|
Yes, you are correct those who invest in a corporations stock actually wants to see it succeed. That is the whole point in buying stock. Imagine that! You use succeed to bypass that we want corporations to make money, but not by killing us, enslaving us, nor taking our properties or rights. Money is great. But, money is not better than our life, liberty or property.
Also these big bad corporations employee thousands of people worldwide. If these corporations were not successful all these employees would be out on the street and then we would hear you complaining about the high unemployment rate. We love that people assemble to create something to make us happier, healthier, and safer. If we run out of ideas or problems to face(e.g. no hunger, no ills, no unhappiness), why not just enjoy life then? We only complain about unemployment when we and others are unhappy about it. If we do need help to solve happiness, healthiness and safety then let us continue the corps that bring that and get rid of the ones that do not.
What would be the incentive for a company to grow and hire people if all their assets were distributed to the people? Easy. The corp would want to get those people to want to trade the money back in for something new the corp makes.
What incentive would the people who work for the corporations have to go to work when they know they wouldn't have to work and still get money? ONE: (I think you mean: they wouldn't have to work TO still get money." They'd still have to get money.) TWO: Are you confusing us with the left wing of the Communist party? That's not us. They are a small, albeit loud on occasion, insignificantly powered group. THREE: If people choose not to work because the have enough to be happy, and they are not in anyone else's way, why would you be unhappy with that? The rich don't have to work, and many don't, but the rich ARE in the way of other people who are not happy -- and yet you would seem to be the type not unhappy about that.
Tell me, what is the brand of computer you are using to type on this forum? What brand of refrigerator do you have in your home? What brand of TV? What type of Internet connection do you have? Most everything you have in your home was created by a corporation; so if you don't want to support them and think they are big bad monsters, then you must give away everything in your house. Wait a second. If I had a non brand-name computer, TV, ... what's the problem? Many people put together their own computer, I have one. Few put together their own fridge, TV, ... but, some do. There's lots of competition there.
The difference between Ds and Rs is more of competition versus monopolies. Rs support Microsoft being a monopoly by reducing its fines, Ds prosecuted and convicted it.
As noble as it would be for everyone to be on the same level, it is not practical. Do you think someone who never finished school should get paid the same amount as someone who took the time and went to college for four year, six year, or even eight years? Of course not. But, how much more is a question worth asking. As someone reaches that top and has no competition, they want too much. It's time to stick together and say: no.
Don't be fooled by Edwards, he talks out of both sides of his mouth. He preaches one thing, but practices another. You need to give an example. If you're saying he's rich and concerns himself with poor people... what's wrong with that. He was not always rich. He remembers. He wants to help. Good for him.
Just like Hillary. Again, example needed.
Also, you need better knowledge of where you are. If you have information, present it. If you have opinions, back them. Especially when on a site that doesn't spend its day in an echo chamber with you.
You've confused us with both communists and with right wingers. Maybe that should tell you something. It does to us.
|