Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justices Reconsider Campaign Finance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 03:42 AM
Original message
Justices Reconsider Campaign Finance
Source: Washington Post

It was clear from the start yesterday just how eager some justices were to revisit the landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance act that the Supreme Court only four years ago blessed as constitutional.

"Maybe we were wrong last time," Justice Antonin Scalia told Solicitor General Paul D. Clement when Clement advised that the court had already decided the very issue at stake in yesterday's oral arguments.

(snip)

Yesterday's arguments concerned a portion of the law that says corporate entities cannot use money from their general treasuries to broadcast ads that run 30 days before a primary or 60 days before a general election, are aimed at a relevant electorate and mention a federal candidate by name.

The naming restriction was particularly important, because Congress was trying to do away with "sham" issue ads that purported to be about a controversy but amounted to an attack on a candidate. The groups are free to run such ads if a separate political action committee pays for them.

(more... )

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042501739.html?hpid=sec-nations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Question
If the investigation into Ohio's fraud connected to the RNC and their computers counting non-votes, and bush and company are arrested and put out of office, CAN THE TWO JUSTICES BUSH APPOINTED...ALITO AND ROBERTS BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE ALSO.. Remember - he was an illegal president and should not have had the power to appoint any body....does anybody know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Alito & Roberts
Probably cannot do that. No provision in the Constitution save impeachment. Remember these people were confirmed by a statutorily legitimate Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC