Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush 'warned over uranium claim'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:46 PM
Original message
Bush 'warned over uranium claim'
BBC World News


The CIA warned the US Government that claims about Iraq's nuclear ambitions were not true months before President Bush used them to make his case for war, the BBC has learned.

Doubts about a claim that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African state of Niger were aired 10 months before Mr Bush included the allegation in his key State of the Union address this year, the CIA has told the BBC. ---

But the CIA has said that a former US diplomat had already established the claim was false in March 2002 - and that the information had been passed on to government departments, including the White House, well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech.

Privatize bush It’s a Good Thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tinnypriv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOW - that's it
Game over. Bye bye Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. If the Dems don't call for Impeachment over this......
I'm giving up. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yaaaaaaay Britain.
I'm so proud to be English (well, half)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry. Can't say that in the U. S.
Just did the run down on CNN, network news, etc.

Not saying that.

Uh uh. Nope.

Hush. Can't talk about it.

Bush was mislead.

He was told a lie and mistakenly repeated.

Not bush's* fault.

sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wish I could say that you're wrong
but as of right now-it looks like the mofo is going get a pass-again! Will this nightmare never end!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. I think some are pretty pissed
like Carl Levin. I saw the thread in GD earlier where some lamented he was goin' after the intelligence sources but I do not concur with their assessments that he's letting Bush off.

I saw him holding a paper and he was reading Rice's quote, read from it more than once, seemed disgusted.

As disgusted as we all felt watching her lie that day "...we never dreamed they'd fly airplanes into buildings..."

Levin seemed like a man on a mission not to be deterred. He possesses a dogged single-mindedness that, while never propelling him to star status, can be the most effective method around. I've seen such men in world affairs in centuries past (studying history) and you might just be surprised. I won't be. ;-)

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. And if those are not sufficient, there will be more where they came
from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. ABC told the same story earlier tonight
Including having Wilson stating that he'd told Cheney's office in March 2002 that the story was false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Glad to hear that
ABC is showing unusual talents lately for telling the truth.

I wonder if it will be catching.

VERY glad to hear that. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChompySnack Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did the CIA really just drop the dime on Bush & Co?
If all that the White House can respond with is "the White House received hundreds of intelligence reports every day." then I think that they are basically admitting that they knew over a year before the war that the documents were forgeries.

High crimes indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yup. Phones were dialing at Langley!
From the BBC article:

But the CIA has now told the BBC that Mr Wilson's findings had been passed onto the White House in March 2002.

That means that the administration would have known before the State of the Union address that the information was likely false - not just subsequently.


I'm glad they decided to just spell it out plain in that second paragraph. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. bigger than a dime...more like ten ton rock....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Nuremburg trials: criminals because they STARTED the war...
Statement by American Justice Jackson at Nuremburg War Criminal Trials... August 12, 1945

"We must make clear to the Germans that the wrong for which their fallen leaders are on trial is not that they lost the war, but that they started it. And we must not allow ourselves to be drawn into a trial of the causes of the war, for our position is that no grievances or policies will justify resort to aggressive war. It is utterly renounced and condemned as an instrument of policy."

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/jack02.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. They said the same thing about 911
What do they think they're getting paid to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Brits made him do it...
See:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3488&mesg_id=3488&page=

Looks like the BushCo swine are setting Blair up for the fall. Not that he doesn't deserve it, mind you.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. shrub's WH is scrambling for any excuse...and they've pulled
out all the stops...what next...shrub and his minions are totally desperate for some kind of excuse...running around like rats in a sinking ship....

nobody is even reminding them of the California graduate students thesis that they plagerized, which was written over 12 years ago...

that'll have to wait for the war crimes trial....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purrfessor Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Poor Poor Pitiful Bush.....
at least he's consistent: he's failed at everything he's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. A few items really stand out in this article…..
Doubts about a claim that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from the African state of Niger were aired 10 months before Mr Bush included the allegation in his key State of the Union address this year, the CIA has told the BBC.

But the CIA has now told the BBC that Mr Wilson's findings had been passed onto the White House in March 2002.

That means that the administration would have known before the State of the Union address that the information was likely false - not just subsequently.



It is obvious that the CIA is not going to be the fall guy for the PNAC group. This has a better feel to it than the Capital Hill Blue item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. "CIA has told the BBC"...heheheheh....drip, drip, drip...GUSH
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 07:07 PM by amen1234
shrub should have tried harder to become "friends" with those nice people over at the CIA....while shrub dallies in Africa, the CIA is busy giving exclusive news stories to major news media all across the world...


time to take shrub to the Haig...maybe they can pick 'em up, courtesy of a nice country in Africa...

the CIA said "that the information had been passed on to government departments, including the White House, well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkahead Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. These are the people in charge of Homeland Security
They're going to blame beaurocracy and say they missed it in the report. Of course, the truth is probably much worse, so they will settle for looking like fools. Now we're supposed to buy that the hard sell he was doing on justification for the war was based on some bad intelligence.

This is becoming a theme for the Bush Administration: Bad Intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhataBildeberger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Bad intelligence, or unintelligent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Poor Oscar! It's small enough to put in the toilet now.
Flush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. See! He was warned and he still used it!
Bush has to reap what he sowed!

Thats from the Bible too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Come On, Baby! It's Finger...Finger...Finger Pointing Time!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. If someone else at the meeting will swear to this then
it's an open and shut, "your ass is on the street" case for impeachment.

Then send him to The Hague to stand trial for war crimes. This in and of itself is enough to convict Bush for war crimes. No wonder they're fighting the ICC so hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. There was somebody present: Terrance J. Wilkinson
"The report had already been discredited," said Terrance J. Wilkinson, a CIA advisor present at two White House briefings. "This point was clearly made when the President was in the room during at least two of the briefings."

Bush's response was anger, Wilkinson said.

"He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2518.shtml

If Mr. Wilkinson is willing to testify under oath, it appears the case is open and shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanger Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. George Bush Center for Intelligence
That is the name for the headquarters building at the CIA in Langley. It used to strike me as funny, till GW started sc*wing everybody.

If you want to see an attempt at CIA humor, check out and read the July 2 briefing. It's the "cloaking technlogy" joke

michael in dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
copithorne Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. READ THIS ARTICLE TOO!
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_2518.shtml

I haven't come across this source. Does anyone know it?

<snip>

An intelligence consultant who was present at two White House briefings where the uranium report was discussed confirmed that the President was told the intelligence was questionable and that his national security advisors urged him not to include the claim in his State of the Union address.

"The report had already been discredited," said Terrance J. Wilkinson, a CIA advisor present at two White House briefings. "This point was clearly made when the President was in the room during at least two of the briefings."

Bush's response was anger, Wilkinson said.

"He said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Remember that name
Terrance Wilkinson. He's the man chosen to testify against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. He lied
He willfully lied. His aides willfully lied.

They must resign. All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Damn right he lied! It was the only way he could get his war that
our soldiers are dying in now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocketdem Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. I give it two, maybe three, news cycles, and then it'll be gone
After all, isn't the world a better place with Saddam out of power?

Sometimes the ends justify the means. It's about time that you silly Democrats grow up and stop seeing the world through your commie-rose-colored glasses.

Saddam gone = good.

War = Saddam gone.

QED, War = good.

Everything else is just stuff and nonsense.

<sarcasm off>

I hope that I'm wrong, but my cynicism is reaching new heights on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. I'm just now thinking that this story is getting REAL traction.
When the WH comes out in a press release and officially says "OOPS" then it's getting warm in there. I haven't been too excited before this, but some reputable sources are coming out of the woodwork now.

This story is gaining momentum and it says nothing about the plagerized document and other misrepresentations befor the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. Dammit!
I was hoping this was a headline in an American paper. Silly me. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. The CIA is NOT going to take the hit for this
They did their job and Bush and his criminal thugs are going to try to lie their way out of it in that fine old Republican sleezebag tradition. No wonder they are the family values/christian party! Such upstanding criminals!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. Not only is the mother fucker a liar!!!!!
Edited on Tue Jul-08-03 10:52 PM by Liberal_Guerilla
But he is also a murderer, that's what his lies led to.

And all the other dumb ass murdering freeper sheep are just as culpable as the idot murderer. The freepers are toast, their "morality and credibility" is shot.

Some repuke talking head was on the tube saying that on a scale between 1-10, this is only a 10. Well what the fuck was getting a blow job? Is that a god damn 10???!!


For christ sake, the veil has been lifted, can we say it now? This emperor wears no clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. So who will call for his impeachment first?
I hope it comes soon. This is too damned important to let simmer until November, 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. BBC keeps putting American media to shame.
I hope they are chasing this story right now to gain back some dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
39. Investigate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC