Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin’s Yahoo account hijacked, e-mails posted online

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Spouting Horn Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:51 PM
Original message
Sarah Palin’s Yahoo account hijacked, e-mails posted online
Source: zdnet

On the heels of media reports that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was using a private Yahoo e-mail account (gov.palin@yahoo.com) to conduct Alaska state business, hackers have broken into the account and posted evidence of the hijack on Wikileaks.

An activist group calling itself ‘anonymous’ claimed responsibility for the compromise and released screenshots, photographs and the e-mail addresses of several people close to Palin, including her husband Todd and assistant Ivy Frye.

Read more: http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1919
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spouting Horn Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link to Wikileaks page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It must be busy, I can't get it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Try Cialis or Viagra......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. Works great for electile dysfunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
101. Is this sub-thread about disenfranchised oriental males????
:eyes:

(from an old racist/sexist 'joke': "What do the men of the orient do when they have an erection???? Most of them vote of course!" Sorry, not into racist/sexist jokes normally but this sub-thread brought out the inner child/idiot in me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #101
284. If you experience a Bush presidency lasting more than 4 years...
please consult a physician!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #284
293. Or a lawyer but I agree, here's another consult-able physician:

Congressman Jim McDermott, D WA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #284
315. Dr. Dean's prescription for America
A complete Republicanectomy in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
274. Can't choose between McCain and Obama
Obvious selectile dysfunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
52. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
120. I just spit all over my keyboard, thanks.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
162. That was nasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
200. C1aLI$ or V1@6RA 2 1ncr3ase UR 51ZE 2D4Y!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
252. WTF...
Jesus....I'm dyin here...I just got home from work :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheNeoCons Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #252
255. ROVIAN TACTIC - IGNORE THIS THREAD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marco86 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #255
348. WIKILEAKS IS LINKED TO SOME GUY NAMED MURDOCK
look for yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marco86 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #348
349. Sorry about the caps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karl_Bonner_1982 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
282. ...What about Bonerax?
....for those of you who saw IDIOCRACY? Since we pretty much live there now, where can I get a prescription for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
132. It seems to work through the Coral distribution network...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RNdaSilva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
342. How about this one?
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 11:28 AM by RNdaSilva
http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Wikileaks_exposes_Palin%27s_private_e-mail_account

"Aides to George Bush came under fire for similar e-mailing behaviour last year."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. the whole wiki site is down
looks like the McThugs got to it quickly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightVictor Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Wikileaks UK has it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. This site seems to be down too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
170. You can download the zip file here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #170
230. nothing much interesting is there?
some pics and text files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #230
327. If there was nothing interesting in those emails, it was stupid to release them.
Not only gave away the hack, but makes Palin look like a victim of "dirty-tricks."

Sometimes, I wish these kiddies would think before "show and tell" time.

Thumbs-down. :thumbsdown: Time-out, and no ice-cream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delt664 Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #327
345. Anon is
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 11:41 AM by delt664
a loosely affiliated group of like minded people. As I understand it they dont have any leaders or defined goals, just a general sense of what they want to accomplish.

Anon hacked this email account in such a way that Palin herself no longer had access to it. They had no idea of what they would find in it until it was hacked, and after the hack they couldnt change the password back to the original. One way or another Palin would know what happened. They only choice was to release the data. I think the point of this was twofold - to show that Palin really was using a personal email account for official business (presumably to avoid freedom of information act queries) and to show just how unsecure free email services like yahoo, hotmail, gmail, really are (hmm maybe it should be illegal to use them for official govt business)

I also found it interesting that Palin immediately deleted her yahoo accounts. I wonder if she is using her official email account now, or if she has just picked up another "Personal" account so she can continue to circumvent the FOIA laws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #170
233. Neither are working for me.
I think the world must be beating a path there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
187. The internet is the best hope for fair reporting, so we have to keep them
from taking it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
85. They have sites in different locations around the world to keep it from
going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. Wikileaks page shows all the contacts addresses..
sheesh..
now anyone can e-mail Track or twig or Branch or Bud..or....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Gee I will get right on that!
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud progressive Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #68
217. that logo should be use by obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
92. It wasn't that hard to break in. Her password was "DrillMe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #92
113. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #92
126. snort.
:spray:

So many jokes, so few keyboards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #92
207. I thought it was "IheartJoeBiden"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
186. Sarah Palin Yahoo Inbox
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
220. Same here--it'd be better to post relevant info rather than a link IMHO nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
296. Need help..who's computer whizzes here?
If so, please pm me..something re the zip file...Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Finally! The good guys hack back! I hope they have plans to watch the electronic vote "counting"
... on election night...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TellTheTruth82 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
320. The good guys hack back?
Are you condoning the breaking of laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #320
343. Using a private email account to conduct state business
in order to avoid future subpoenas may have some legal issues of it's own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TellTheTruth82 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #343
350. doesn't matter
Fruit of the poisoned tree and all that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this not a possible proverbial straw breaking the camel's back?
This seems huge - or should I say 'hugh1111"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Haha, nice.
I hope they find some evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It shows her using her personal (not so secure) account for state government business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. ...Probably thinking to get around FOIA. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. yep and that too!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Well, all she needed was a secure password.
Any guesses as to what password Palin was using?

My money's on "bulldog". Without the quotes.

(Advice follows: always, always, always use a secure password. That's a non-dictionary word, preferably including punctuation marks, numbers, letters, and a mix of caps and lower-case letters. An unsecure password might be "bulldog" or "NorthByNorthWest"; a secure password looks something like "#%,Yu&cV)". They're a bitch to remember, but a secure password is all that stands between you and a fully compromised account.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. How about Barracuda or Pit Bull...certainly not Yellow Dog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
76. Password? Probably FirstDude, F!rstDude if she wanted security
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bad_robbie Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
78. Strong passwords have their own weaknesses
The worst of which is having to memorize it, failing, and writing it down somewhere, usually a post-it on the monitor, under the keyboard, or stuck to the bottom of your desk. Your advice is still good, as long as each individual picks passwords that they can still keep in their head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #78
122. that's why I use pass phrases. easy to remember and very long
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:26 PM by no limit
as an example:

what in the world is a password?

Although I don't think they got her password because it was easy. It looks like they were able to reset it so they probably had her personal information. Not sure what yahoo asks when resetting a password since I dont have a yahoo account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #122
164. It's really easy to break into a Yahoo account by password reset
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 05:24 PM by El Fuego
All you need is the person's birth date and then answer a personal question chosen by the person. If they made the personal question something really obvious, bingo.

Not that I've ever done anything like that. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #164
353. Ha! I was right, that's how they did it (link)
http://news.aol.com/elections/article/palins-e-mail-account-hacked/178749?icid=100214839x1209919098x1200554602

"The hacker guessed that Alaska's governor had met her husband in high school, and knew Palin's date of birth and home Zip code. Using those details, the hacker tricked Yahoo Inc.'s service into assigning a new password, "popcorn," for Palin's e-mail account, according to a chronology of the crime published on the Web site where the hacking was first revealed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #122
224. Another good way to make secure passwords? Use patterns on the keyboard.
For instance, you could hit the first and last letter of each row on your keyboard.

q\a'z/

That coupled with some shifts and numbers make hard to crack but easy to remember passwords.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #224
272. good tip, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sentath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #224
328. I like diagonal chains and branching patterns
for example mko0ki8o9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #122
339. I use my friend's birthday.. It's not recorded anywhere, and I never forget it
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
247. You can use programs locally that store your password
And remember a simple password for that - it's encrypted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
292. Regardless of how secure
a password might be, there are really two items here:

1) If you have something to hide, don't use an email at a site like Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, or some other public web=based email company, because they can be pretty easy to get into no matter WHO is trying to hack in (If you want security, you need to be informed about what sites are covered with high encryption);

2) Those of us with nothing to hide don't really give a fuck about who sees what we're getting emails about. Sarah Palin should never have been leaving digital bread crumbs behind.

I also am not a public figure, rich, celebrity or have any kind of other reason to worry about my email accounts. And while it might be a genuine concern for some, I don't worry about identity theft, because if someone were to apply for credit in my name, they'd be laughed right out of a store or bank or whatever, because it's so amazingly bad. See? Being poor and penniless DOES have its good points! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #292
344. I disagree, yahoo's system can be perfectly secure
assuming you trust yahoo not to share your information intentionally as long as you don't come up with an idiotic "secret" question nobody will be able to get in to your account. It's clear these hackers got in there by being able to reset her password, so she was dumb enough to make the secret question extremely easy to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JenniferJuniper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why on earth is the governor of Alaska using a Yahoo account?
I mean, my 13 year old could probably hack that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Maybe, she wanted to get around the Freedom Of Information Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
190. Or maybe she's just that dumb
Probably been using Yahoo for a long time, and when she became governor just kept using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
118. Politically, to avoid scrutiny and FOIA-like requests; technically, because she's incompetent ...
That's just what I was thinking when hearing she'd been using a private account for gov't business. She might think she's clever by using a private account to keep some of her public business from prying eyes, but was too much of a fool to realize the inherent insecurity in doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
227. For precisely the same reasons that the Bush White House used private email for official business

To avoid accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
273. Because she lacks the experience and the judgement.
She is the vice presidential nominee of a major political party for the world's most powerful nation. And she is dumb enough to use an insecure means of communication. All the "hackers" had to do was know her date of birth and answer a personal question that she probably made really easy. Anyone with any kind of high level executive experiance would know not to do that. The Obama campaign should be all over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
325. Probably touted it as a cost saving effort
Maybe she got rid of the government e-mail accounts along with the luxury plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is that Bristol with baby Trigg in 2 photos?
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 02:01 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
She looks and acts more like his mother than her mother does!
http://gawker.com/5051193/sarah-palins-personal-email-account-hacked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
90. God's will *was* done (from one of those screenshots). Someone hacked it! LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
91. I think the baby is Sarah's grandchild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #91
114. I agree
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
Every time I see Bristle holding that baby, she is oozing maternal instinct and adoration. The same cannot be seen in photos showing Sarah Piehole holding the baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not fooled Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #114
285. "Bristle"
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 09:59 PM by not fooled
:P

bristle...bistro...trig...track...trick...drillbit...twig...branch (latter from above poster)...the laughable permutation-mutations are endless :crazy: :silly:


twinge...twit...twister...:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kmdemqueen Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #91
172. not sarah grandchild
that was that poor down syndrome baby she had. You tell me what kind of mother would take on a job such as vice president and possibly ignore her baby. What she is bring him on the campaign trail. I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #91
276. Well, yeah, but we've got bigger fish to fry now!
That was our bait for the stupid media whores, but we've got them hooked now. Catch up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #276
316. Of course it was bait. And every now and then I'll express an opinion
that may not be relevant to you. Go lecture someone else and leave me the hell alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Though I don't agree with everything 'anonymous' does they are Legion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcollier Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. This should be good!
Step Down Sarah Failin.... Just go away now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
183. What do you mean, ex LOD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #183
338. 4chan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. The e-mail index is interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. If Your On The Site - Try Copying It And Get It Posted Here At DU.....
having connection problems and can't get to the site. Probably busy and taking a lot of traffic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Here's one
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 02:36 PM by spotbird


The inbox only had 84 messages, she must delete everything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
133. 84 message Unread; 174 messages total.
Would have been interesting to see what was in the "Emails for Archive" and "Sent" folders -- and to get a full download of the whole account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. Post whatever you can...
I can't get it to load either...all people trying to see what she's been up to...time for her to go underground deeper than she's been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. A few more






The index:

yahoo-account-services-us@cc.yahoo-inc.com
Your Yahoo! password was changed
4:23 AM 5KB
Read


19079829061@mms.dobson.net
LOOK AT TRIG!!!!!
12:36 AM 52KB
Read


Amy McCorkell
HI SARAH
Sun, 9/14/08 4KB
Read


You replied to this message
Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 9/13/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 9/13/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 9/13/08 3KB
Read


Candy Sunderland
Welcome Home!
Wed, 9/10/08 17KB
Read


Juanita
Re: Hello!
Mon, 9/8/08 3KB
Read


Fatkidron@aol.com
Attachments

Fwd: Fw: A story you will never read anywhere else.
Mon, 9/8/08 20KB
Unread


Remus

Read: Hello!
Mon, 9/8/08 3KB
Read


JD & Trish

cousin jason
Sat, 9/6/08 6KB
Unread


Amy McCorkell

Read: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 3KB
Unread


Juanita

Read: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 3KB
Read


Jon Morgan

Attachments

From Cousin Jon
Fri, 9/5/08 76KB
Unread


ftb907@hslak.com

Delivered: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 2KB
Read


Ivy Frye

Re: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 4KB
Unread


ftb907@hslak.com

Delivered: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 2KB
Read


Juanita Fuller

Return Receipt: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 2KB
Unread


Ivy Frye

Delivered: Hello!
Fri, 9/5/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye

Delivered: Re:
Wed, 9/3/08 2KB
Unread


Ivy Frye

Delivered: Re:
Tue, 9/2/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye

Delivered: Re:
Tue, 9/2/08 3KB
Read


Sally Heath
Read: Tri-Cities family coming to convention
Mon, 9/1/08 3KB
Unread


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Delivered: Fw: Tri-Cities family coming to convention
Sun, 8/31/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye

< No Subject >
Sun, 8/31/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye
veep talking pts
Sun, 8/31/08 9KB
Read


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Attachments
Kids 3378.jpg
Sun, 8/31/08 25KB
Read


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Attachments
Kids 3378.jpg
Sun, 8/31/08 25KB
Read


Greg and Brandi Jones
Congrats from your cousins
Sat, 8/30/08 4KB
Read


katie
MY INPUT FOR SARAH IN THE TRI CITY HERALD.....YEA DOGGIES
Sat, 8/30/08 9KB
Read


Sally Heath
Re: WhooHoo
Sat, 8/30/08 3KB
Unread


Sally Heath
Read: WhooHoo
Sat, 8/30/08 3KB
Read


Meghan Stapleton
Attachments
FW: Motor Fuel Tax Suspension
Sat, 8/30/08 1169KB
Read


Ivy Frye
< No Subject >
Sat, 8/30/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye
< No Subject >
Sat, 8/30/08 3KB
Read


finch@ncidata.com
Read: WhooHoo
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Read


gov.sarah@yahoo.com
Re: From JP
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Read


Judy Patrick
JP cell 223-4704
Fri, 8/29/08 2KB
Read


Judy Patrick
From JP
Fri, 8/29/08 2KB
Read


Goode, Kelly C (GOV)
Re: What a day!
Fri, 8/29/08 5KB
Read


Goode, Kelly C (GOV)
What a day!
Fri, 8/29/08 5KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Fri, 8/29/08 3KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Draft letter to Governor Schwarzenegger / Container Tax
Thu, 8/28/08 12KB
Read


frank bailey
link
Wed, 8/27/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Wed, 8/27/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Wed, 8/27/08 3KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)

FW: Thanks
Mon, 8/25/08 7KB
Read


Ivy Frye

Delivered: Re: change
Mon, 8/25/08 3KB
Unread


sp@hslak.com

Delivered: Re: change
Mon, 8/25/08 2KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: change
Mon, 8/25/08 3KB
Read


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 8/23/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 8/23/08 3KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re:
Sat, 8/23/08 3KB
Read


McBride, Rhonda (GOV)
Rural Wireless Service
Sat, 8/23/08 32KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
RE: Using Royalty Oil to Lower the Cost of Fuel for Alaskans
Fri, 8/22/08 42KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
RE: Please approve
Fri, 8/22/08 11KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Court of Appeals / Executive Director Parole Board / Boards and Commissions
Thu, 8/21/08 10KB
Unread


Ivy Frye
Delivered: Re: Merge to left
Thu, 8/21/08 3KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
FW: DPS Employee Draft
Wed, 8/20/08 15KB
Read


McAllister, William D (GOV)
Re: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues
Wed, 8/20/08 12KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
FW: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues
Tue, 8/19/08 11KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Court of Appeals Nominations
Sat, 8/16/08 11KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
another records request
Fri, 8/15/08 5KB
Read


frank bailey
Attachments
Letter
Thu, 8/14/08 293KB
Read


McBride, Rhonda (GOV)
Tara Jollie's B-Day
Tue, 8/12/08 8KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08
Tue, 8/12/08 25KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08
Tue, 8/12/08 22KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08
Tue, 8/12/08 18KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
Attachments
FW: Capitalizing on coal reserves, Crow Tribe strikes deal for $7B
Tue, 8/12/08 10KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08 - CG Dinner
Mon, 8/11/08 29KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
RE: Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08
Sun, 8/10/08 28KB
Read


Mason, Janice L (GOV)
Scheduling - Week of 08.10.08
Sun, 8/10/08 24KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Status report
Fri, 8/8/08 6KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
FW: Special session press release
Fri, 8/8/08 29KB
Read


Colberg, Talis J (LAW)
Followup.
Fri, 8/8/08 4KB
Unread


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Delivered: $$$
Thu, 8/7/08 3KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter
Thu, 8/7/08 5KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
Attachments
FW: John Harris's response to Lyda Green
Thu, 8/7/08 68KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
RE: Request for Information and Documents
Thu, 8/7/08 10KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter
Thu, 8/7/08 3KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
Attachments
FW: Request for Information and Documents
Thu, 8/7/08 525KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
Attachments
FW: Memorandum of Law
Thu, 8/7/08 669KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)
Attachments
FW: Informal Meeting with Gov. Palin Next Week
Thu, 8/7/08 268KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Attachments
FW: PR 08-2598 Summer 2009 Schedule Released
Wed, 8/6/08 770KB
Read


Rutherford, Marty K (DNR)
Re: AO
Wed, 8/6/08 4KB
Read


Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Update
Wed, 8/6/08 5KB
Read


Sean Parnell
RE: Meet and Greet
Tue, 8/5/08 20KB
Read


gov.sarah@yahoo.com
Fw: Meet and Greet
Tue, 8/5/08 20KB
Unread


ftb907@hslak.com
Delivered: Re: weekend statement
Tue, 8/5/08 2KB
Unread


ftb907@hslak.com
Delivered: Re: weekend statement
Tue, 8/5/08 2KB
Read


McBride, Rhonda (GOV)
Walter Soboleff
Tue, 8/5/08 10KB
Unread


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Delivered: Fw: Willow
Tue, 8/5/08 3KB
Read


katie
Re: HEY
Mon, 8/4/08 3KB
Read


Palin, J.D.
RE: Willow
Mon, 8/4/08 3KB
Read


Karl Clauson
Attachments
weekend statement
Mon, 8/4/08 52KB
Read


fek9wnr@yahoo.com
Delivered: Re: Staff at the House on Saturday Morning
Sat, 8/2/08 3KB
Read


Nizich, Michael A (GOV)

FW: info from today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #57
73. Has anyone here realized that one of those email addresses in her inbox
is a damned Alaska telephone number??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #73
82. It's her daughter's
which has likely been changed by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #57
242. One of those email addresses is "mms.dobson.org"!
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:57 PM by intheflow
dobson.org? :wtf: I'm sick to my stomach.





I also looooove Amy McCorkell's email:

"Pray for me as well. I need strength to 1. keep employment, 2. not have to choose"

Doesn't say what she might have to choose, but regardless, the irony of both points is beyond belief.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Anything juicy yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. Not so far
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 02:42 PM by spotbird
It's kind of boring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
141. "President McCain"????? SHe calls him that ALREADY??
That's so weird!! I love how she outlines what a VP does.. like she's showing off her ABCs. That's just creepy that she called him President McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #141
212. You must have missed the press release back in April when Diebold Accidentally leaked the Sham Elect
You must have missed the press release back in April when Diebold Accidentally leaked the Sham Election Results as seen on The Onion News Network!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BronxBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
158. What's that Dark Box?
Looks like she practicing talking points about what it means to be the VP

Sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
307. I saw one where she's ranting about the life issue- couldn't read it well---too small print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Cynic Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why isn't it milfgov123 or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
196. You're kidding - more like miwlf.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. gotta love the 8/31 "Veep talking points"
proof she was coached for the Gibson interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well, certainly she was coached
Also interesting: both gov.sarah@yahoo and gov.palin@yahoo have now been deleted. Also known as destroying evidence, for those keeping score at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. Does that amount to a crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. however, you can never totally "delete" deleted information
someone adept at computer forensics can reconstruct anything deleted from a hard drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. Doesn't reformatting the hard drive delete everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
72. No
Not really.

From Microsoft's web site

"Is the Data Really Gone?

Here's the problem: An index of files is maintained for the hard drive, telling it where things are stored. When you install a file, especially a big one, it is scattered around the hard drive in bits and pieces. On your command to open the file, the hard drive checks the index, then gathers the pieces and reconstructs them.

When that file is deleted, the links between the index and the file disappear. That tells your system that the file is no longer needed and that hard drive space can be overwritten. But the deleted file remains on your computer. Only when it is overwritten do you begin to be safe. Even then, a specialist might be able to recover the old data.

Assuming you just deleted everything in preparation for saying goodbye to your PC, it is unlikely that the sensitive information has been overwritten. It's still sitting there, and anybody with a shareware program could find it.'"


The short answer to your question is that unless the areas where those data were stored on whatever media they're being stored on is over-written by something new, it's not gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #72
137. I have a program that lets you overwrite stuff up to 96 times. a beaut
if I might say so myself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #137
153. That's fine for normal use....
...but even overwriting the data doesn't completely destroy it, it just makes it harder (and more expensive) to recover. If it's sufficiently important, a forensic examiner can get it back, no matter how many overwrites have been done. That's why the Federal Government mandates that the disk platters of all decommissioned drives be physically destroyed (either by burning or being shredded into tiny fragments).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #153
235. I have been told .....
A hard drive with an open chassis, and a hammer ... will erase a hard drive ....

I have assumed it is true .....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #235
254. That's true, assuming the hammer is applied with sufficient vigor...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 08:24 PM by Kutjara
...to break the platters into small pieces. A power drill straight through the drive case and platters also works (but again, this is considered insufficient by Uncle Sam).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #153
311. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
86. It is more basic than that.
Most email systems have multiple levels of back-up, both for auditing and recover purposes. Yahoo undoubtedly has these protections in place. There is not a single "hard disk" to format, per se. To destroy the evidence you would have to eliminate it from every backup copy and every audit log. That is certainly possible, but it is not as simple as hitting the "format" button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. And if the hacked inbox has evidence of illegal activity
then a court could issue a search warrant that would require Yahoo to produce all email activity on the account.

A lawyer might have to help us out here. There may be some legal principle about fruit of a poison apple. I'm not positive that a search warrant could be based on evidence obtained through a criminal hacking activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #86
270. Hackers RULE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
99. No. It simply unhooks all the bits of information you need to find anything.
The actual data is still there unless you use a shred program which writes random bit patterns over the drive many times. Even then, there are magnetic analysis that can be done to recover data. That is why the high classification drives are required to be physically shredded.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. She'll have to do a 7 layer wipe!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Animator Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
102. Actually no it doesn't
I speak from personal experience. About a year ago I was doing some house cleaning on my PC, giving it a fresh install of XP. I made sure to back up all of my important files onto my secondary drive.

I wanted to make sure I wiped out any viruses or spyware that might have snuck onto the drive so I did a complete format before the install. After I was done, much to my horror, I discovered that I had formatted and installed XP onto the wrong drive. I almost passed out. About 7 years worth of Photoshop, and computer animation work had just vanished. All I had to show for my years of graphic design experience were the few low res images I had uploaded to my webpage.

Fortunately even under those catastrophic circumstances, the files were only mostly dead.. and we all know there's a big difference between mostly dead, and all dead. If you accidentally wipe your drive, don't panic, and for gods sake don't write anything else to that drive. There are data recovery programs available that can scour your drive and reassemble all the pieces of your humpty dumpty files. Just don't put anything else on that drive until all your files are recovered. Formatting is recoverable, writing new files over formatted sectors makes them unrecoverable.

Fortunately, my story had a happy ending, I was able to get pretty much all the files I'd lost... were talking hundreds of gigs worth of file too! If I did lose any files on account of Vista being installed over them I haven't noticed them being gone.

That being said, the same technology that was my saving grace could destroy an unsuspecting victim. Say a business owner wanted to get all new computers for his employees, and liquidate all of his obsolete ones. He could resell them, donate them, or chuck them in the dumpster out back. Whatever he does with them, he'd better hope that he's done a thorough job of wiping out any critical information that was on them before he chucked them. Formatting the drives are not enough.. there are other steps that must be taken to ensure the data that's been erased in unrecoverable. It would be easy for someone to buy one of these obsolete systems, use the data recovery tools to rebuild all the file structures and access all the sensitive information you thought you'd erased.

If you've ever had to use the "forgot my password" option when you've accessed your bank account online... or they send you a confirmation email when you change your password.. Your new password is... big trouble. If you use Outlook, it stores all those emails on you hard drive.

If you've ever written in your personal journal how much you hate your boss, or that you secretly fantasize about boinking your secretary on her desk to the astounded gazes of all your coworkers?... Blackmail anyone?

So yeah... moral of the story? Data isn't as easy to kill as you might think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #55
241. Clear Blue Sky
Clear Blue Sky

The only way to destroy a HDD, is to physically destroy the Hardrive... A reformatting is just the iceberg.. On the other hand, if you thrown an HDD from a high building.... and when the HDD is cracking up, fycially destroy the plates who are inside, you have a fighting possibility to manage to kill an HDD once and for all.. You can also blow the HDD up, but that could be a problem, with the authority then.. They seldom like explosives on the run.. Or, if you don't want to do it the fun way.. A powerfully Magnet would also do the trich.... Take the magnet over the drive, for 15 minutes or so... And then not even the Mighty NSA would have the slightest Chance of taking anything out of it anymore...

Diclotican

Sorry my bad english, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
127. Or... just get the backup tapes from Yahoo! This isn't a personal PC issue.
I'm guessing that Palin was using Yahoo! web email, so all the emails were stored up on Yahoo! servers, and so ALL her emails are likely available, via backups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
70. Welllll, maybe not
Just deleting the accounts wouldn't delete the E-mails. If this is all on the up-and-up, it'll be interesting to see what Yahoo does with the information in those accounts should they come under subpeona for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
351. She should be jailed then for deleting those accounts.
Amazing how the GOP can just bend the rules and get away with this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I find it a bit odd that the hackers use Yahoo! toolbar on Firefox.
But they know more than I so...

Wonder if anything will come of this. The accounts may have been deleted, but the emails should still be on a server somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, in her defense, at least she knows how to send an e-mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is she George Bush in drag or something?
If I didn't know any better I'd swear she was already the president with the way she's carrying on. Trying to boss around Schwarzenegger, trying to squash investigations, and now this. She needs to come down off herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. The difference between George Bush and Sarah Palin?
Lipstick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INDIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
136. Awesome line...just awesome. Sub Cheney for Bush and you have...
a full fledged campaign slogan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
163. So, I'm wondering...
does Georgie prefer gloss, matte, or frost?


:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tismyself Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #163
309. a little sand in the vaseline
true grit, you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
245. And, hopefully, power
Right now, she is just the Governor of Alaska

Bush is the President, so he can get away with anything

Palin might think she can get away with anything, but she is not the President. Yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
263. Yea and it is still a PIG !
Lipstick or NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #28
319. More like Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. I hate this...
dirty tricks crap regardless of who does it. Its like the repukes using spam to portray Obama as a muslim. The whole thing is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie2 Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
301. I scrolled through half the comments
looking for someone as appalled at this as I am. Perhaps it is you.

The comments here are those of kids at Christmas, eagerly unwrapping all their gifts.

This is someone's personal email account. This is ok with everybody? How would you feel if it were done to Obama, to Palin, to Franken?

For people who champion the right of privacy to the nth degree, there is an awful lot of disassociation going on here.

I also feel compassion for all those who sent her emails, and any personal info that may be in them.

Would you like the contents of your yahoo account spread all over the internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #301
336. Be appalled all you like. Using yahoo to send state business emails is probably illegal.
It sure as hell is unethical, and calling her out on this is fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torbird Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. They Better Have Gotten Everything
because such a thing isn't going to happen again. If these hackers failed to get her OTHER yahoo account as well, or didn't copy all the emails from this one, then bye-bye because all this has now been erased by the McCain people.

So, let's hope the hackers have files. Otherwise, all this information that could have been released through FOIA is down the memory hole. Thanks, guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
addicted2politics Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
124.  it better be good and they better have covered their tracks
if they didn't get some evidence of her committing a felony and they get caught.. they will be doing some serious jail time (as well as any one that helped them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
221. Someone on another forum posted that he suspected the release of the account name was a ruse.
Said that he thought the account name had been "leaked" to anonymous, not discovered, because then amidst all the big hubbub the contents of the three accounts could be destroyed. No, almost all the contents were made unavailable almost immediately, ostensibly because a "white knight" got onto the hack instantly and shut it down. The other accounts were pulled at the same time. With nothing damaging leaked, my Rove-y sense has been activated. I mean, what would you do if, during an investigation, your candidate mentioned in conversation that she had 3 Yahoo! accounts that included some possibly damaging mail? Especially if you had a friend working for Yahoo! who could make sure they were good and gone. Sorry to be a buzzkill, but it looks awfully like we've been had. Wish we'd seen those Nizich messages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skratchez Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #221
310. Good point...
I just read the Michelle Malkin account (linked from slashdot.com) and there were some troubling details/omissions. I hope Karl Rove doesn't get all the perks that mafioso get when he's in prison, particularly access to our interwubz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
267. Consider the blackmail possibilities
Fact: Most hacking going on these days is for profit. Most of it is centered on identity theft, but hackers are criminals. They will take money however they can get it. There are cyber criminals who routinely launch denial-of-service attacks to extort money out of businesses that depend on that service. So let;s assume these are fundamentally bad actors and not political game-players

Just consider this possibility. What if your are a serious criminal hacker and you discover this account. And once inside this account, you discover some information that would be very embarrassing, so embarrassing that it would torpedo the Palin candidacy, and thereby remove the whole fascist enterprise from power. What would you do?

How much would that be worth? Well, if these guys can whip out $85 billion for AIG like it's nothing, how much would they be willing to bay in order to remain in control of our government and money supply?

Think about that one. If you are going for that payday, you had better play your cards right. One thing you would not do is put the most embarrassing stuff out in public. But maybe you would put enough out there to send chills up every fascist's spine.

I think if I were doing that, I'd send such a public shot over the bow to get their attention. Then to protect myself, I'd make it clear that I had an underground gang of 20 partners who are all going to expect $20M each, and if anything happens to any of us, the other 19 take it public.

Maybe it is a fantasy. Maybe not. Consider the possibilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightVictor Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wikileaks UK is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flagg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. She was using a yahoo acount for conducting Alaska state business ?
Wow, she IS qualified. LMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. gov.palin and gov.sarah?
Gosh, nobody could have anticipated that a hacker would be able to find those account names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. The password was probably "mooseburger"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Limelight Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. Wouldn't it be ironic
If they hacked her email with their blackberry that McCain invented?!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
156. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thank you hackers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. k&r for no, email isn't secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. " Wikileaks may release additional emails should they be of political substance."
From the Wiki page.


Oooohhh....this is gonna get good

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Now they'll NEVER get McCain to use email. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karl_Bonner_1982 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
281. Doggone it!
Until this happened I had hopes of McCain at least trying to learn computers and the Internet so that he could make an embarrassing blunder with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Animator Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
47. Since McSame doesn't know how to use a computer...
I wouldn't put it past him to rely on her to help him with the White House computers.

"Sarah where are those damned launch codes?"

"Ohh I put them in a zip file on my geocities page."

"You did what?!"

"It's okay dontcha know.. It's set to private."

"Well I need them, what's your geowhatsit page?"

"geocities.com/rapturemaker"

"Well bring it up!"

"Wow, I'm pretty popular!"

"Huh?"

"This page has gotten over a thousand hits in the last few days!"

"I think I'm having a heart attack!"

"Don't fight it John, it's God's will."

"Stupid Cunt! ughgger..."

"Thank you Jesus! I knew he'd keel over sooner or later... If I'd known this is what would set him off I'd have done it months ago. And to think I wasted all that time trying boink him to death!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Love it, very funny. I can see that scene. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anticon Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
171. Holy crap
That is one of the funniest things I've read in a while!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
216. Hilarious!
:rofl: :rofl: Someone who knows how, please nominate this post for a DUzy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #216
288. done! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #288
300. Thanks!
I look forward to seeing it this weekend. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
49. Don't really like it
I don't like the idea of hacking into someone's personal account. But I like even less someone using a friggin' ordinary Yahoo account to do government business. And I like even less than that, the government spying on personal accounts. Since Palin would do that if the president told her to, apparently, and Bush has his warrantless surveillance gobbledygook going on....well, HOW'S IT FEEL, SARAH? If the McCain team doesn't like it, let's see them champion privacy laws....with a straight face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueKansan Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
50. HYPOCRITES!
How sleazy to high five each other because Palin's email account was hacked. It's a crime, an invasion of privacy, no matter what you think of her. If someone had done this to Obama, you would all be having a cow. IT IS WRONG, NO MATTER WHO IT WAS DONE TO. We're supposed to be better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. enjoy your stay, it should be very very short.
freep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #59
107. Uh-uh. From a loyal DU'er, this "leak" is a trap.
And too many of us are following like lemmings right into it. See my other post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #107
268. It's a Rove false flag op...
The lack of damaging information in the release makes that pretty much a no-brainer conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #59
283. BlueKansan has a point
It is illegal, and no thats not a freeper assault, thats common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flatulo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #59
333. First, abusing a new poster because of a low post count is against the rules.
Second, calling someone a Freep is against the rules.

Third, the poster is 100% correct. This action is sleazy, illegal and it sickens me to see people howling with glee over this.

I sincerely hope these hacker face jail time or a hefty fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #333
356. some follow the unwritten rules
everyone in double digits is monitored and watched like a freeper until proven otherwise. Nobody wants to think through what this Palin story is about. Internet privacy. The UN wants to impose on the world the rules used in CHina.





oh,
but for a few miniscule political points gained, the loss of anonymity is worth it ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
61. You're exactly right. It is just like warrantless wiretapping.
Of course, it's also wrong and illegal to do state business via a private e-mail account.

But, two wrongs don't make a right. I hope you are as upset about the warrantless wiretapping Bush did and is doing, and the fact that Palin used an easily hackable account to do state business.

Looks like to me that she is being hoisted on her own petard.

But, again, you're right. It is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. Oh, and BTW, laws trying to outlaw abortion is also an invasion of privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
67. Obama isn't obstructing an investigation
while running for the White House.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
75. Your Concern Is Noted.
Welcome to DU.




:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
77. It'd be wrong if they didn't bust her ass for using it for state business.
but they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
79. Which one are you? Peg Finch or Candy Sunderland? nt
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 03:41 PM by NoGOPZone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
81. The irony level of a Republican using the Colbert avatar
is OVER 9000!!!!!!11111111oneoneoneelevn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #81
142. Many don't GET irony, and probably believe
everything he says! And, you know, Colbert is SUCH a loyal repuke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spelldmilk Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #81
167. Totally off subject: Where did you get that Obama picture? It is beautiful.
And thank you for putting the link to that vid. Hadn't seen it before, and my 5yo. and I just watched it together. He loved it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faith No More Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
88. Oh, I see
when the government does it to us it's ok but when we do it to them, it's a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
94. As you thugs have told us about domestic spying...
... if you aren't doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to worry about.

How does that sound to you now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #94
308. sounds good to me! My thoughts, exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
96. Well, if she hasn't done anything wrong, what's the problem?
Isn't that George Bush's explanation for invading our privacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pete2069 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
129. Republicans discussing Crimes of others..
No it is not right , but the criminal crimes , hiding of
information from the citizens of this country , the abuse of
our constitution & laws put them on a different playing
field.
Bush , Cheney and McCain visit your email , telephone calls ,
credit & financial transactions , your health records ,
what you eat and buy , when & where you drive on a daily
basis.  
Every American citizen has a life ,  is an open book for Bush
and his military-corporate-republican complex.
Why does the law only apply to the American citizens and not
the people in charge of protecting our freedom and privacy
which are in control of running government.
Quote the law to them and see where it gets you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
139. Hacking a Nazi's account, used to illegally circumvent government transparency, is wrong?
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 05:05 PM by Zhade
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
179. God hasn't saved us from stupid American voters for the last 7.85 years.

What makes you think s/he's going to start now?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #50
191. Can't really picture him stonewalling a subpoena to be in the same position.

That makes it a little different, I'd say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ka hrnt Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #50
205. I agree.
This is unbelievably low. *shakes head*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #50
206. if they can tap ours
we can tap theirs!

They don't like it? Tough effin' shit.

Oh, and Failin', get your stinkin' nose outta my uterus, while you're at it.

What's with the Nizich mail? "confidential Ethics Matter." That sounds like it could be interesting reading.

Although what I'd love to see are emails to and from her hubbie's former biz partner. You know...the one the National Enquirer says she had an affair with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
214. Hmmm, see your hobby is "Horticulture"
That's good. Cuz once you are outta here, the manure will go to good use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #214
271. Dorothy Parker quote
"You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
223. Waaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
228. "WE" didn't hack the email account...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:40 PM by jberryhill
You know, when Nelson Rockefeller died from a heart attack while screwing his mistress, I didn't think that heart attacks were very funny.

I still got a chuckle out of it.

Sorry.

Here, you have a state official using a private email account to conduct state business, in an effort to avoid accountability for her communications.

There should have been NO such email account.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
234. name 3 other Democrats in Olathe, KS
Ugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insleeforprez Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
249. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
51. At first I thought it was from The Onion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
54. I think there is something juicy.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 03:05 PM by kristopher
"Hey Sarah, I'm reading the paper and have thought and prayers going to you......don't let the negative press wear you down.
Pray for me as well. I need strength to 1) keep employment 2) not have to choose.

Lately I just pray may God's will be done. I am trying to learn patience and listen to God. I pray He gives you energy! Strength!

Love Amy"


OK, if this is truly a Palin email (and that is still unknown), then I think this sounds like blackmail. 1) money 2) choose who I'm going to get it from, you or the press...

That's my read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
58. I wonder how long it will take the Right to "prove" that Anonymous has secretly been backed by Obama
since the very beginning? At the very least, they're going to try to bring back the "poor little Sarah" line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
60. I hope somebody in the MSM will point out that this is what the Bush White House has been doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
62. SWEET! Let's watch Sarin squirm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
63. Holy crap, that is one vapid collection of emails
All that's missing is the "God Made Little Kittens" spam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #63
238. Yeah, that's why I'm leaning toward maybe it's an inside job.
"Oh, look, the dirty liberals hacked Sarah's account. And what did they find? Let God's will be done."

Wow. Way to reveal the nasty confidential stuff, hacker dudes.

It's either KKKarl Rove or some 13 year old kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #238
331. After some thought, I would have to agree
I mean, it's all so....boring.

Give us something of substance and then I'll believe it was something other than "moles" paid to make Sarah Palin look like a victim of those nasty Democrat sons of bitches.....

I've seen too many sick people do this sort of thing to themselves in order to make themselves into Martyrs...


so yeah...I also think there's an awfully good chance it was an inside job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matt819 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
66. Neither the US nor UK wiki sites are loading (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
69. So I herd Sarah Palin lieks mudkipz.
To do list:


A Barrel Roll
Hal Turner
Furries
Scientology
Ur Mom
Save America


Anonymous delivers, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #69
150. This deserves recognition - I lol'd.
I see wut u did theer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #69
257. Rules one and two.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 08:27 PM by boppers
Yer doin it wrong.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
71. Hey, where can we read these emails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
74. I know the RepubliCONS are stupid but, I can't believe ...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 03:34 PM by Myrina
... that one of 'em is STUPID ENOUGH to open an email account on a free service like Yahoo with a user name like 'gov.palin'.

Me smells something fishy.



:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. Well, remember Ollie North
and his little problem with PROFS emails.

Caribou Barbie will rue the day that John McCain invented the Blackberry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pete2069 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #74
115. I agree
Some of the email looks like a setup.....
Bending to the religious right wing , her honesty and loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
229. I think she really is that dumb, but Rove isn't. So he figured a way
to hide destruction of evidence. See my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #229
286. Tend to agree
This so called hack smells of a Karl Rove trick. Wouldn't get too excited about the e-mails boys and girls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
80. This sucks - we can't read the fucking things
And the dude who posted it didn't copy paste any of it. Very frustrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blayne Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
83. Both sites are down now.
The hackers still have their copy of the info they copied from the accounts, and hopefully it is a complete copy of the two accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
89. The site loaded no problem and I downloaded the .zip file
The zip file has screen shots of a few Palin emails, contact lists, email account info, and a couple of family photos. Try this link and download the .zip files.

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin_Yahoo_account_2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
93. AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THINKS THIS STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN?!? Whether it's true or NOT!
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 03:57 PM by Brotherjohn
If it's a hoax, it's kryptonite.

If it's all true, all it does is serve to give the other side ammo that we're being "mean to poor wittle Sarah" again. That's the hole we've just dug ourselves out of, thanks to the campaign actually returning to ISSUES the last couple of days.

A return to Sarah ANYTHING only serves to drag the campaign back into the gutter, which only benefits McCain.

I would even go so far as to suggest the McCain campaign or their surrogates actually hacked and leaked Palin's account, and relaeased this info "anonymously". (after scrubbing anything that might be incriminating, of course)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #93
105. I do too. It makes Dems look like criminals, & all the emails I saw are cosy homilies
showing what a dedicated public servant & nice christian gal she is.

Something smells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #105
119. Please see post #116
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anticon Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #105
173. Will this get her off the hook in her criminal case??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #105
201. ARRRRRRGH - We are once again failing for a bunch
of bullshit that is going to hurt us bigtime - this is a setup, wake up people!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #93
117. Caution is a god idea, certainly. This plays into their Poor Sarah meme.
and creating a campaign of emotions instead of issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #93
121. I don't like it either.
To have a thread that makes mention of the fact that this occurred is one thing -- to revel in it is quite another.

Nothing much to be gained and everything to lose with stunts like this IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #93
123. I think it stinks, too.
If this happened to Biden I'd be hopping mad!

And it's real fishy that her account was so easy to hack into.

This sure will play the sympathy card for her.

Hmm---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #93
134. I guess that depends on what they find in those emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #93
143. Hey, some hackers did this, and it has no reflection on any of us
I don't think it's the work of the McCainite, as it does not reflect badly on us at all. They'd only do it for an advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeoutofjoint Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #143
178. not bad reflection? snooping in someone's email!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #143
188. It makes her look the victim (again) and distracts from the issues (again). (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #93
199. Yes, It does smell!
When I first read emails. Nothing bad about her, nothing juicy.. so I strongly suspect that it was done on purpose and then blame on democrats, making Sarah look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #93
210. You're absolutely right...the lunatics run DU and the Dem Party now..
...no better than the repuke thugs...it'd be nice to have a few people here who had a shred of decency left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #93
222. True or not I disagree with hacking anyones email
as well BrotherJohn. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #93
243. It does smell. but IT'S NOT ABOUT US.
Let's be a little less self-absorbed and put ourselves (mentally) in the position of an unscrupulous campaign manager who's just found out that his candidate, who is under investigation, has 3 email accounts on a public server with potentially damaging messages. He could get his connection who works at the company destroy the contents of the accounts, but that might lead to obstruction of justice charges. What to do? How about leaking the name of the least dangerous account to a hacking group, and have Connell watch for their activity and pull it all down the instant it starts? Then, amid the hue and cry over hacking, your inside Yahoo! techie can destroy the evidence, which probably can't be subpoenaed now anyway since it would be fruit of a poisoned tree.

Like I said, an escape hatch, not a trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #93
337. If it is true, then she has potentially violating a lot of transparency laws.
You're not interested in seeing daylight on that kind of behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
95. anything revealing?
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:01 PM by Barack08
or just ordinary emails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
97. I just got in to the site. Interesting. Palin favors warantless eavesdropping!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
98. Bullshit. Republicans Did This
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:04 PM by Crisco
To try to drum up sympathy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
100. Two words - - -
Dan Rather


This is classic Rove. Have someone "discover" damaging info about your candidate. Prove that the damaging info is phony. From then on, anything anyone uncovers is just dismissed as "more of the same hoax."

Remember -- after the Dan Rather incident, anything anyone came up with on Bush was just pooh-poohed as "more Dan Rather stuff."

Rove has done this in almost every election he's been anywhere near.

Not saying that this is the case, but learn from history -- or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #100
193. The info that Rather had was correct, the copies of the info were the forgeries. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #193
250. I know -- but the scam worked for Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #250
306. Okay, good, wasn't clear.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
103. Karl Rove, circa 1986
From Wikipedia:

In 1986, just before a crucial debate in campaign , Rove claimed that his office had been bugged by Democrats. The police and FBI investigated and discovered that the bug's battery was so small that it needed to be changed every few hours, and the investigation was dropped. Critics, including other Republican operatives, suspected Rove had bugged his own office to garner sympathy votes in the close governor's race.


I can't help thinking Palin's going to get a huge bump in the polls from this. I also can't help thinking the timing - when Palin was sinking like a brick in the favorability ratings, and the economy is in the process of doing the same - is perfect for the McCain campaigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #103
116. What makes you think it was democrats
who hacked her yahoo account. It seems to me having a free email account to conduct top state business on is asking for some kids to try to hack it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #116
128. I don't think it was Democrats. I think Rove did it.
But the trick is convincing the public - and, to do so, we need to get the media on board first. It's going to be an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcsl1998 Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #128
209. Remember, Rove Planted A Bug In His Own Office, Then Called FBI...
...to say his office was bugged by the Democrats in TX gubernatorial race in the 1980's - By the time the scam was figured out, his candidate was in office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #116
145. it doesn't matter who it is. it will be perceived as someone who's "against palin" = democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #103
159. My thoughts too on first seeing this...
Very Rovian in its appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #103
225. No, not a trap, an escape hatch.
People won't think it's cool that she was obviously avoiding public oversight by using private accounts for state business. But, Rovian? Yes.

See my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #225
253. You're giving the public too much credit.
The gut reaction will be "I can't believe someone hacked her email."

The reasoned response would follow that with "but she shouldn't be using a private account for official business, both because of state records laws and because it's not secure."

Most people tend to go with their gut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #253
278. Maybe, but see my posts #'s 243 & 221 for their real motive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dakdirty Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
104. Man, oh man.
I do not approve of hacking a person's personal information in most circumstances, although I think in this case, the public interest is served by exposing this person's utter lack of discretion. You want a person one old geezer's heartbeat away from the presidency who doesn't have the sense to NOT use a free email account for transmission of governmental business? Not me, and hopefully, nobody else either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColonelTom Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #104
112. This won't prove that point to Joe Sixpack.
We need to walk this one back to the shoreline pronto, or it's gonna sink us. Find out who did this and hold them to account for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
108. Wow what a stupid woman
she was conducting business as Alaskan Gov. on a free email account. I found the picture of Bristols (lol) and baby Twig very disturbing. She was making fun of the little fellow.
Sarah Palin really needs to be spayed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jorno67 Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
110. Just think
This Idiot could very well end up with top secret security status. Oh I feel safer already - thank you Republicans!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
111. Didn't "anonymous" write the Repukes' favorite novel
"Primary Colors"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlieQ Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #111
151. Different anonymous.
These folks are just engaging in internet buffoon-ery for the lol'z. No party affiliations, no class, no gender. Just general fun and mayhem. It's what 4chan is all about (and for those of you at work, I wouldn't recommend checking out 4chan until you get home, and even then, be careful).



And while I definitely think that general black hat hacking is horrible and mean, hacking a government account is more gray. I mean, the addresses were public knowledge days ago. What kind of idiot doesn't immediately delete the yahoo account when the stakes are that high? Yahoo accounts are notoriously unsafe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
125. "Draft letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger re: container tax" dtd 8/28
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 04:47 PM by lynnertic
I'm so ashamed for looking.

I wonder if the CA budget includes a container tax.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #125
130. I wonder, too. Unfortunately, it sounds like the idgit might have just gotten some screenshots ....
... of the Inbox folder, rather than doing a full download of the whole email account. Fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #130
152. Srsly. Can you BELIEVE the missed opportunity?
That person is going to WISH TO HEAVEN that they'd gotten something worth the torment they're about to go through.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #152
219. No question. They're going to be prosecuted no matter what, now ...
... and a full expose of the emails might have at least made the punishment worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #130
244. Not "idjit", "patsy". I believe the only explanation that makes sense is
that it was a setup that was being monitored so it couldn't go further than it did. Now who's going to question the total destruction of the contents of the accounts or even be able to subpoena anything from Yahoo!? Rove and Connell did themselves proud getting rid of what might have been a real problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #244
313. Yeah, true. Plus, any hacking into the account like this could taint the forensic integrity ....
.... and they could deny the message contents as being authentic.

But there are always backups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #313
324. Never thought of the integrity part, but as for backups, the R's prolly had an inside techie
delete them "for national security". An excuse for the deletion of the Yahoo! files, I believe, was the primary goal of the operation. They could have deleted the stuff at her end as soon as they became aware of it. And Rove's top IT guy, the one who writes the vote corruption programs, Mike Connell, certainly knows how to effectively clean a drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #125
154. Somebody needs to find out if Arnold received a letter from Palin...
...on official State of Alaska letterhead on that date.

Otherwise it could just be construed as giving political advice over a potential policy.

Just as some of the emails to her aides could be dismissed as "don't forget to pick up my dry cleaning".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
131. I wouldn't want this to happen to Obama.
And, I certainly wouldn't want it to happen to me.

If there were real evidence of something illegal that would force her to step down, then at least you could begin to have the discussion on whether the ends justified the means.

As it is, hackers are notoriously amoral types who don't worry about such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #131
138. I would.
As governor her official communications are the property of the people. When someone uses a method of hiding their official actions from public scrutiny I want that method revealed and thwarted.

I want open government no matter who is president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #138
148. Somebody goes to the trouble of hacking her,
...yet doesn't include an email in which she is conclusively conducting state business?

Instead we get a couple discussing campaign strategies and proffering prayers.

The headers are intriguing, but they aren't a slam dunk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
135. Since she conducts state business with that email addy, I don't have a big problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
140. Now that wasn't very nice
Is there anything that can be used against her in a court of law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
144. Did you notice the creepy church-lady comment on that screen shot?
In her email back to Sean Parnell (sp?), she is talking about that radio host and she says "Something evil is going on with him."

Now take that in the context of her religious extremism and her friend the Witch Hunter from kenya that laid hands on her and visits her church as an honored guest regularly. They're all about the "evil" She writes as tho she thinks that the radio guy is filled with "evil" because he isn't falling at their feet.

We've HAD 8 years of an unqualified, unsophisticated, vindictive, absolutist, religious extremist. We cannot do this again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ann_american2004 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
146. SMELLS FISHY - inside job
hackers didnt back up anything? hmmm
the headlines today say how her aides are refusing subpoenas?

seems to me she has the most to gain by her email accounts being deleted now "for security reasons"

hope Americans see right thru this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
147. Stephanie Miller gave that address out on her show yesterday.
I thought is was hilarious. It is an address in the public domain so there is nothing she can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
149. I don't buy it - Think it's a setup
Delete the evidence, empty the trash, leak the account. And suspicions that the personal account was used to hide unethical and/or illegal activity suddenly lose credibility.

Pretty obvious in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ann_american2004 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #149
155. yup - exactly
just seems too timely and convenient.
the hackers didnt save any of it but cute pictures on Bristol and her baby? that just doesnt sound typical of their trade. it's a setup

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #149
157. Agreed...
If you got into the account and then didn't find anything, what would be the value of declaring it was hacked into to the world??

:popcorn:

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #157
160. Bingo!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #149
294. Exactly. And creates a smokescreen under which to have Yahoo! insider erase their copies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #149
341. I doubt it with a 4chan hacker involved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
161. Keeping an eye on this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
165. How does this help?
So far, I see nothing truely incriminating.

I would suggest that it might have been smarter to hack it, and observe a while. Then, having collected and observed all the data, post it.

I do not know the background of this activist group, but this reads a lot more like an inside job to excuse the deletion of data than a true exposure by activists. Perhaps I am just too paranoid, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
166. The accounts have deleted
Which leads to a bigger issue.. Given the content (DPS/Government items), you can now add obstruction of justice to the charges against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
168. Not cool...
Privacy is one of the main issues we seek to de-thug. I don't see how this will help that. It's not as if she'll ever view this incident as an opportunity to see how it feels to have one's privacy breached.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
169. Well, this will keep her in the news
and generate sympathy for poor picked-on Sarah.
Coincidence? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OakCliffDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
174. Since the info was obtained by illegal means, is it still admissible as evidence?
I would like to see those emails.
I would settle for just a look at the address book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_patriot_md Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #174
194. I would think they would be.
Anonymous is not a law enforcement body so I think that makes a difference regarding rules of evidence. Besides, isn't that how they got the illegally record phone conversation from Linda Tripp during Monicagate?

Personally, I think the cutesy e-mails and pictures serve to establish bona fides that it was really her personal account.

The content of the e-mail, unless there is a smoking gun in there, is immaterial in my opinion. What matters is that it establishes that she used her personal account for routine state business, mundane or otherwise. One e-mail even directed someone to use that address vice her official one for state business.

It shows that she is using a personal, non-archived, non-auditable account for official communication. That is a no-no, in terms of open and transparent governance. Period.

I also found it interesting that her husband Todd, seemed to have been copied on some of the official e-mails. Todd is not an elected or appointed official and shouldn't be on those e-mails. Not so much because he isn't allowed to know such things, but in my world it violates the principle of "need to know."

Anyhow, it's often the cover-up not the act itself that is really the problem. Isn't that what Watergate taught us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #194
323. The big problem I see...
is that this makes everything in the account suspect. I mean, how do we know for sure now that none of the e-mails were altered or tampered with in some way? It's certainly a possiblility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
175. This was a private account. Don't advertise this stuff in my name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
176. CNN reporting it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
177. I did the download and read the emails and looked at the pictures. This is a GOP set up
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:00 PM by Geek_Girl
If hackers found anything juicy or damaging they would have posted that. Not cuddly family pictures and nauseating emails from friends and colleagues.

Everything I've seen and read seems to reflect the person of Palin that the GOP are trying to portray. This is a set up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #177
185. Yep.That was my first impression too.
I can see a big shit-storm coming our way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
180. PRESIDENT McCain? OMFG that woman is insane.
LISTING the duties of VP?

I didn't think it possible, but she has even less intelligence than I thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
181. If someone has the ZIP file post it on the Internets
so we can all download it. FTP it then, of course, share the link with us. Thx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jennied Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
182. Ya know, as much as I think this is cool. What if this was Obama's account?
Everyone would be having a fit about how unfair it was. We'd blame the GOP for getting someone to sneak into his account. Etc.
We should stick to the issues and not go snooping around her email account. I know that hackers did this, but we're promoting this behavior by having it at the top of the democraticunderground page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #182
192. On the other hand, if hackers did this to all politicians we'd be in a much better
position to un-partisanly oust them and have them arrested for their civil service crime schemes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #182
232. If Obama was using a private email address for state business, then he should be busted for it too

You are forgetting the issue at the heart of this.

The governor should NOT be using a Yahoo account to conduct official business in the first place - and THIS is exactly one of the reasons why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chupacabranation Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
184. I'm probably the most suspicious person on the planet...
...I question everyone's motives, for EVERYTHING, but. In my mind, I really don't think this was a Rove or Rovian tactic on McCain's campaign.

They're not even halfway smart enough to dream up something like this. Rove only co-opts technology when he can do something "old school" (like vote stealing).

I think the lack of anything "juicy" in the emails reflects the fact that she's been on the campaign trail in the past two weeks and hasn't been hunkering down to her usual machinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #184
189. Pfft!
It keeps her in the news and allows her to play the sympathy card.
Number one rule in detective work: who stands to gain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chupacabranation Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #189
195. At a certain point...
...someone that's so beset or beleaguered begins to engender your contempt, and not your pity. They seem weak. And have overplayed victimhood.

I think Palin is to that point. Her favorability is sinking like a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #184
197. Bull shit this is right out of the Rove Playbook
A famous example: late in the 1986 Texas governor's race, Rove apparently planted an electronic bug in his own office, then staged a press conference accusing the opposition of spying. The FBI was called in, smelled a rat, and no arrests were made. Still, the charge hovered in the press and Rove's client beat the Democratic incumbent.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jackson-williams/dr-rove-will-see-you-now_b_123247.html?show_comment_id=15242254
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #197
258. You got the player right, but not the motive.
Dems aren't being blamed for this, apolitical hackers are. The aim was to get rid of evidence w/o getting caught for obstruction of justice. Palin still looks bad for using a private account to avoid public oversight--no way to transfer that to us--but now, under the all the smoke that's been thrown up, I'll give anyone 20:1 that Connell's connection in Yahoo! has destroyed the contents of all 3 accounts.

Some things aren't about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #184
198. There's no need for high tech hacking
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:33 PM by ThoughtCriminal
You don't have to hack anything as long as she's playing along. It's actually more simple than a number of gems that he has known to have pulled off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInPhilly Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #198
203. I vote on the red herring!
Just when the polls turned back to Obama...

How to address this? I don't know, other than full condemnation from the Dems. I don't know, should they even acknowledge it?

However, the truth remains that this exposes Palin as non-technical and stupid enought to use a Yahoo account to conduct her official business. If ever, that really blows and the people of Alaska should be aghast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #198
326. You're leaving out the best part. They created cover to
delete the inside Yahoo! files, which could be claimed a)to be part of the hack, or b)to have been thought by the Yahoo! tech as necessary to protect nation security, depending on whether or not anyone investigates far enough to trace the destruction to an insider. Another poster also claims that this creates doubt about the authorship of anything damaging uncovered in Yahoo!'s copies, but my guess is that they're gone. Which brings this escapade up to Rove's usual felonious level.

I think our focus should be on Palin's aides feeling free to refuse subpoenas. This is an outgrowth of Rove's discovery that he could do that w/impunity as long as Bush is in office. Why aren't we making maximum noise about how they should be locked up? Do all Republicans now have a free pass to refuse any distateful subpoena? Can criminal conspirators all over the country just claim to be loyal Republicans to be allowed to refuse to testify when they have information essential to lock someone up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
202. Information wants to be free!!!
Long live hackers! Hackers can save us from Caribou Barbie, and McGeezer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #202
291. Post your mothers maiden name ans ssn.
It was a social hack, not even a technical compromise.

Secondly it is illegal (federal pound me in the ass prison) and you would be right pissed if it happened to any one you know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
204. Guys, I'm new but I don't like this...
This feels wrong; there's PLENTY of PUBLIC material to go after Palin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
208. Unless there is something truly rotten in those emails, I call bullshit.
Poor Sarah Palin. Somebody stole her email account. Boo hoo hoo. :cry:

We need tougher controls on the internet! Throw the hackers in jail! Ban anonymous and encrypted internet traffic. Mandate government keys. Allow warrentless remote searches and seizures of electronic data.

Well, you get the picture...

I think they knew this crap email account was there before they vetted Palin, so they cleaned it up and dropped it into the lap of some script kiddy.

Sarah Palin is a honey pot in so many ways. The GOP selected her because she is sticky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
211. What an idiot. How can she protect the country if she can't protect her own email?
You flunk, Sarah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #211
226. good question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #211
251. Seems her people protected it pretty well. We didn't get anything, did we?
And now that it's been revealed by a criminal act, it probably can't be subpoenaed from Yahoo! either. If it still exists there. She is dumber than dirt, just like Bush, and has the same "brain". (As in the book, Bush's Brain.)

See my posts above #'s 243 & 221.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drgonzosghost Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
213. This was dirty, and damn it I am dissappointed in our side on this one...
I can understand if there was something incriminating in there that the world needed to see, but there wasn't. And now it's only going to fuel her victim complex even more. Way to go assholes! Just when her approval ratings were starting to tank!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #213
248. "Our side?"
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 08:15 PM by Liberalynn
Am I missing something? :shrug: Have they already found out who anonymous is? How do you conclude it was "our side?" It could have been the Pukes trying to set the Dems up or some independent hacker just trying to prove they can hack anyone.

I'm withholding judgment until they find irrefutable proof of who did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drgonzosghost Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #248
262. Yeah, I stand slightly corrected on that...
I just automatically assume that republicans are all computer illiterate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #248
298. anonymous is made mostly of 15 year boys who hang out at *chan boards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #248
299. anonymous is made mostly of 15 year boys who hang out at *chan boards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #213
290. "Our side"? Puhlease! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #213
312. You think using private email to bypass transparency laws isn't incriminating?
There's no call for secrecy in a democratic government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skratchez Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
215. Some of you are missing the point.
This is a disgusting invasion of privacy, and highly illegal. Nevertheless the consequences don't relate to criminal investigation of Palin, just a lovely smearing (as if any GOP would even deign to listen to this pablum.) Wikileaks has already proved that they are mercenary and are no doubt holding on to some juicy juicy stuff, I got the .zip and it is boring as all heck. Although it is telling that wikileaks.org and .uk are down (as of 5pm PST.) Considering the kind of stuff they host it's pretty amazing that they went down internationally (and they have a reputation of multiple back-up servers on several continents at least according to wired.com) I know there are a lot of hacker/tech types that are very conservative (strangely) and I can't even imagine how many of McLame/Paleing lawyers are barking up those trees with threat letters.

Wikileaks could post blueprints for suitcase nukes and be ignored, hopefully the only reason they're down is that their traffic got huge because of this event. *fingers crossed*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #215
236. Government officials should not be using Yahoo to conduct official business

For precisely this reason.

Have you read Yahoo's terms of service? It is not "private" email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #215
260. That's not it either. Different Rovian motive. See my posts #'s 243 & 221. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benevolente Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
218. hmm, I wonder why she had to use a Yahoo account
Aren't government officials provided with an official email account? I smell a rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
techtrainer Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #218
231. Government officials aren't allowed to have personal email accounts?
You know, family vacations, photos, recipes etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
237. Probably hacked by the McCain camp? They're now calling for an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #237
261. Going on offensive to stall demand for Yahoo! to release contents to investigators.
This was the point of a Rove operative leaking the name of the account to the hacker org. and standing watch so that their hack wouldn't get anywhere. Odds are some connection in Yahoo! has destroyed the contents, so it's real important to their camp that these things aren't subpoenaed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedem77 Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
239. I'd love to see what was in the inbox
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
240. Michelle Malkin whines..........
Sarah Palin’s private e-mail hacked, family photos raided; cesspool blog gloats; feds investigate
By Michelle Malkin • September 17, 2008 02:59 PM

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/sarah-palins-private-e-mail-hacked-family-photos-raided/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justaregularperson Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #240
277. Why is the FBI involved? It is a personal account? Would they help you or I?
We need to end the three caste system with different rules and law enforcement for different classes of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
246. so it`s the democrats fault now and we are going to pay the price
or is it dr evil karl who has hatched this diabolical e mail hoax to destroy obama`s bid for the presidency.....

poor moose,she`s just a simple home town girl who wanted to be a miss alaska but had to accept running for vice president instead.....


no wonder her daughter :smoke: pot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheNeoCons Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
256. ROVE HACKED THE ACCOUNT - IGNORE THIS THREAD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #256
266. Almost. He most likely had someone leak the account name to "anonymous"
Or how else would the hack be interrupted so quickly and all 3 accounts be emptied out if they weren't waiting. Smokescreen for destruction of evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
259. In my ever so humble estimation, that's going way too goddamn far.
Look, object to her based on the issues, but that is just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
264. This is deplorable
I hope the Obama campaign gets out there and explains how much they are disgusted by this action by these hackers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
265. Now she's against WARRANTLESS WIRETAPPING?? eom
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 08:46 PM by CanOfWhoopAss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcollier Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #265
269. Question Of The Day...
How did you republicans like the Tax Increase we all having money in money market accounts got today.... 3% tax.... OUCH.... That Hurt!


All those who played the wise move and moved their money to money market accounts over the weekend to protect their money from the forseeable crash coming this week, were just penalized with a 3% tax on those funds courtesy of the bush administration....

WOW!!! Nobody Seems To Notice!!!

Except those across America whose losses are part of the 1 Trillion dollars lost over the past 3 days in the stock market...

That's just wrong... That's like forcing people who lost bigtime at a casino to pay an "exit fee" on the way out the fuking door.....

Yet republicans are eager to provide corporate welfare to these big corporations (our taxpayer cash by the way).


ENOUCH!!! Time For Change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
275. The only thing worse than a presidential candidate who doesn't know HOW
to use email is a vice-presidential candidate who uses a web-based, piece of shit email provider like Yahoo to conduct government business. That's just about the stupidest fucking thing I've ever read. And the Republicans want this dizzy broad (forgive my politically incorrect speech) in a position of authority? Dumbshits, all of 'em are dumbshits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flatulo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
279. This is not cool.
This action really bothers me. If Obama had been violated in this way there would be howls for an investigation and criminal charges. Hacking into email accounts is illegal.

http://www.usiia.org/legis/ecpa.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
280. Awww...
This is disgraceful.
Thievery, abuse , and dishonesty everywhere.
Nothing is sacred anymore.
Sigh, its just that its sooo disappointing.
Sarah Palin, how could you! Be ashamed. Be very ashamed.

As for you dorks who stole the emails, confess.... her password was her middle name
or birthday, wasn't it? Megalomania. So Typical. So Predictable.
But its illegal boys, so really, the FBI will be on you if you left any IP fingerprints.

Kids today, just kids on a lark.
Of course, this is all the Republican's fault, they being such shining examples to our
kids on how to be lawless. No wonder their emails get ripped.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
287. Slashdotters, maybe from the Wired article, reporting her PW was her ZIP CODE.
As I sit here with all my internet filtered heavily by the Federal Government I guess I should first state that hacking people's e-mail is bad, mmmkay?

Aside from that, what an absolute dumbass to use their ZIP code. I'm not even sure that qualifies as hacking. BTW, a source in the hacking community revealed the next 3 passwords they were going to try: M00seShootah, PhelpsIz#1 and FootPrintzInTheSand.

PB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
289. This is a serious invasion of privacy.
I object when the government snoops on my e-mails and phone calls. It's really wrong for anyone to hack another person's e-mail no matter who the person is or who is doing the hacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
295. Hah, CNN removed my coment about this on ac360.com
I posted on Anderson Cooper's live blog, asking if he had covered the topic at all tonight. The post sits there with an "awaiting moderation" for a bit, refresh a few times later and it is gone. The posts of other people immediately before and after mine sit there fine.

They've gone the way of FauxNews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
An Intellectual Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
297. How do we know this isn't an intentional leak?
Rove might do anything to distract the sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ann_american2004 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
302. THE GENERAL CONSENSUS
is Rovian politics- inside job. I checked other threads on political sites and M$M sites and after the initial shock most people are seeing this as an intentional distraction. Many many people are pointing out who has the most to gain by this? Palin and the RNC with the deletion/new inaccessibility of her emails. Impressive. There was even a person on one site who was said to be a part of Anonymous and said that most of them were Ron Paul supporters. LOL. It was funny. The second most common posting was asking what does Palin have to hide to badly that she had to use a personal email for gov buisness? A few pointed out the irony of it. I dont think America is buying this. Americans want to talk about the issues not this stuff. God Bless America! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #302
330. Thanks for the research. Glad you joined us.
It is heartening to see that even if the investigation committee is not seeing this as a sign that there were things in those accounts that needed hiding, us common folks are. And we know exactly in what direction to point the finger for the leak of the one address. Almost as good as getting the actual dirt. I'm sure DUers reading it will find your post a truly welcome contribution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speakinup Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
303. Don't take the bait!...stay focused on the ECONOMY and OBAMA's message
Just heard Greta Von Sustern on FOX trying to muster up more OUTRAGE over this (alleged) violation of Sarah Palin. One of her guests even admitted that this may work to Palin's advantage by garnering her more sympathy. Here are the rules of the game. Anytime the focus is on some ridiculous scandal (true or not) about Sarah Palin and her family, Mc Cain/Palin wins. Anytime the focus is on the issues like the ECONOMY, Obama/Biden wins. Don't you find the timing of this outrageous story suspect? Just happens to occur after the dow drops another 450 points and Obama/Biden are gaining ground...There are only 6.5 weeks to go. There is too much work to do to get distracted now or let the media start focusing on foolishness just as the advantage is turning in Obama's favor. Drop this turkey and get back to work focusing on the one issue we have seen that actually moves the polls in Obama's direction. What do you think is on the mind of every undecided voter's mind tonight? Is it Sarah Palin's email account? No! Not unless you play this story up! It's the Economy, Sugar! That's Obama's winning issue, we should stick with it. This other stuff is radioactive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
304. couldn't get to the screenshot of an email: "Could the server be experiencing high demand?"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenocrates Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
305. Secret Service now involved... it wasn't funny before, its not funny now. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
314. ROVE 101 = Stage Attack Against Yourself to Appear Like a Victim of Dirty Tricks.
Funny how this "shocking" news hits mid-week so it will be fully fed by this week's news cycle and it comes right on the heels of numerous reports of Palin dishonesty and slipping polling for her. Funny how that happens, isn't it?? I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

With luck the Secret Service will catch a slip up by the Rove operatives and they will reveal this for what it is...A ROVE DIRTY TRICK TO GENERATE SYMPATHY FOR MRS. NAZI.

Isn't it high time for an angry mob to take Rove, the TRAITOR, into custody and exact some long-deserved justice?

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #314
318. indeed..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
317. Is this legit?
I know she is dumb as a stump, but to have an email account like that should be forbidden. I would never do that and because my job would have a fit, even terminate me for such recklessness.

So, is this for real or bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
321. I bet they "forgot" to save the emails before deleting them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenEyedLefty Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
322. Gee, it's amazing the hue and cry that's going up about the governor's "privacy"
When ordinary citizens aren't given the same courtesy by our government. Makes ya wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
329. Until something really damaging comes from this hacker attack, we can assume it's a trick.
So far, everything they have released has been banal crap that will only endear her to her base.

Doesn't smell right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
332. This is Republican gamesmanship - don't fall for it
And Greta Van Susteren did a whole show on this? No wonder she lost the OJ Simpson trial. Or is she so corrupt that she's just going to go along with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
334. So someone went for the 'Honey Pot', eh?
Too stupid to be real Hackers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
335. here's a link to everything that was saved/screensots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
340. If this is genuine, it is good. We are allowed no privacy, why should she have any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marco86 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
346. It is impossible as they describe it
If one bad hacker turned good all of a sudden, the zip file sent to wikileaks would not have included the screenshots showing
a) password changed
b) the e-mail drafted to wikileaks

It would have been sent to wikileaks by the "bad hackers" and they would not have access to either of those items.

Look into Wikileaks, as it is run by two australians, one of them Findlay, a Professor at Murdoch University. That's right Murdoch University.

This was done to accomplish goals
1) humiliate democrats
2) carte blanche for Plain and all of her contacts to in good faith delete every e-mail they have

Remember, unless she gave something up, it would not have been believable for even a second show it shows an invasion of privacy and a list of e-mails and contacts. No real smoking gun but enough to scream invasion of privacy and make it look like she didn't do it herself.

Did I mention Murdoch
In case I didn't mention it, Murdoch

The line about if there is anything of politcally relevant is really believable because MURDOCH would certainly release that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marco86 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
347. DID I MENTION MURDOCH
LOOK AT MY LAST REPLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
352. That's an awful thing. Only scum would do that.
I have no use for her, but no one should be hacked like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #352
354. Who hacked her email and why was it important to announce it a success?
If Bidens email account was hacked......

would it be acceptable?
Some here seem to be saying yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
355. She's clearly a security risk
a yahoo account? How is anyone supposed to believe she can handle the security of this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
357. I am probably not the first to say it but..
after reading this string, Gov. Palin's foible is certainly not worth the trouble. If she was that lame to have a weak password, then that is her problem, not ours.

I don't see where this buys the Dems anything unless there is a potential subpoena material. And in that case, let the legal system do its thing...OTOH, will they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC