Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel Says UN Nuclear Chief Should Go For Failure Over Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:35 AM
Original message
Israel Says UN Nuclear Chief Should Go For Failure Over Iran
Source: Agence France-Presse

JERUSALEM (AFP) — Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz called Thursday for Mohamed ElBaradei to be removed as head of the UN nuclear watchdog, saying he had turned a blind eye to archfoe Iran's nuclear ambitions.

The call for ElBaradei's dismissal comes just days before the International Atomic Energy Agency is due to publish a new report on Iran's nuclear programme, to serve as a key part of further discussions at the United Nations on whether to impose a third set of sanctions on Tehran.

"The policies followed by ElBaradei endanger world peace. His irresponsible attitude of sticking his head in the sand over Iran's nuclear programme should lead to his impeachment," Mofaz told public radio from Washington.

--
ElBaradei raised the ire of many Israeli officials after telling France's Le Monde newspaper that Iran would need "between three and eight years" to develop a nuclear bomb and that there were was no immediate threat.

"I want to get people away from the idea that Iran represents a clear and present danger and that we're now facing the decision whether to bombard Iran or let them have the bomb. We're not in that situation at all," the Egyptian UN nuclear chief said.



Read more: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hw0TF084rmiXKrjWQLTldJcv0S3w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. IBI/P! n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. These fools could blow up the whole damned world.
And I am NOT talking about Iran. It is beginning to look like the "STATE OF" Israel wouldn't know peace if it flew up to them in the form of a dove with an 80 meter wingspan and took a shit on their heads.

If we live through the next year or two, it will not be due to the efforts of the Pig Bush and his minions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mohamed ElBaradei is a real hero.
Could Mofaz's real problem with him be that the man is actually trying to stop a new, unnecessary war? Lord knows, the current group in charge there are about as trigger happy as our crew. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes, he is. But you know, we've been conducting operations
inside Iran for some time, as well as arming various groups and sending them in. Iran isn't trigger happy because they have not responded to this provocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. for not parroting US/Israel warmongering propaganda?
hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Israel Says" blah, blah, blah, blah,
:boring: OMG seriously Israel just Shut the fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, and keep shut up until our troops are home.
And after that too unless we hear some more responsible voices from Tel Aviv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. My irony meter just exploded on reading this....
"The policies followed by ElBaradei endanger world peace."

Projection much, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. How the hell can Mofaz call for ElBaradei's removal
when Israel isn't even part of the NNPT? This is a dayum joke! :crazy: :crazy: :freak: :freak: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Shhhh!
You're not allowed to point out the sheer hypocrisy of *that nation* ...
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Easy. Israel is a member of the IAEA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They haven't signed the NPT, though
Three states—India, Israel, and Pakistan—have declined to sign the treaty. India and Pakistan are confirmed nuclear powers, and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has made a statement that some interpret as tacitly admitting that Israel possesses nuclear weapons<11>, breaking a long-standing policy of official denial, though it is not known to have conducted tests (see List of countries with nuclear weapons). These countries argue that the NPT creates a club of "nuclear haves" and a larger group of "nuclear have-nots" by restricting the legal possession of nuclear weapons to those states that tested them before 1967, but the treaty never explains on what ethical grounds such a distinction is valid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty#India.2C_Israel_and_Pakistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. But that's okay! They're *special*.
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 01:29 PM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Much like the two other states who haven't signed.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yup... they're all *ostensibly* our allies.
Wheeeeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Didn't say they did sign the NPT.
The "question" was how could Israel complain and I explained how. It is a member of the IAEA and can complain, even more so because Iran is also a member as well as a signatory to the NPT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I understand they could complain, as a member of the organization
I imagine that gives them legal standing, as far as this goes. However, if they haven't signed the NPT, they don't have much room to criticize anyone else on the matter of proliferation.

For the record, I don't think Iran is led by loony world destroyers anymore than I think Israel is. I have my doubts about the current U.S. administration, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. The NPT
"However, if they haven't signed the NPT, they don't have much room to criticize anyone else on the matter of proliferation."

Actually, Israel has as much room as any body to criticize on the matter of proliferation, especially when the object of the criticism is a signatory of the NPT. Where it would be hypocritical would be if they were complaining about India or Pakistan, who, as you know, are also not signatories of the NPT.

"For the record, I don't think Iran is led by loony world destroyers anymore than I think Israel is. I have my doubts about the current U.S. administration, though."

That statement gets no argument from me, because, sadly, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. And its government is full of hypocrites.
Double-standards do not a democracy make.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Which can be easily said of many countries...
...though generally, not be many here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. And replace him with John Bolton!! That moustache can sniff a nuke *anywhere*!!
Even in places they don't exist!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. The UN didn't even know Iran had a nuclear program at all just a few short years ago
until Mahmoud spilled the state secret with a breaking news press release




hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jordi_fanclub Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Exactly as Israel...
until Mordechai Vanunu spilled to The Sunday Times his knowledge of the Israeli nuclear programme.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Vanunu - a true Israeli hero!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. WHAT failure? THEY DON'T HAVE NUKES.
Meanwhile, Israel hypocritically won't allow anyone to inspect THEIR nukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC