Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wal-Mart approves $7B buyback plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 07:41 PM
Original message
Wal-Mart approves $7B buyback plan
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- Wal-Mart Stores said late Monday that its board had approved a $7 billion share buyback plan to replace a previous $5 billion program.

Shares climbed 23 cents to $52.33 in light volume after-hours trading. Ahead of the news, Wal-Mart's (WMT: news, chart, profile) stock closed the regular session down 18 cents at $52.12.

In June, the nation's largest retailer announced a $5 billion buyback plan.

Monday's plan would replace the previous program, the Bentonville, Ark. company said. Shares will be purchased in both the open market and through private transactions


"We screw our employees and pass the savings on to our stockholders."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are they doing this?
Someone savvy with stocks, please explain this to me. What is the purpose?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will increase the earning per share. Less shares on the market
to divy up the profits to. Makes their shares look more attractive, and tends to reward share holders that continue to hold rather than sell back.
Meantime it can attract new buyers because of the increased earnings per share. It's generally used as a marketing ploy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That sounds negative, I should be more fair than that
had a Wal-Mart moment.

When used properly, it is a good way to raise the value of undervalued stock for your shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Think of it this way.
A company makes a boatload of money. What do they do with it?

Well, they could pay it out to the owners of the company as a dividend, but dividends are taxed higher than the capital gains you would get by re-investing it in the company.

They could invest the money (outside the company), but you can actually LOSE money in investments, and people who know how to run a retail business don't necessarily know how to invest a couple billion dollars - it isn't the business they are in (like why banks auction reposessed properties, they COULD get more, but they aren't in the real estate business). Safer investments don't earn as much as the rest of their capital, so it drags down returns.

They could increase the capital account, but all that equity doesn't do you any good just sitting there. In fact it reduces your ROE and makes you look weaker to some analysts (never got that one myself).

They could "invest" it in growing the business, but if you grow beyond your capacity to effectively manage (like Boston Market) just for the sake of growth you can take a BIG hit later.

So what do you do? You buy back a ton of your own stock. It returns earning to shareholders (by buying them out), marginally increases the demand for your stock (you're buying on the open market) and that hopefully increases the share price, AND you now have fewer outstanding shares for the same level of earning. Greater earnings/share SHOULD mean higher share price (thus you are "paying" ALL of your shareholders).

In many cases you can hold that treasury stock to re-issue later (without a new underwriting). So it is often seen as a sign that a company's management thinks their stock is "cheap" right now and they expect to be able to re-sell it later at higher prices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. back dated to Jan 1 2003 dividends are taxed the same as cap gains.
Just a clarification.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC