Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge Smear: Old Crimson Interview Reveals A More Radical John Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:21 AM
Original message
Drudge Smear: Old Crimson Interview Reveals A More Radical John Kerry
<snip>

“I’m an internationalist,” Kerry told The Crimson in 1970. “I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.”

Kerry said he wanted “to almost eliminate CIA activity. The CIA is fighting its own war in Laos and nobody seems to care.”

The Kerry campaign, celebrating primary victories in Virginia and Tennessee last night, declined to comment on the senator’s remarks.

As a candidate for president, Kerry has said he supports the autonomy of the U.S. military and has never called for a scale-back of CIA operations

http://www.thecrimson.com/today/article357339.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Drudge, let's see an interview with George W. from 1970
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 10:25 AM by Screaming Lord Byron
Let's see who holds up better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJets Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll take Kerrys'individualism
over Bushs' priveledged stance anyday anyhow-rich kids weren't the ones fighting in Vietnam kids like my brother were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm waiting for the revelation
of Kerry's first grade report card. Bound to be something scandalous there.

(Of course, they wouldn't want us to see *'s...an F for "plays well with others.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's legit
Hell, he said those things as a congressional candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, Drudge, how's the Hollywood bar scene?
Come out of the closet yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noon_Blue_Apples Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. As * would say

"that was 34 years ago"

can't play it both ways

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who gives a shit what someone SAID 34 years ago!
Gee...Do you suppose he also wore bell bottoms, wide belts with large belt buckles and a bad hairdo?

This is truly freaking shocking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What is shocking
He didn't say it at a party. He didn't say it casually. He made a position statement during a congressional campaign. THAT follows you around.

Sure, I have little doubt he has changed his mind, but you have to admit, it's a pretty extreme change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Fair enough, but remember who the real enemy is here.
I'm ABB and I'll defend any candidate against a hostile media. I can live with the differences between John Kerry's interview in 1970 and his views now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. As can I
But it IS fair to bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. If You Were Just Wounded In An Illegitimate War
I'd like to read your comments. Put things into perspective. The man had every right to be angry as hell to his government that sent him to fight a war over nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. In the context of the times, a perfectly reasonble statement
I'm still not sure any nation should be able to move its troops overseas without U.N. approval, except in self-defense.

And as for the 1970s CIA, it was primarily a criminal organization. How do you feel about the operations of the Cali drug cartel? Or the us operations to undermine the duly elected government of Venezuala (or 1980s Nicaragua, for that matter).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The UN doesn't decide what is self defense
That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. No, but if the it can decide who is outside of international law
and sanction them appropriately.

I don't see where agreeing to abide by established standards of international law (largely established by teh U.S.) is a problem, unles you Bush* or Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. International law
Is neither international, nor law. It is a hope, a dream perhaps that ignores the realities of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. i agree
i think it is a problem. the media has been so stuck on GWB's record from years ago....it only makes sense that they'd start pulling up what kerry was doing 30 years ago, too. IMHO if that's fair game, so is this.

i wish everyone would focus on the here and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. It shouldn't matter!
It was 34 years ago, for god's sake! Even if I believed in the Easter Bunny 34 years ago, chances are I don't anymore. 34 years ago, GWB was a stupid, moromic alky with a cocaine problem. Does the RW hold THAT against him anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. It was a congressional race
That does put it into play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. They didn't put a lot of stock what a lot presidents had to put forward.
Mostly because no one ever said boo about the secret underbelly of the US government and its machinations. JFK was the one that spoke up, after experiencing several activities that were undermining his presidency and the country he represented, he became very angry with them. He stated was going to smash the ugly thing into a thousand pieces. They took to his life to make an example of him and under the assumption he might try.

Frankly I don't care if Kerry or any other person wants to turn tail and run like a coward, that's their choice(btw I don't think Kerry would especialy with the support of a large majority of people).

In the end though, one must realize that sooner or later there is no place to hide and you have to do for yourself before others can lend a hand. I wasn't born under a rock and don't intend to be hiding under one anytime soon. Look to yourself for your own courage, nobody else can give it to you anyway.

Living a life and believing it's okay to be part of an assumed illusion is are two incompatible concepts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Oh...But what Howard Dean said ten
years ago is relevant to his candidacy....Yum, cake...and I can eat it too!!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who cares
Plus its not LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. it's just too bad
he isn't still saying that. he was right, back then. more right, anyway. of course, if he were he probably wouldn't be democratic frontrunner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billhos Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is not good
If this campaign focus's on what the candidates said and did thirty some years ago as young men, then theDemocrats will loose. No body cares much! What the campaign needs to focus on is what they will do over the next four years. People will not vote out an incumbent unless the opposition can come up with a coherant alternative. remember what happened in the 2002 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. What Bush said at about the same time
"You take Sally
And I'll take Sue
There ain't no difference
Between the two
Cocaine
Running all around my brain"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. everything's fair game ...
and Kerry can take each statement/revelation/old vote and deal with them as they arise. Explain himself, explain his thinking. Drudge is a sensationalist. Screaming headlines over nothing are his stock in trade. When he finds incontrovertible evidence that Kerry was devil-worshipping in his back yard last week, I'll worry. Till then, I'll just roll my eyes at the Drudgester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Personal account of Kerry losing his ideals in 1983. very sad...
Edited on Wed Feb-11-04 01:00 PM by JohnOneillsMemory
This is a personal account from a member of the American Friends Service Committee that my father sent to me to warn me not to expect much from Kerry by way of policy change.

"...what Kerry did and told me in 1983 (not to mention two decades of compromised behavior since) it has little to do with him as a presidential candidate. Back then, as Lieutenant Governor, Kerry played an important role in Senator Kennedy’s effort to convince the Reagan Administration to choose Boston as the Homeport for the planned Battleship Iowa naval flotilla. The central weapons system of that flotilla was to be the nuclear-armed Tomahawk cruise missile. That the deployment of these weapons was a violation of the Nuclear Weapons Freeze which Kerry and Kennedy ostensibly supported, that these weapons made war with the Soviet Union more likely, that the Navy has a long history of nuclear weapons accidents, and that the homeport was to be located at the end of a busy runway at Boston’s Logan Airport (and thus carried the danger of a catastrophic nuclear weapons accident,) were of no consequence for Kerry as he made his political calculations.

Along with Tony Palomba of Mobilization for Survival, I led the successful opposition to the Homeporting campaign. At one point I had a one on four meeting with Kerry, two of his aides, and one of (then) Governor Dukaukis’ aides. During that meeting, every time I asked Kerry a question about the dangers and roles of the nuclear armed Tomahawks and the flotilla itself, he answered by saying “As an old Navy hand…” you have nothing to fear, or “As an old Navy hand…” it’s not a problem.

Seeing that he was hardly about to give an inch, I explained that I remembered what he had said and had done as he organized and worked with Vietnam Vets Against the War, and I asked him how what he was telling me squared with what he had said then. A long and excruciating silence followed, during which it seemed that we could hear dust fall on the floor boards of his State House office.


Finally, he broke the painful silence and said “The name of the game is different now.”



That my friends is the Senator Kerry that many of us here in Massachusetts have come to know over the past two decades.



In addition to needing hard and clear statements of policy from Kerry now as a candidate, we also need to be educating and organizing so that if we are fortunate enough not to be saddled with the imperial Texas Mafia beginning in 2005, that we are ready to confront and move a Democratic Administration which would come to power in the tradition of those that have launched imperial wars, refused to implement the NPT, and practiced “coercive diplomacy” with nuclear threats and blackmail, and urged funding for so-called “missile defenses” and the militarization of space.

Sorry to be an iconoclast, but illusions will kill us…and many others."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. NONE of us are the people
We were 20, 30 years ago. Except if you're Arnold, and you like groping women.

Let's face it: the RW can only disperse materials on Kerry which are older than Bush's DUI and cokehead days. If that's the best they can do, they need to be sent to their corner and not be allowed to play until after we whoop their master's ass in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. good!
then i'll be HAPPY to vote for him should he get the nomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Did he inhale?
Can he claim that when he was young and foolish he did young and foolish things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. I really miss the old Kerry.
Remember, the new Kerry said if Howard Dean were elected he'd have to get permission from the UN to wage war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. yeah, well try drudging up some old bush interviews for a good laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC