and the VP and others went into hiding. The U.S./Bush-backed rightwing fuckwads not only kidnapped Chavez and took him away, they suspended the Constitution, the National Assembly, the courts and all civil rights, they were trying to round up the members of Chavez's government, and their next move would have been to start torturing and executing them, a la Pinochet. When tens of thousands of Venezuelans went into the streets and surrounded Miraflores Palace, demanding restoration of their Constitution and the return of their elected president, and the loyal members of the military then came forward and took back the Palace (the seat of government), the VP and other cabinet members came out of hiding, and restored the legitimate government, with the VP as president, until they could find out what had happened to Chavez.
RCTV (fuckwad rightwing corporate 'news' station) broadcast the lie, on behalf of the coupsters, that Chavez had resigned. He had not resigned--but that was part of the coup scenario (that they would force him to sign a resignation--which he refused to do). They had also hosted coup meetings, and coup broadcasts, and had doctored video footage to make it look like Chavez supporters were shooting people. (See "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"--the Irish filmmakers' documentary; they were on the spot when it happened.) This is why the Chavez government later denied RCTV a license renewal for use of the public airwaves--the only such denial they have ever issued. Is there any worse misuse of the public airwaves than to support a fascist coup against the legitimate government?
However, you are certainly correct that Chavez is a particular target of the Bush Junta and its death squad cronies in Colombia. One assassination plot against Chavez, hatched within the Colombian military, was exposed. (President Uribe was obliged to apologize for it, in a four hour meeting with Chavez). Caches of arms have been discovered in Venezuela, and hired soldiers--origin, Colombia--that were likely part of an assassination/coup plot. I read one AP report (a journalist who actually traveled with Chavez--a report that other corporate 'news' monopolies never picked up), in which Chavez describes how his private life has been severely curtailed by necessary security. (He said something like, "I don't have a private life.")
The Colombian military and its death squads must be particularly agitated against Chavez these days, because their plot to hand Chavez a diplomatic disaster, with dead hostages, failed. Last year, Uribe
asked Chavez to negotiate with the FARC guerrillas for hostage releases. When Chavez was successful in that negotiation, and the first two of six hostages were about to be released (12/1/07), the Colombian military (or possibly the U.S. military--or both), bombed the location of the first two hostages, as they were in route to their freedom, driving them back on a 20 mile hike into the jungle. Chavez got them out later, by a different route--along with four more--at which point (3/1/08) the Colombian military (using ten U.S. "smart bombs" and high tech U.S. military surveillance--and possibly U.S. aircraft and personnel--likely orchestrated from the "war room" in the U.S. Embassy in Bogota) bombed the camp of the chief FARC hostage negotiator, Raul Reyes, just inside Ecuador's border, murdering him and 24 other people in their sleep, and nearly starting a war with Ecuador. Reyes was about to release high profile hostage, Ingrid Betancourt--this was back on March 1--when the U.S./Colombia took him out. Thus ended Chavez's successful hostage negotiations--which had been lauded by the president of France and other world leaders, human rights groups and the hostages' families. All talk of a peaceful end to Colombia's 40+ year civil war also was killed, with Reyes. (The civil war and the cocaine trade are the Colombian military's gravy train--$6 BILLION in Bushite/U.S. taxpayer military aid.)
Their plot to embarrass and sully Chavez had failed. They then came up with the "miracle laptop" (later, laptopS), which they claimed they had retrieved from Reyes' bombed out camp, and Uribe began making wild charges against Chavez and leaking "evidence" from the laptopS, for instance, that Chavez was helping the FARC obtain a "dirty bomb" (--Chavez, who has harmed no one). Greg Palast exposed one item. They claimed that the number "300" combined with the word "dossier" meant that Chavez gave $300,000 to the FARC. I figure Donald Rumsfeld's* "Office of Special Plans" is alive and well and now applying itself to stealing Venezuela's oil reserves.
Recently, I heard a Q&A on C-span, with Colombian Defense Minister Santos in DC. Someone asked him about a recent meeting between Uribe and Chavez, in which they "buried the hatchet" and announced some positive Colombian/Venezuelan projects (a railroad, for instance). Santos had publicly criticized this meeting, undermining his own president (for which he was rebuked). Santos replied, and I quote: "I promised on this trip never to mention the C word."
It's obvious from all this that Chavez is particularly hated by the Bushites and the Colombian military (and death squads--the most extreme fascists and mercenaries). He has successfully survived their every treacherous scheme. But I think it should be stressed that, while Chavez is an important leader of the peaceful, democratic revolution that has occurred in South America, the Bushwhacks are faced with a "Sorcerer's Apprentice" situation, with strong leftists getting elected all over the continent--most recently in Paraguay (of all places!)--and with ordinary citizens and voters, grass roots community leaders, union leaders, social justice groups and others--the vast majority of the people--in determined rebellion against U.S./corporate domination. It might make Freepers everywhere cheerful for a day--if an assassination plot against Chavez succeeded--but it would not change this political landscape, except to solidify the new leftist leadership and their countries even more.
"The times they are a-changin'."
-----------
"The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants Like Chávez," by Donald Rumsfeld, 12/1/07http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/30/AR2007113001800.html