Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After Obama win, Clinton warns of "false hopes"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:03 PM
Original message
After Obama win, Clinton warns of "false hopes"
Source: REUTERS

By Claudia Parsons Fri Jan 4, 1:46 PM ET
NASHUA, New Hampshire (Reuters) - New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, reeling from defeat in Iowa at the hands of Barack Obama, urged Democratic voters on Friday not to build up "false hopes" by choosing an inexperienced presidential candidate.

In Iowa, which kicked off the process of choosing the next U.S. president with its caucuses on Thursday, the former first lady finished a disappointing third, nine percentage points behind Obama and narrowly behind former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards.

"This is a new day, this is a new state," Clinton told reporters after arriving in the New England state. Despite her loss, she said she would continue to contrast her resume with Obama's comparative youth and inexperience.

"We can't have false hopes. We've got to have a person who can walk into that Oval office on day one and start doing the hard work that it takes to deliver change," she said.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080104/pl_nm/usa_politics_clinton_dc



i personally like Edwards first, then Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama has by far the thinnest resume of all the remaining candidates
How can he promise all these hopeful things when he has done very little except to beat Alan Keyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm positive ANYONE on DU could have beaten Keyes
but beyond that, Obama did win... IN IOWA. I prefer John, obviously, and I believe he is much more equipped to deal with this disastrous situation we have in this country and HE has been behind fighting for eliminating hunger, being for the workers, and Jesse Jackson said Edwards was the ONLY candidate from both parties who was paying attention the African-American constituency.

GO JOHN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. More legislative experience than the two he beat in Iowa.
:shrug:

Hillary 7
Edwards 6
Obama 11

It's a strawman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. the same way Hillary...
Edwards, Biden, Dodd, Kucinich, and Richardson can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taylor egv420106 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. What allegedly happened
In just a few more senatorial years that makes HRC significantly more experienced?

NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well it is "false hope"..

when you tout a policy being "universal" and IT'S NOT!...



buyer beware... :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. This really makes her look little and petty.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 09:29 PM by Kittycat
Desperate times call for desperate measures? I think not. I wished she had a little grace and tact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. 'look'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. well, you see, she's running for President
She wants to win!

Imagine that!

---------------

But, she's a woman, you know - I guess she should just keep her mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't "Hope" what Bill Clinton ran on? He wasn't
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 09:44 PM by doc03
any more qualified than Obama. Oh, I "hope" Hillary doesn't get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, Bush ran as the candidate of change and a compassionate
conservative, a uniter not a divider and look how well that has turned out. Obama for all of his likability, is not right for our country right now. We don't need Mr. photo-op, we need hands on, with experience. I will not use my one vote to help get him elected President. This country matter more to me than a Democratic ticket that offers us a charmer with style but no substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And just who is that that is so experienced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I want Edwards...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've yet to hear what change she proposes to deliver
Nobody believes she's gonna change anything and when she makes statements like this it makes her look like just another politician.

Besides what is all this "experience" she claims to have? Obama has been an elected official longer than she has. Six years as a senator is the only experience she can rightfully claim.

And if she has any hope at all of winning the nomination and the general election she needs to tell Bubba to take a fuckin hike right now. His ego is getting in the way of her campaign big time. Besides every time I see him now all I can think is this is the guy who shut down the Iran contra investigation and allowed daddy bush to get off scot free. No wonder the two of them seem to be so buddy buddy these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Poor Hillary...
Now she has to try and scare everybody regarding Obama... what a loser... This is no different than the Repukes saying to vote for a Democratic candidate means that cannot handle any potential terrorist attacks.... no difference at all...:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Being a President's wife and a few years in Senate....
is suppose to be massive amounts of experience?

If experience was what really mattered to voters, Richardson, Biden and Dodd we be at the top of the heap instead of her, Obama and Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. So other people's hopes
are false? Really?

What an arrogant, condescending, ignorant, stupid, elitist, self absorbed, insulting, asinine, twisted, manipulative, underhanded, self righteous, pitiful, ill-informed, presumptuous, nasty and bitchy thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimsterdemster Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. really? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. If Hillary or Edwards lose...watch out
Edwards belongs to the CFR..the think tank that bringing US down. So, he's a hypocrite. Hillary is NWO/Bilderberg pick... and f**k that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Inexperienced candidate is better than incorrect candidate

"Inexperienced" is not important because experience can be gained as long as one is traveling on the right path.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cover up, Hillary, your overwhelming arrogance is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh Hillary, your stripes are showing
I really hope voters see this for what it is. She attacks even in defeat.

What's her executive experience? Chair of the Legal Services Corporation.

What's Obama's? Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago.

What's her legislative experience? 6 years.

What's Obama's? 7 state, 3 federal, total 10 years.

What's her education? Major in political science, thesis on a community organizer (remember, the one where she went Bush-like and had it suppressed?), JD from Yale.

What's Obama's? Major in political science concentrating on international relations, JD from Harvard, magna cum laude.


Looks like Obama wins on all of the above, plus he was a lecturer on constitutional law for nine years. I'd say intricately knowing the Constitution is important for a president (we see that with Bush, who keeps asking where the pictures are so he can understand it).

Sure, Hillary knows the layout of the White House and how the staff manages it, but I wouldn't credit that as any necessary experience for being our chief executive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Good analysis, thanks! eom
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. She should keep it up. I might end up liking Obama at this rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. This type of stuff is why her campaign will disintegrate.
The Clintons are now part of the royal elite and think they can tell Americans what to think.

The arrogance is shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hopes are always false.
They are projection into the future. And building a campaign on a supposed weakness of the opponent is not a good strategy because it is only defensive. Unfortunately for her, that's now the only possibility left by her vapid, vague and rubbery program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. It ain't you babe
"We've got to have a person who can walk into that Oval office on day one and start doing the hard work that it takes to deliver change"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC