Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Petraeus: Diplomacy, Not Force, With Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:19 AM
Original message
Petraeus: Diplomacy, Not Force, With Iran
Source: Washington Post

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, President Bush's nominee to lead U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, supports continued U.S. engagement with international and regional partners to find the right mix of diplomatic, economic and military leverage to address the challenges posed by Iran.

In written answers to questions posed by the Senate Armed Services Committee, where he will testify today, Petraeus said the possibility of military action against Iran should be retained as a "last resort." But he said the United States "should make every effort to engage by use of the whole of government, developing further leverage rather than simply targeting discrete threats."

Petraeus's views echoed those expressed by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who this month said that talks with Iran could be useful if the right combination of incentives and pressures could be developed.

Despite President Bush's repeated commitment to diplomacy to resolve problems with Iran -- including its activities in Iraq, an alleged nuclear weapons program and support for terrorist groups -- some lawmakers and U.S. allies remain concerned that military action is being contemplated.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/21/AR2008052103007.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I do not trust Petreaus not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I don't either, but tend to to think he is telling the truth
as far as his best judgment might be considered truth.

The narrative of the past couple of weeks has placed Obama squarely against the WH and the repugs on the issue of diplomacy or not with Iran. Petreaus just sided with Obama, and against the his commander in chief and his political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Betrayus need s to take his Tongue out of
Bushes Naughty places
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pea-Traeus
the appeaser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. and he is supposed to be nominated today I think.
that is a big mistake, why didn't the Congress get Admiral Fallon in testimony and let him spill the beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
for appeasement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. hmmmph. -- we'll see.
the surge isn't what you could call a success -- and that's petraeus's baby -- we'll see if he stands by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. If you beleive that HE beleives that
I have this bridge..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can we get that in writing
And no invisible ink please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. scrub yet another June invasion of Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. "possibility of military action against Iran should be retained as a last resort"...against what???
Has Iran been attacking American shores again??! Damned American "media", I didn't hear a thing about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. WTF
does "military leverage" mean ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's an APPEASER!
He APPEASES!
That's what he does!
He's for APPEASMENT!

He's the APPEASINGEST APPEASER of all the APPEASING APPEASERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. It just means the ammunition is not in place yet!

Get ready for the Obtober surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. his testimony seemed to suggest that he was okay with force against Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_MUST_Go Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Is that the same 'last resort' bush talked about before he destroyed Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yeah, the "last resort" will be reached quite quickly
"Disarm unilaterally and let us occupy you! No? Well, we tried to negotiate, but Iran would have none of it. We had to glass the country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. appeaser!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. The generals
love war,its their business,and business is good.Mr and Mrs America please keep freedom alive,keep sending your kids(cannonfodder).SUPPORT THE TROOPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC