Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For Mrs. Clinton, Listening Subsides and Talk Is Louder [NYT]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:16 AM
Original message
For Mrs. Clinton, Listening Subsides and Talk Is Louder [NYT]
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/nyregion/23HILL.html?ex=1072760400&en=6123f6c3cf6b2118&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
For Mrs. Clinton, Listening Subsides and Talk Is Louder


By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ

Published: December 23, 2003

Hillary from Westchester was on the line, and she was upset.

"Literally, I have been accused of everything from murder on down," the first-time caller complained. "And it's hurtful and personally distressing when it first happens. But when it continues . . ."

Hillary was Hillary Rodham Clinton, the junior United States senator from New York, who surprised Brian Lehrer by unexpectedly phoning his call-in show on WNYC radio in New York this month to respond to a sensational charge that a listener had made about her and her husband.

<snip>

Relentlessly and ubiquitously, Mrs. Clinton is out there, pounding away at Republicans, responding to her critics, staking out distinct positions on everything from Afghanistan and Iraq (she is a hawk) to terror money and unemployment insurance benefits (she wants more). By design or not, in the last few months she has been showing a feisty side that her critics long suspected was there but that her advisers say she has been reluctant to display.

"She's just much more comfortable," said Harold M. Ickes, a longtime friend and adviser who acknowledged that Mrs. Clinton was "gun-shy" at first, largely because of her turbulent days in the White House. "She's much more sure afoot," he said.

In the last several weeks, it has been all Mrs. Clinton almost all the time. She has made a string of high-profile appearances — visiting troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, giving back-to-back interviews on the Sunday morning political programs and delivering speeches to prominent foreign policy experts in Manhattan.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go girl Go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. give them hell Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Mrs. Clinton" called in?
Why wasn't the headline: "Senator Clinton"...?

In any case, good for Hillary! I hope she pummeled the other caller's stupid ass.

:toast:

I don't listen to call-in radio, so I have no idea what WNYC is all about. Are they "librul" or right wing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You beat me to it Partypooper,
this is the second article from the NYT, where the headline will read "Mrs Clinton", instead of Senator Clinton......that really bugs me. A not so subtle way to try to "lower" her, by neglecting to use her LEGAL title (unlike the buffoon who currently parades around with President in front of his name)
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. And in the whole article, not ONCE
was she referred to as "Senator Clinton" the writer used "Mrs. Clinton" for the entire article. Yeah, "not so subtle" like an atom bomb is "not so subtle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The problem is Time's stylebook, not bias.
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 01:57 AM by PinkTiger
The NYT uses "courtesy" titles, unlike the AP, which does not. Meaning, that in an AP story, she would be "Clinton" after the first reference. The NYT uses "Mr. Bush" and "Mr. Clinton" when referring to the current pResident and the former President; so style dictates that it use "Mrs. Clinton" after the first reference, which uses "Senator."
It is not a slur. It is the style. Go back and read the article. After she is identified as the junior Senator from New York, she is referred to as "Mrs. Clinton."
This is a problem caused by the NYT's use of courtesy titles. People who don't understand the stylebook make assumptions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. It's still bias
In that they use "Mrs." rather than "Ms."

But, true, it's not the bias I was assuming it was, so I still stan... er, sit corrected. Thanks for setting me straight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildThang Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. I really want to read her book
She has had to suffer much more than many public figures. Hopefully she will just keep getting stronger.

Has anyone here read her book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're attacking Hillary because...
she's a threat to them and they scared shitless that she's going to beat the hell out of them all the way back to the White House as President Hillary Cliton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ha ha! This is supposed to be a negative piece on her...
...to bolster the freeper notion that the Clintons "crave the spotlight." Yet, after reading it, I admire her even more!

Nice try, Ray...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sick of Hillary's pro-war stance
Which has cost her any support she ever had from me.

If she thinks this display of unprincipled bloodthirstiness will win over those who villify her, she's wrong. They'll always hate her.

And if she truly believes that this war is proper, then sadly, she's become part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary will be senate majority leader before the decade is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DennisReveni Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't think so.
She hasn't really done anything for NY. Yes, her name is on a lot of bills. But that is more for personal gain than to aid her constituents.
She will have a very hard campaign in 2006 if Rudy runs. As I undrestand it Rudy is out polling her now.
If her and Bill had not been such DINO's they could have left a real legacy. Now due to her pandering to the right all her dreams of the presidency may crumble.
Leaving her nothing but a footnote in History as the first first lady elected to office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'd like to see her kick Junior's ass!!!!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DennisReveni Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary is a DINO
http://www.dsausa.org/lowwage/Documents/TANF.html
"Unfortunately, a cadre of "moderate Democrats" affiliated with the Democratic Leadership Council, including Senators Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman, has joined the President. They have embraced the higher work requirements and seem unwilling to seriously address the problem of poverty. Some of these Democrats have gone so far right on welfare that a number of Republican Senators, including Olympia Snowe and Orrin Hatch, have actually found themselves significantly to the left of the DLC Democrats."
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0605-07.htm
"But no one is going to confuse Hillary Clinton, who has cozied up to the conservative, corporation-funded Democratic Leadership Council, with a progressive reformer. She remains the conventional inside-the-Beltway pol who angrily shouted, "Russ, live in the real world," after U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., tried to explain why Democrats should embrace campaign finance reforms he had proposed.
Hillary Clinton's determination to remain in the cautious, unquestioning center was very much on display last fall, when the Bush administration came to Congress seeking a blank check to wage an unnecessary and unjustified war with Iraq. While other senators expressed concern over the failure of the Bush administration to make a credible case that Iraq posed a serious threat, Clinton bought the White House line.
"I will take the president at his word that he will try hard to pass a U.N. resolution and will seek to avoid war, if at all possible," she declared.
Twenty-three more skeptical senators chose not to take the president at his word. Among them were Bob Graham, D-Fla., who then chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Carl Levin, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. While Clinton was praising the president's pronouncements, the skeptics voted "no.""
http://in.news.yahoo.com/031109/139/2992v.html
Washington, Nov 9 (ANI): Susan Sarandon has launched a vitriolic attack on Senator Hillary Clinton, insisting she feels nothing but contempt for the Ivy League lawyer.
According to a report in website Rate The Music, Sarandon has slammed Clinton's political performance and claimed that she "blew" her chance of success.
"Hate her! The only thing she's going to be remembered for is standing by her man, and that is really sad. She had a shot, and she really blew it. She turned out to be just another politician, which was really disappointing. I also think she lost a lot of support. I know a lot of people who write very large cheques who have told her, 'That's it for us, don't come back.'," she said.

She voted for the war, and was part of that disgusting silent vote for the 87.5 billion dollars. After her recent trip to Afghanistan she proudly proclaimed US success there. Unfortunately the news from that country is the exact opposite.
Hillary is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hillary has to survive re-election. Some dink said on the news that
Rudy Guliani might run against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joncofey1 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. SHe's Dreamy
I Love her ankles. I want to read her book but unfortunately
my Village needed an Idiot and dayz dun picked me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Even though she supported the war
I'm still in her corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC