Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Orleans Fights Over Housing Projects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 07:54 PM
Original message
New Orleans Fights Over Housing Projects
Source: AP

NEW ORLEANS -- To many, the B.W. Cooper projects are 56 terrifying acres of government-issue housing marked by bloodshed, drugs and blight. To Barbara Williams, they're home.

"I love B.W. Cooper," the 65-year-old retiree said recently, her 18-month exile in Houston after Hurricane Katrina finally over. "I was never sick a day back home in the project. In Houston, I had two heart attacks and a light stroke."

But her homecoming may be short-lived. If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development gets its way, B.W. Cooper and other major New Orleans housing projects will be torn down. In a billion-dollar plan, HUD wants to replace them with developments of mixed architectural styles, for people of various incomes.

As bad as the projects were, some tenants have come to regard the drab, brick housing with a certain affection. For many, the projects are all they have ever known. Some see HUD's plan as an attempt to keep poor blacks from returning to New Orleans.



Read more: http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-katrina-housing-projects,0,3631524.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines



Catherine Austin Fitts saz HUD is a criminal organization. This should be investigated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the major plan is is to keep the poor out. make it upscale city.
drive the poor, the different and NO special flavor out. turn it into a hemogenous style city complete with no trace of it's former glory and self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And a huge transfer of wealth from HUD to Bushco!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. As a New Orlenian, let me just say that we cannot ever reopen these projects as they were
They were extreme poverty in extreme density, which bred criminality. They were islands in the city.

We are rebuilding projects now as infill in existing neighborhoods, and that model works. The tenants are integrated into a functioning neighborhood instead of exiled into towers and blocks of nothing but grinding, pervasive poverty and criminality.

If you want, I can post pictures later this week of what these buildings now look like. They are uninhabitable and they are in areas that have no groceries, no clinics, no hospitals, NOTHING. Bringing a dependent population back into this right now is the HEIGHT of irresponsibility. It would be like opening a nursing home in Nagasaki the year after the bomb went off.

People should absolutely have the right to return to the city, but we have to be realistic. We need people to come home and work and rebuild the city. If people can do that, come on down. But if you are dependent in any way, it would be HIGHLY advisable NOT to return to the city right yet. We just don't have a social service system of any quality yet back up and running, and what we do have is absolutely taxed to the max. You already wait for HOURS and HOURS if you need to go to the ER, there is really no mental health service at all for the poor and the police are stressed to the limit.

The city has NO social services right now, no hospital capacity, NO mental health services, little job training, essentially NO support services for an indigent population to move home. The police are still about 30% understaffed, and the crime rate is CRAZY high now.

Please come home, but PLEASE come home smart. If you need support, be sure to arrange it before you come home, or stay where you can get it. And PLEASE, support the urban renewal that is the new way to do Section 8 housing - infill and integration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Interesting observations. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. as long as the fed plans include replacing the housing
an earlier report I read in the NYT stated that the plan was to only replace 10% to17% of the housing capacity compared to that being torn down (this was talking about several projects.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. youngdem; A most qualified opinion posted by you.
Hurricane wiped the slate clean for some of those wards. The city needs rebuilt a a sound plan needs to be followed,step by step.
If people were to walk a mile in your shoes, maybe they could begin to understand the needs of the many far outweigh the needs of the few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Projects, in NOLA or elsewhere, are evil.
In the '90s, they finally decided that if you want to have a chance at ending persistent poverty, you had to break up where it was concentrated. This wasn't an ad hoc judgment. It was after investigating why persistent poverty occurred--it's not just a black thing, by any means.

And so they started to do, as projects got past their useful lifetime and it was politically expedient.

The people spread around often take their habits with them; crime goes up, at least short term. The adults don't always do better, and usually find it unnerving--their support network is gone, those that reinforce old patterns of thought and activity are missing. Often they find ways to move back. So it sounds horrible.

But their kids tend to do better, sometimes much better. Just being able to say "their kids tend to do better" is an improvement, because it represents at least some people breaking out of persistent poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Catherine Austin Fitts....
http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/CAFmoneyTrl.html
Enron. Arthur Anderson. WorldCom. Global Crossing. Some of the biggest players in corporate America, and what do they have in common? They are all perpetrators of reporting fuzzy numbers as revenue to pump their stock prices. But in the realm of creative accounting run amok, one institution stands apart as the mother of all financial fraud -- the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Although HUD's mission involves "spurring economic growth in distressed neighborhoods," the reality is that HUD is an agency run and managed by the departments of Treasury and Justice, Lockheed Martin, JPMorgan Chase, Dyncorp, Harvard, AMS, Arthur Anderson, and others that use the agency for their own for-profit interests.

All this according to Catherine Austin Fitts, the self-described "cleaning lady" whose job it was to clean up financial messes such as the savings and loan scandal at HUD. Few people know more than Fitts about how the money works in Washington -- and now that Enronitis is spreading, Fitts has found a willing audience for her insight on how complicated financial schemes get cracked and implemented at the highest corporate and governmental level. The software she has developed, if implemented, is poised to revolutionize the way communities and individuals use their money.

When Fitts left the Wall Street firm of Dillon Read and joined HUD in 1989 as Assistant Secretary of Housing, what she found was an agency awash in conflicts of interest and fraud that was subservient to the big-money people in the financial community.

Moreover, she discovered that HUD had never tracked its financial results on a location-specific basis, so each field office had no idea how the money worked in its jurisdiction. By putting together a crude place-based cash-flow map, she found that HUD's business had been substantially distorted by the way the data had been presented. Her numbers proved that S&L and HUD fraud were perpetrated by the same networks, in the same places, and involved the same use of federal credit.

"In Washington, everyone was talking about the S&L and HUD scandals as if they were separate, but it was clear that place-based financial data would have told us what had happened, who had profited, and how to prevent it from happening again," Fitts recalls. "It also became apparent that our investments in communities conflicted with the other federal, state, and local investments in that place."

Fitts was fired by the Bush administration in 1990 after only 18 months on the job. She was told the day after she left that the preparation of place-based financial accounting and statements had also been terminated.

Out of work, Fitts decided to dedicate herself to the concept of helping communities finance themselves. Fitts founded a new company, Hamilton Securities Group, which in 1993 won a contract with HUD to manage its $500 billion portfolio.

After her discouraging experience in the employment of HUD, the things that gave Fitts the most hope were digital technology and the advent of the Internet, which were both becoming more and more accessible to the public. Hamilton's contract with HUD provided an invaluable opportunity to draw from what Fitts describes as "the richest database in the world on how the money works in neighborhoods."

When HUD decided to auction off a portfolio of defaulted mortgage loans, Hamilton introduced a proprietary place-based bidding software and an online database of information so that the portfolio could be bid upon in an open, competitive auction. With it, little guys were able to compete with big, publicly traded players for the first time.

The problem, she found, was that the model was too effective. In 1995, Fitts' team auctioned $950 million worth of multifamily mortgages in the Southeast. It was estimated that by selling them the old-fashioned way the sale would bring $350 million, but thanks to the innovations implemented at Hamilton's recommendations, the loans sold for $710 million and, according to Fitts, "took the world's breath away."

Although the sale hurt some big players, it helped taxpayers save $2 billion in defaulted loan sales. That accomplishment raised eyebrows and sent a loud message to HUD that all this time they had been dealing with low bidders.

One of the reasons Hamilton was called in to help with the sale is because HUD needed to raise its loan recovery rates in order to issue more mortgage insurance without congressional appropriations. Hamilton came in with its optimization software, blew away the market with wildly successful loan sales, brought HUD's recovery rates up from 35 percent to 70 percent and 90 percent, and HUD was able to generate $2.2 billion in new revenue and new credit.

But the story didn't end happily ever after. In 1997, HUD canceled Hamilton's contract and the loan sales program while continuing to use the new recovery rate assumptions in order to get new credit originations. That is a clear case of, in Fitts' words, "cooked books."

And, Fitts notes, HUD is currently out of compliance with its own accounting rules. In 1999, under the direction of HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo, HUD's Inspector General refused to certify its own financial statements as required by law, while admitting that $59 billion somehow disappeared. The explanation given was accounting systems failure, and the matter was dropped without investigation.

"In 2000 I visited with a senior staff assistant to Kit Bond, the chairman of one of the appropriations committees for HUD," remembers Fitts. "I asked her what she thought was going on at HUD, and she said, 'HUD is being run as a criminal enterprise.' Then Bond, the committee, and my congressional delegation, all Republicans, all voted a $1.7 billion increase in HUD's appropriation."

Starting in 1994, Hamilton Securities Group began building an easy-to-operate computer software system to track the money flows in any given region. The program, Community Wizard, provided the kind of transparency needed to expose cooked books. Former Hamilton employee Carolyn Betts remembers the power of Community Wizard, even in its infancy.

"It was in the beta stage, so it was not complete, but with each piece of information it became more and more powerful," recalls Betts. "The HUD field office people went absolutely crazy when they saw it. You could go in with a pointer on a map and get to information on expenditures by each HUD program. It was a pretty beautiful program and would have become unbelievably powerful."

To imagine the Wizard at work, Betts says, picture a place-based website with modules. For each place, you could pull up a map, like on Mapquest, and see information such as the socioeconomic characteristics of the residents or the amounts of revenue generated by private companies.

The developers at Hamilton got geocoded information from every government agency and private contractor they could, including information on all payments made by the federal government to contractors. Depending on which side of the law you sit, Community Wizard could be either a godsend or a threat.

In the fall of 1996, Hamilton became the target of nightmarish covert operations, smear campaigns, harassment, and criminal investigations. The Community Wizard technology was ultimately destroyed in 1998 when Department of Justice agents stormed in and wrecked Hamilton's office. Fitts suspects that Wizard held secrets which may have revealed that some U.S.-guaranteed mortgage securities were fraudulently issued and were illegally draining HUD's reserves.

Thanks to Hamilton's innovations, HUD was able to save taxpayers over $2 billion through the defaulted loan sales. In spite of that, the agency refuses to pay Hamilton over $2.5 million worth of outstanding invoices. To top it off, John Ervin, a HUD contract servicer, brought a qui tam (whistleblower) suit against Fitts that accused her of committing fraud against HUD to the tune of $3.8 million.

So the cleaning lady of fraud is now being sued for allegedly committing fraud against the most fraud-ridden agency in the U.S. government. Is this a great country or what?

Fitts has continued to develop groundbreaking technologies to separate the U.S. government from the tentacles of corporate America and give economic control back to the people. Her latest is called a Solari.

"A Solari is an investment advisor and databank for a neighborhood of 10,000 people or less that promotes transparency and literacy about how the time and money works, while raising and reengineering capital within that place," Fitts explains.

The Solari Action Network is an investment advisory company founded by Fitts in 1998, and its launch date is set three months after the feds pay Fitts the monies owed under Hamilton contracts. Once launched, the first thing needed is a Community Wizard-like technology to give average people the confidence to approach complex financial situations.

The second part of a Solari is the creation of a trust structure for shareholders, an investment pool, if you will. This plan includes nonvalue, voting "A" shares owned by a self-perpetuating group of entrepreneurial neighbors. The nonvoting "B" shares have monetary value and are sold to whomever "A" shareholders determine. First they are sold to the community, but ultimately they can be traded on the stock market. The "A" shareholders only make money on "B" shares, which encourages all neighbors to optimize total equity in the place.

Here is a theoretical example. If the town of Forestville had a Solari Network, its "A" shareholders could, by using Community Wizard, determine that residents send $2 million to HUD, which takes $1 million for "overhead" and plans to use the other $1 million to renovate four housing units in Mirabel Heights. If the shareholders estimate the actual cost of construction to be $200,000 if financed locally, they can tell Washington to cancel the HUD expenditure and save residents $1.8 million in taxes. This would be a sophisticated way of telling Washington to shove it. Moreover, it's a method for residents to distance themselves from a "criminal enterprise."

"If HUD is spending money outside of the Constitution and failing to comply with the law, it would be improper to give them money because by doing so, we would be encouraging criminal activity," says Fitts.

Fitts envisions Community Wizard being reinvented on a decentralized basis, one for each neighborhood. She has already agreed to help one community in California build its own version through a website.

"I will reinvest the proceeds from litigation judgments or settlements, and/or capitalizing Solari as part of a global settlement, into venture capital that will fund as many locally developed Community Wizards as possible," Fitts promises. "My hope is that online collaboration will lead to a much more dynamic network of databases and tools to take control of the money flow."
http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/CAFmoneyTrl.html


Catherine Austin Fitts can be reached at catherine@solari.com. Fitts' writings can be read at www.solari.com.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wow!
Wouldn't it be awesome to have programs like this all over the govt? Just think of the wasted tax money that would be saved and the accountability it would force on the govt. Thanks, I had never heard of this woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I love her! She gives me hope for the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. I read earlier in a NYT piece - that the plan is to tear down
a number or projects and in the replacement only include somewhere between 10 - 17% of the number of units for former residents of the projects. It is outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. "for people of various incomes."...
yeah, for the; upper middle class, upper class, wealthy, super wealthy, ultra wealthy, mega wealthy and discustingly wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's called "Gentrification", but it has its place
The working class that is rebuilding New Orleans also deserve housing but if 'Nawlins wants its tourism industry to flourish in a new direction,they need to diversify away from strictly "Urban Blithe" and reduce its size with more appealing,higher value real estate tax base property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC