Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: Firings likely in transport of nuclear warheads across U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:13 AM
Original message
Source: Firings likely in transport of nuclear warheads across U.S.
Source: CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Air Force will recommend the firing and disciplining of several service members involved in the mistaken flight of nuclear warheads across the country in August, according to a military official familiar with the investigation.

The source did not want to be identified because not everyone involved has been informed.

The just-concluded investigation into the August 29 incident is expected to recommend the firing of at least five Air Force service personnel and disciplinary action against others for failure to follow safety and security procedures, according to the source.

Criminal charges also are being considered, the source said.

The squadron commander in charge of handling munitions at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota was relieved of duty soon after the incident.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/18/loose.nukes/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like punishment for ratting on the project and making them
abort those nuclear missiles going to their ultimate mission.

These guys weren't incompetent or malevolent. They were following orders. Punish whoever issued those orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If that's the case...
...hopefully they won't go down quietly.

And anyone involved who's career, probably isn't going to go quietly if it means that they're taking the fall for someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. you could ask Mr Cheney and the Commander in Chief
they are ultimately responsible....for our safety
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did we find out who transported them yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagrman Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. The important thing to find out is who gave the Commander the orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, I'm sure he didn't make that decision on his own.
Isn't there something in their oath or code that says they don't have to follow orders that are just plain wrong (like going against protocol for shipping nuclear warheads across the US, etc.)? If so, then yeah, they should be punished - if they did it and they knew what they were doing and why, then they should definitely pay the piper. But so should Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagrman Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The old "following orders" plea doesn't save you from wrong doing any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. What really happened?
Are we to believe that nuclear weapons are easily mistaken for conventional weapons? Do they stack them up right next to each other? Do they just use a different color nose cone for nukes?
It is inconceivable to me that nuclear weapons were accidentally loaded onto the wing of an aircraft and flown across country.
In my suspicious mind, they were loaded onto the aircraft to be delivered to, oh I don't know, a Middle Eastern country that this administration has been talking about? Not just delivered but dropped on what they think may just possibly be nuclear sites. I say maybe because they don't know for sure where the sites are.
I believe that they were "discovered" when Air Force brass allowed the story to be leaked in time to stop the start of WWIII.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. sounds fishy to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Me too. considering many DU'ers are ex-military that have experience
working with the loading and unloading of nukes.

and the very weak explanation that is provided in the article is so full of errors and from the information that I have gleaned on here from the ex-military,I find the reasons in the article very hard to believe.

There seems to be a gigantic ordeal to get nukes checked in and out and on top of that the amount of security that is protecting the nukes is extraordinary.

There would have to be either one giant cluster fuck, some sort of bizarre conspiracy or someone from the high up that gave this the green light, then slink ed away when these guys got caught. I believe the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There is no way these nukes could have got through the stringent checks
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 04:50 PM by bambino
some people have been very naughty. Gee what would have happened if Osama Bin Laddin got a hold of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. They will fire those who objected and leaked the story....
Keep all those who OBEY illegal orders and all those in favor of "Armageddon".

:hide:



K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which do we have? Whistle blowers? Cheney complicit elves?
A group of men who goofed together?

To repeat?

Whistle blowers?
Cheney helpers?
Incompetents?

Which would most likely be taken to trial?
Which would most likely have a pretend public relations campaign conducted against them?
Which rules did a group of imcompetents miss?

Since the a/c flew to Barksdale and since we learned what Barkdale is - the origin for shipments to Cheney's corporate warfront in the Middle East/Asian West, and -

since someone is leaking that they 'men' will be taken to trial -

we only have to know who the leaker is.

What do we have here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Criminal Charges? For what crime? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC