|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:02 PM Original message |
Leahy: Bush Not Involved In Firings (Therefore, Exec Privilege Claims for Rove, Bolton are Illegal) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow. Another threat from Senator Leahy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Detail from TPM: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's what they said month before last... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FREEWILL56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. I like the circumstances this places bush into. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #28 |
43. "I do not recall," "I cannot remember," and "I was not aware," coming soon to a hearing near you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. I hear ya.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Like I said the first time I read this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. This Congress is Anti-America! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. then whats the hold-up on contempt hearings....lets move it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. If almost anybody else said this I'd be encouraged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. So Junior pleads guilty, cites executive privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
38. Congress can still investigate to determine whether laws need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 06:47 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. It would be good if they did their job. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlevans (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. This could be good if it actually happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Maybe wants it to get closer till Bush gets out of office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. Somebody with More Legal Knowledge Than Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I think it would be impeachable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. That's What I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. a very large network |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. I copied this from a thread I started on this in GD: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Yep...and it was confirming Mukasey without having WH comply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
33. Actually, no. "Are we going to get our hopes up AGAIN...?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. That'sCalled aCleft Stick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
14. Moron* the new teflon don. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. You know,,we complain about this process but we really don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. So, what's the delay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pingzing58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. If they plead guilty and receive Pres. pardon's it will look bad for GW historically. Timing is ok! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. You really think ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. Ithink just about everything he's ever done will look bad for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. Snore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Wake me ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
23. Maybe the Sen. feels.this puts the Pres. between the proverbial "rock and hard place" . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
24. K&R and hoping for the best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. I bet the WH is really shaking in their boots NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimboDem (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
29. I am numbed by these supposed Democratic leaders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boricua79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
31. Good...SQUEEZE LONG AND HARD, Sen. Leahy. Keep it going... NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
32. The BushCorp presidency is illegal, so what's your point? I am totally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
35. Turley + Rhodes suggested yesterday that Pelosi PROMISED not to impeach --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Were that true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 01:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. promise to who and for what in exchange? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluesmail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
36. Something's up, what it is I have no idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
39. ho-fucking hum... now Leahy can go on Christmas vacation, Dems suck too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
41. Then it follows that the White House Counsel is a criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. That's why this is so NU-cu- LIAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
45. "Damned if you do, damned if you don't" has never sounded so good. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
46. But it's just fine, 'cause impeachment is off the table. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
47. that is an accusation to be decided by the congress or a grand jury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-01-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
48. If he ruled that the executive privilege invocation is illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-02-07 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
49. well, the white house has had plenty to time to hide/destroy evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC