Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Despite Clinton Pleas, Saudis Let Terrorist Go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:52 PM
Original message
Despite Clinton Pleas, Saudis Let Terrorist Go
Source: ABCNews Blotter

Mugniyah Was Spotted On a Commercial Flight Bound for Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah refused a personal plea from President Bill Clinton to help capture Hezbollah terrorist Imad Mugniyah in 1996, according to former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke, now an ABC News consultant.

Clarke says the CIA learned that Mugniyah, wanted for a string of terror attacks, had boarded a commercial flight in Khartoum that was scheduled to stop in Riyadh.

"We appealed to the Saudis to grab him when the plane landed, and they refused," Clarke said in an interview broadcast Wednesday on ABC "World News With Charles Gibson."

After the initial refusal, Clarke said, U.S. officials went to the then-crown prince, now king.

"We raised the level of appeals all the way through Bill Clinton who was on the phone at three in the morning appealing to the highest level in Saudi Arabia to grab him," Clarke said.

"Instead, the Saudis refused to let the plane land and it continued on to Damascus," Clarke said.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4286232&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. He tried
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. only President that attempted to kill bin laden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. dupe
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 08:55 PM by sabra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. In order to get the Saudi's to do something for ya..you gotta
kiss him and hold his hand. just sayin..

The truth is coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not sure why this is in LBN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. And you are trying to prove WHAT with this?
That the Saudis are NOT our allies? That they deliberately attempt to embarrass Democrats so that their Reagan/Bush/Republican buddies will look better by comparison?

Or that Obama, with his Muslim "sensitivities" will handle them ever so much better? Or is that implication never to be voiced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. huh? just new information that atleast I have never seen before...
that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Heck, aquart - the OP never even offered an opinion, which alot of us do
.
.
.

Longevity on this board does not censorship privilege give

LBN is LBN

If he broke the rules

just alert on it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToughLuck Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. So much for our "friends" the Saudi family..
Kudos to you Bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If the Saudis didn't have oil, would they still be the PNACers friends?
.
.
.

something to ponder

for a nanosecond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC