|
He had conquered Poland and France. He had NOT yet attack Russia. I believe it was General Beck who said in 1940 "You can NOT kill a Hero" when he canceled plots to kill Hitler in the 1940-1941 period. Basically do to the German Success on Continental Europe there was no political support for a removal of Hitler.
By 1943, the situation had changed, Hitler had attacked Russia, he had failed to take Moscow in December 1941. The Germans had lost Stalingrad in the winter of 1942-1943, he had lost Kursk in the Summer of 1943, the US and British had taken driven the Germans out of Africa and had taken Sicily. During Kursk, the Western Allies had invaded Italy proper and Mussolini's fascist government had fallen (And Italy had surrendered).
It was at this point the plots to kill Hitler were revived. The Army Leadership did NOT want the Russians to get to Germany, but there was no way the German Army could do that without oil. Prior to Hitler's attack on Russia, Russia had been Germany's main source of oil. With the failure of the attack in 1941, the Germans lost up to 90% of the oil they knew they needed to operate. The German did go on the Offensive in 1942 in Russia, but one of the reasons they failed was their infantry had to use only 10% of the oil they had used in peacetime, to save fuel to the Tank Division and the German Air Force. That offensive ended in Stalingrad. The Germans tried again in 1943 but was stopped in the Battle of Kursk, after which the Russians pushed them back, by the summer of 1944 the Germans had been pushed out of pre-WWII Russia, and heading for Berlin.
The Allies where also advancing in 1943, in Italy and in 1944 France. It was at this period, between the invasion of Italy and France that the German Army made approached to the Allies. The Western Allies had a problem. 2/3 of the German Army was tied up in Russia, if it was freed from Russia, the Western Allies COULD NOT INVADE FRANCE. The Allies could NOT get enough troops on shore to fight off the German Army. Thus D-day could NOT occur (or if it did it would have been a disaster) WITHOUT THE RUSSIANS TYEING UP 2/3rds OF THE GERMAN ARMY.
Thus in 1943-1944, the Germans would loved to have made a deal with the West, including pulling the German Army out of France and Italy (and even the Balkans) if freed to fight the Russians from taking Berlin. The Western Allies knew they could only invade IF THE GERMAN ARMY WAS TIED UP IN RUSSIA. Stalin knew he had the Germans on the ropes, all he needed to do is keep attacking, as long as the Western Allies did NOT provide the Germans with oil, Stalin knew he would take Berlin sometime.
In simple terms, the Russians could defeat the Germans, if the Western Allies did NOTHING (i.e. no shipments of oil to Germany, remember the US was the #1 oil exporter of this time period). The Germans could defeat the Russians ONLY IF THE ALLIES SUPPORTED THE GERMANS, at the minimum exporting oil to the Germans. The Western Allies could do NOTHING, if the Germans and Russians came to an agreement.
The conspirators had a problem, they could NOT promise any withdraws till they were in Power, and could NOT get into power until Hitler was dead. The only troops in Berlin were Home Army troops (Basically old men and young boys) under Beck. As a Reserve Army, Beck had no day to day control over these troops, thus their loyalty in a coup was suspect (All the regular and first line Reserve troops were in Russia, Italy, the Balkans or France). The conspirators could promise, they could not deliver.
At the same time, the Lucy Ring was operating. What was the Lucy ring is unclear, OAS (The predecessor to the CIA) claim it was their project, but it appears to be a Soviet Spy Ring that had been forced to use the OAS to get information to the Allies do to lost of an ability to communicate with Moscow. The effectiveness of the Lucy Ring did NOT provide confidence in the Conspirators (Who were NOT member of that ring) given that any troop movements would be sent to Moscow almost as soon as the OAS received it. The Western Allies had a greater fear of a Moscow- Berlin Separate peace then anything else, for it would kill off any chance of the Western Allies landing and taking France. Thus unless the Western Allies were confident that the coup would be unknown to Moscow, they were NOT about to have anything to do with it. Both Churchill and FDR wanted Western Allies troops on Continental Europe and that meant an invasion, and invasion that was impossible if Stalin and Hitler signed a separate peace. Thus any agreement to STOP fighting the Russians was a kiss of death to any peace agreement between the Western Allies and Germany, until Antwerp was taken in December 1944, the Western Allies did not have a single port along they path of March (Brest finally fell in the fall of 1944, but after the Allies had taken Paris). Compared to the Russians supply lines, the Western Allies supply lines were barely supplying the troops by December 1944 (and the main reasons the Western Allies advance in 1944 ended on the German-French border, the Western Allies had no supplies to go further, and until supplies were built up could not advance). It was not till the Spring of 1945 that the Supply lines were up to par and the Western Allies advanced into Germany.
My point was simple, given the situation on the Ground in 1943-1945, the Western Allies could NOT agree to any peace with Germany. Such a peace would require that the US supply Germany with oil. Oil that would have permitted the German Army to stop the Red Army, prevent any Western Invasion of Europe but leave the Western Allies with no say on Continental Europe.
Now Stalin and Hitler could have made a peace, if Hitler had been willing to give Stalin Poland and central Europe in exchange for a free hand in France and Italy. Fortunately these two men hated each other after 1941 and Europe was to small for both of them.
The conspirator hope for the Western Allies to permit them to fight the Russians AFTER a peace with the Western Allies, made no sense to FDR or Churchill. It gave them nothing, it gave Germany Europe. Germany had to give, at least the US, more, namely France (Germany would only expect to hold onto Germany). Britain had to agree to what the US wanted, Churchill was to dependent on the US for food, Guns, Materials and money to fight the was alone.
Thus my point the Conspirators plan did NOT address wanted the US wanted, nor wanted the USSR wanted. France and Poland respectively. The Conspirators had to give up one or the other (and preferably BOTH) for any hope of Peace. They were NOT in a position to do either (remember the conspiracy FAILED) during 1943, by the time they did try to kill Hitler, July 1944, the US had already landed its troops in France and Russia was entering Poland. The partition of Europe was already occurring by the success of the two armies with access to Oil and nothing the Germans could do to stop the partition.
|