinances stronger than the statewide law. Nebraska and Oregon have passed legislation prohibiting smoking in almost all public places and workplaces, including restaurants and bars, but the laws have not taken effect yet.8

*
Secondhand smoke is especially harmful to young children. Secondhand smoke is responsible for between 150,000 and 300,000 lower respiratory tract infections in infants and children under 18 months of age, resulting in between 7,500 and 15,000 hospitalizations each year, and causes 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths in the United States annually.9

*
Secondhand smoke exposure may cause buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 physician office visits per year.10 Secondhand smoke can also aggravate symptoms in 400,000 to 1,000,000 children with asthma.11

*
In the United States, 21 million, or 35 percent of, children live in homes where residents or visitors smoke in the home on a regular basis.12 Approximately 50-75 percent of children in the United States have detectable levels of cotinine, the breakdown product of nicotine in the blood.13

*
Research indicates that private research conducted by cigarette company Philip Morris in the 1980s showed that secondhand smoke was highly toxic, yet the company suppressed the finding during the next two decades.14

*
The current Surgeon General’s Report concluded that scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Short exposures to secondhand smoke can cause blood platelets to become stickier, damage the lining of blood vessels, decrease coronary flow velocity reserves, and reduce heart rate variability, potentially increasing the risk of heart attack.15

For more information on secondhand smoke, please review the Tobacco Morbidity and Mortality Trend Report as well as our Lung Disease Data publication in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).



Sources:
1. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
2. Ibid.
3. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.
4. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition 2002. National Toxicology Program.
6. Shopland, D. Smoke-Free Workplace Coverage. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2001; 43(8): 680-686.
7. Halpern, M.T.; Shikiar, R.; Rentz, A.M.; Khan, Z.M. Impact of Smoking Status on Workplace Absenteeism and Productivity. Tobacco Control 2001; 10: 233-238.
8. American Lung Association. State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues (SLATI). May 8, 2008. Available at http://slati.lungusa.org/StateLegislateAction.asp . Accessed on June 10, 2008.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Schuster, MA, Franke T, Pham CB. Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes with Children in United States. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 156, 2002: 1094-1100.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. America’s Children and the Environment: Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses. Second Edition. February 2003.
14. Diethelm PA, Rielle JC, McKee M. The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth? The Research Philip Morris Did Not Want You to See. Lancet. Vol. 364 No. 9446, 2004.
15. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: 6 Major Conclusions of the Surgeon General Report. A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006; Available here. Accessed on 7/7/06.


Smoking 101 Fact Sheet

August 2008

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity (disease and illness) and premature mortality (death) worldwide. Smoking-related diseases claim an estimated 438,000 American lives each year, including those affected indirectly, such as babies born prematurely due to prenatal maternal smoking and victims of "secondhand" exposure to tobacco's carcinogens. Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult smoker.1

* Cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer. Smoking is directly responsible for approximately 90 percent of lung cancer deaths and approximately 80-90 percent of COPD (emphysema and chronic bronchitis) deaths.2
* About 8.6 million people in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking.3
* Among current smokers, chronic lung disease accounts for 73 percent of smoking-related conditions. Even among smokers who have quit chronic lung disease accounts for 50 percent of smoking-related conditions.4
* The list of diseases caused by smoking includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema), coronary heart disease, stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myeloid leukemia, cataract, pneumonia, periodontitis, and bladder, esophageal, laryngeal, lung, oral, throat, cervical, kidney, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. Smoking is also a major factor in a variety of other conditions and disorders, including slowed healing of wounds, infertility, and peptic ulcer disease.5
* Smoking in pregnancy accounts for an estimated 20 to 30 percent of low-birth weight babies, up to 14 percent of preterm deliveries, and some 10 percent of all infant deaths. Even apparently healthy, full-term babies of smokers have been found to be born with narrowed airways and reduced lung function.6
* In 2005, 10.7 percent of all women smoked during pregnancy, down almost 45 percent from 1990.7
* Neonatal health-care costs attributable to maternal smoking in the U.S. have been estimated at $366 million per year, or $704 per maternal smoker.8
* Smoking by parents is also associated with a wide range of adverse effects in their children, including exacerbation of asthma, increased frequency of colds and ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome. Secondhand smoke causes more than an estimated 202,000 asthma episodes, 790,000 physician visits for buildup of fluid in the middle ear (otitis media, or middle ear infection), and 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases each year.9
* In 2006, an estimated 45.3 million, or 20.6% of adults (aged 18+) were current smokers. The annual prevalence of smoking declined 40 percent between 1965 and 1990, but has been virtually unchanged since then.10
* Males tend to have significantly higher rates of smoking prevalence than females. In 2006, 23.6 percent of males currently smoked compared to 17.8 percent of females.11
* Prevalence of current smoking in 2006 was highest among American Indians/Alaska Natives (32.2%), intermediate among non-Hispanic whites (21.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (22.6%), and lowest among Hispanics (15.1%) and Asians (10.3%).12
* As smoking declines among the non-Hispanic white population, tobacco companies have targeted both non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics with intensive merchandising, which includes billboards, advertising in media targeted to those communities, and sponsorship of civic groups and athletic, cultural, and entertainment events. In 2005, advertising and promotion by the five major tobacco companies totaled $13.1 billion.13
* Tobacco advertising also plays an important role in encouraging young people to begin a lifelong addiction to smoking before they are old enough to fully understand its long-term health risk.14 Ninety percent of adults who smoke started by the age of 21, and half of them became regular smokers by their 18th birthday.15
* In 2007, 20 percent of high school students were current smokers.16 Over 6 percent of middle school students were current smokers in 2006.17
* Secondhand smoke involuntarily inhaled by nonsmokers from other people's cigarettes is classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a known human (Group A) carcinogen, responsible for approximately 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 (ranging 22,700-69,600) heart disease deaths in adult nonsmokers annually in the United States.18
* Workplaces nationwide are going smoke-free to provide clean indoor air and protect employees from the life-threatening effects of secondhand smoke. Nearly 70 percent of the U.S. workforce worked under a smoke free policy in 1999, but the percentage of workers protected varies by state, ranging from a high of 83.9 percent in Utah and 81.2 percent in Maryland to 48.7 percent in Nevada.19
* Employers have a legal right to restrict smoking in the workplace, or implement a totally smoke-free workplace policy. Exceptions may arise in the case of collective bargaining agreements with unions.
* Nicotine is an addictive drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously. Smokers not only become physically addicted to nicotine; they also link smoking with many social activities, making smoking a difficult habit to break.20
* In 2006, an estimated 45.7 million adults were former smokers. Of the 45.3 million current adult smokers, 44 percent stopped smoking at least 1 day in the preceding year because they were trying to quit smoking completely.21
* Quitting smoking often requires multiple attempts. Using counseling or medication alone increases the chance of a quit attempt being successful; the combination of both is even more effective.22
* Nicotine replacement products can help relieve withdrawal symptoms people experience when they quit smoking.23
* There are seven medications approved by the FDA to aid in quitting smoking. Nicotine patches, nicotine gum and nicotine lozenges are available over-the-counter, and a nicotine nasal spray and inhaler are currently available by prescription. Buproprion SR (Zyban) and varenicline tartrate (Chantix) are non-nicotine pills.24
* Individual, group and telephone counseling are effective. Telephone quitline counseling is widely available and is effective for many different groups of smokers.25
* Nicotine replacement therapies are helpful in quitting when combined with a support program such as the American Lung Association's Freedom From Smoking (FFS), which addresses psychological and behavioral addictions to smoking and strategies for coping with urges to smoke.

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses United States, 1997-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report . July 2005. Vol. 54;25:625-628 .
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS). Tobacco Use in the United States. January 27, 2004.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette Smoking Attributable Morbidity - U.S., 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2003 Sept; 52(35): 842-844.
4. Ibid.
5. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2001.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: Final Data for 2005. December 5, 2007; (56)5.
8. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. State Estimates of Neonatal Health-Care Costs Associated with Maternal Smoking U.S., 1996. Vol. 53, No. 39, October 8, 2004.
9. California Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. June 2005.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005. April 2007. Accessed on February 8, 2008.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994.
15. Mowery PD, Brick PD, Farrelly MC. Legacy First Look Report 3. Pathways to Established Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. October 2000.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance � United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. June 6, 2008; 57(SS-04).
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office on Smoking and Health. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). 2006 NYTS Data and Documentation. April 18, 2008. Accessed on April 30, 2008.
18. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. June 2005. Accessed on 4/30/07.
19. Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-Specific Trends in Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage: the Current Population Tobacco Use Supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43:680-686.
20. National Institute of Drug Abuse. Research Report on Nicotine: Addiction, August 2001.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Analysis by the American Lung Association, Research and Program Services Division using SPSS and SUDAAN software.
22. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Tobacco Use. You Can Quit Smoking. Accessed on October 2, 2007.
24. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
25. Ibid.
Secondhand Smoke and Children Fact Sheet

September 2008

Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke given off by the burning end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 250 chemicals known to be toxic or cancer causing, including formaldehyde, benzene, vinyl chloride, arsenic, ammonia, and hydrogen cyanide.1

* Infants and young children are especially susceptible: their lungs are still developing and childhood exposure to secondhand smoke results in decreased lung function. Children who breathe secondhand smoke are more likely to suffer from cough, wheeze, phlegm and breathlessness.2
* In children, exposure to secondhand smoke causes over 202,000 asthma episodes in children with asthma.3
* The current Surgeon Generals Report states that there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposures can be harmful to children.4
* Infants and children suffer additional acute lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, due to secondhand smoke exposure.5
* Of children 3 to 11 years of age, almost 60 percent, or 22 million, are exposed to secondhand smoke. Almost 25 percent live with at least one smoker, compared to 7 percent of nonsmoking adults.6
* Secondhand smoke exposure causes buildup of fluid in the middle ear, resulting in 790,000 visits to health care providers. Middle ear infections are the most common cause of childhood operations and of childhood hearing loss.7
* A California EPA study 430 sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths are annually associated with secondhand smoke exposure.8
* Babies whose mothers smoke while pregnant or who are exposed to secondhand smoke after birth have weaker lungs than other babies, which increases the risk of many other health problems.9
* Babies are 20 percent more likely to be born low-birth weight if their mother was exposed to secondhand smoke during the pregnancy.10

For more information on smoking, please review the Trends in Tobacco Use report and Lung Disease Data in the Data and Statistics section of our website at www.lungusa.org, or call the American Lung Association at 1-800-LUNG-USA (1-800-586-4872).

Sources:

1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
4. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
5. Ibid.
6. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Home Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on August 28, 2008.
7. California Environmental Protection Agency. Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant. Executive Summary. June 2005.
8. Ibid.
9. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2006. Children are Hurt by Secondhand Smoke Factsheet. January 4, 2007. Accessed on July 30, 2008.
10. U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Preveniton. Preventing Smoking and Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Before, During and After Pregnancy. July 2007. Accessed on September 18, 2008.

View American Lung Association Nationwide Research Awardees for 2008-2009


Maybe you'll deny global warming and evolution next. :eyes:

And yes, Obama KNOWS that smoking is idiotic. That's why he's trying to QUIT.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #210
212. Sure...
Just list all the criteria and controls used in these so-called "scientific" studies that prove that little propaganda sheet you are so proud of trotting out. And while you're at it, please refute this study which is still to date the largest study ever done on second-hand smoking.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1998/03/08/wtob08.html

Also, you may want to explain the bias concerning publication bias on passive smoking.

http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/7_15_98/jpv71013.htm

PS. So Barrack Obama abused his kids for years, but he's A-OK now that he's trying to change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #197
220. My husband has the same reaction...
At times we've stayed in "non-smoking" rooms at hotels that had clearly been sprayed with Febreeze to try to cover up the odor. But Febreeze doesn't scrape that crap off the walls and furniture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajPayne2 Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
185. What the fuck ever
If I can do 2 tours in Iraq and 2 tours in Afghanistan, I'll smoke if I fucking want to. The funny thing is, I can still probably outrun the non-smokers in my unit. Bullshit report to get more grant money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #185
192. high-five!
Best fucking response to this thread so far. Welcome to DU, buddy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
221. Dumb name for a real problem.
Calling it third-hand smoke is erroneous, as it's the residue left behind from second-hand smoke.

Using a not-so-trendy name to define it sets the scenario for people to mock the problem and ignore the serious effect it has on people...as witnessed in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #221
238. I disagree. It's an extremely good name. Some addicts are trying to mock it because of this. (nt)
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 01:58 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #238
249. What's 3rd-hand about it?
Also, it's no longer smoke...It's the residue from 2nd hand smoke.

They should call it what it is, instead of looking for a cutesy name for it.

This reminds me of the tendency to name any sort of scandal whatever-gate, ever since Watergate. People roll their eyes and ignore it after a couple of "gates".

This residue is a serious problem that needs serious consideration by smokers and non-smokers alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
227. That's okay, smokers, you can come sit near me.
I'm a non-smoker (quit) but your clothes, hair, etc don't bother me in the least. You can't smoke in my house but you're welcome to smoke outside on the porch (I even keep an ashtray out there for you) and come back in, stinky and all. I'll even go sit outside with you while you smoke -- doesn't bother me. And I'll even give you a big hug when you leave.

Now, if you pile on some horrific smelling perfume/cologne (which for me is about 95% of them), stay the hell away from me, you can forget that hug, and know that I'm going to feel nauseous until I get the stench out of my house!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #227
239. ditto, dahling
you described me too :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #227
247. I don't blame you for not allowing people to smoke in your house
My parents used to allow smoking in my house when i was a kid, and it took days for the disgusting stench to disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
228. Looks like this finding has touched a few nerves. LOL!!!
Just quit already :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
237. logical. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
244. Sounds like a simplfied version of "six degrees of separation" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zelta gaisma Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
245. funny how ...
Edited on Mon Jan-05-09 11:14 AM by zelta gaisma
the addictive toxic weed(tobacco) is legal and the non-addictive non-toxic(marijuana)isn't , hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
246. Oh, for fuck's sake.
All this goddamn hysteria over smoking could be far more profitably applied against industrial pollution...but of course, that wouldn't give people the superior feeling of getting to look down on us smokers.

I took up smoking as a needed stimulant. I was suffering from constant exhaustion, and the nicotine helped me get up and moving. I've kept the habit because I'm still having issues with exhaustion. I smoke maybe two cigarillos or 3/4s of a cheap cigar in a day. Straight tobacco, minimal additives. I may switch to nicotine gum at some point, but it'll be because my therapist recommended it, not because a bunch of self-righteous ****s with too much time on their hands shrieked at me until I decided to quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrenzy Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
250. Does DU have an "Ignore" function?
Umm, regardless of my position on "third hand smoke" (I quit smoking over a year ago) - I'd rather not have to scroll through hysterical busy-bodies posting the same damn multi-page post 20 times on the same thread.

Thanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
251. My vet warned me about this with the cats
She could smell it on them and told me that when they clean their fur they ingest it and it could make them really sick. :-( Quit 2 and 1/2 years ago. Never thought I would be able to, but somehow have managed. My heart goes out to those of you trying to quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
252. I rode a Greyhound bus through North Carolina once
OMFG!!! I've been exposed to fourth-hand smoke!! :scared:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC