Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: US Reviewing 'Entire Relationship' With Russia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 12:54 PM
Original message
White House: US Reviewing 'Entire Relationship' With Russia
Source: AFP

CRAWFORD, Texas (AFP)--The United States is reviewing its "entire relationship" with Russia, the White House said Monday, charging that Moscow is still not complying with a cease-fire deal for the Georgia conflict.

"We're reviewing our entire relationship with Russia," said spokesman Tony Fratto. He said there is "no question that Russia has not lived up to the cease- fire agreement" brokered by France.



Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20080825%5cACQDJON200808251339DOWJONESDJONLINE000350.htm&&mypage=newsheadlines&title=White%20House:%20US%20Reviewing%20'Entire%20Relationship'%20With%20Russia



Pentagon declares Russia not honouring Georgia deal
Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:34pm BST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Monday that Russia has not met its obligations to withdraw troops from Georgia under a French-brokered ceasefire agreement.

"There continues to be a large presence of Russian forces in Georgia," U.S. Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters. "It's fair to say that they are still not living up to the terms of the ceasefire agreement."

French President Nicolas Sarkozy brokered the truce but the plan is vaguely worded and Russia claims a mandate to keep large numbers of troops in Georgia, a small but strategically important country with a pro-Western leader and two major energy pipelines.

Moscow has withdrawn most of its forces from central and western Georgia and says those still in place are peacekeepers needed to avert more bloodshed and protect the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

more:http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2552247320080825
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. i'm afraid
they want to start a war!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Translation: We're gonna nuke the Evil Empire so we can
Edited on Mon Aug-25-08 01:00 PM by kestrel91316
cancel the elections that we are gonna SOOOOO shellacked in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Relationships is Hard Work. Smirk." - Commander AWOL
"Therefore, I has decidered that I is going to continue my World Record Vacationing at the Imperial Pig Farm Upon Crawford. As usual."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great! What are they going to do in the four months they've got left?
This bunch is the lamest of lameducks, what are they up to?

Start the new Cold War and leave it in Obama's lap?

Of course, they may be thinking McCain's a shoe-in, in their usual rosey way of looking at things, so they may just think they're seting the table for the next four years.

Or, they're not planning on leaving . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I know you're following the Black Sea events....
I have $5 that says that a serious Superpower standoff occurs and makes US-Russian relations Issue #1 in the corporate media before the election, possibly in the next few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. That is precisely my biggest fear.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think that's a pretty good bet.
Keep an eye out for news of the flag ship of the Black Sea fleet missle cruiser Moskva leaving Sevastopol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. I dunno about that
I dunno about that. To date, Turkey has allowed only three ships to pass through the Bosporus, a guided destroyer (the McFaul), a command ship (the Whitney), and a coast guard cutter (the Dallas).

Those three ships seem woefully unprepared to send anything even a message of intent, let alone an actual naval standoff when compared to the Russian Black Sea fleet (six missile boats, four missile corvettes, five ASW corvettes, two attack subs,two guided missile frigates, three guided destroyers, and one guided missile cruiser).

Maybe the Turks will let more ships through-- but if not, I think the U.S. is forced into an impasse...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deny and Shred Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. All it takes is proximity, not equal strength to get hostilities started
I too fear starting hostilities is what the Pentagon wants. They see the end of the gravy train coming ... unless ...
The US was trying to claim the sppedboats that Iran had were a threat. A destroyer would do much better.
I say recruit Filipino Monkey for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. You think that the Pentagon wants to go to war with Russia?
You think that the Pentagon wants to go to war with Russia? The same pentagon who has been desperate in their cries to the White House that the armed forces are spread too thin, are not equipped well, and cannot possibly engage in another conflict with a reasonable chance of success?

(Too many satellites from too many countries looking precisely at the Russian Black Sea Fleet would deny the U.S. the ability to claim "they" started it...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. All the better to make Russia seem like the big, bad bully. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. How would that be accomplished
How would that be accomplished seeing that the Russian Black Sea fleet is not, in and of itself, posturing in an aggressive fashion?

(Unless you think this is all a clever American ruse to go to war with Russia to shore up the GOP base to ensure a McCain win in Nov. That nutty little waste-of-brain material has been floating around on DU today....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. "US warships to dock in Georgia's flashpoint port"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. And I'm sure you've seen the followup
And I'm sure you've seen the followup that the U.S. ships may be leaving, yes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Leaving? I saw a report that the Navy can no longer confirm a Poti destination...
Got a link? :shrug:

BTW: Odd how little ink this gets in the media, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. CNN this morning.
CNN this morning. No link...

It's not at all odd to me that it gets little play. It's nothing more than being backstage at a sideshow to a geopolitical sideshow-- not that many would agree with that positions, but we've seen much larger naval deployments to hotter world spots with no adverse military consequences to any involved, I simply don't think this is going to be anything more than a very good exercise for the Russian Black Sea Fleet.

I'm just not going to make this out to be a flash point, a hot point, the beginning of a contained conflict or any other hullabaloo.

Countries make noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. it isn't odd, it is by design
distract the easily distracted tv watchers while the US causes/fakes a crises with big bad Russia, never mind we have no business in their neighborhood, and BAM! Instant rah rah GO USA! Flags appear and the war/game is on. With the congressional democrats blessings no doubt.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. It may also be like the 1981 Psyops that proceeded Able Archer 83....
and, what many experts agree, was the closest the US and Russia ever got to all-out nuclear war.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Archer_83

KAL-007 was part of the fallout of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Interesting
Able Archer 83
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Able Archer 83 was a ten-day NATO command post exercise starting on November 2, 1983 that spanned Western Europe, centred on SHAPE's Headquarters situated at Casteau, north of the Belgian city of Mons. The exercise simulated a period of conflict escalation, culminating in a coordinated nuclear release.<1> It incorporated a new, unique format of coded communication, radio silences, participation by heads of state, and a simulated DEFCON 1 nuclear alert.

The realistic nature of the exercise, coupled with deteriorating relations between the United States and the Soviet Union and the anticipated arrival of Pershing II nuclear missiles in Europe, led some in the USSR to believe that Able Archer 83 was a ruse of war, obscuring preparations for a genuine nuclear first strike.<1><2><3><4> In response, the Soviets readied their nuclear forces and placed air units in East Germany and Poland on alert.<5><6> This relatively obscure incident is considered by many historians to be the closest the world has come to nuclear war since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.<7> The threat of nuclear war abruptly ended with the conclusion of the Able Archer 83 exercise on November 11


No wonder Russia is backing away from NATO. It has become obvious what their really purpose is, as a surrogate US military force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush is looking again into Pooty-Poot's soul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Guess he did not see so clearly the first time....What a total schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I watched
a remake of ON THE BEACH last night. Scared the crap out of me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Watch the "Bedford Incident."
Now, that's scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. "We're evaluating how badly we can fuck things up before we have to leave."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. George W needs to stop everything he is doing now...and that means
everything. I am sick of all these last minute executive disasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Apparently attacking Iran is 'so' July. They're rolling out the new fall lineup.
F E A R..can ya smell it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. who in the white house even know where russia is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Condi is supposed to..............
But I'll admit, I have my doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. exactly - she's incredibly stupid - see her actions pre 911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. This isn't going to go away.
And I hate it.

:kick: and 5th R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Looking for more FEAR
to proclaim... as they cannot win on issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush doesn't speak for America!
The White House speaks for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pete2069 Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Made to order scare tactic for McCain's Campaign
Bush with his corporate backing has destroy our country back
to the early 1900's with his arrogant cowboy corporate
policies.
Scare the .... out of Americans so they will vote for the war
party
Bush stated he was a war president bring them on ,, and McSame
say he is the 100 year plus war man.
So the Exxon's , Halliburton's  and other elite of war
contractors say they are with McSame ,  BRING THEN THE .... ON
, we don't care because we don't serve only the little people
do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm wondering why they decided to wait until the end of this admin. to roll out Cod War 2.0
They could have benefited so much more from it if they had rolled it out in the Spring of 2001 and even more so had they tied the Russians to Al Queda, I mean, after all, the Russians were in Afghanistan for a long time and so has Al Queda (apparently, the head dude of Al Queda was on some country's payroll. The name of that country escapes me right now) See!

This administration is too incompetent to have figured out they could have resurrected their old boogie man long before now. I guess I'm happy that they're this incompetent, but sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. If the timing were purely political, I think that October would have been the time.
In August when people are on vacation or thinking about back-to-school or just trying to enjoy what's left of the summer, nobody's focusing much on a small country that no one's heard of. Add on two weeks of conventions, and there's not too much extra air in the media for something like this.

That's why I think that this much fuss was not intended, but resulted from a series of miscalculations. First, either the U.S. was not clear enough with Saakashvili about the fact that we were not going to get into it against the Russians for him, or the U.S. was of two minds, one Cheney's and the other somewhat more rational types like Gates, maybe Condi and some military types.

Saakashvili seems like something of a hothead considering his actions against the Georgian people, and have either read into what was said by administration officials what he wanted to hear and not what was intended. Saakashvili could also have been listening to political operatives, like Scheumann (sp) and possibly Rove, who may have been either freelancing or working for Cheney and/or McCain, neither of is the Commander in Chief.

The Russians may have miscalculated the long term consequences of their reaction, which to me has been and continues to be disproportionate. Putin's Czarist/Stalinist threats make him look more like George Bush in the Middle East--a bully. Look around the world. Has Bush's adventures made him or the U.S. popular? No. Are other nations more likely to cooperate with us? No. Bullies are not respected, nor can they really lead. People usually try to avoid bullies, and my do what they say for some time. However, there is usually a confrontation or a backlash, and the bully is put in its place. Eventually. It is happening with Bush and it will happen with Putin.

We should all hope that cooler heads prevail on both sides. We have the opportunity to get rid of Bush, and that will help. However, Putin looks like a Czar, and getting more rational leadership in Moscow may not happened soon or easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Obama campaign could easily turn this to their advantage...
Run an ad campaign that says "The GOP has fucked things up so bad we're now in immediate danger of ending up in another cold war with Russia. Can we afford four more years?" We can also tie it right in with "100 years."

But to do it, they must get their ad-campaign out before McCain's people run theirs. If we get our framing out before McCain can, we win that round. And it will be a big round, since everybody except Bush's faithful 20% will be scared to death of another cold war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Russia just took over Georgia and the US better get a grip
Putin is ticked off and has the nukes


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. Ooooh, no more visits to the ranch for you, Pootie-Poot.
Edited on Mon Aug-25-08 05:40 PM by kskiska
It's just as well. Pootie wanted to ride horses and there weren't any. Maybe * should do some more soul-gazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. Translation: The Cold War is back on.
Which is funny because one of the repugs crowing 'moments' was Reggan 'winning' the Cold War (yeah right, most of us here really knew what happened). Only to see Bushco restart it again (I real good way of pissing on a repug icon's legacy-but hey this is Bush folks) to hopefully hand it over to the next guy. Which I hope Obama has enough sense to 'nip' this thing in the bud and set things right again. Otherwise it's WWIII folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. Military Industrial Complex wants a new cold war and so do
Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. Boy, good thing we had a Soviet expert on staff!
That was a real help, wasn't it? Someone who spoke the language, who said she felt "more at home" in Moscow than anywhere in the U.S., was an expert on Soviet policy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. A little SOUL searching, as it were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC