Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interior Plans Broader Offshore Drilling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 03:42 PM
Original message
Interior Plans Broader Offshore Drilling
Source: Associated Press

Apr 27, 4:31 PM EDT

Interior Plans Broader Offshore Drilling
By JOHN HEILPRIN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Interior Department has put the final touches on a five-year plan to expand oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and offshore from Alaska and Virginia.
(snip)

Details were sketchy, but in January, Bush ended drilling bans in an area of the central Gulf of Mexico and in Alaska's Bristol Bay. That action cleared the way for:

-Making an area in the Gulf of Mexico south of Florida's panhandle available for drilling. The "Lease Area 181" is a small part of a much larger 8.2 million acres that Congress approved for oil and gas development in December.

-Opening 5.6 million acres to drilling in waters northwest of the Alaska Peninsula, known for endangered whales and the world's largest run of sockeye salmon. Interior plans to sell leases there in 2010 and 2012, pending environmental reviews. An estimated 200 million barrels of oil and 5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas exist under those federal waters.




Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/O/OFFSHORE_DRILLING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-04-27-16-28-13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. U.S. Proposal Would Allow Oil Drilling Off Virginia
Source: WP

Five-Year Plan Would Also Open Alaskan, Gulf Waters

The Interior Department will announce a proposal Monday to allow oil and gas drilling in federal waters near Virginia that are currently off-limits and permit new exploration in Alaska's Bristol Bay and the Gulf of Mexico, according to people who have seen or been told about drafts of the plan.

The department issued a news release yesterday that was lacking details but said that it had finished a five-year plan that will include a "major proposal for expanded oil and natural gas development on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf." Department officials declined to describe the plan.

Congress would still have to agree to open areas currently off-limits before any drilling could take place off Virginia's coast. Every year since 1982, after an oil spill off Santa Barbara, Calif., Congress has reaffirmed a moratorium on drilling off the nation's Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Last year, after a vigorous push by drilling advocates, Congress opened new waters in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Interior Department might still go ahead with environmental and geological seismic studies off Virginia, but the plan does not envision drilling there before 2011, according to a congressional source who saw an earlier version of the proposal. The sources who described the plan spoke on the condition of anonymity because they didn't want to compromise relationships with people who showed them drafts.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042701611.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. If a gigantic oil spill happened to engulf the White House........
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 10:12 PM by Gloria
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pillage, Rape and Blunder, the Bush White House way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They must be stopped from raping our environment in the name of big business. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Cut to the chase, lets invade Virginia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Too late they are already here. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Alot of conservative fishermen in VA.
Edited on Sat Apr-28-07 12:57 AM by smiley_glad_hands
Wonder what there take on this will be? Probably just call it a reef and go rockfishing. Anyway, as a virginian, I oppose this idea.

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think we need the Democratic Presidential candidates to make hay of this.
We may need natural gas, and that wouldn't cause anywhere near as much disruption to the environment (no spills, etc). Our present heating infrastructure may need it... I don't know for sure. But we should be cutting back on oil use and switching as much electrical over to wind farms as possible. Plus, nanosolar.com announced earlier this year that their revolutionary roll-out solar panels will be going into mass production later this year at their two huge facilities, one in Silicon Valley and one in Germany! Visit their site and look at the technology... it's very exciting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. "Bush" proposal, if you please.
The US doesn't have a say in this.

I know.

It's the LBN rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think so...
jest try it, ye bloody bastards...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC