Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin seeks review of Monegan firing case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 08:21 AM
Original message
Palin seeks review of Monegan firing case
Source: Anchorage Daily News

Gov. Sarah Palin wants a state board to review the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan -- taking the unusual step of making an ethics complaint against herself.

Her lawyer sent an "ethics disclosure" Monday night to Attorney General Talis Colberg. The governor asked that it go to the three-person Personnel Board as a complaint. While ethics complaints are usually confidential, Palin wants the matter open.

The lawyer, Thomas Van Flein, also asked the state Legislature to drop its own investigation into the Monegan matter. He says the Personnel Board has jurisdiction over ethics.

A senator running the investigation immediately refused.




Read more: http://www.adn.com/monegan/story/514163.html



The Alaska Attorney General is appointed by the Governor. Yup, that'll clear things up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. More of the same Bush tactics
Refer it over to your cronies to bury the matter.

Fortunately the State Legislature seems to be having none of Plain's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I did see somewhere yesterday that one of her contemporaries called her "a quick study"!
She learns bush/Rovian tactics FAST!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. the 3 member- personnel board is appointed by the governor (Palin)
so...Palin wants her own handpicked panel to investigate her

That's like Bush's DOJ investigating him


"Van Flein indicated the governor likely will not agree to a deposition unless lawmakers turn the matter over to the Personnel Board.

"Assuming you agree to submit to proper jurisdictional process, we can check the Governor's schedule to see when she and the First Gentleman are available for an interview," Van Flein wrote."

Much like Bush and Cheney refusing... and claiming Congress has no authority over them


""Our concern is that Hollis French turns into Ken Starr and uses public money to pursue a political vendetta rather than truly pursue an honest inquiry into an alleged ethics issue," Van Flein said in an interview."

Now that's funny because Palin wrote a letter harping on the "liberal media" picking on some guy in Alaska screwing around and accused them of not going after Clinton that way...



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/51539.html


"Van Flein said the investigation should be handled by the state Personnel Board, not the legislature, because it's "statutorily mandated" to handle ethics cases. The three-member Personnel Board is appointed by the governor."


and here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26517013/

not the "fair inquiry"....framing the current inquiry as unfair and that Palin is getting a raw deal

and this was interesting

"Van Flein, who also previously represented the Palin family in another matter, said there was no conflict of interest in the dual representation arrangement. Van Flein is permitted to bill the state up to $95,000 for work in the current case.

Van Flein saw no problem with the arrangement. "Our representation is dual but the billing is not," Van Flein said before Palin's legal filing was disclosed Tuesday evening. "Matters involving a personal issue will not — and have not — been billed in the government contract."

Van Flein said that prior to his hiring by the state's Department of Law on Aug. 21, "We represented the governor and her husband privately." He declined to provide further details on that matter.

The attorney said he doesn't know whether Palin suggested to the Alaska Department of Law that it hire him and said he bid for the work. Van Flein and another lawyer in his firm are billing the state $185 an hour under the contract. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Have your own appointees judge you. Where else have I seen that?
I think she learned this from someone else's example or, more likely, someone else is telling her what to do. Didn't I hear something about a bunch of McCain lawyers heading to Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice timing. I wonder (hehe..) who explained that tactic to her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe they'll put Alberto Gonzalez in charge of the investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why does Gov. Palin need an investigation?
Can't she answer for her own actions? Or isn't she sure why she fired Monegan?

Boy, the Republicans sure wanted us to focus on Gov. Palin's record, not her family, not her personality, not her public pronouncements, but her record. Now that we're doing so, I'm sure we're going to hear the stuck-pig squealing of the Republicans whining about how "sexist" and "unfair" it is to ask hard questions about Gov. Palin's record. But again, why does she need to call for an investigation into her own actions? Why can't she put on her big girl panties and speak for herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. She is trying to take the matter out of the Senators hands
and put it into somebody she can control's hands, where the investigation will be delayed until after the election. I'm not sure she was around when Spiro Agnew was vice president, but if this crap comes out then, she is in big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC