Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Urges White House on Leak Probe (Schumer of NY)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 12:29 PM
Original message
Senator Urges White House on Leak Probe (Schumer of NY)
Edited on Tue Jan-06-04 12:30 PM by MoonAndSun
<http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=703&e=2&u=/ap/20040106/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak>


snip>WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator called on the White House Tuesday to require staffers to cancel reporter confidentiality agreements so the journalists might tell investigators whether a Bush administration official leaked a CIA (news - web sites) operative's name.



In a letter sent to White House chief of staff Andrew Card, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., argued that the White House staff has only "partially cooperated" with Justice Department (news - web sites) investigators by turning over phone and e-mail records.






go Chuck, the Dems can not let this issue go!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes do keep this public and in the open 24/7
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have a question about this
Josh Marshall says everyone in the WH knows who the leaker is, so why doesn't the FBI simply ask that question? Unless they're asking the wrong questions, people in the WH have to be lying to investigators if they say they don't know. It's very simple to get to the bottom of this. As Marshall says, the WH obviously is trying to brazen this out. They ain't cooperating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe that is one reason why AssKKKroft recused himself,
because he was not asking the right questions to the right people, and the career people at the FBI maybe were complaining?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know there was pressure from the career people from the beginning
for him to recuse himself. I do wonder, why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. tell us who refused to sign the release for the reporters....shine the
light on those fools..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think the reason Ashcroft recused himself was because..
Edited on Tue Jan-06-04 01:58 PM by 0007
Karl Rove ran a campaign for Ashcroft. Ashcroft refused to recuse himself two or three months. This is an outrage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. rove not only ran a campaign for ashcroft,
but he had to sue ashcroft to get paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I never heard that before
lol - oh what a muddy and interelated web has been woven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoKingGeorge Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Tom Dashle had sent a letter to aSSman asking
for an update on the investigation. After the weekend aSSman recused himself. Give Tom some credit. I guess by recusing himself and having the Chicago AG continue ,he can argue for the continuing delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Grand Jury needed now
and subpeonas all around, including Bush and Cheney. Get everyone under oath. What did you know about this and when did you know it? What internal investigations were carried out (you know they had to) and what were the results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bravo, Senator Schumer!
Edited on Tue Jan-06-04 07:41 PM by TacticalPeak
And bravo, Senator Daschle!

And I understood that DOJ said that the AG recused because of the 'developing' case. To me, that sounds deliciously threatening to the Crisco Kid.

Shades of John 'Law and Order' Mitchell.

:evilgrin:


edit: What hilarious sentence structure from Scotty! Freudian, I tell you:

snip

White House press secretary Scott McClellan responded to the
request, saying, "It would be unfortunate if people are seeking to
politicize a serious matter like leaking classified information for partisan
gain."

"Seeking" for partisan gain? Or "leaking" for partisan gain. My English teachers would say that proximity is the first arbiter.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC