|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:18 PM Original message |
Navy Intercepts Russian Bombers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Setting the starting positions for WW III. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. We're practically defenseless because of *'s occupation of the sovereign Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. No - we are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxer (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Ya, we only have three carrier groups in the persian gulf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Meh. There are worse predators in the sea than carriers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. That leaves nine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foxer (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Except for this little tidbit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Besides the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Pea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. We *rarely* have 3 CVSG's in the Gulf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
38. How do you know???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. The Chinese don't really have a navy large enough to even come close to an operation that large in s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. The Japanese would kick China's ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flanker (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 06:45 AM Response to Reply #48 |
70. The Japannesse navy is a joke, built to fight the battles of PRE-WWII |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 06:50 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. And what is the range of a SU-30? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flanker (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Ballistic missiles does NOT equal ASM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Didn't say it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flanker (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #75 |
86. The Su-30Mk2 does not need external fuel tanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. It does with a full combat load |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #70 |
112. However, I believe that there are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweet Pea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Defenseless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. OK, that's a gross overstatement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
40. Exactly. Russia and China could DESTROY us by attacking the West Coast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
59. Please, "regional powers at best" When China and Russia decide to combine their forces they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. How exactly would a Sino/Soviet air wing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. Give me a break! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustDavid (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #59 |
106. YOU HAVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheLastMohican (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 04:42 AM Response to Reply #47 |
69. Russia and China developed a different military doctrine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 06:56 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Considering that in every war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. I do not recall any war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheLastMohican (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #72 |
91. Korea and Vietnam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
88. This is true. I am surprised the Chinese have not tried this sooner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. If true, this is scary stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. If people are smart they would NOT vote McCain for security on such an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icnorth (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. That ought to stimulate Dubya's testosterone...eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. I just love how wonderful our country is...is it alright to give classified and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Buzzing the Nimitz??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icnorth (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I sure hope Agent Mike doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. Yeah no shizzle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raebrek (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
36. The article said there were two planes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Like we never use spy planes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddad56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. they were recon planes, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Probably messed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. The Russians knew how close they were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milly (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Blackbird |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddad56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
52. They don't fly SR71's because satellites have taken their place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FalconsRule (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
115. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. Would you describe * as more of a chess player or a checkers player? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Candyland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. A Gambler With a Losing Streak Wider Than the Toronto Beltway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Toronto Beltway. Hwy 401 - width depends where abouts - looks like 18 here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. It's Been Quite a While Since My Last Visit--Thanks for the Photo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
15. And Russia reports an American aircraft carrier sailing unusually close to its planes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
17. Silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
19. Only to Neo-con Head Cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
24. TacticalPeek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baclava (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. The Tupolev 95 is kinda cool....in a 50's retro kinda way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Baclava |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baclava (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. The Tupolev 160 Blackjack is pretty sleek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Baclava |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baclava (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #49 |
67. You KGB? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. Baclava |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. 2000 feet is "buzzed" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
44. But what about the other one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. shoot'em down.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boricua79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. hahahah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. In the western Pacific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 05:35 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Close enough, the Nimitz just made its first port call at Sasebo, Japan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Not far from the Sakhalin Islands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xolodno (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
41. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Xolodno |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. maybe the BBC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
53. Can we say Russia has stealth technology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Prop planes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Why can't prop planes be made stealthy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. The nature of the shape and rotation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. well something is making them invisible to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. They were not invisible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #64 |
77. they flew undetected across the artic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Not prop bombers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Stay in denial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. It is not denial. Physics always rule. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. As a note, the blog indicated they could not be seen visually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. or perhaps Russia has a technology that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I'm an Occam's razor kind of guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:32 AM Response to Reply #85 |
95. Thanks for the information regarding stealth and propellers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #79 |
101. Do you have any... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #77 |
89. So we are simply to take the word of a Russian General? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:17 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. uhh NORAD didn't see 911 or the Pentagon hit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #92 |
97. And you know why that was the case, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #53 |
90. They were detected over 500 miles away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #90 |
102. Fox News now theres a helluva source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. That's fucking weak - your google broken? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:57 AM Response to Reply #105 |
108. you put up a fox news link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. You are simply looking for excuses to reject contrary ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Here you go... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ckramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. Obama who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
55. Does this mean I can skip my trip to the gym tonight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
66. Pictures here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-14-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Thanks for the photos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
94. LOL thanks for the pics, I didn't realize what an antique we were discussing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:51 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. The TU-95 is old but reliable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-13-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
68. Condi's expertise sure has paid huge dividends.....for the Defense Industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-15-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
82. Putin's not stupid enough to start a hot war with the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
93. Oh, for Christ's fucking sake. This is NEWS? We should get excited about THIS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mik T (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
98. Well if you believe that the spy satellite is being used to test our ABS systems then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mik T (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Quote from BBC news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Probably not shadowed by Russian planes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #99 |
103. Bingo Mik T give the man a prize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mik T (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #103 |
113. LOL-woman, but thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #98 |
104. Yes Mik there is more here than meets the eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #98 |
107. Could this be about Kosovo getting its independance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Or Russia is struggling to be relevant again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #107 |
114. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC