Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help wanted: War czar with clear vision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:58 AM
Original message
Help wanted: War czar with clear vision
Source: ap




Help wanted: War czar with clear vision

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 24 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Now that the White House is searching for a "war czar," it begs the question of who has been coordinating U.S. involvement in
Iraq and
Afghanistan the past four years.


A team of West Wing players led by national security adviser
Stephen Hadley has tried to keep turf-conscious agencies marching in the same direction on military, political and reconstruction fronts. A few Bush aides say privately, however, that the White House probably should have recruited someone to oversee the war effort a year ago.

Critics say the administration's job of coordinating the war has never gone smooth enough or fast enough. And now two key members of the White House team focused on the war are leaving.

"The problem is not broad strategy and policy, it's that the bureaucracy is so inefficient and there's been so little follow-up that the machine doesn't work," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070506/ap_on_go_pr_wh/war_czar;_ylt=AjI8o3sPXLx6EHCbf8i3eK2MwfIE




OH NEWT---------you are such a???????

....."The problem is not broad strategy and policy, it's that the bureaucracy is so inefficient and there's been so little follow-up that the machine doesn't work," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. How about Newt for the "War Czar"?
He could be called the "War Newt", and since he knows exactly what the problems are he should be able to fix things in short order. Wait a minute, this is a job for the War Newt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not enough ? for Horse's Ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wanted: credible political scapegoat with high desire to fall on own sword at command. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. ONLY somebody WITHOUT clear vision would take the job!
If you have a dram of sense in your head, you're hang up, hard, on whoever called and asked you to run the occupation. Only the guy with his head absolutely in the clouds would take this job because, you know, 'we can still win it'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does this mean the Commander in Chief DOESN'T have a clear vision?
He sure as hell isn't paying any attention to domestic policy, so what else does he have to spend time on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about Joe Lieberman
... it would free up a seat in Connecticut, he's all gung ho for this war and he'll eventually get the blame for the disaster in Iraq. Seems like a win-win situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I nominate George W. Fucking Bush.
We pay him to be Commander In Chief. Anything that the "War Czar" gets paid should be docked from the Decider Guy's paycheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about the SECRETARY OF DEFENSE!!!!

Am I wrong in thinking that the Secretary of Defense is in charge of running wars and interfacing with the president?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. We're so fucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. War czar with clear vision....oxymoron defined.
Nobody with clear vision would have anything to do with this clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC