Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Market falls on fears bailout won't save economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:14 PM
Original message
Market falls on fears bailout won't save economy
Source: Reuters

NEW YORK, Oct 3 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended its worst week in seven years with another tumble on Friday on fears a $700 billion financial sector rescue plan won't unlock credit markets or stave off a U.S. recession.

Based on the latest available data, the Dow Jones industrial average .DJI was down 155.95 points, or 1.49 percent, at 10,326.90. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index .SPX was down 14.85 points, or 1.33 percent, at 1,099.43. The Nasdaq Composite Index .IXIC was down 29.33 points, or 1.48 percent, at 1,947.39.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0336034820081003



HUH??? The market "rallies" because it "thinks" Congress will cave and pass the crapweasel sell-the-USA-to-the-highest-bidder bill and now that they gave the farm and the barn and the house away, the market "thinks" this won't "save the economy"??????

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's called
a "suckers rally".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice. Screwed Again.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reuters is full of shit, as usual
A run on hedge funds has more to do with the decline than any fit of pique over getting just what they wanted did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jerks!nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. We are in a recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Shit, Ohio never left that first recession. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. DUH! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Decptive use of the words "ON", "AFTER", and "AS"
News writers use those words to imply a causal connection when they have neither knowledge of, nor evidence for such a cause and effect relationship. For example:

Market falls AS O.J. Simpson jury begins deliberation.
Market falls ON discovery of Fossett's plane.
Market soars AFTER Iraq's presidency approves elections law.
Market rebounds ON news of Brittany Spears DUI arrest.

This is an attempt to claim greater knowledge and understanding of the situation than any mere human can possibly posses. The markets have entered a period of chaos and volatility. Trying to explain individual daily moves is futile, because chaotic volatility is inherently unpredictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Good old "Post hoc ergo propter hoc"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. But not even phrased as a logical fallacy.
Instead, it's a logical fallacy derived from a conversational implicature.

We assume they're implying a causal link, when they don't even bother to do that, so the fallacy's all ours.

Don't you like how discourse pragmatics can be used to manipulate and obfuscate? (And I reiterate my belief that basic discourse pragmatics and conversational implicatures should be a mandatory part of 9th grade English.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. What do you think of the practice known as "lying with the truth"?
Would you put that in the same general category? It seems to have become almost acceptable recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Yesterday, their reasons were used as propaganda
And I'll pick on my favorite target, CNN.COM:

They blamed yesterday's tanking of the market because investors were uncertain about the bailout. That did two things: It made it appear that if any congress person had any ideas about voting no to the bailout, horrible things would follow. This also kept the average joe hoping the bailout would go through.

In actuality, the market tanked yesterday because the bush economy is swirling around the toilet, and yesterday's economic news was terrible, just as bad as today's. But CNN, one of the biggest cheerleaders for the bailout, used yesterday's stock market drop to gain supporters for the bailout through fear.

CNN is a digusting right wing NeoCon mouthpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Well said,
ON reading your post, I thought. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Esra Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bread and circuses
You eat the bread, and have your attention distracted by the circuses.
Get with the program.
Economics has always been about smoke and mirrors anyway.
I'm sure they will get some more smoke soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bailout is a sham
The well has run dry. The treasury and Fed can trot out any numbers they likes, but it doesn't change reality. The Drunken Chimp and his cronies have bled America to death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Close, but the middle class as a whole still has a lot of money. The looting will still go on. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. don't be silly
A one day fall on Wall Street before the bailout was the direct result of our refusal to roll over.

But now, we are told that there is no possible connection between the two.

See, you just don't understand how these things work. You probably don't have a degree in economics, that's your problem.

Funny - the crisis was supposedly caused by a break down in trust, and it was "solved" by a campaign of brazen and outrageous dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hell I could've told them that
That 700 BILLION is just going to bail out the free trade off shoring bastards that have been killing the middle class for the last 8 years.

Its not going to create one damn job in this country! 700 BILLION down the shithole to save a few fucking millionaires! When the hell are Americans going to say BS WE'VE HAD IT!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I couldn't agree with you more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hyperinflation
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pay attention to the talking heads this month:
what they mean is the '700 billion dollar' bailout won't save the economy, but possibly, a two or three trillion dollar bailout just might work. Wake up people, they are now on the second phase of this plan, which is to get Americans use to the idea that the 700 billion was just a start.

Yesterday, Bloomberg.com quoted Warren Buffet as saying this bailout will probably entail a lot more than 700 billion. As more 'experts' start saying the same thing, it programs the sheep to freely give more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's exactly what the next step will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. So, when's the SECOND bailout bill gonna be introduced?
:puke:

Hey, why stop at a $700 billion giveaway? How about 700 trillion? 700 quadrillion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I believe that this so-called bailout will be good for about 80 days.
About Dec 20, there will be a large bailout requested. Congress will falter and bingo Georgie declares martial law. No messy election needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. A very real scene that could play out, I figured it would be another terror attack, not
Economic Terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I agree. We didn't get any warning about the coming of the economic disaster. People knew. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. The market is a bottomless pit. There's not enough money in the universe to make it happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeignSpectator Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. You all just have no idea how the economy and stuff really works, so shut up!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's nice that the market caught on...

too bad its one day too late!!!

No wonder they had to push this through as quickly as possible, using extreme fearmonger tactics with certain House members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, one bright side ...
... it appears now that the formerly-lucrative 'oil speculation' market has dropped off along with the DOW and we're back down around $100/barrel ... and gas prices are falling ... so hopefully the insanity is over and we're finished getting screwed at the pump.


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. It won't.
The "bailout" that isn't. And won't.

The Rich say "thanks again, suckers!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. I see it more as some people were hopeful, then realized it was crap and panicked.
Looks like perhaps more people are catching on that this won't save it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. Banking System Will Need Another $500 Billion: Bill Gross - Pimco
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4142752&mesg_id=4142752

25 Sep 2008

"The banking system needs another $500 billion to survive beyond the $700 billion rescue plan being contemplated by Congress, said Pimco founder Bill Gross.

Gross said on CNBC that the government bailout plan will help free up bank balance sheets so they can start lending again, but will provide only about $50 billion in real capital to the system.

"The plan goes far but it doesn't go far enough in terms of recapitalization," he said. "The banking system and the investment banking system in total really requires about $500 billion more. Where that comes from is still up in the air."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is only just the beginning. It will cost us another $3T to $5T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. sub 10K here we come. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC