|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
DogPoundPup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 10:58 AM Original message |
Court: Saudi Arabia not liable in Sept. 11 attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wonder if it was bush loyalist on that court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. a Bush loyalist made sure Iraq was found guilty in 2003 in a 9-11 family suit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicdot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. maybe even 2 loyalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Poppy bush is even closer to the Saudis than his dim son, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vinylsolution (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. Weren't the Saudis being represented.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Why, yes they were!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. 15 of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, Iraq had nothing to do with it. This whole thing stinks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. The names of the 4 princes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. After all they did committ "Treason"!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. We are living in the awful "Era of the Total Cover up". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. oh friggen kick for aggravation!. . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Good rulings (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well ain't that shocking and so special and how convenient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nickster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. I wish they had more detail. I wonder if the charitable organization that they mention was the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
12. well thats not suprising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. Crooks covering for each other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. And yet, somehow, Saddam Hussein was NOT protected by "sovereign immunity" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Ah. Good thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. Boy, who DIDN'T see this one coming? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-14-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. So they can help kill thousands of americans and because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
18. Saudi Arabia immune in 9/11 case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Repeal the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. And, Dick Clarke said he delegated the decision to allow the bin Ladens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Saudi Arabia has not been designated a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. State Department. - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. O_I_L !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Hint: The US Govt. is not covered by said Act. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. So, what's the next step? The Supremes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sattahipdeep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-16-08 07:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. The kingdom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bulloney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. That's another thing that made Bush's case of invading Iraq so weak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. So let me see if I understand this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetaTrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
27. And now Saudi Arabia is building Abu Ghraib Deluxe, where they can select and train the best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SHRED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Don't forget who defended the Saudis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
29. The GOP-appointed bench still embraces the idea of the power of Kings, literally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. yeah, right fifteen out of the nineteen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-16-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
38. Didn't a court find Iraq liable for 9/11?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-16-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
39. What judicial system is this!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC