Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Throwing in the Towel in Pakistan (Pakistan Army losing to Taliban)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Throwing in the Towel in Pakistan (Pakistan Army losing to Taliban)
Source: ABC News

As a widening political crisis distracts President Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's army appears to be folding in the face of a mushrooming Taliban insurgency sweeping down from the Afghan border, diplomats and Western military officials say.

"I am very concerned that they are sort of throwing in the towel because it's something the people don't support and since Musharraf is also on the ropes," a Western military official told ABC News.

A series of deadly attacks that have killed hundreds of Pakistani troops this year and the abduction of more than 200 soldiers in the volatile Waziristan district have convinced longtime observers that the military lacks clear direction from the top.

Foreign governments, including the U.S., Britain and other European nations that have suffered terrorist attacks on their soil, are particularly concerned President Musharraf has lost focus, amid a widening political crisis and his struggle to remain in power, diplomats say.

This week, the U.S. government pledged $750 million in USAID development funds to the tribal areas over the next five years. In addition, U.S. and U.K. troops will retrain the Frontier Corps, an ethnically Pashtun paramilitary force, in counterinsurgency tactics, Western military officials say.



Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/10/throwing-in-the.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now there's one serious ugly mess on the horizon that's being ignored
because of the mess that jr created in Iraq. Actually, Saddam would have been a good to have around at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blayne Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He would be great to have around right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, they DO have the bomb, don't they?
Not soon or eventually. Now. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, Pakistan has nuclear warheads
And missiles capable of carrying them hundreds of miles.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/index.html

"The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) estimates that Pakistan has built 24-48 HEU-based nuclear warheads, and Carnegie reports that they have produced 585-800 kg of HEU, enough for 30-55 weapons. Pakistan's nuclear warheads are based on an implosion design that uses a solid core of highly enriched uranium and requires an estimated 15-20 kg of material per warhead. According to Carnegie, Pakistan has also produced a small but unknown quantity of weapons grade plutonium, which is sufficient for an estimated 3-5 nuclear weapons.

Pakistani authorities claim that their nuclear weapons are not assembled. They maintain that the fissile cores are stored separately from the non-nuclear explosives packages, and that the warheads are stored separately from the delivery systems. In a 2001 report, the Defense Department contends that "Islamabad's nuclear weapons are probably stored in component form" and that "Pakistan probably could assemble the weapons fairly quickly." However, no one has been able to ascertain the validity of Pakistan's assurances about their nuclear weapons security."

According to the information here: http://www.saag.org/papers2/paper148.html, they are currently testing ICBM's with a range of up to 2500 km carrying a 1000-kg warhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. A PolySci Prof on the local N(eocon) P(ropaganda) N(etwork) outlet,
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 09:04 AM by loindelrio
in his weekly show, was bleating on about how the West will not allow an 'Islamic Bomb' (in the context of that new Greatest Threat EverTM, Iran, and the urgent need to bomb such threat).

I was about to call in and ask what the name of the capital of Pakistan was, but what the hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. The necons' ME crusade is going really well
Why dont they just stay home and persecute Democrats? That's one group they seem to be able to get over on at will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. But but but, didn't I just hear one of the right wing propagandists
telling us that the Taliban were being defeated, and their numbers are dwindling? I'm sure that was the line of garbage I was just being fed not more than a week ago. Limbaugh? Hannity? Beck? Those guys know the score right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is terrifying because they have the BCCI funded bomb
Hopefully, something will be done to strategically strengthen the saner people there to keep them in control. The root of this entire mess is that we were willing to over look organizations like BCCI and ISI because they were useful to US covert activities at one point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. One of the most important countries w.r.t. our problems "over there" is coming unglued
And the press is doing a horrible job of covering the story. Pakistan could break up for all we know. Even yet, the current government cannot control the "stateless" terrorists in the mountain region.
:thescream:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Pakistan was once an economically sound and forward looking state until it was drowned
under military spending and the constant erosion of democracy...

I think there is a lesson in there somewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Waziristan was never really part of Pakistan. The Paki government had agreements
with the autonomous border tribes. The lesson is 'give em an inch and they'll claim themselves independent of Islamabad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. If I understand the situation, soon the Taliban will have access to nuclear missiles. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC